PDA

View Full Version : Because It’s FUNNY When We Do It


synergy777
13-08-2007, 12:21 PM
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/%e2%80%a6because-it%e2%80%99s-funny-when-we-do-it/

Just when you think they have had their fill, when they couldn’t possibly fit any more into their collective gullet after engorging themselves at the buffet table of vulgar, brutish, boorish behavior, well, surprise, surprise, they come along and one-up themselves, just as they always have, always do, and unfortunately for the rest of us, always will.

It’s probably not a good thing to admit at this particular moment, given what it is I do these days for a living, but the fact of the matter is that until this afternoon, I had never heard of Sarah Silverman.

I do not watch television except for the news and the weather, and not because I am some sort of advanced, enlightened being who doesn’t need distractions like everyone else. Rather, it is because peace of mind is more valuable to me than gold, and thus the last thing I want to hear about are the details of the decadent, depressing world of show business types in America and what life is like for them in the sewer. Thus, I do not know who the latest flavor of the day is with regards to movies, music, television, etc, and therefore why up until today Mz. Silverman was someone unknown to me.

You can imagine then how shocked I was to read the following quote from one of her comedy routines. As usual, I apologize ahead of time to those with delicate ears or delicate eyes–


“I hope the Jews did kill Christ…I’d do it again. I’d fucking do it again—in a second.”


‘Must be a mistake’ I thought to myself. ‘They’re not that bold yet’.

A quick google search, using the name of this illustrious, much-celebrated and adored Jewish American Princess and a few of the key words attributed to her performance (that I was just sure couldn’t have taken place in this ‘Christian’ country known as the United States, and particularly with all those ‘God Bless America’ bumper stickers flying around these days) and, as luck would have it–‘Bingo’! just as Fr. Burger used to say on Friday nights at St. Bernadette’s when I was a grade school youngster…Page after page after page of that infamous one-liner, along with page after page after page of praise and rave reviews from the most influential newspapers and periodicals in America.

Of course, in hindsight I now realize that this assumption on my part, that ‘They’re not that bold yet’ was merely symptomatic of this thing known as denial that a lot of us are going through these days as we consider the immensity of the situation we are facing. Again, in the interests of my own defense, this is a perfectly understandable, human thing, this ‘denial’ business. What is taking place with regards to the ‘nice Jewish folks’ who run our entertainment industry and the level to which they are willing to stoop these days is so insane and incomprehensible that it would appear to be impossible to any person of relatively sound mind.

More than this though, this ‘denial’ thing is perfectly understandable when considered in the context of what it means to be a Gentile. The fact is, we do not know what it is like to think with a Jewish mind and to see things through Jewish eyes. As much as we have been propagandized into thinking that we are all the same and that we all share the same basic values, needs and affections, the truth is that this is just another clever marketing ploy on the part of their PR people in making us and our behavior more predictable and pliable. We were not cut from the same cloth. We are not fruit that has fallen from the same tree. We Gentiles do not think like our Jewish counterparts, the history of the last 2,000 years being proof positive of this. As long as we remain Gentile and they remain Jewish we will never see eye to eye, just as we never have, something that they realize all-too-well despite the fact that we do not.

And it is for this reason that there is this undeniable predominance of Jews or else Jewish influence in American media, because Gentile culture has to be remade in their image so that it is more ‘hospitable’ to their affections and their agenda. If the proof of this is not self-evident to us it certainly is to them, partial evidence of which can be found in that infamous article written by Joel Kline appearing in the LA Times a few years ago–


‘This is what happens when you (Gentiles) forget to keep scaring us…Now that we’ve assimilated to the point where we’re completely the same as white people, we’re trying to re-create a community by shoving our culture down your throats.’


And thus, given that we do not think like our counterparts in the Jewish community means we have a difficult time understanding what drives and motivates them. We have trouble appreciating the ‘qualities’ that many (if not most) of them hold dear to some extent, such as nerviness, the willingness to ‘cross the line’ in terms of polite behavior, the willingness to offend and the seemingly ever-present proclivity towards defaming and degrading what is sacrosanct to others, something they refer to collectively as ‘chutzpah’.

And it is this fact–meaning that I still–even in 21st century America–think like a Gentile rather than a Jew, that is the reason for my briefly entertaining that ‘They’re not that bold yet’ notion’.

The other reason for this momentary lapse into non-reality is, simply, that I ‘forgot’, another by-product of having 8 kids, which is the loss of short-term memory…

I forgot that there were already films such as ‘The Last Temptation of Christ’ and ‘The Da Vinci Code’ and others of a similar vein whose central theme was that Jesus was a buffoon whose memory deserves being degraded and defamed in the worst way imaginable. I forgot that there was a new movie due to be released any day now by those ‘nice Jewish folks’ in Hollywood wherein Jesus talks a librarian who is still a virgin into sleeping with him. I forgot about all those other things that have surfaced in the Jewish media in America these last years such as the ‘Gospel of Judas’ that caused Jews everywhere in America to go gaga, claiming that Jesus ASKED Judas to betray Him by handing Him over to His enemies, the Pharisees. I forgot about all the other ‘discoveries’ of late such as Jesus’ remains being found, thus debunking His resurrection and, of course, lest we forget, that porno film ‘Corpus Christi’ which figures Jesus and his Apostles engaging in a homosexual orgy, again, all masterpieces from our fine Jewish folks in the American media.

And, again, (at the risk of appearing to beat what is an already dead horse) I really think that it all comes back to the difference between being Jewish and Gentile. It is easy to forget about these things, because these things are so ‘over the edge’ that the mere thought of their existence clashes with reality in the Gentile mind. For us, it’s inconceivable how anyone of any stripe could hold a man like Jesus in such low regard, and I am not talking organized religion here or Jesus’ divinity or anything complicated like that, but rather just Jesus the man, Jesus the human being…Even ATHEISTS who do not nurse a predatory mindset when it comes to dealing with their fellow man should be able to appreciate someone like Jesus merely in terms of His humanitarian message. Even if it were proved today beyond any reasonable doubt that the whole story of Jesus was a myth and that the New Testament was just a piece of fiction, a person of good will could still entertain positive feelings for Him as the main character in a storyline. therefore, for those of us who were never raised in the sewer of Jewish Talmudic thinking, this organic, institutionalized contempt that most Jews entertain for him is inconceivable and thus we look at it as irrational and thus not worthy of study, similar I suppose to why a particular person might hate ice-cream.

Nevertheless, I searched the net for something that might better contextualize this young lady’s remarks, as difficult as it would be to imagine any kind of contextualizing taking place that could possibly mitigate the poison in her words…

Nothing.

Ok, maybe a typo or a misquote….

Nothing.

What I found instead was a whole lot of other garbage she had defecated out of that refined, Jewish mouth hooked up to that wonderful Jewish soul that we Gentiles are regularly told by the proper Jewish authorities is superior to the souls of us non-Jews and found as well a whole smorgasbord of other goodies that illustrate why these folks think they are so superior to the rest of us: In-depth, no-holds-barred discussions about anal sex, oral sex, incest, abortion, rape, bestiality, masturbation, jokes about people starving to death or dying of disease, you name it. A seemingly bottomless pit of topics drudged out of some spiritual septic tank, none of which were off-limits or considered off-color with this young ambassador from a group of people who entertain with militant fanaticism the idea that they are chosen by God and favored over everyone else.

Thinking that there had to be others like me who looked with distaste upon all of this, I then began reading some of the reviews and articles written on her rise to stardom. Being that it is a no-brainer that the media in America is as Jewish as matzo ball soup, I was relatively confident that there had to be SOMEONE, ANYONE out there from within the Jewish community who would see the danger of ‘anti-Semitism’ rearing its head as a result of her ugly comments concerning Jesus. After all, this is the era when Christians and Jews are supposed to be getting along famously and when the rest of us have to be REALLY careful not to say something that might offend them, such as the role their ancestors played in the death of the man we most revere, Jesus Christ.

Another quick search on google for anything that might hint of some squeak of protest, and, to my surprise (or perhaps not to my surprise) there was nothing. I checked the website of the biggest of all the anti-anti-Semitic organizations in the world–the ADL, sure that Mz. Silverman’s comments would have caused their alarms to go off in panic. After all, these are the folks who would–if it were possible–have sensors placed on every street corner in America that can detect when someone passes gas in an ‘anti-Semitic’ way and who in all other ways and at all other times raise holy hell when anything comes along that might put the Jewish community in a light they consider less than perfect. These are the folks who–under the direction of Abraham Foxman, ran Mel Gibson’s life through the meat grinder for his movie ‘The Passion’ and who put the heat on him to remove that passage in his film lifted from the Gospels where the Jews accepted the blame for Jesus’ death in exactly the same way as Mz. Silverman did in her monologue. These are the same folks who just recently took the leader of the largest Christian church in the world to task for daring to re-instate a centuries-old prayer asking God to show His benevolence upon the Jewish people by opening their eyes as to what jerks they are when they don’t get their way 100% of the time, and…….

Not a peep from the pip-squeak Foxman.

I checked with some of the other Jewish organizations that see a Holocaust erupting at any moment as a result of Christians’ holding fast to the idea that it was a Jewish plot to have Jesus killed in 33 AD. I looked at groups such as the Jewish Defense League, Jewish Defense Organization, World Jewish Congress, Jews For the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, Jews Against Zionism, Jews For Zionism, Jews For Breast Enhancement Surgery, Jews Against Breast Enhancement surgery, Jewish-this, Jewish-that, you name it…

And yet, despite the fact these folks are sooooooo sensitive to the need for Christians and Jews to all get along and for the rest of us to put this ‘Jews are responsible for the death of Jesus’ thing behind us and let bygones be bygones, there was nothing from any of them. Nothing. Not a burp that would indicate some sort of intellectual indigestion on their part. No protests or denunciations. Not an apology. No attempt to distance the more ‘respectable members’ of the Jewish community from the remarks of this over-indulged, foul-mouthed, poorly-disciplined porn-star-wannabe.

‘Ok’ I thought to myself. ‘Certainly someone from within the Christian community had something to say about this. Someone, a preacher, priest, politician, pundit, someone.

Tragically, not a whimper, and even from the heavy hitters within the Christian community who rally their flock from time to time with some pressing issue such as purple Teletubbies or the Muslims. Robertson was as quiet as a church mouse. Hagee didn’t bring an ounce of his impressive weight to bear (pun clearly intended) within his organization as he does in calling for the US to slaughter a billion Muslims around the world. The late Jerry Falwell who recently died and went to hell had said nothing about it when he was alive, no doubt consumed with the business of buffing the leer jet he had received as a gift from the state of Israel many years ago.

Likewise with the other loudmouths from the secular right-wing media, such as Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Hannity, Savage, Beck, Liddy, etc. Nothing from Joseph Farah’s WorldNetDaily that bills itself as the vanguard protecting western Judeo-Christian culture against the spectre of ‘Islamo-Fascism’. Not a mention of Mz. Silverman and her less-than-complimentary comments about the man revered by over a billion Christians and a billion Muslims worldwide. Is it too far a stretch to imagine what these guys would have done had it been a Muslim saying such a defamatory thing about Christ? They would have erupted with the verbal equivalent of irritable bowel syndrome to the point that they needed some kind of surgery to shut down the process long enough for us to clean up the mess.

I kept searching, desperately hoping against hope that there would be some sane person out there from within the ‘Judeo-Christian’ community who would have something unfavorable to say about such an ugly performance. Some protest, some sense of outrage at what would have been considered ‘hate speech’ in some countries and prosecuted by the law if it had been directed against Jews. Was there no decency (or, absent that, some consistency) on the part of those who are constantly lecturing the rest of us ad nauseum on what is and is not acceptable behavior?

To my horror, all I found was praise, the same kind taking place on Good Friday when the crowd cheered for Barabbas. One ‘nice Jewish boy’ writing for an influential periodical said “The line is funny to me because it so shockingly exposes a dangerous, hidden truth. The fact is, most Jews have felt the same way at one time or another.” Going through the list of other comments, it was more of the same –‘Isn’t she GREAT?!!’ they all seemed to ask–not as a question, but rather as a demand for agreement, the unspoken but clear message trailing afterwards being ‘And don’t you dare think otherwise’.

I contacted a Jewish friend of mine who is constantly trying to ‘set me straight’ in terms of my ‘misconceptions’ about Judaism. ‘No,’ he tells me all the time…‘We don’t hate Jesus, we just don‘t think He is the son of God.’ I ask him if he has heard of Mz. Silverman. ‘Yes’ he tells me. I ask him if he heard Mz. Silverman’s comments about Jesus, and again, the answer was ‘yes’. ‘Why don’t you speak out against it?’ I ask him. ‘Aren’t you concerned that the silence on the part of the Jewish community might make Christians start believing in all those ‘old canards’ of Jews nursing a hatred for Jesus?’

A very interesting answer on his part–‘Well…Our rabbis teach that we are not supposed to get involved in things like this. We’re supposed to lead exemplary lives and let this be the testimony to the goodness of Judaism.’

‘But’ I interject, ‘Why is it that you guys are so vocal whenever someone else says something defamatory about what is sacred to you?…’


He repeats what he said before, only this time with a certain hint of ‘uh, oh’ in his answer, as if he were caught off guard by the obvious double-standard in operation here. ‘Well, you see, our rabbis teach us that…..’

What it all boils down to, fellow Gentiles, is a very simple-to-understand, very easy-to-pronounce, 4-syllable word that has always been the bedrock of the Jewish mindset and which, not coincidentally, was the thing that Jesus warned us most about, which is this thing called ‘HYPOCRISY’. You see, when WE do it, meaning when we rightly attribute the murder of Jesus Christ to His Jewish enemies 2,000 years ago, it is called ‘hate-speech’ and something that they want to make illegal in the United States, just as they have throughout the rest of the formerly Christian western world. However, when THEY do it, we are supposed to just sit there and take it like a woman being raped by a gang of thugs, and the operating principle behind it all is–


‘Because it’s FUNNY when we do it’.


A pure case of double-minded Talmudic thinking if there ever was such a thing. It’s perfectly acceptable to paint a picture of Jesus as His enemies would prefer, meaning the bastard son of a Roman centurion and a buffoon who ‘got what he deserved’, and as long as it is done in this light, well, then it is ok to gloat over His death and boast of the Jewish conspiracy to destroy Him and His revolution against Phariseeism. To mourn Him though and to lay the finger of blame on those who openly boast of their role in it and to do so in an uncomplimentary light changes the equation completely, the logic of their argument being that there is HUGE difference between 6 and half-a-dozen.

Well, the fact of the matter is that this search for an answer concerning the audible silence over Mz. Silverman’s anti-Semitic remarks (yes, anti-Semitic, since Jesus WAS INDEED a Semite) turns out to be not as much a boondoggle as it is a boon. ‘Behind every cloud there is a silver lining,’ as they say, the silver lining in this case being this thing known as self-evidentiary truth, and, just as importantly, truth that has been staring us in the face all along, and not just for generations, but for millennia, this thing called Jewish hypocrisy. Not wanting to blast your eyes out of your sockets with a long barrage of capital letters, but nevertheless–

CAN YOU JUST IMAGINE FELLOW EARTHLINGS, THE HOWLING THAT WOULD TAKE PLACE IF INSTEAD OF A JEWISH COMEDIAN SAYING ‘I HOPE WE DID KILL JESUS AND I WOULD DO IT AGAIN IN A SECOND’ THAT IT WAS A GENTILE SAYING ‘I HOPE HITLER DID KILL 6 MILLION’ OR A MUSLIM SAYING ‘I HOPE WE DID KILL THE JEWISH REPORTER DANIEL PEARL’???…

…Good lord, the companies manufacturing ear plugs would be so flush with cash from the sales of such a shrill, ear-splitting event taking place that they would most likely diversify their holdings and create some new banking conglomeration.

I know what you are all saying… ‘Big deal, another foul-mouthed, vicious-minded Jew in the entertainment industry defaming Jesus. A dime a dozen, SOS…Same Old Shtick,’ to which I say, ‘Yes, you’re right. A leopard does not change its spots and a bad tree bears bad fruit…’

Still, as with all events in life, including what seem to be senseless disasters, there is a lesson to be learned in all of this, not the least of which is that we Gentiles need to stop wasting our time waiting for the Jews to ‘come around’ and see the light. We need to face the obvious–THEY WILL NEVER DO IT BY THEIR OWN VOLITION. The idea entertained by a lot of Christians these days that ‘very soon 144,000 Jews are going to convert to Christianity and so we have to be careful not to push them away’ is as likely as 144,000 alligators one day deciding they would rather be vegetarians.

They’ve had 2,000 years to abandon the idea that the world is flat and a whole host of other backwards, regressive tendencies in their thinking that have caused them nothing but misery and yet as of this moment they have not. They have had 2,000 to liberate themselves from the oppressive bondage that their Rabbinical leaders hold over them and yet, as of this moment, they have not. Jesus performed miracles in the plain sight of their ancestors 2,000 years ago and it STILL wasn’t enough to keep them from giving into the demands of their Rabbis in having Him executed, and it is no different today. The Western world that–at least at one time–was the embodiment of Jesus’ teaching is crucified on a daily basis economically, politically, on every front imaginable and in what was every Christian institution and this all takes place principally within the context of what is a Jewish-oriented agenda. The Jews want to be absolved of the guilt for what their forefathers did 20 centuries ago, and yet when some filthy-mouthed gypsy named Silverman comes forward and before billions of people on earth revels in the idea that she bears some of that guilt and would do it all over again and the rest of the tribe then does nothing to protest this, they share her guilt and the guilt of their ancestors.

Personally, what I would REALLY like to see happen is that the silver-tongued Mz. Silverman be taken to one of those ‘Christian-hating Moooozlim’ countries we hear so much about from the likes of Hagee, Limbaugh, Robertson and every other shabbos goy working overtime in lying to the American people and let her find out how people in those countries deal with filthy-mouthed sluts who say such things about the same Jesus who is loved and revered by Muslims around the globe, and that WOULD be funny. I can guarantee one thing, we wouldn’t hear about the outcome of THIS on our Jewish news network.

Give it up, fellow Gentiles. Leave it in God’s hands to convert the Jews and relieve them of their blindness. They scorn your good will and mock your naiveté in the same way they laughed at Jesus as he hung on the cross for 3 hours.

In the meantime, the rest of us need to do what is necessary in securing a future for our children and grandchildren where they will be safe from the likes of Silverman & Co who are intent upon remaking them into something more acceptable to the Synagogue, and rescuing our progeny from the clutches of these predators will not be realized as long as we worry about hurting the feelings of our ‘nice Jewish neighbors’ who, while possibly not attacking our Christian sensibilities in an overt way, nevertheless still aid in the larger agenda of destroying the name of the hated Jesus by their silence on matters such as these and others. Their motto has always been one of ‘never forget’ and in view of the things that are happening to all of us today, it is probably wise that we do the same, if for no other reason than for the sake of those who will inherit the fruits we ourselves have planted…

…And you can forget about them ever having their fill. As they have demonstrated on far too many occasions, they never do.

2007 Mark Glenn, Correspondent, American Free Press Newspaper

www.crescentandcross.com

crescentandcross@gmail.com

anoninnyc
13-08-2007, 07:57 PM
sarah silverman is a piece of trash. and she is ugly as hell, both inside and out.

snoopsnuffleopagus
13-08-2007, 11:08 PM
Peace & Greetings!: synergy777!:

LOL!!!!! Just picturing her standing before Father Yahweh and Yahshua and all the Saints, and Father Yahweh saying: By all means, share with us your reason.


ROFLMAO!!!!!!

Kind Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

synergy777
14-08-2007, 12:22 AM
she is a jew, although she is not a real torah jew, as they revere yahweh/yashuah. she is just another zionist media attention whore. i think the hoe is just saying this shit for controversy/fame, no good person could hate yashuah.

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 01:01 AM
Salutations, Peace and Blessings be upon you synergy777!:

synergy777!: within this very incident, the 'Crux of the Crux of the Crux' of the Israeli><Caananite War, which has been going on 4,000 years, precisely for this type of behaviour. My Talmudic adherent brothers and sisters, have never understood their 'position' in Father Yahwehs Plan, First He worked with certain well known individuals who preserved and advanced His Plan, than He worked with a 'People', who WERE to have preserved and advanced
Father Yahwehs Plan. Alas, Lo, these many Years, they have never understood, they WERE to be PARADIGMS,......Not 'PETS.'

Stiff necked, backsliding Ho!

Kind Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 01:31 AM
syn!!!!!

Tell me what you think of this THEORY, Yahshua, though not 'Existant' until His Birth, had been 'Prophecied" to come at a 'somewhat accurate' time and place. Prophecied well over 100 times with robust specificity.

He is to be the 'Saviour of All Mankind', save us from what? I ponder....

Yahshua is to 'Save' us from the corruption of Father Yahwehs Plan, preserving His Plan and being THE PARADIGM of Father Yahwehs Plan: Stay with the program, no talmud, no kabala, Pure Moral Character Development.

THEORY: Yahweh.....'Knew'.....there would be corruption of the Plan,and provided Yahshua as an example of the Torah without the talmud. He taught on all matters of Life and Relationships through the 'Lens' of the Torah, only the Torah, no 'traditions', oral or written,

Shame on her!!! Death by Lapidation!!!! ah, thats right. I am not 'sinless'

"She has eyes but cannot see, ears but cannot hear...'

Kind Regards: Snoopsnuffleopagus

edit
14-08-2007, 01:47 AM
Stay with the program, no talmud, no kabala, Pure Moral Character Development.



Mam,

From ypur stand on/in this ^ regard ..what would be your judjment or point of view of Acid/Alkaline Balance

(The Textbook)

Thank you in advance

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 01:53 AM
syn!!!!

This leads to: Since the majority of 'jews' did not and do not recognise Yahshua as Messiah, rather He was mocked and scorned at that time, so since He wasn't being properly 'Followed by the 'People", who had been trained in the Laws, some Europeans decide to use the 'Personage' of Yahshua, CHANGE His Name to 'jesus', OVERLAY their 'ancient traditions and doctrines'. DO AWAY WITH THE LAWS.......Thats History from 350 CE.....

Heavy Doodoo Bro!.........

Babylon

Kind Regards: Snuffleopagus

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 02:24 AM
Hail!!!! Fellow Cyberversian......edit...:!:

Why, Heavens to Murgatroid, What do you mean?

Agita?

My answer: NO JUDGMENT ABOUT ACID/ALKALINE STATUS

only discernment

I have 'Theorised' scriptural text, fom Exodus to current time, provides concrete evidence where Yahwehs 'People', the Yahdaim(people of Yahweh), 'jews', went 'off the Tracks', 40 years in the Sinai, was punishment, not a reward, their forced relocation to Babylon was punishment, not a reward,and on and on and on, til now,still strife.

I 'Posit' strict obedience to the Torah, will bring 'Peace on ones borders and Rain in its season'

The interesting thing is the 'Legal Contract' between Father Yahweh and the Yahdaim who He brought out of Egypt, to possess the Land He was giving them, has 'Contingency Clauses', and it is available to every human being who can read; regretably, much more attention was salaciously 'paid' to Mr. Ickes Business contracts, when there is a more urgent 'Contract' to be studied. This would resolve a 4,000 year old 'cunundrum', don't you 'think'?

What say you?: Cyberversian........edit..

Kind Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

edit
14-08-2007, 03:30 AM
The interesting thing is the 'Legal Contract' between Father Yahweh and the Yahdaim who He brought out of Egypt, to possess the Land He was giving them, has 'Contingency Clauses', and it is available to every human being who can read;
I 'think' i think that it is the interesting thing,, Can you say where is it in the bible, please?
Originally Posted by snoopsnuffleopagus (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=93345)
A fresh perspective of the Middle-East Conundrum would be enhanced by
resetting Historically Proper Names & Titles for the Entities of interest in the aforementioned region. To wit:

#1: Instead of the name,Palestine, a Roman Slave Colony, why not restore the name Canaan?

An often overlooked point in the Israeli-Canaanite conflict is the matter of the Legal Contract between Father Yahweh and the Yahdaim(people of Yahweh) that is available for any human on Earth to peruse.

Contained within that contract is precise equitable solution to the current dillema.

Yahweh = G-d = Hashem ( The LIGHT )
Yahdaim(people of Yahweh) - like t-he Adam as -humanity ..so them (or otem or atem or hem or ham or 'et in Hebrew) are the people -- in short they are also of light as ET is light but quantum-like and rhey would be the hosts of HASHEM ? right ?

