War In Afghanistan - Exit Strategy Announced?

[peterjohnglynn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8ThaCiyN4k

Is there an exit strategy afoot in the War on Afghanistan?

Elitist Miliband wants to re-open talks with the Taliban. The MOD is seeking to slash compo for their troops. Operation Panther's Claw a success though all ground won will need to be handed back as not enough personnel to hold the ground.
Plus the popularity of War on Afghans is waning as casualties mount.

[runciter]

“Operation in Afganistan is rooted in Israel”

Washington’s Blog
Friday, July 24, 2009

The real reason why the U.S. continues its presence in Afghanistan is Iran – the country which is an annoyance for Israel, said Karen Kwiatkowski, a writer and former U.S. Air Force officer.

She says the real reason America continues its presence in Afghanistan is to keep the pressure up on Iran.

“Obama has not yet defined what winning in Afghanistan looks like,” Kwiatkowski says, “And what we are doing is working towards what is not defined.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/operation-in-afganistan-is-rooted-in-israel.html

[runciter]

david icke wrote:

This focus on Iran is once again connected to the domination of the gathering global battleground that Brzezinski calls 'Eurasia'. Have a look at this map of Eurasia and see how many countries are subject to unrest, conflict and invasion in the region surrounding Iran.

http://www.rense.com/general86/mppp.jpg

This is the whole of Eurasia and below is the area that is being especially targeted ...

http://www.rense.com/general86/mppp2.jpg

The military and covert operations orchestrated by Britain, America and Israel, all controlled by the House of Rothschild, have invaded and destabilised Iraq and Afghanistan and are now moving in on Pakistan with their mounting campaign of bombing. The engineered terrorist attacks in Mumbai, a speciality of Mossad, are part of the destabilisation of India.

Two Taliban militant leaders, who defected from the notorious Taliban chief in Pakistan, Baitullah Mehsud, the mass killer of civilians and military personnel, said he was an 'American agent' pursuing a US-Israeli agenda in Pakistan. One of them, Turkistan Bittani, said that Mehsud was being funded by US and Israeli intelligence services for brainwashing innocent youths.

Bittani pointed out that the al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership had never been targeted by the dozens of US drone strikes in Pakistan's north-west region. The other defector, Qari Zainuddin, said that Mehsud had established strong links with Israeli intelligence services which were destabilising the country. 'These people [Mehsud and his associates] are working against Islam', he said. They are working for the Rothschild Zionists and the Illuminati.

The big prize in this area is Iran, which would connect Iraq with Afghanistan and Pakistan and give them control of a vast region from Israel to the border with China. Iran would also give the British-American-Israeli cabal greater access to the Caspian Sea with its massive oil and gas reserves.

The plan is to control as many countries as possible that border Russia and that is the reason for the 'people's revolutions' in Georgia and Ukraine and their desire to join NATO. The Rothschild cabal wants to trigger a war involving Russia and China that will bring about the planned world government and world army. Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard:

'Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an "anti-hegemonic" coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope of the challenge posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China would likely be the leader and Russia the follower. Averting this contingency, however remote it may be, will require a display of U.S. geostrategic skill on the western, eastern, and southern perimeters of Eurasia simultaneously.'

Brzezinski, Soros and the Rothschild Zionist network control Barack Obama and he does whatever they say. His first act in office was to agree bombing raids on Pakistan and he has backed off from threatening Iran with a military attack while covert operations worked to oust the Iranian regime another way. If that doesn't work, you will see the atmosphere change because they want Iran and they will not stop until they get it.

http://www.rense.com/general86/netan.jpg

Netanyahu: If it doesn't work the boys are going in ...

Standing in the wings, fingers on buttons, are the Israeli trio of shoot-to-kill maniacs, Prime Minister Netanyahu, Foreign Minister Lieberman and Defence Minister Barak, the guy in charge of operations when the Palestinians were slaughtered in Gaza. They can't wait to scream 'chocks away' and bomb targets in Iran and if the 'green revolution' goes nowhere the calls for military attacks will be wound up again.

The mainstream media has reported events in Tehran this week with their usual bias and ignorance, but, as always, the truth is very different.

http://www.rense.com/general86/ickk.htm

[runciter]

5. Look at the map below:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_NE-72ZXux-g/SSpdlzGxu1I/AAAAAAAAGo0/uMCImuHbxFQ/s400/Pakistan+Afghanistan.JPG (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_NE-72ZXux-g/SSpdlzGxu1I/AAAAAAAAGo0/uMCImuHbxFQ/s1600-h/Pakistan+Afghanistan.JPG)

The above map first appeared among American neoconservatives.

It was used in an article by Ralph Peters entitled "Blood Borders: How a Better Middle East Would Look," published in Armed Forces Journal.

A senior Pakistani government official has said that "One of the biggest fears of the Pakistani military planners is the collaboration between India and Afghanistan to destroy Pakistan. Some people feel the United States is colluding in this." (Redrawn map has Pakistan wary (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2008425673_pakistan23.html))

Some commentators suggest that the United States is financing militants in order to tie down the Pakistani army and leave the way open for an American advance into Pakistan.

On 3 December 2008, at Al Ahram Weekly, Abdus Sattar Ghazali wrote 'Behind the scenes' (Cached (http://64.233.183.132/search?q=cache:odl0kv6V4NAJ:weekly.ahram.org.eg/2008/925/op31.htm+al+ahram+Behind+the+scenes&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=uk))

He tells us about the US-UK-Israel agenda for the Middle East and South Asia region.

Among the points made:

1. The Global Trends 2025 report by Thomas Fingar, US deputy director of national intelligence for analysis, suggests that Pakistan may become much smaller.

2. The New York Times reported on a "New Middle East" map published in 2006 by the US Air Force Journal along with an article by retired Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters, entitled, "How a better Middle East would look?" The map and Peters suggested that a 'natural' Pakistan would be much smaller than today.

3. It can be argued that redrawing the map, from the Lebanon and Syria to Anatolia, Arabia, the Persian Gulf, the Iranian Plateau and South Asia is part of a longstanding Anglo-American and Israeli agenda.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_NE-72ZXux-g/STrH3CwRywI/AAAAAAAAG-o/jPAkX1L10e8/s400/greater_israel.gif

4. "Constructive chaos" (violence and war) is the means to gradually achieve this objective.

5. There is a rapidly deteriorating situation in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) in the wake of frequent US missile attacks and Pakistan's military operations.

The FATA region, along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, was peaceful before the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

The commander of US forces in Afghanistan, General David McKiernan, was asked by a group of parliamentarians meeting with him at the residency of the US ambassador in Islamabad: Why did you Americans come to Afghanistan when it was so peaceful before you got there?

6. Some commentators suggest that the US is financing the Taliban. The point is to bog down the Pakistani army, they say, leaving the way open for the Americans to grab Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

Recently, in the officers' mess in Bajaur, the northern tribal region where the Pakistani army is stuck fighting militants, one officer offered his own theory: Osama bin Laden did not exist, he told a visiting journalist. Rather, he was a creation of the Americans, who needed an excuse to invade Afghanistan and encroach upon Pakistan.

http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2009/02/mumbai-attacks-and-military-of-usa.html

[runciter]

This is a speech not made by Gordon Brown.

"I know that this has been a difficult summer.

These sacrifices that have hurt so many families in our country are ones that the whole of Britain will want to acknowledge.

The campaign in Afghanistan is a patriotic duty.

The USA needs to keep the heroin flowing into Europe.

Heroin profits help to finance the CIA's terrorist operations.

The USA needs military bases in Afghanistan, because Afghanistan is next door to Iran, Pakistan, China and other countries that we want to destabilise.

To the north of Afghanistan lie huge quantities of oil and gas.

We want to control the oil, the gas and the pipelines.

When it comes to the threat of terrorist attacks on the streets of Britain, just remember that Britain has a long history of arming and using militant Moslem groups to carry out acts of terrorism.

Britain used militant Moslems in Sumatra to undermine Sukarno.

Britain used the Moslem Brotherhood to undermine nationalists in Egypt, Syria and Iran.

Some of Bin Laden's mujahideen trained in Britain.

And the so-called mastermind of the London tube bombings, Mr Aswat, apparently worked for MI6 in the Balkans.

Our troops are making progress as they attempt to turn Afghanistan into an American colony.

And what about all these Pakis in your neighbourhood?

I can assure you that they are useful as cheap labour; and they mainly vote for Labour.

Some of our leading councillors are Pakis and some have done very well financially, thanks to us.

Remember to fly the flag."

That was a speech not made by Gordon Brown.

http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2009/07/campaign-in-afghanistan-is-patriotic.html

[runciter]

Thursday, 30 July 2009

Afghan War in UK 'National Interest', Lies Rothschild Zionist Miliband

http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/July_2009/fazaeli-fatemeh20090729145222843.jpg

'The UK foreign secretary says the presence of the country's military in Afghanistan is in Britain's national interest, while in opinion polls a majority of Britons favor a pull-out. "This mission is in Britain's national security interest," Foreign Secretary David Miliband told the American PBS television on Tuesday.

His comments come only hours after a new poll, published by The Independent revealed that the majority of Britons have lost their confidence in the UK's involvement in the Afghan war, urging the troops' immediate withdrawal. Miliband however, turned a blind eye to the nationwide demand, stressing that the 42-member international military coalition must remain in Afghanistan until Afghan security forces can take over.'

Read more... (http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=101920&sectionid=351020601)

http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/25428/48/