revive MKultra 1988 new tech by George H.W. Bush

[deca]

I have to check this PDF out
I have just noticed it been newly added
I can`t believe its being admitted !!!!!!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA
On July 18, 2009, the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Investigations was provided with details regarding a secret CIA program which was concealed from Congress under orders from Dick Cheney, and show that new technology which emerged in 1988 caused George H.W. Bush to revive the 1950's era MKULTRA programCongressional Disclosure. pdf http://www.larsonmedia.net/special_access/sa_docs/2009_HPSCI_CIA_Schakowsky.pdf

[deca]

from the above PDF

I am writing to disclose information relevant to the investigation of CIA program activities and
disclosure mandates led by House Intelligence Subcommittee on Investigations & Oversight
Chairwoman Jan Schakowsky. I possess documents and information that I believe will be of significant
value during these proceedings and I wish to make this information available to the Committee and
cooperate in any manner deemed appropriate.
First, I wish to state that nobody wants to deny the intelligence community the tools which are needed
to keep our nation safe. Second, right and wrong is not a partisan issue, it is one of integrity and high
ideals that are core values to our nation since its inception. Third, there is growing opinion that
Congress has abrogated their duty and mandate as a check and balance, has authorized programs
without even knowing the full extent of the polices or scrutinizing their necessity, and this has caused
innocent U.S. Citizens to suffer as a result. For all of these reasons, this investigation is necessary and
information obtained during these proceedings will not only lead to a nation which is safer and more
secure, but will also be invaluable moving forward in regards to authoring future legislation. There
should be no further debate as to the need for such proceedings as the argument is futile whenCongress remains completely in the dark about the activities taking place under a secret program and
is being lied to regarding when the program began. Most importantly, these proceedings must be
pursued with a genuine desire for change and this requires disclosure. Congress cannot continue to
legislate from a position of ignorance.
For informational purposes, I am an American Citizen who has never held a passport, I was confirmed
by California Secretary of State Deborah Bowen as a write-in candidate during 2008 Presidential
Primary election proceedings, am currently elected as Vice President of the Flamingo Heights
Community Association, I am an active member of the Elks, a FCC licensed amateur radio operator
KI6JJN, and have carried the Marine Corp League flag in recent Memorial Day and Veterans Day
parades. I have never been convicted of a felony or drug charge and have never caused bodily harm
to another person in my entire lifetime. My father served in WWII, my mother retired after 20 years in
the Veteran's Administration, and these facts are verifiable public record. The information, material
and documents in my possession were obtained through an informal relationship with contract
personnel, my direct involvement as a research subject during early development of the intellectual
property that is the basis of the secret program, and more than 10 years of research, investigation,
FOIA disclosures, and correspondence with agency personnel. I am able to provide the Committee
with information including when contracts were initiated, who administered the contracts, activities that
took place underneath the top-cover, what resources came from other federal agencies, how portions
of intellectual property have been used to deceptively within the IC itself, and most significantly, what
mechanisms failed and caused intelligence personnel to jeopardize national security due to misaligned
efforts to conceal their criminal acts. This information is reliable source, includes copies of contracts,
grant applications (including those dated prior to September 11, 2001), mandatory progress reports
provided from contractor personnel to program managers, internal e-mail communications obtained via
FOIA provisions, court testimony and transcripts from civil proceedings, and other materials. Congress
has no excuse to remain in the dark about these activities.
Because I am unsure of the authority and scope of the Committee's investigation, and because
previous disclosures to Congress have been obstructed by CIA personnel, I will rely on direction from
Chairwoman Schakowsky and her staff in determining what disclosures are appropriate and the proper
procedure for submitting documents. In the absence of such direction, I proceed here with minimal
information that does not directly cite sources and methods or the identities of personnel.
1. The program has been active for over a decade. Media reports including a recent New York
Times article1 have stated “Several members of Congress said the program, begun in the
immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, involved creating a capability that
was never used”. I wish to make perfectly clear that this claim is erroneous. Contract personnel
whom I have communicated with have been under contract to develop “The Program” technology
since 1989, it was viable in 1994 as demonstrated in a documented feasibility trial2, and portions
were mature and refined when George W. Bush was inaugurated in 2000.
2. The technology which is the basis of the secret program has been funded under carve-out
contracts using appropriations allocated by Congress to the National Institutes of Health, NINDS
(1989 to 1999), NICHD (2000-2003), and more recently, the NIBIB and DARPA. In March of
2000 under the Bush Administration, NIH funds appropriated by Congress for Children's Health
research initiatives were being dispersed to DARPA Program Managers who were appointed full
time in Arlington, and who failed to disclose any DOD affiliations on grant applications (copies
upon request). In these instances, the GAO was prohibited from taking any action on submitted
1 “C.I.A. Reviewing Its Process for Briefing Congress” - New York Times, Scott Shane - published Online July 9, 2009 and in print on
July 10, 2009 on page A16 of the New York edition.
2 Citation available upon request. The results of the feasibility trial did appear in a medical journal, however not until 2 years later and
in a redacted form that omitted selected technological achievements.