:blink"blink:

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 04:01 AM
Hail Cyberversian......edit......:

blink........

The issue is the Contract contained in the Pentateuch. Concerning two 'Peoples': The 'Peoples' taken out of Egypt and the 'Peoples' inhabiting the 'Land of Caanan'.

Said 'Contract' has 'qualifying contingencies' for 'Peoples' taken out of Egypt to 'Legally', Possess' the Land of Caanan', and dispace the 'Peoples' therein.

Breaches of Torahnic Law incurs penalties termed as 'Curses'. Multiple Breachs of the Laws: May, and Have, 'VOIDED' the 'Contract' for possession of Land of Caanan. Note: to be 'Driven Off!', to be 'Carried Away!'.

The ramifications of these 'Curses' wreak havoc with peoples lives'

As to your Eytomological exercise: I disagree, Yahweh is not a g-d

Source: J(ah)Text 700 BCE

Perhaps a 'Being' through your agency, would 'clarify' your cryptology, and explain your position on this most serious matter. People are suffering terribly while we type.

I have Posited a Theory for a possible solution to the Israeli-Caananit Dilema. What is yours? 'Anything but that' will not be considered as an answer.

My firm position is: No talmudic overlay, and 'Obedience' to the Torah.



Kind Regards Cyberversian........edit....: Snoopsnuffleopagus

Cyberversian.......edit.......after your say, I shall say no more, my position is clear.

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 04:37 AM
Hail Cyberversian..edit,><><!

The 'Contract' begins when Moshe descends the mountain after his meeting with Father Yahweh, and gathers the Yahdaim; Exodus Chapter 19:is an excellent beginning, proceed to the end of Leviticus Chapter 27. And amplification of 'Contract' is found in the Book of Deuteronomy(Alah-HaDebarim, and these are the Laws) Chapters 3-31. VERY EXPLICIT!!

A few pages, much less than Mr. David Ickes 'Contract' which held such fascination to so many.


'Viva Equity & Parity!"

Farewell Cyberversian.......edit.......up,up, and awayyyyyyyy!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

synergy777
14-08-2007, 01:47 PM
wahe/yahweh

corruptions was planned for, the people rejecting, scorning disobeying yashuah was known before it happened. people do not like to hear truth, truth that belittles them, tells them what they really are, they prefer someone praising them not chastising/teaching them. they prefer not to look in, as they are scared to see the evil/emptiness in themselves. see people are in a daze, sleepwalking, not awake. to wake someone up from slumber incurs the wrath of them, and them are merely their ego/posessions, no more, no less. when you wake someone up, they are angry at you for disturbing their sleep/life/ego.

people are unfortunately rather deceitful, and attach themselves to power/mass so they can progress, feel accepted. how many teachers, prophets etc have been welcomed, none whatsoever. after they are killed, the people, then do an about turn profess loyalty, so that they might be saved from the fear they have of death, whilst alive they profess to be gods, alive, wise, succesful, when death comes near, they return to the state of cowards. as inside they are dead, have no knowledge of the levels of life, only operate on the animal level, food, labour,sex. theres not much too them, they are the living dead.

people only care about god, when its serves them. they hate you saying this, but why do they hate it? they hate god, but want his blessing for marriage, birth, death, god is a product/service to them. they call themselve atheist, agnostic, or christian one day a year, usually december 25th. they are not christian, as christ never existed. yashuah existed, he was a jew, not christian. they are vaticanite. a people who are this lost, are the lost tribes, they are living the curse. they know nothing other than what they have been told, its all a fairy tale. i pity them, i am glad i come from a civilisation/culture, they have none.

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 01:55 PM
Right On! syn:

WAKEY, WAKEY (slap!) MS. Silverman!

Someday, WE will ALL look back and laugh!.

Kind Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

synergy777
14-08-2007, 02:03 PM
its just shocking that the educated, modern people of the west who have access to all this material, don't even read the texts, question them of the divinely born into religion, lol. personally the west is dumbed down, shallow, and has lost its postion, its been tavistocked/socially engineered, its like gm food. bigger, attractive, not natural and cheap, lol, remember you are what you eat, lol

snoopsnuffleopagus
14-08-2007, 02:26 PM
But syn!:

The 'West' is Charitable, look how they have been 'Helping' the Iraqis and the Caananites and the Afghanis.

Kind Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

synergy777
14-08-2007, 04:16 PM
look how the romans helped yashuah, lol he was a palestinian, born in bethelem, etc. look at how they treat his brothers/sisters and his name, boy are they in for a shock, lol

edit
15-08-2007, 10:55 AM
Hail Cyberversian......edit......:

blink........

The issue is the Contract contained in the Pentateuch. Concerning two 'Peoples': The 'Peoples' taken out of Egypt and the 'Peoples' inhabiting the 'Land of Caanan'.

Said 'Contract' has 'qualifying contingencies' for 'Peoples' taken out of Egypt to 'Legally', Possess' the Land of Caanan', and dispace the 'Peoples' therein.

Breaches of Torahnic Law incurs penalties termed as 'Curses'. Multiple Breachs of the Laws: May, and Have, 'VOIDED' the 'Contract' for possession of Land of Caanan. Note: to be 'Driven Off!', to be 'Carried Away!'.

The ramifications of these 'Curses' wreak havoc with peoples lives'

As to your Eytomological exercise: I disagree, Yahweh is not a g-d

Source: J(ah)Text 700 BCE

Perhaps a 'Being' through your agency, would 'clarify' your cryptology, and explain your position on this most serious matter. People are suffering terribly while we type.

I have Posited a Theory for a possible solution to the Israeli-Caananit Dilema. What is yours? 'Anything but that' will not be considered as an answer.

My firm position is: No talmudic overlay, and 'Obedience' to the Torah.



Kind Regards Cyberversian........edit....: Snoopsnuffleopagus

Cyberversian.......edit.......after your say, I shall say no more, my position is clear.
Try Times Reader Free (http://select.nytimes.com/gst/timesreader.html?vendor=XQWBC070025)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif
___________Science
____________ Findings
Our Lives, Controlled From Some Guy’s Couch
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/08/13/science/tier.190.2.jpg Findings: By JOHN TIERNEY
Published: August 14, 2007 (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14tier.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5124&en=22efff4469281187&ex=1344744000&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink)
Until I talked to Nick Bostrom, a philosopher at Oxford University, it never occurred to me that our universe might be somebody else’s hobby. I hadn’t imagined that the omniscient, omnipotent creator of the heavens and earth could be an advanced version of a guy who spends his weekends building model railroads or overseeing video-game worlds like the Sims.

But now it seems quite possible. In fact, if you accept a pretty reasonable assumption of Dr. Bostrom’s, it is almost a mathematical certainty that we are living in someone else’s computer simulation.

This simulation would be similar to the one in “The Matrix,” in which most humans don’t realize that their lives and their world are just illusions created in their brains while their bodies are suspended in vats of liquid. But in Dr. Bostrom’s notion of reality, you wouldn’t even have a body made of flesh. Your brain would exist only as a network of computer circuits.

You couldn’t, as in “The Matrix,” unplug your brain and escape from your vat to see the physical world. You couldn’t see through the illusion except by using the sort of logic employed by Dr. Bostrom, the director of the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford.

Dr. Bostrom assumes that technological advances could produce a computer with more processing power than all the brains in the world, and that advanced humans, or “posthumans,” could run “ancestor simulations” of their evolutionary history by creating virtual worlds inhabited by virtual people with fully developed virtual nervous systems.

Some computer experts have projected, based on trends in processing power, that we will have such a computer by the middle of this century, but it doesn’t matter for Dr. Bostrom’s argument whether it takes 50 years or 5 million years. If civilization survived long enough to reach that stage, and if the posthumans were to run lots of simulations for research purposes or entertainment, then the number of virtual ancestors they created would be vastly greater than the number of real ancestors.

There would be no way for any of these ancestors to know for sure whether they were virtual or real, because the sights and feelings they’d experience would be indistinguishable. But since there would be so many more virtual ancestors, any individual could figure that the odds made it nearly certain that he or she was living in a virtual world.

The math and the logic are inexorable once you assume that lots of simulations are being run. But there are a couple of alternative hypotheses, as Dr. Bostrom points out. One is that civilization never attains the technology to run simulations (perhaps because it self-destructs before reaching that stage). The other hypothesis is that posthumans decide not to run the simulations.

“This kind of posthuman might have other ways of having fun, like stimulating their pleasure centers directly,” Dr. Bostrom says. “Maybe they wouldn’t need to do simulations for scientific reasons because they’d have better methodologies for understanding their past. It’s quite possible they would have moral prohibitions against simulating people, although the fact that something is immoral doesn’t mean it won’t happen.”

Dr. Bostrom doesn’t pretend to know which of these hypotheses is more likely, but he thinks none of them can be ruled out. “My gut feeling, and it’s nothing more than that,” he says, “is that there’s a 20 percent chance we’re living in a computer simulation.”

My gut feeling is that the odds are better than 20 percent, maybe better than even. I think it’s highly likely that civilization could endure to produce those supercomputers. And if owners of the computers were anything like the millions of people immersed in virtual worlds like Second Life, SimCity and World of Warcraft, they’d be running simulations just to get a chance to control history — or maybe give themselves virtual roles as Cleopatra or Napoleon.

It’s unsettling to think of the world being run by a futuristic computer geek, although we might at last dispose of that of classic theological question: How could God allow so much evil in the world? For the same reason there are plagues and earthquakes and battles in games like World of Warcraft. Peace is boring, Dude.


Our Lives, Controlled From Some Guy’s Couch
Published: August 14, 2007
(Page 2 of 2)

A more practical question is how to behave in a computer simulation. Your first impulse might be to say nothing matters anymore because nothing’s real. But just because your neural circuits are made of silicon (or whatever posthumans would use in their computers) instead of carbon doesn’t mean your feelings are any less real.

Simulation-argument.com. Nick Bostrom. David J. Chalmers, a philosopher at the Australian National University, says Dr. Bostrom’s simulation hypothesis isn’t a cause for skepticism, but simply a different metaphysical explanation of our world. Whatever you’re touching now — a sheet of paper, a keyboard, a coffee mug — is real to you even if it’s created on a computer circuit rather than fashioned out of wood, plastic or clay.

You still have the desire to live as long as you can in this virtual world — and in any simulated afterlife that the designer of this world might bestow on you. Maybe that means following traditional moral principles, if you think the posthuman designer shares those morals and would reward you for being a good person.

Or maybe, as suggested by Robin Hanson, an economist at George Mason University, you should try to be as interesting as possible, on the theory that the designer is more likely to keep you around for the next simulation. (For more on survival strategies in a computer simulation, go to www.nytimes.com/tierneylab.)

Of course, it’s tough to guess what the designer would be like. He or she might have a body made of flesh or plastic, but the designer might also be a virtual being living inside the computer of a still more advanced form of intelligence. There could be layer upon layer of simulations until you finally reached the architect of the first simulation — the Prime Designer, let’s call him or her (or it).

Then again, maybe the Prime Designer wouldn’t allow any of his or her creations to start simulating their own worlds. Once they got smart enough to do so, they’d presumably realize, by Dr. Bostrom’s logic, that they themselves were probably simulations. Would that ruin the fun for the Prime Designer?

If simulations stop once the simulated inhabitants understand what’s going on, then I really shouldn’t be spreading Dr. Bostrom’s ideas. But if you’re still around to read this, I guess the Prime Designer is reasonably tolerant, or maybe curious to see how we react once we start figuring out the situation.

It’s also possible that there would be logistical problems in creating layer upon layer of simulations. There might not be enough computing power to continue the simulation if billions of inhabitants of a virtual world started creating their own virtual worlds with billions of inhabitants apiece.

If that’s true, it’s bad news for the futurists who think we’ll have a computer this century with the power to simulate all the inhabitants on earth. We’d start our simulation, expecting to observe a new virtual world, but instead our own world might end — not with a bang, not with a whimper, but with a message on the Prime Designer’s computer.

It might be something clunky like “Insufficient Memory to Continue Simulation.” But I like to think it would be simple and familiar: “Game Over.”« Previous Page1 2 (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14tier.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5124&en=22efff4469281187&ex=1344744000&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink)
Sphere: Related Blogs & Articles Next Article in Science (10 of 14) »

The Beam of Light That Flips a Switch That Turns on the Brain

By INGFEI CHEN
Published: August 14, 2007 (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)

Karl Deisseroth and fiber-optic wires with laser light.http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/08/14/science/brain_1_190.1.jpg
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/08/14/science/brain_2_190.jpg
Light stimulation every 200 milliseconds generates electrical activity, right, in an area of the brain associated with depression.

