sandman
10-08-2007, 10:01 PM
Be Forewarned. What you will read over the next minute might give you nightmares.
It is rumored that a few days before 911, there were a number of maintenance men in coveralls doing maintenance checks on floors throughout the WTC buildings. There have been a few relatives of the WTC victims who have openly spoke about the victims making mention of an unusual amount of maintenance people performing inspections of the buildings just days prior to Sept 11th. Which of course would be a guise for implanting detonation explosives in the primary structure beams and elevator shafts. Controlled demolition was set up just days before the event and of course, this was an inside full-scale operation executed by personnel with high levels of trust and loyalty.
The men in guise as maintenance men were Afghanistan members trained in US military. Those who debate that 2 planes actually destroyed the Twin Towers or the WTC7 should reconsider listening to American firefighters who survived and made it out from the building describing the detonation blasts systematically blowing up from floor to floor. The planes were merely a sacrifice to distract witnesses from recognizing the implosions coming within the buildings from the bottom up as the internal structures of the buildings were systematically detonated. By watching the explosion of the plane impact high up, they would not notice the internal implosions from below systematically devastate the interior construction of the building prior to the detonation of the buildings.
The planes that were flown into the buildings were also previously tampered with to force automatic pilot override and was remotely controlled, catching the pilots and all crew and passengers off guard at the last seconds. Radio transmissions were interfered with, no mayday alerts made from the pilots were received by tower control. The transmissions of the hijacking were pre-recorded. The alleged cell phone call made by a passenger on the plane was apparently static and the word hijack was overheard. Hijack isn’t only possible by people, but by computers and technology. The WTC 7 also needed to be destroyed to cover up the evidence of the materials being transported days previously, which still remained from the operation.
In the event that the WTC destruction did not go as planned, and the obvious detonation of the buildings were known, the Muslim maintenance men theory would have still been part of the plot. The names of the so called hijackers (whom have been found alive elsewhere in the world unaware that their names were broadcast by US media as terrorists who died in the hijacking) would have been used as the maintenance men.
However, as the plan was successful. What was not prepared for was the firefighters who began doing what they are paid to do, and police were brought in to confront them and remove them from doing what they were paid to do. Why??? What’s to hide????
Professors have lost jobs over debating the government/media story, musicians have been boycotted by radio stations for merely questioning George Bush. Sound like the holocaust? Loose lips sink ships. Why charge people to debate government propaganda.
The question is why? After the first failed attempt on the Twin Towers in 1993 with fingers again pointed at a fictional Afghanistanian rebel by the Bush Sr admin, why did this attack get re-enacted again in 2001 under Bush Jr's admin? The answer is simple. The plan was stemming two decades ago to develop a transnational pipeline across the Middle East knowing the oils sands were rich in resources there. The plan was strategized between the elite members of Afghanistan, Great Britain, Israel, and the USA political administrations. To accomplish this, first there must be cooperation from a coastal community.....which was Israel, to give way for US military to safely approach land.
Next step is to conquer immediate interior regions of the coast, which is Syria and Iraq. We know that Syria has as well been instigated by Israel as an excuse to start a war with them. Of course, Iraq is now virtually under control, Syria is basically intimidated into submission, and now, only two more countries exist in the way between the coast of the Middle East and Afghanistan. The countries of Iran and Pakistan (just to the South of Afghanistan). Of course, we will see the US military attack Iran and Pakistan, gradually or immediately, no date is officially set until they feel the plan, the strategy, as well as the timing is right.
The plan to destroy the Trade Center was simple, as it was named the “World” Trade Center, key word being WORLD. The WTC was a symbol for international economic relations, and of course was situated on American soil. Objectively, the response was expected to garner mass rally support from US citizens to engage in war with whomever they fingered out as the terrorists. They also originally expected that the destruction of an internationally recognized structure would also garner support from the United Nations. This expectation of course backfired.
The plan was to finger point (fictional) Afghanistan rebels and then overtake the (fictional) terror threat on Afghanistan soil as a guise to start building the pipeline while beginning the campaign to work their way through the other Middle East countries. A very basic war game strategy. Finding a fictional Afghanistan rebel of the powerful Bin Laden family was fabricated as a means to begin placing US military personnel on Afghanistan grounds to begin the operation. Then next strategic step was conquering the land of Iraq, as this country is not nowhere near the size of Iran. So winning a war in the smaller central country between Afghanistan and the Western Coast was vital to American representation on land in the Middle East.
At this point today, they now have American military situated on both sides of Iran, the biggest country in this campaign. Syria and Pakistan are also bordering just around the countries they need to conquer in the Middle East to establish a transcontinental pipeline, so these two countries must also be strategically targeted during the campaign in order to keep them submissive during the takeover.
However, the key to success is Iran!!! They must overtake Iran to win the Middle East and develop the intercontinental pipeline from Afghanistan through to the coastal region of the Middle East, and inevitably be transported to Great Britain and the United States. It's a basic war game. Simple strategy, not overly creative. With support from a coastal entry point and the final position country on your side as an ally, you can attack between and target countries one by one towards the takeover of all countries between Israel and Afghanistan. Basic war game strategy. Milton Bradley and Hasbro gameplan.
Some of the political smoke and mirrors throughout this fictitious war.
How George Bush Jr left as a Governor to win Presidency when in fact the election was rigged by selected media companies to announce and promote GWB as the winner regardless of electoral counts that were officially posted. Of course, the Florida re-vote was a strategy to make everyone talk about Florida and not discuss the fact that numerous states had concerns regarding the official counts as opposed to the media reports.
