PDA

View Full Version : Help... I need your comments[microchip agenda]


montag
13-08-2007, 10:04 AM
Go here and read this article (http://blogs.theage.com.au/thedailytruth/archives/2007/08/thickband.html) or sales pitch on the human brain chip and leave your comments at the bottom of the page to warn others just how dangerous this is..

Much appreciated..
Montag

montag
13-08-2007, 10:55 AM
Please(Bump)..

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 11:15 AM
I see no need for a brain chip other than for people with disabilities, but even that may be possible to cure in a less invasive way.

For example, when I need information, I go to the Web and do a couple of searches. I don't need to have a constant hard-wired brain-to-computer access for that.

montag
13-08-2007, 11:25 AM
I see no need for a brain chip other than for people with disabilities, but even that may be possible to cure in a less invasive way.

For example, when I need information, I go to the Web and do a couple of searches. I don't need to have a constant hard-wired brain-to-computer access for that.
This is how it is being marketed to us though as just another gadget for our amusement and convenience. The truth is that this is all about control, once we allow them inside our head it's game over..
Mind Control Microchip Verichip Welcome to the Machines - YouTube

garth
13-08-2007, 11:36 AM
Gidday Montag, another step in the totalitarian tip toe....all laughs & jokes now....but just wait till your thoughts aren't your own & you can be tracked anywhere on the globe.

comment left, not sure if they'll post it:)

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 11:37 AM
This is how it is being marketed to us though as just another gadget for our amusement and convenience. The truth is that this is all about control, once we allow them inside our head it's game over..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKx1gLCQef8

If people want to insert microchips under their skin or in the brain, then fine, that's up to them. But if someone tries to insert a microchip into my body I will empty an entire 30 rounds clip in their face!!!!!

montag
13-08-2007, 11:39 AM
Cheers Garth, I'm still waiting to see if they'll post my comment too..
If they don't then that'll just make the article even more telling..

montag
13-08-2007, 11:42 AM
If people want to insert microchips under their skin or in the brain, then fine, that's up to them. But if someone tries to insert a microchip into my body I will empty an entire 30 rounds clip in their face!!!!!
It's the young ones this is being marketed too through movies and cartoons, the older generation will say no but the kids will be lining up for them in a few years if we let this go ahead..

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 11:46 AM
If people want to insert microchips under their skin or in the brain, then fine, that's up to them. But if someone tries to insert a microchip into my body I will empty an entire 30 rounds clip in their face!!!!!

Glock 298 rounds in full auto - YouTube :D

lydia78
13-08-2007, 11:52 AM
Today's entertainment is tomorrow's detainment.

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 11:54 AM
It's the young ones this is being marketed too through movies and cartoons, the older generation will say no but the kids will be lining up for them in a few years if we let this go ahead..

I see two dangerous scenarios. The first is that it will become impossible to buy things and to go into buildings etc without having a microchip implanted. The second is that they will even create a law that demands that all citizens must be microchipped.

garth
13-08-2007, 12:05 PM
I see two dangerous scenarios. The first is that it will become impossible to buy things and to go into buildings etc without having a microchip implanted. The second is that they will even create a law that demands that all citizens must be microchipped.

I think your right, step one appears to "make it fun", then will come the "peer" pressure particularly in youth scene, like your not anyone unless your chipped. Next step is the enforced "chipping".

Makes you wonder if this will bring forth a underground "chip removal" service?

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 12:26 PM
I think your right, step one appears to "make it fun", then will come the "peer" pressure particularly in youth scene, like your not anyone unless your chipped. Next step is the enforced "chipping".

Makes you wonder if this will bring forth a underground "chip removal" service?

It's important to show that enforced chipping will not solve things like terrorism for example. A suicide bomber could cut somebody's arm off, remove the chip and have it implanted. Then the law makers could say that that would be prevented by having bio metrics in addition to the microchip. But if bio metrics are needed, then the microchip is not needed. The law makers cannot both demand the microchip and biometrics because biometrics make the microchip redundant.

dondaz
13-08-2007, 01:16 PM
If people want to insert microchips under their skin or in the brain, then fine, that's up to them. But if someone tries to insert a microchip into my body I will empty an entire 30 rounds clip in their face!!!!!

If only everyone thought like this; there would be no illuminati:D

Just posted on that site, it's a main stream place so who knows if they will post our replies.

The microchip is a big NO for me!

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 01:36 PM
If only everyone thought like this; there would be no illuminati:D

Just posted on that site, it's a main stream place so who knows if they will post our replies.

The microchip is a big NO for me!

The scary thing is that they need only one little argument for the microchip; the smallest thing that can be shown to improve security. ALL kind of surveillance and tagging can be said to improve security. There's no doubt about that. And all they need to do is to have some experts and mainstream media 'father' figures to tell the people how and why the microchip will improve their safety. In this way they can all too easily take away all privacy and all freedom.

21_12_2012
13-08-2007, 01:54 PM
The scary thing is that they need only one little argument for the microchip; the smallest thing that can be shown to improve security. ALL kind of surveillance and tagging can be said to improve security. There's no doubt about that. And all they need to do is to have some experts and mainstream media 'father' figures to tell the people how and why the microchip will improve their safety. In this way they can all too easily take away all privacy and all freedom.

One example of this would be the 'Madeline' case.

"Madeline would not have been lost if she was chipped...get your child microchipped...have peace of mind"

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 02:03 PM
One example of this would be the 'Madeline' case.

"Madeline would not have been lost if she was chipped...get your child microchipped...have peace of mind"

:eek: That's absolutely right. It would be so easy for them to come up with things like that. Another example would be a number of cases with abduction of babies. VeriChip already has something called Hugs (R):

http://www.verichipcorp.com/content/solutions/HUGS/

And then the media will report: "The abducters removed the Hugs straps from the babies before carrying them out of the hospital. The new Kiss system based on implanted microchips would have prevented that from happening."

21_12_2012
13-08-2007, 02:29 PM
:eek: That's absolutely right. It would be so easy for them to come up with things like that. Another example would be a number of cases with abduction of babies. VeriChip already has something called Hugs (R):

http://www.verichipcorp.com/content/solutions/HUGS/

And then the media will report: "The abducters removed the Hugs straps from the babies before carrying them out of the hospital. The new Kiss system based on implanted microchips would have prevented that from happening."

Exactly... they will use any sneaky tactic they can to introduce these chips...

fuknut
13-08-2007, 02:30 PM
I LOVE YOU

The sheeple out there has got no idea what are coming to them. From the posted remarks F I surfed the internet using just my thoughts and not a mouse or keyboard, it's fair to say Cuddles and Curves would pop up every 15 seconds.
DB

It'd be my screensaver. If we're sitting at the pub and I kinda zone out, you know I'm deep in the cami section. - Jack

I also left a reply, but doubt if they will post it. All you guy's replies are shining in their non existence :mad:

THANK YOU

kblood
13-08-2007, 02:33 PM
There are no real dangerous scenarios... just unfortunate ones.

montag
13-08-2007, 02:47 PM
This is my comment, still waiting for it to be posted(not holding my breath):rolleyes:

Anyone remember the Borg from Star Trek? If you do then you know thats what we have to look forward to if we allow micro chips to be implanted in our brains.

This has all sorts of very serious implications for the future of society and what it means to be sentient, human and free yet it is being marketed to us as just another gadget for our entertainment purposes.

We must as a society say no to this in the strongest possible terms otherwise it's game over..

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 04:37 PM
Anyone remember the Borg from Star Trek? If you do then you know thats what we have to look forward to if we allow micro chips to be implanted in our brains.


Alan Watt talks about a brain chip. And that the agenda is to turn everybody into Borgs. That's potentially even worse than the VeriChip. Sort of like a three stepping stones totalitarian approach: (1) ID cards with biometrics, (2) Implantable RFID microchips, and (3) brain chips.

Personally I believe that the brain chip is only used as a scare tactics to make the RFID microchip look more acceptable to people, to lower people's subconscious defenses against it.

logic bomb
13-08-2007, 04:53 PM
Personally I believe that the brain chip is only used as a scare tactics to make the RFID microchip look more acceptable to people, to lower people's subconscious defenses against it.

Exactly. There will not be a micro-chip as such, its just PRS. Its our permission they need more than anything to control us thru technology. Technology that has existed for a long time and has been in use on the general public for years. Beyond, chips, RFID and nano. What they want is an electronically binding (soul) contract. Anybody that has been/or is being targeted with Radionics will know exactly how it feels. Its not nice.

I could tell you some far out stories about myself and what I've experienced but you wouldn't believe me. I never got implanted so overtly until I came to North America.

lb

Anders Lindman
13-08-2007, 05:25 PM
Exactly. There will not be a micro-chip as such, its just PRS. Its our permission they need more than anything to control us thru technology. Technology that has existed for a long time and has been in use on the general public for years. Beyond, chips, RFID and nano. What they want is an electronically binding (soul) contract. Anybody that has been/or is being targeted with Radionics will know exactly how it feels. Its not nice.

I could tell you some far out stories about myself and what I've experienced but you wouldn't believe me. I never got implanted so overtly until I came to North America.

lb

Yes, and they know that it will be difficult to get all people's permission and acceptance of the implantable microchip. Many will fall for the propaganda that the implantable RFID microchip will protect them better (which is true, because every form of surveillance and tagging will do that). Even more people will accept the implantable RFID chip because it will be convenient for opening doors, paying at the supermarket etc. But there will still be many people who will refuse the implantable RFID microchip.

To target these people, they use what can be called PRS 2.0, which goes something like this:

1) Problem: Bring in a new threat (brain chip) that is even worse than the original threat (implantable RFID microchip).

2) Reaction: "This is even worse than the first threat. This must be stopped. What are we going to do about it?"

3) Solution: Keep on pushing the bigger threat (brain chip) and surreptitiously sneak in the old problem (implantable RFID microchip) under the radar of people's minds.

lemonique
14-08-2007, 12:04 AM
Good thread Montag!! If it becomes compulsory to be chipped I'm afraid I'll be one of those that immediately digs the buggar straight back out again.. I suspect there's a few Annie Oakley's on this forum (male version as well) that would do the same. I'm dead against anyone or anything being chipped, and that includes our pets and the disabled...in the spirit of Annie I offer you this Utube to have a look at..(Not an intention to disrupt your thread Montag) It's Annie's attitude that's badly needed this day and age...
Stick around for the song 'You can't get a Man with a gun' (wanna bet!)

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
YouTube - Annie Get your Gun Trailer Betty Hutton

Cheers :)

montag
14-08-2007, 05:32 AM
Comments have now been posted, thanks to everyone for contributing..
http://blogs.theage.com.au/thedailytruth/archives/2007/08/thickband.html#comments

kblood
14-08-2007, 11:28 AM
I sometimes "zap" myself just to make sure I got no functioning "chips" in me. The natural biologial systems cant be removed or stopped of cause, but might be stunned though. That takes quite a degree of mindcontrol though ;)

bicycle
14-08-2007, 01:35 PM
If people want to insert microchips under their skin or in the brain, then fine, that's up to them. But if someone tries to insert a microchip into my body I will empty an entire 30 rounds clip in their face!!!!!


It will probably be too late by then, coz those around you who have been chipped coz its 'cool' just like mobile phones are 'cool' now, will just be more controlled to 'police' you even more.

You will need more than 30 rounds:D

bicycle
14-08-2007, 01:40 PM
This is my comment, still waiting for it to be posted(not holding my breath):rolleyes:


But a lot of us here already KNOW this,its about getting of our arses and away from the screen and casually bringing it into conversations with people not in the know, in a freindly non confrontational way. If after that they just laugh at you and say your just a conspiracy theorist then fuck em and move on to anyone who will listen.

Anders Lindman
14-08-2007, 02:27 PM
It will probably be too late by then, coz those around you who have been chipped coz its 'cool' just like mobile phones are 'cool' now, will just be more controlled to 'police' you even more.