TierneyLabhttp://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/tierneylab/tierneylab75.png (http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/)
Could we be living in a computer simulation? Join the discussion.

Go to TierneyLab » (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14tier.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5124&en=22efff4469281187&ex=1344744000&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink)
Further Reading
"Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?" Nick Bostrom. Philosophical Quarterly, 53:211, 2003.
"How to Live In A Simulation." Robin Hanson, Journal of Evolution and Technology, September, 2001.
"The Matrix as Metaphysics." David J. Chalmers, Matrix site.
"Historical Simulations - Motivational, Ethical and Legal Issues." Peter S. Jenkins, Journal of Futures Studies, 11:1, 2006.
Simulation-argument.com. Nick Bostrom.

edit
15-08-2007, 11:05 AM
Hail Cyberversian..edit,><><!

The 'Contract' begins when Moshe descends the mountain after his meeting with Father Yahweh, and gathers the Yahdaim; Exodus Chapter 19:is an excellent beginning, proceed to the end of Leviticus Chapter 27. And amplification of 'Contract' is found in the Book of Deuteronomy(Alah-HaDebarim, and these are the Laws) Chapters 3-31. VERY EXPLICIT!!

A few pages, much less than Mr. David Ickes 'Contract' which held such fascination to so many.


'Viva Equity & Parity!"

Farewell Cyberversian.......edit.......up,up, and awayyyyyyyy!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

Thank you, birdy...&..Farewell

snoopsnuffleopagus
15-08-2007, 04:41 PM
Hail!! Cyberverseian....edit..:



Farewell, thank you and as always, my Kindest Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

edit
15-08-2007, 04:48 PM
oh

yer already back here, birdy... no munch flyin'fer ye..eh?

snoopsnuffleopagus
15-08-2007, 05:50 PM
Hail!,and Salutations: Cyberverseian edit!!:


Tweet tweet, chirp trill, palemale.com

Tweetle trill chirp chirp chirp!

Kind Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

edit
15-08-2007, 07:07 PM
Is the answer in the.. http://www.livescience.com/template_images/livescience_logo.gif
B -- De-evolution ( towards the dark - matter) and EVOLution ( towards the enligtment) make the touchy points ? ..Do they? and are those with the quantum-light memories or so.. big knowledge?

Well...why run for the enlightment ?

And ..the bird's goal , in this de-evolutionary part, would be a mineral or some sort of an ET..i suppose?

Here is a question >>



Greatest Mysteries:
Why Are There Transitional Animals?
By Corey Binns, Special to LiveScience

posted: 14 August 2007 08:21 am ET

Share this story (http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/070814_gm_trans_forms.html)
Email Editor's Note: We asked several scientists from various fields what they thought were the greatest mysteries today, and then we added a few that were on our minds, too. This article is one of 15 in LiveScience's "Greatest Mysteries" series running each weekday.

Evolution is a tale of gradual change, but some animal alterations appear to have advanced by leaps and bounds.
Ancient four-limbed fish crawled out of the sea. Dinosaurs, insects and mammals took to the air. Our closest relatives straightened their backs and began walking upright on two legs.
But what made them do it? Charles Darwin taught us that evolution has no direction. Instead, living creatures exploit resources already available to them. So the answer eludes us there.
"For Darwin, the evolution of transitional forms was one of the most vexing questions with regard to his theory," said West Chester University biologist Frank Fish.
In "The Origin of Species," Darwin speculated on how natural selection could turn a land mammal into a whale. Since then, scientists have found clues to explain these animal transitions in the fossil and molecular records, as well as in energetic analyses, but the full story is yet to be discovered.
Into the deep
For instance, how terrestrial mammals moved back into the water and evolved into whales, seals and manatees continues to puzzle Fish and colleagues.
"Did the land-loving ancestors of these aquatic groups simply fall into the water, were they driven by hunger or did they seek safety while escaping from predators?" he asked. "The selection pressure must have been extreme as these new semi-aquatic mammals could not swim efficiently and there would have been additional large energy demands in thermoregulating in a highly thermally conductive medium."
Studies conducted by Fish on the energy demands of swimming have shown that the locomotion transition from crawling land mammals to swimming whales, manatees and dolphins came from a sequence of morphological changes. This transition to living in the sea involved changes from paddling with limbs to undulating the body to oscillating a tail, such as the horizontal tail flukes in modern whale species.
When ancestors of whales, dolphins and manatees changed their swimming stroke from paddling with paws to graceful tail movements, Fish said, their swimming performance improved and used energy more efficiently.
With the new discovery of whale fossils, scientists have only recently been able to study the efficiency of limbless swimming. However, bones alone cannot tell us the whole story of how and why mammals lost their limbs in the water.
"Because only the bones have been preserved, we still do not know when these transitional forms started to insulate the body with blubber and how the fluke's design changed to generate large propulsive forces with high efficiency for high-speed swimming," Fish told LiveScience.
Early whales such as Ambulocetus most likely returned to the water, said American Museum of Natural History paleontologist Jack Conrad, because water free of big crocodilians at that time represented an unexploited resource.
"These early whales were basically playing the same game that crocodiles play: Wait for something to come get a drink and then pull it in the water for dinner," Conrad said. "This is also the same game that early land vertebrates, early amphibians and early relatives of crocs and dinosaurs were playing. These animals weren't necessarily 'on their way' to being anything; they were well suited to being exactly where they were."
Losing legs
Not only is it more efficient to swim without limbs, burrowing without legs is also better, and this raises questions about the twists and turns of reptilian evolution.
"If you're a good headfirst burrower, arms and legs just get in the way," Conrad said. "You have to make bigger holes to fit your arms and legs, which create drag as you move through burrows."
For instance, although scientists know snakes can burrow more efficiently without arms and legs, exactly how they lost their limbs remains a mystery.
Just as the earliest whales may have taken advantage of the unexploited resource of crocodile-free water, the earliest snakes must have taken advantage of transitional traits expressed by their relatives.
But which four-legged relatives and their family traits led the transition for legless snakes? Conrad explains that scientists have come up with three candidates—iguanas, monitor lizards, and skinks—as the most likely relatives to have made way for the slithering snake.
DNA evidence has pinned iguanas and chameleons as the closest relatives to snakes. But some scientists point to the elongated bodies and snake-like tongues of monitor lizards as signs that, over time, snakes evolved from some monitor lizards. Still others suggest the short or sometimes nonexistent legs of the 800 species of skinks are clues to where limbless snakes originated.
Between the holes in the fossil and molecular evidence, scientists can only make educated guesses for now as to where and when legs of snakes walked off into evolutionary history.
"It's like putting together a really big puzzle with only a quarter of the pieces and trying to figure it all out," Conrad told LiveScience. "You find tantalizing tidbits that lead you in one direction and others that send you in the other direction."
Standing upright
The puzzle pieces fit together recently for a team of scientists who studied why our closest ancestors stopped walking on all fours.
Biological anthropologist Herman Pontzer from Washington University in St.Louis and his colleagues found that walking on two legs costs humans only one-quarter the energy used by chimpanzees that knuckle-walk on four legs. The group measured the oxygen burned by five chimpanzees and four people as they walked on a treadmill. The findings were detailed in the July 16 issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
In general, chimps exert more energy than people. But one chimp, with a longer stride than his fellow chimps, was more efficient at walking upright. Pontzer assumes the variation he saw among the five chimps in his study is similar to what exists in the wild. Some chimps are born with longer legs than others.
In the fossil record, the research team found evidence of changes in leg length and pelvic structure that may have made it easier for some chimps, like the one in their study, to stand upright.
"Variation is a foot in the door with which evolution can select for bipedalism," Pontzer told LiveScience. "Not only do we have system we can understand here, but it shows us how evolution could have tinkered with variation."