[deca]

What have TI`s being telling you!!!!


4. Of paramount importance in crafting current and future legislation, the committee must possess
knowledge of the most basic policies and procedures of this program. Without it, Congress will
continue to legislate from a position of complete ignorance. These policies include the following:
a) Deployment of the technology is dependent on the legal framework of a “rendition” to
accommodate temporary and physical bodily access to the person, but the affected person
is not transported geographically. Obama has retained the rendition policy because this
tool cannot be deployed without it. This disclosure is necessary.
b) Under the Bush Administration, anyone affected by the technology has been designated as
a “ghost” detainee, however they are not in physical custody, and after deployment, are
free to roam in the United States or elsewhere. This is relative to the legal language
describing a detainee as “in the custody of, or otherwise under the effective control of...”.
The committee should also seek to define what current policy is as the Obama
Administration announcement regarding closure of “overseas ghost sites” was parsed with
the word “overseas”, and leaves open the possibility for“domestic” use of this mechanism.
This complicates statute significantly because designation as a “detainee” does not require
the individual to be physically in custody, but merely “under the effective control of”.
c) The technology of the secret program uses FCC regulated spectrum as well as TCP/IP
connectivity and is capable of both monitoring the activities of the target, but additionally,
significant physical abuse and torture may also be administered remotely.
Congress cannot legislate from the dark. Existing legislature contained in the Intelligence
Authorization Act 2010 clearly shows Congress is not being provided with the information
necessary to legislate effectively or coherently. The failure to disclose these policies forces


6. Documents in my possession provide compelling factual evidence that proves the secret CIA
program is primarily a domestic program, not a program initiated to target terrorists, and not
initiated after 9/11. Regardless of any claimed overseas or terrorism related directives, the Bush
Administration has targeted Americans with no link to terrorism, including members of the media,
and in some instances, for partisan political purpose in a manner far more sinister than the
Watergate scandal. The claim that the program was initiated post 9/11 and to target Bin Laden is
deceptive top-cover and the committee should defund the agency until it stops being blatantly
lied to. There is considerable evidence substantiating the domestic directive is primary and
includes rule changes made at the Federal Communications Commission to accommodate the

[ricko]

Dirty Government filth.

