WEBBOTS: Clif High on Journys With Rebecca

[papiowhisperer]

Links to last night's radio interview just went up:

http://journeyswithrebecca.com/jwr9b/jwr9_july28a.mp3
http://journeyswithrebecca.com/jwr9b/jwr9_july28b.mp3

Enjoy! :)

There is a forum where people gather to talk about the reports. http://webbotdiscussions.forumco.com/

Also, http://www.urbansurvival.com written by one of the people involved at halfpasthuman.com spins the data as it relates to things economic.

[cruise4]

I heard that. Good stuff. Posting this about reduces it's ability to work. Bit of a conundrum until he writes the filter.

[size_of_light]

I heard that. Good stuff. Posting this about reduces it's ability to work.

"We predict things that never happen because we predicted them."

Genius. :D

[cruise4]

:D If you understand what they attempt to do, extract unconcious emotional content from a quantum possibility of uncertainty, then it's allowed. I think it's a genius idea.

I wonder if they could put in what actually happened at a previous time and refine the digging down alogorithm somehow to improve predictive possibility? maybe not. It would serve to colour itself maybe.

I suppose it's an attempt to show any 'Global Mind's' thoughts, and we all change our minds.

It might be very accurate if everyone was on the net. That's a scary thought all of a sudden. Caesar anyone?

[size_of_light]

I've heard these guys a fair few times on Rense.

He hasn't had them on for a while...maybe something to do with all of their predictions late last year failing to materialise.

Nice guys, just really bad at what they do. :eek: :D

[krakhead]

"We predict things that never happen because we predicted them."

Genius. :D

Is that a genuine quote? :eek: That's the conspiracy world's best get out clause surely?! :D

[size_of_light]

Is that a genuine quote? :eek: That's the conspiracy world's best get out clause surely?! :D

No, the quote is my interpretation.

I might be being a bit too hard on these guys, but I remember a prediction they made late last year that around about November the world was going to go crazy and there'd be a 'crack that was heard around the world' or something like that and other major disaster scenarios.

Sound of crickets chirping.

Nothing happened.

How many chances do you give someone before you face the fact they're not very good at predicting things?

Sooner rather than later they'll probably be right with one of their doom predictions, but that's not hard to see coming now anyway.

[strt]

Actually they are not that bad. I read their posts often. They are pretty accurate on some occasions and they are first to say that they may be wrong on others. Method they are using is very logical so I can understand hits/misses problem they have.

[cruise4]

There is a potential problem here though. It replaces the mainstream media as as a vehicle for subliminal/predictive programming. If a bot can be written to retrieve, a bot can be written to 'write'.