You will need more than 30 rounds:D

:eek: I will have to increase my firepower:

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

:D

bicycle
14-08-2007, 02:33 PM
:eek: I will have to increase my firepower:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kceF9VEyIvo

:D

Aghh... good ol arnie, hey how come he is not wearing his nazi ss death cult trouser belt?:confused:

I hope his daddy does'nt find out:rolleyes:

Anders Lindman
14-08-2007, 02:48 PM
Aghh... good ol arnie, hey how come he is not wearing his nazi ss death cult trouser belt?:confused:

I hope his daddy does'nt find out:rolleyes:

Arnold has played roles in some good movies. But a role as an actor should not be mixed up with the role in real life. ;)

bicycle
14-08-2007, 02:51 PM
Arnold has played roles in some good movies. But a role as an actor should not be mixed up with the role in real life. ;)

Hollywood propoganda;)

Anders Lindman
14-08-2007, 02:56 PM
Hollywood propoganda;)

Yep. Actors can be used in politics where communication with the public is important. Arnold would fit that role well when it comes to a strong leader who can defend the people against terrorists.

matrixcutter
14-08-2007, 05:11 PM
One example of this would be the 'Madeline' case.

"Madeline would not have been lost if she was chipped...get your child microchipped...have peace of mind"

Would an implanted chip help to keep my child safe?
In the wake of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, every type of child monitoring device is in demand (http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article1788169.ece)


Also see A generation is all they need (http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/136744) By Kevin Haggerty, from the Toronto Star on Dec. 10, 2006

...
At this juncture, an unfortunately common tragedy of modern life will occur: A small child, likely a photogenic toddler, will be murdered or horrifically abused. It will happen in one of the media capitals of the Western world, thereby ensuring non-stop breathless coverage. Chip manufactures will recognize this as the opportunity they have been anticipating for years. With their technology now largely bug-free, familiar to most citizens and comparatively inexpensive, manufacturers will partner with the police to launch a high-profile campaign encouraging parents to implant their children “to ensure your own peace of mind.”

Special deals will be offered. Implants will be free, providing the family registers for monitoring services. Loving but unnerved parents will be reassured by the ability to integrate tagging with other functions on their PDA so they can see their child any time from any place.

Paralleling these developments will be initiatives that employ the logic of convenience to entice the increasingly small group of holdouts to embrace the now common practice of being tagged. At first, such convenience tagging will be reserved for the highest echelon of Western society, allowing the elite to move unencumbered through the physical and informational corridors of power. Such practices will spread more widely as the benefits of being chipped become more prosaic. Chipped individuals will, for example, move more rapidly through customs.
...

matrixcutter
14-08-2007, 05:50 PM
Alan Watt talks about a brain chip. And that the agenda is to turn everybody into Borgs. That's potentially even worse than the VeriChip. Sort of like a three stepping stones totalitarian approach: (1) ID cards with biometrics, (2) Implantable RFID microchips, and (3) brain chips.

Personally I believe that the brain chip is only used as a scare tactics to make the RFID microchip look more acceptable to people, to lower people's subconscious defenses against it.
I've put a few of Watt's mp3s together here (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6117).

The brain chip is not just a scare tactic. They have already had international science meetings in which they have discussed the brain chip e.g. at Loyola University, Lousiniana. Watt has discussed this a few times.

At this meeting, in around 2001, they said that the brain chip is ready. The only thing left to do is to condition the public to accept it. They said that they would do this by putting them in movies, books and cartoons for children etc.

Since then we have had brain chips in The Final Cut (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364343/) with Robin Williams, The Stepford Wives (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0327162/) with Nicole Kidman, Matthew Broderick, Bette Midler, Christopher Walken etc. and before that we had Johnny Mnemonic, with Keanu Reeves, who also went on to be in The Matrix, which is also relevant to this agenda.

Bond was chipped (although not a brain chip) in the latest movie, Casino Royale (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381061/), and I for one would put money on there being a brain chip involved in the next Bond movie, or possibly the one after that.

A quick Google search has revealed that Kelly Parra - who writes Young Adult Fiction for MTV/Pocket Books - interviewed author Suzanne McMinn, who says:
"The hero in the second book has an implanted brain chip that allows him to see evil before it strikes." (http://wordsofauthors.blogspot.com/2005/07/words-of-author-with-suzanne-mcminn.html)
So this kind of conditioning is well under way.

Watt points out that at no point did they mention politics at this international science meeting, because they know that politics is merely a show for the public. These people know that there is an agenda unfolding. They also never said "we might" or "we could" do x, y and z. They said that they will do it.

Then there are things like this, right in your face, which are almost unbelievable:
Masonic Youth Child ID Program (MYCHIP) (http://www.mychip.org/)


We can expect much more predictive programming, which Watt has also done blurbs on:
Nov 23, 2006 Alan Watt Blurb - "PART 1 of Movie Predictive Programming / Occultic Connection" (http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/audio/Alan_Watt_Blurb_PredictiveProgramming_Nov232006.mp 3)
Predictive Programming, Hero and Heroine, Formula of Human Behaviour, Hollywood Grove, Pentagon War Movies, The Globe Theatre, Stratford upon Avon, Hermetic Thought, Stabbed in the Eye, Idea of Inevitability, NETWORK, THEY LIVE, WICKER MAN, CONTROL FACTOR, THE EXPERIMENT, EYES WIDE SHUT, THX 1138, LOGAN'S RUN, BRAINSTORM, THE FINAL CUT, DEVIL'S ADVOCATE, Talismanic Microcosm, Magus R.C., Personal Quest, Re-creation

Nov 24, 2006 Alan Watt Blurb - "PART 2 of Movie Predictive Programming / Occultic Connection" (http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/audio/Alan_Watt_Blurb_PredictiveProgramming_Nov242006.mp 3)
Cutting Through, Movie Industry, Drama Propaganda, International Censorship Meeting, Leveling the Old, Shortwave Radio, Panic Sales, Programming, "Sin Cities," HOLLYWOODISM, Cinema, 1984 THE LAST MAN, FAHRENHEIT 451, THE OTHERS, Plato's Cave, Legal Tyranny, GATTACA, DARK CITY, FROM HELL, DAYS OF THE CONDOR, DNA Collection, White Coat Priesthood, Latin Language, Darwinian Theory, Sports, the Altar, "Hollywood Babylon" book

Anders Lindman
14-08-2007, 06:03 PM
I've put a few of Watt's mp3s together here (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6117).

The brain chip is not just a scare tactic. They have already had international science meetings in which they have discussed the brain chip e.g. at Loyola University, Lousiniana. Watt has discussed this a few times.


I still think the brain chip can be a diversion tactic, something maybe not even Alan Watt is aware of.

I will check out the movie predictive programming blurbs. Sounds interesting.

bicycle
14-08-2007, 06:19 PM
Thanks for the mp3's matrix, i've just recently got into allan watts stuff:)

matrixcutter
15-08-2007, 01:34 AM
I still think the brain chip can be a diversion tactic, something maybe not even Alan Watt is aware of.

I will check out the movie predictive programming blurbs. Sounds interesting.
The brain chip is the end goal of the microchip part of the overall global agenda.
The technology is ready and has been for years, and this agenda has been gradually unfolding over the last few decades, involving normalising different new technologies, getting us used to it all step by step. The implanted chip will come first, and indeed is already here, but the brain chip is the goal. That is admitted.

What diversion tactic are you thinking about?

matrixcutter
15-08-2007, 01:35 AM
Thanks for the mp3's matrix, i've just recently got into allan watts stuff:)
You're welcome.

Do pass them on, in other forums, or just out and about if you can print the transcripts out.

Anders Lindman
15-08-2007, 03:52 AM
What diversion tactic are you thinking about?

The diversion tactic I called PRS 2.0:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=96883&postcount=24

Anders Lindman
15-08-2007, 04:18 AM
The diversion tactic I called PRS 2.0:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=96883&postcount=24

Hmm... Maybe it would be better to call it: Problem Reaction Diversion:

They know that it will be difficult to get all people's permission and acceptance of the implantable microchip. Many will fall for the propaganda that the implantable RFID microchip will protect them better (which is true, because every form of surveillance and tagging will do that [given a totally benevolent/friendly government now and in the future including all people working and those who will work for the government in the future]). Even more people will accept the implantable RFID chip because it will be convenient for opening doors, paying at the supermarket etc. But there will still be many people who will refuse the implantable RFID microchip.

To target these people, they use what can be called Problem Reaction Diversion (PRD), which goes something like this:

1) Problem: Bring in a new threat (brain chip) that is even worse than the original threat (implantable RFID microchip).

2) Reaction: "This is even worse than the first threat. This must be stopped. What are we going to do about it?"

3) Diversion: Keep on pushing the bigger threat (brain chip) and surreptitiously sneak in the old problem (implantable RFID microchip) under the radar of people's minds.

montag
15-08-2007, 04:36 AM
1) Problem: Bring in a new threat (brain chip) that is even worse than the original threat (implantable RFID microchip).

2) Reaction: "This is even worse than the first threat. This must be stopped. What are we going to do about it?"
If you read the majority of the comments from the story I originally posted(besides the comments from this forum) nobody feels particularly threatened by this technology, same goes for many friends of mine when I bring it up.. I'm sure they'll make sure there is lots of porn available when it's introduced, what red blooded male will say no to being the star in their own porno playing inside their head..??
Most people only look at whats in it for them and have no idea that there could possibly be nefarious motives in action..

Anders Lindman
15-08-2007, 07:42 AM
If you read the majority of the comments from the story I originally posted(besides the comments from this forum) nobody feels particularly threatened by this technology, same goes for many friends of mine when I bring it up.. I'm sure they'll make sure there is lots of porn available when it's introduced, what red blooded male will say no to being the star in their own porno playing inside their head..??
Most people only look at whats in it for them and have no idea that there could possibly be nefarious motives in action..

Yes, but it will be difficult for them to push for the brain chip as ID tagging. And thus, it will be difficult for them to demand that all citizens must have a brain chip by law. The implantable RFID microchip on the other hand they can make a law for, supported by the claim that it will enhance national security and people's safety.

So they make people like Alan Watt (whether he is aware of it or not) for example to talk solely about the brain chip to steer the attention away from their real goal which is compulsory tagging of all citizens, so that it will be easier for them to carry out their plan. Just as in the movie Wag the Dog, the mass media is through Problem Reaction Diversion made to make news stories about something other than the real issue.

tru3
15-08-2007, 12:39 PM
They know that it will be difficult to get all people's permission and acceptance of the implantable microchip. Many will fall for the propaganda that the implantable RFID microchip will protect them better (which is true, because every form of surveillance and tagging will do that [given a totally benevolent/friendly government now and in the future including all people working and those who will work for the government in the future]). Even more people will accept the implantable RFID chip because it will be convenient for opening doors, paying at the supermarket etc. But there will still be many people who will refuse the implantable RFID microchip.

imo, all it's going to take to get the vast majority of people to line up for harvesting is one suitcase bomb in one medium sized city. it's just not quite time yet.

that's a very nuanced thesis, anders. you could be well be right. the rfid, based on what i've read, can quite easily be used to generate an electomagnetic field through the bodymind. in other words, the door swings both ways.

that was kind of my point of the post "over there". most people are not going to change their belief about this, but perhaps just planting a seed of doubt might be possible:

are you really willing to bet the farm that they can't hack into you once the circuit's in place?

when i'm talking to people about chipping, i always ask that question and generally, there is at least a flicker of confusion on their faces.

they don't laugh off that one.

Anders Lindman
15-08-2007, 03:09 PM
imo, all it's going to take to get the vast majority of people to line up for harvesting is one suitcase bomb in one medium sized city. it's just not quite time yet.

that's a very nuanced thesis, anders. you could be well be right. the rfid, based on what i've read, can quite easily be used to generate an electomagnetic field through the bodymind. in other words, the door swings both ways.

that was kind of my point of the post "over there". most people are not going to change their belief about this, but perhaps just planting a seed of doubt might be possible:

are you really willing to bet the farm that they can't hack into you once the circuit's in place?

when i'm talking to people about chipping, i always ask that question and generally, there is at least a flicker of confusion on their faces.

they don't laugh off that one.

