PDA

View Full Version : hegelian dialectic


anoninnyc
12-08-2007, 04:35 AM
Why is it important for you to understand the subject of the Hegelian Dialectic? Because it is the process by which all change is being accomplished in society today. More importantly, it is the tool that the globalists are utilizing to manipulate the minds of the average American to accept that change, where ordinarily they would refuse it.

The Hegelian Dialectic is, in short, the critical process by which the ruling elite create a problem, anticipating in advance the reaction that the population will have to the given crisis, and thus conditioning the people that a change is needed. When the population is properly conditioned, the desired agenda of the ruling elite is presented as the solution. The solution isn't intended to solve the problem, but rather to serve as the basis for a new problem or exacerbate the existing one.

When the newly inflamed difficulty reaches the boiling point of a crisis, it becomes the foundation upon which arguments may again be made for change. Hence, the process is repeated, over and over, moving society toward whatever end the planners have in mind.

It's also important to understand that as this process is being driven, arguments are created both for and against certain measures of change. All arguments are controlled. The presented solutions — each with varying levels of unadornment — are "debated" publicly by the manipulators or their minions. This is done until a perceived compromise has been reached on the best measure to take in route to solving the crisis. Then, the outcome of the "debate" — which purportedly weighs the concerns of the public with the mandate to do something — is enacted as public policy.

Such is a summary of the Hegelian Dialectic. Though few in American society have ever heard of it, still fewer have not been profoundly impacted by its use in the effective neutralization of opposition in the formation of public policy.

For more on the Hegelian Dialectic, including examples of its use, see the links below.

http://www.amerikanexpose.com/hegel/

fccool
12-08-2007, 06:44 AM
It's very interesting to read some of the Hegel's works. Something I found to be interesting:

The spiritual individual, the nation - in so far as it is internally differentiated so as to form an organic whole - is what we call the state. This term is ambiguous, however, for the state and the laws of the state, as distinct from religion, science, and art, usual ave purely political associations. But in this context, the word 'state' is used in a more comprehensive sense, just as we use the word 'realm' to describe spiritual phenomena. A nation should therefore be regarded as a spiritual individual, and it is not primarily its external side that will be emphasised here, but rather what we have previously called the spirit of the nation . . . in short, those spiritual powers which live within the nation and rule over it.

So we find today such statements as USA talked to RUSSIA and they made an agreement. Such views of the state automatically make all inclusive assumption that everyone in the country inclusively made a decision with everyone in other country. I know nobody believes it to be such, but on a subcontious level it creates US and THEM type of mentality. So virtually individuals are suppressed in view of the bigger individual which THE STATE is.

The same is true on the corporate level. You get AUTODESK buying out ALIAS. ALIAS signing the agreement. They are treated as actual living and breathing human beings.

Same in the world of sports. I know it's a silly example, but as you'll see nevertheless a relevant one. BULLS beat the SONICS. When fans reffer to their team they say WE BEAT SONICS.

So, although Hegel was the promoter of the individual freedom on the surface, his views actually suppressed the concept of the individualism to begin with. The collectivism is rampant. Essentially that's what Democracy today is. 51% rule the 49%. Or 34% ruling other 64% in case of 3 candidates.

So what did I learn from all of this? The concept of a so called "citizenship" is a bulshit concept. So is the concept of patriotism and "dying for our country"... and even more interesting concept of hegelian "freedom". Technically, freedom defined as:

1. the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint: He won his freedom after a retrial.
2. exemption from external control, interference, regulation, etc.
3. the power to determine action without restraint.
4. political or national independence.
5. personal liberty, as opposed to bondage or slavery: a slave who bought his freedom.
6. exemption from the presence of anything specified (usually fol. by from): freedom from fear.
7. the absence of or release from ties, obligations, etc.

So essentially, if individual has "freedom" he should be able to blast his 10000 watt speakers in his yard in spite of the anguish to the neighbours until he goes to sleep. And the neighbours should be free to shoot a couple holes in his stereo to render it useless and thus giving them opportunity to relax. BUT, we strangely define freedom as:

1. Power to do whatever we want... except infringe other people's freedom or well-being. This limitation may be enforced by law, or rules and regulation, or by force (same thing).

So that's where the idea of Government as the MEDIATOR OF FREEDOM comes in. The only problem with this notion is simple question ... where do you draw the line as far as when well-bing of one individual ends and other's begin?

In case of our loud music blasting dude... he probably would not blast the music if he knew that ignoring the well-being of others has dare consequences of other people excersising their freedom to kick your ass :). But if Government steps in, then the rules and regulations will have to be passed that would state... well, this guy has a right (we give it to him) to play music at 100DB loudness, and until 7. p.m. at night, so deal with it... and pay your taxes while you at it :).

So in essence, the hegelian freedom is only confined within context of Government given rights, and that's the way majority come to understand it. AND IT'S BULSHIT!!!! :)

synergy777
14-08-2007, 04:30 PM
thee olde Problem Reaction Solution, (PRS)

heres another influernce on the political machine known as the neocon movement.

Leo Strauss - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Project for the New American Century - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia