View Full Version : Interesting site, right here.
harris999
11-08-2007, 04:12 AM
I was looking through the "Todays News Forum" and came across a post by Julieray, which led me to this site, so all credit goes to him/her.
Anyway, theres tons of info on this site about aliens and god and our creators and stuff, and while it does sound a little far fetched, its a pretty interesting read (I've only read a few pages, so im still undecided about it all, but like i said, its very interesting).
Anyway, check it out, i think it would be intresting to hear other peoples opinions on it.
site : www.wingmakers.com
cleft_asunder
11-08-2007, 05:42 AM
It's a disinfo site, funded by the Illuminati.
smariot
11-08-2007, 07:31 AM
You can tell because they totally screwed up the description meta data on their FAQ page. Is there no safe haven from malformed markup? The horrors!
logic bomb
11-08-2007, 05:27 PM
Peoples memories are short when it comes to places like this. This was outed in 2004 as a dis-info site funded by the the Intelligence Services. Illuminati if you like Cleft_.
lb
john white
11-08-2007, 05:30 PM
Peoples memories are short when it comes to places like this. This was outed in 2004 as a dis-info site funded by the the Intelligence Services. Illuminati if you like Cleft_.
lb
Yes, outed by who?
Finton bloody Dunne! (or if not some creature like him, like DBS)
logic bomb
11-08-2007, 05:33 PM
Yes, outed by who?
Finton bloody Dunne! (or if not some creature like him, like DBS)
In English?
john white
11-08-2007, 05:38 PM
In English?
You dont know who finton dunne is? and DBS is that racist little shit Daryl Bradford Smith. Its a typical pondlife tactic to smear just about every other site as "disinfo" to sucker their fan base into thinking they have "THE Troof!"
Anyway, if people have a case against wingmakers:
Lets see it then
logic bomb
11-08-2007, 05:41 PM
I didn't know Fintan Dunne had outed them. Wouldn't know, don't listen to jokers like that. It was DBS that confused me.
lb
The entity is viewed in the universe of time and space as an evolving particle of exploration commissioned by First Source to explore, populate, develop, and transform the outposts of creations into enclaves of Source Intelligence. When the entity is viewed in the dimensions of non-time and non-space -- its natural habitat -- it appears as an immortal facet of First Source that has been individuated, but when viewed in the three-dimensional environment of genetic density, it appears as a temporal facet of its species.
I have spent hours on end at Wingmakers.com, it's an interesting site.
The links (http://www.wingmakers.com/links.html) page is worth browsing.
http://www.wingmakers.com/reproductions/hirez/chamber12hr.jpg
As John White stated, let's see the prosecutions evidence.
john white
11-08-2007, 06:35 PM
I had a cast about on the net, and the cheif objection seems to be "this interpretation of things unseen and unknown seems out of line with my interpretation of things unknown and unseen, so this must be disinfo" and varients thereof: for heaven sakes the UFO scene is thick with it and has been for years, just about everyone is disinfo according to someone else who is also themselves disinfo according to someone else... and how the heck does anyone know that any info about aliens in any form is "genuine info" anyway, outside of personal experiance:? And thats always subjective
Mostly in cases like this the "disinfo" label is wanged around by those who don't want others to consider the information becuase they think THEY know what is true based only on the construct inside their own heads, and thats the reason for my objection. Of course saying Dunne or Smith have declared it disinfo is an oxymoron becuase theres no-one they havnt declared disinfo, including each other... (and OF COURSE Icke!) but why have we got the concrete certainty with no case that wingmakers is disinfo in this thread?
Of course I don't know everything, so again, if there is a worthwhile case to be made: lets see it made! Otherwise Wingmakers is info same as everything else the veracity of which is down to personal discernment