Another Great Mystery: How Did the Universe Begin? (http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/070813_gm_universe.html)

It is perhaps the greatest Great Mystery, and the root of all the others. The rest of humanity's grand questions—How did life begin? What is consciousness? What is dark matter, dark energy, gravity?—stem from it.

them
15-08-2007, 07:31 PM
Buteo jamaicensis
http://www.nps.gov/archive/prsf/nathist1/wildlife/birds/images/redtailedhawk.jpg (http://www.hbw.com/ibc/videos/Accipitridae/Buteo_jamaicensis_5g.wmv)<<<link

snoopsnuffleopagus
15-08-2007, 07:43 PM
Salutations & Greetings, Cyberversian edit::

Tweet warble trill:

Amongst all the panopoly of mysteries that confront Humankinds, your position on these matters gravitas, in your own, personal words, would be most welcome, to we, who have enjoyed the myriad of erudite information you, Cyberverseian edit, have so graciously, shared with us, your fellow denizens of the Cyberverse.

Neccessity beckons from afar, for me to service other matters, but, I shall offer one word, and than, I am gone: PLATYPUS

Warble X infinity double squared

As always! My Kindest Regards!: Snoopsnuffleopagus

limelady
15-08-2007, 08:17 PM
The native Australian Platypus is quite possibly the most exquisite example of Annunaki genetic experiments, comprising DNA from various creatures.

When a Platypus specimen was first sent to England, the local scientists concluded that some smart-arsed Australian had tried to play a joke on them by sewing the feet and bill of a duck onto the body of a rat. The peculiar animal in front of them just looked too bizarre to be taken seriously.

But even more bizarre than its appearance is the Platypus' reproductive system. The Platypus is a monotreme which means that it lays eggs like a bird, yet suckles its young like a mammal. The Echidna is the world's only other monotreme.

http://www.veeriku.tartu.ee/~ppensa/platypus.jpg

Part mammal (suckles its young) part duck (lays eggs, has webbed feet, and a duck-bill), part otter (has otter's tail), part electric eel (detects its aquatic prey in the same unique way as the electric eel) and part snake (it has venomous barbs attached to its hind legs, painful and toxic enough to kill a dog), thus combining all 'typical' Australian attributes into a single improbable creature.

The gods sure had a bit of fun with this one of their creations didn't they? :D

edit
15-08-2007, 08:18 PM
What is ' Cyberversian' ?

them
15-08-2007, 08:20 PM
It just goes to show that everything that can happen will happen.

them
15-08-2007, 08:21 PM
What is ' Cyberversian' ?

I think it's oneness spelled differently..

edit
15-08-2007, 08:24 PM
http://www.surfmagazine.nl/2006/img/Hawk.JPG ?

snoopsnuffleopagus
15-08-2007, 08:29 PM
Ladies & Gentlemen!:

Snoops loves Platypuses, 'specially with a fine Claret.

Kind Regards!:Snoopsnuffleopagus

2edit: Cyberverseian: Denizen of the Cyberverse(internet) of unknown quantities and qualities: Gender, Age, Species, Political or Theocratical positions, etc...

edit
15-08-2007, 08:41 PM
Ladies & Gentlemen!:

Snoops loves Platypuses, 'specially with a fine Claret.

Kind Regards!:Snoopsnuffleopagus

2edit: Cyberverseian: Denizen of the Cyberverse(internet) of unknown quantities and qualities: Gender, Age, Species, Political or Theocratical positions, etc...Code - da Vinci ? (http://images.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=http://resources.snowtime.nl/Snowtime_nl/maps/TS.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.snowtime.nl/Destination.aspx%3FCode%3DTS&h=384&w=600&sz=204&hl=nl&start=11&um=1&tbnid=gpXTzIxzD1LReM:&tbnh=86&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3DClaret%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dn l%26sa%3DN)

edit
15-08-2007, 09:00 PM
Green LimePart mammal (suckles its young) part duck (lays eggs, has webbed feet, and a duck-bill), part otter (has otter's tail), part electric eel (detects its aquatic prey in the same unique way as the electric eel) and part snake (it has venomous barbs attached to its hind legs, painful and toxic enough to kill a dog), thus combining all 'typical' Australian attributes into a single improbable creature.

The gods sure had a bit of fun with this one of their creations didn't they? 77
Lime may smell nice and is good for hmm.. a/the? tea, but does it has some connection, then. with the human genetic codes?
And the same Q about this animal noted above - does it remineds someone on some inner or organic working function that might be evolbed into the loved so..animal ?