[deca]

more

order to advance research efforts into an “operational” phase. Personnel have stated in research
progress reports and elsewhere that 1000 research subjects would be needed in order to
quantify variables and to refine parameters across a multitude of races, genders, ethnicity and
ages. While this is a provable fact supported with reports and patent applications of contract
personnel (available upon request), it is my allegation and well founded belief that this fact is
relevant to the CIA Tapes scandal. Notably, any use of Prisoners of War as research subjects
constitutes war crimes and is violative of international law. The administration has sought to
assert that prisoners captured in the current war are not POW's, but rather, are "detainees" and
are somehow different than POW's. Also notable is the report issued by the Red Cross which
found that CIA Medical personnel are complicit and active in acts of torture, and were not used
in a humanitarian role. More evidence exists and includes statements from Samuel Provance, a
U.S. Army Intelligence Officer who had access to the hard-site at Abu Ghraib as a network
computer technician. Provance is quoted in an interview3 and in Congressional testimony4:
“In early October, several weeks after Major General Geoffrey D. Miller, U.S. Army commander of
the Joint Task Force Guantanamo visited the prison, boxes of electronic equipment were shipped
to the prison. "Computers started coming in, and they just never stopped coming," says Provance.
"Brand-new, state-of-the-art desktops, laptops. But there were still no lights in the guardhouse...'"
“In discussions I had with some of my colleagues, brutal treatment of the detainees was justified
by the fact that they were “the enemy” and that they “belonged here.” But to my surprise, I learned
that a large number of the detainees had no business being there at all. SSG Schuster, who
worked in the outprocessing office, told me that most of the detainees had just been picked up in
sweeps for no particular reason, and that some of them weren’t even being tracked or registered.
She also said they were all being kept

There is a behavior modification element of the program technology that is contrary to the
interests of the United States and of questionable value either domestically or when deployed on
detainees. There is no top cover for this one, and Congress cannot continue to abrogate their
oversight responsibilities. Failure of the Committee to conduct oversight of this element could be
catastrophic. The focal of the program's behavior modification element is the ability to provoke
extreme rage and violent acts. This technology has been deployed domestically with violent
results and if such technology has been deployed upon detainees previously released (or will be
released) from Gitmo, it could be used to exert control over insurgent violence and explains the
behavior of suicide bombers in a manner more believable than the current religious theme. The
use of the technology in this manner places the lives of our enlisted in danger for no other reason
than political agenda. Such an activity, while being repulsive, could support administration war
policies, prolong expanded authority, could even be used secretly by the past administration, and
inexplicably, is not inconsistent with the CIA's long history of hiding acts that if made known,
would be found far too sickening to tolerate. I am able to provide detailed progress reports and
patent applications which detail the increased rage and promiscuity resultant from deployment of
the technology in a behavior modification role upon request, as I fear that enclosing it here will
permit CIA personnel to compromise these communications to the committee. I have the
evidence, am willing to provide it, and failure by the Committee to obtain complete disclosure of
this program element needlessly places the lives of civilians and enlisted in harm's way. It should
also be noted that concealing this element of the program, even from CIA personnel or
contractors complicit or active in deployment of the technology, is possible and would be entirely
consistent with past CIA acts of secrecy where only a minimal number of components are made
aware of this element. Congress cannot permit the CIA to function or exist for the purpose of
maintaining or prolonging the existence of expanded executive power, just because the CIA will
lose the ability to deploy the technology domestically without such expanded power. We as a
society, cannot allow intellectual property and the desire to deploy such intellectual property
domestically, to dictate whether we are at war and whether Citizens are entitled to the civil rights
and liberties of the U.S. Constitution, while we simultaneously pretend to be liberating Iraqi's.

[tracker]

Yeah , I also noticed on the 1st section of your second post , that a comment said "its not an matter of right and wrong".

yeah and we know why dont we ?


because its sooooooooooo wrong !

yeah and then they quickly skipped past that to say how its a matter of integrity etc and keeping folks safe .

:eek:

well it doesnt keep us safe from TPTB who make this happen does it ?:rolleyes:

let alone keep us safe from the mind games and life manipulation games they play on folks .

:cool:

[deca]

more

Conducting such programs (sometimes for decades) without any disclosure to Congress, and
which use innocent civilians as research subjects is not a new activity for the CIA. For example,
on April 3 1953, acting Deputy Director/Plans of the CIA, Richard Helms, sent a memorandum to
then DCI, Allen W. Dulles, authorizing the “MKULTRA” program in which the CIA "Technical
Services Division" (TSD) pursued research and development of chemical and biological
materials "capable of clandestine operations to control human behavior". In 1963, CIA Inspector
General J.S. Earman conducted a review of the program activities and the resulting report5 was
not discovered until 1974, and would likely not have surfaced at all without the commissions
established to investigate in the wake of the Nixon era "Watergate" scandal. The findings
contained in the 1963 report include:
a) "...initiated a program for covert testing of materials on unwitting U.S. Citizens" (pg.7)
b) “...devices for remote measurement of physiological processes" (pg.22)
c) "...places the rights and interests of U.S. Citizens in jeopardy" (pg.2)
d) “...reviews the rationale and risks attending this activity and recommends termination of such
testing in the United States” (pg.7)
e) “...In protecting the sensitive nature of the American intelligence capability to manipulate human
behavior, they apply "need to know" doctrine to their professional associates (pg.6)
f) “...records afforded no such approach to inspection. There are just two individuals in TSD who
have full substantive knowledge of the program and most of that is unrecorded” (pg.6)
g) "...Present practice is to maintain no records of the planning and approval of test programs"
h) “...used 20% of the CIA/TSD total annual R&D budget during a ten year span of the programs
existence” (pg.10)
i) “The research and development of materials capable of producing behavioral or physiological
change in humans is now performed within a highly elaborate and stabilized MKULTRAstructure... Annual grants of funds are made under ostensible research foundation auspices to
the specialists located in the public institutions“ (pg. 7)
j) "...the program is conducted through standing arrangements with specialists in universities
(and) private research institutions" (pg.7)
k) "...the final phase of testing of materials involves their application to unwitting subjects in
normal life settings.... the capabilities to produce disabling or discrediting effects cannot be
established solely through testing on volunteer populations..." (pg.10)
l) "officials also maintain close working relationships with local police authorities... (to) protect the
activity in critical situations" (pg.13)
m) "CIA/TSD initiated 144 projects relating to the control of human behavior during the ten years of
operation of the MKULTRA program" (pg.21)
n) "A significant limitation on the effectiveness of such testing is the infeasibility of performing
scientific observation of results" (pg.12)
o) “...evaluating the materials on different races, genders, ages, and nationalities was stated to be
"of great significance" and included "all social levels... high and low" (pg.12)
p) "...it does not follow that termination of covert testing of MKULTRA materials on unwitting U.S.
citizens will bring the program to a halt... Some testing on foreign nationals has been
occurring under the present arrangements" (pg.15)
q) "No effective cover story appears to be available" (pg.14)
r) "A test subject may on some occasion in the future, correctly attribute the cause of his reaction
and secure independent professional medical assistance in identifying the exact nature of the
(materials) employed, and by whom." "An extreme reaction could lead to (a) request for
cooperation from local authorities in suppressing information of the situation." "risks of
compromise and resulting damage to the CIA has led the Inspector General to recommend
termination of this phase... existing checks and balances do not afford senior command of CIA
adequate protection against the high risks involved" (pg.16)
Like the current program, the CIA claimed it "terminated" the MKULTRA program, however in a
1977 interview, 14 year CIA veteran Victor Marchetti specifically called the CIA claim of
terminating the program a "cover story". I wish to make perfectly clear to you that Congress is
continuing to be flat out lied to. The program has not been abandoned by CIA Director Panetta.
The technology and program activities continued this afternoon in the vicinity of China Lake
Naval Air Weapons Station in California. Further, the above findings from the 1963 CIA Inspector
General report clearly show that the CIA regularly engages in such acts, which include deceiving
Congress, hiding programs for decades behind alternate funding mechanisms, performing
biological research upon unwitting U.S. Citizens for development of behavior modification
capabilities, and operates with little concern for the life and civil liberties of U.S. citizens. This
report would also appear to be a prime example explaining why former DCI Hayden refused to
permit any review of the detainee practices by Inspector General John Helgerson. I would like to
remind the committee that this 1963 Inspector General report likely never would have surfaced
were it not for the committees established to investigate in the wake of the Nixon era Watergate
scandal. Lastly, the above report shows a level of foresight by IG Earman that is uncanny.
The above information raises serious concerns in how the CIA has been conducting these secret
activities there should be no doubt as to the need for this committee's investigation and the need for
disclosure.

[positivity]

holy shit!! so is this when someone goes out and shoots up a school or something like that they are under the control of the cia? this means they can penetrate there mind remotly and instruct them to kill or hurt or be hurt themselfs?? shit how the fuck is that possible???:mad:

[bobbydiva]

Wow I'm going to have to give this a deeper read.

[decim]

Brilliant find Deca.

[ging]

:eek:

I know about MKUltra but to read a document like that is so disturbing

[mikethepunk]

I have to check this PDF out
I have just noticed it been newly added
I can`t believe its being admitted !!!!!!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA

Thanks DECA! I just sent this document to a bunch of people over at The Alex Jones Show!

cheers!

[Ian2day]

I have to check this PDF out
I have just noticed it been newly added
I can`t believe its being admitted !!!!!!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA


On July 18, 2009, the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Investigations was provided with details regarding a secret CIA program which was concealed from Congress under orders from Dick Cheney, and show that new technology which emerged in 1988 caused George H.W. Bush to revive the 1950's era MKULTRA programCongressional Disclosure. pdf http://www.larsonmedia.net/special_a...Schakowsky.pdf (http://www.larsonmedia.net/special_access/sa_docs/2009_HPSCI_CIA_Schakowsky.pdf)


Strangely enough that was arround about the time that I had the idea for project bluebeam. What better person to use than the one who came up with the idea, and who just happened to also have DID. Also back then I lived next door to the guy who nicked the idea for Air bubbles in trainers from me. His son in law was a Nasa engineer and owns the patent for the nike air bubble. Jesus walked on water, I walk on air, Nike Air!

[ging]

Strangely enough that was arround about the time that I had the idea for project bluebeam. What better person to use than the one who came up with the idea, and who just happened to also have DID. Also back then I lived next door to the guy who nicked the idea for Air bubbles in trainers from me. His son in law was a Nasa engineer and owns the patent for the nike air bubble. Jesus walked on water, I walk on air, Nike Air!

?

What a strange and interesting life you lead, Ian. I remember in another post you stated that you wrote 'Hit me with your Rhythm Stick'

Busy man indeed.

[Ian2day]

What if the reunification of Germany was used as a deal clincher for the uniting of the CIA factions and NASA factions to agree on both supporting not Project Bluebeam but Prophet Bluebeam. To sell the CON to the world, they had to have their sworn enemy on board. Sort of validate it so that the other nations of the world would believe and go along with the deception.

[Ian2day]

?

What a strange and interesting life you lead, Ian. I remember in another post you stated that you wrote 'Hit me with your Rhythm Stick'

Busy man indeed.

I'm just a very imaginative and creative person. Unfortunately so far I have only ever met vultures and parasites sucking my creativity from me. I can hope and believe that I will meet someone who can balance my creativity with their business and administrative skills. Be the ying to my yang so to speak.

[ging]

I'm just a very imaginative and creative person. Unfortunately so far I have only ever met vultures and parasites sucking my creativity from me. I can hope and believe that I will meet someone who can balance my creativity with their business and administrative skills. Be the ying to my yang so to speak.

I see. Well, who am I to try and discredit a man I don't even know?

Best of luck to you, sir. :cool:

[redskywalker]

lol omg deca v.g find!
* * * * *
still reading but many thanks:D

[fetish_scientist]

holy shit!! so is this when someone goes out and shoots up a school or something like that they are under the control of the cia? this means they can penetrate there mind remotly and instruct them to kill or hurt or be hurt themselfs?? shit how the fuck is that possible???:mad:

one way is through the medications, like prozac