My personal opinion at the moment is that the RFID chip is only for tagging, just as the ones used for tagging pets and cattle. My objection to the RFID chip is that I will simply point blanc refuse having a chip inserted into my body :shudder:

If they make a law that demand every citizen to be chipped, I will refuse. If the police come to bring me to the hospital to be chipped I will go with them. I will not shoot them in the face. :D That was just my way of showing how serious the problem is. If I get a letter in the mail saying that I am ordered by law to be at the hospital at a certain time, I call the hospital and tell them that I will not go there. They would have to bring the police to escort me.

bicycle
15-08-2007, 03:13 PM
If you read the majority of the comments from the story I originally posted(besides the comments from this forum) nobody feels particularly threatened by this technology, same goes for many friends of mine when I bring it up.. I'm sure they'll make sure there is lots of porn available when it's introduced, what red blooded male will say no to being the star in their own porno playing inside their head..??
Most people only look at whats in it for them and have no idea that there could possibly be nefarious motives in action..

Well, fuck em move on to people who will listen.

bicycle
15-08-2007, 03:20 PM
Just heard on the alex jones show that a lot of the elite are calling for another 9/11 to 'save' america (save their asses more like) and that part of the solution to this new, even bigger 9/11 is to chip everyone after bush has declared marshal law with these new powers his handlers have granted him.:confused:

Should make good tv I guess over here in europe:D

Unless the idiot sheeple (I hate that term, but I cant think of a better one)wake the frigg up!!

matrixcutter
16-08-2007, 04:56 PM
Just heard on the alex jones show that a lot of the elite are calling for another 9/11 to 'save' america (save their asses more like) and that part of the solution to this new, even bigger 9/11 is to chip everyone after bush has declared marshal law with these new powers his handlers have granted him.:confused:

Should make good tv I guess over here in europe:D

Unless the idiot sheeple (I hate that term, but I cant think of a better one)wake the frigg up!!
Another 9/11 or maybe an engineered plague.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean Anders. You seem to be suggesting that they are using discussion of the end goal (of the microchip agenda) in order to sufficiently distract/frighten people so as to be able to implement what is nothing more than one of the stepping stones on the way to the end goal. That doesn't make any sense at all to me. And it doesn't take into account the fact that they have held international meetings at which they have admitted that the brain chips are ready to go now.

Also, as montag said, many people are simply not bothered about the threat of widespread chipping. And when you go on myspace (for example) and discuss the brain chips, you get ridicule from one side, delight from another, and only one in a few dozen will show some intelligent interest.

matrixcutter
16-08-2007, 11:00 PM
Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped Population (15mins) (http://video.google.co.uk/url?docid=1263677258215075609&esrc=sr4&ev=v&q=aaron%2Brusso&srcurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.co.uk%2Fvideoplay %3Fdocid%3D1263677258215075609&vidurl=%2Fvideoplay%3Fdocid%3D1263677258215075609% 26q%3Daaron%2Brusso%26total%3D337%26start%3D0%26nu m%3D10%26so%3D0%26type%3Dsearch%26plindex%3D3&usg=AL29H201fc9GZi5jsGB0EvzZQqagAd2o2Q)
Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has gone in-depth on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, who personally told him that the elite's ultimate goal was to create a microchipped population and that the war on terror was a hoax, Rockefeller having predicted an "event" that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan eleven months before 9/11.

Rockefeller also told Russo that his family's foundation had created and bankrolled the women's liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite.

Full interview (1hr 9mins) (http://video.google.co.uk/url?docid=3218585954111617501&esrc=sr3&ev=v&q=aaron%2Brusso&srcurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.co.uk%2Fvideoplay %3Fdocid%3D3218585954111617501&vidurl=%2Fvideoplay%3Fdocid%3D3218585954111617501% 26q%3Daaron%2Brusso%26total%3D337%26start%3D0%26nu m%3D10%26so%3D0%26type%3Dsearch%26plindex%3D2&usg=AL29H21cyEZkyLTOJICo1Se2CJ2It-4T1g)