Another issue was the day the WTC Towers were destroyed (September 11th was pre-discussed as the date because of the significance to the emergency phone number 911....again, very basic gameplan, nothing creative). Even GWB was so shocked the plan was underway, he couldn't respond for nearly ten minutes as he pretended to listen to little kids in a black community school. See Michael Moore’s movie Fahrenheit 911.
They knew the obvious date of the event and the PR campaign had to have him in a school was an innocent enough promotion of a caring President, or so they thought.
Another recognized problem was the need for Canadian support, which the Liberal Party Leaders of Canada did not provide. The wealthiest supporters of the Bush Jr admin privately financed support for a Conservative campaign to oust the Liberals and win the Canadian federal election where the new Prime Minister Stephen Harper would cooperate with the American agenda. American political parties have assisted other countries to elect Leaders that benefit the American cause, and Canada is no different.
The question of what is needed now with fledgling support from Americans in general is the question GWB admin political analysts are concerned with. The stories regarding weapons of mass destruction, the bouncing back and forth campaign regarding which country now poses the new terror threat from Syria, to Pakistan, to Iraq to Iran is overdone. Numerous people heard North Korea saying they have nuclear warheads that could reach the coastal region of California and even further in than California, yet the American political ring does nothing to combat a real and admitted terror threat of serious nature. So, people overall have become very skeptical. Even the soldiers themselves are questioning the plot of their presence in the Middle East?
So, what is next? How does the USA garner support from their countrymen to invade the biggest country in the war game puzzle? When other countries leaders are aware of the gameplan and are unwilling to actively participate in this war, how do they garner support for more troops from other countries to invade Iran,? The cooperative US, Great Britain, Israel and Afghanistan campaign is too close to turn back now. Iran represents the biggest problem with achieving this mandate? How do they get to finish the next step of this campaign if they can not get enough people to participate in the take over of Iran? If demolishing the Twin Towers and sacrificing thousands of people didn't get the desired results from Americans or the international community, what will gather support?
Here is a suggestion to ask yourself right now. Right or wrong, agree or disagree with the war in Iraq, like or dislike George Bush Jr, if an actual warhead missile destroyed all of New York in a single blast, and, was then collectively identified by numerous countries as coming from Iran, would it scare you into action?
Even though you know your own government is corrupted with tyranny, would the thought that you and your loved ones were under imminent attack influence you? Would an attack like this get your attention to fight alongside a dictator to protect those you love on your homeland? Would an attack against New York killing hundreds of thousands of fellow Americans instantly get you willing to enlist and go to Iran to eliminate the threat that could take your loved ones life in front of your eyes?
Now, the obvious oversight during a state of panic. Would the missile launched from the Middle East be coming from an Iranian enemy, or…. is it possible….a strike like this, would again be initiated by Afghanistan cooperatives, who would send the missile to the eastern coast of New York? A gameplan executed right from the edges of Iraq and Iran’s border, just close enough to Iranian borders to be claimed as being sent from Iran. Would this action be something achievable by a very few trusted top commands from the USA? Are the United States most loyal and trusted personnel attempting to set this plan up quietly while fraudulently pretending to be searching for nuclear warheads? Is it possible that the Afghanistan and US most loyal personnel have a nuclear warhead and the training to commandeer an attack on the Eastern coast of the United States? Is the same media who lied about the first Presidential election also lying about the plots of the US military in the Middle East? Is it possible? That’s the question.
In a state of fear for your loved ones, you may change your views. You might know the possibility exists that the American government co-conspired with Afghanistan allies to target their own people under the guise of enemy attack from Iran rebels. However, you will gladly adhere to American policy to fight in war when your own loved ones are under serious threat. You will most likely change your current views in a heartbeat.
Will you be willing to enlist into military and go to war against a fictional enemy if it means that YOUR OWN loved ones will be secure from terrorist attacks executed by a foreign government, or……………………..even your own government.
So, I ask you, what must now be coming to influence a rally of mass support? And what day would an event like this best take place? One hint: Happy Anniversary.
Sandman / Juryroll.com
It is rumored that a few days before 911, there were a number of maintenance men in coveralls doing maintenance checks on floors throughout the WTC buildings. There have been a few relatives of the WTC victims who have openly spoke about the victims making mention of an unusual amount of maintenance people performing inspections of the buildings just days prior to Sept 11th. Which of course would be a guise for implanting detonation explosives in the primary structure beams and elevator shafts. Controlled demolition was set up just days before the event and of course, this was an inside full-scale operation executed by personnel with high levels of trust and loyalty.
The men in guise as maintenance men were Afghanistan members trained in US military. Those who debate that 2 planes actually destroyed the Twin Towers or the WTC7 should reconsider listening to American firefighters who survived and made it out from the building describing the detonation blasts systematically blowing up from floor to floor. The planes were merely a sacrifice to distract witnesses from recognizing the implosions coming within the buildings from the bottom up as the internal structures of the buildings were systematically detonated. By watching the explosion of the plane impact high up, they would not notice the internal implosions from below systematically devastate the interior construction of the building prior to the detonation of the buildings.
The planes that were flown into the buildings were also previously tampered with to force automatic pilot override and was remotely controlled, catching the pilots and all crew and passengers off guard at the last seconds. Radio transmissions were interfered with, no mayday alerts made from the pilots were received by tower control. The transmissions of the hijacking were pre-recorded. The alleged cell phone call made by a passenger on the plane was apparently static and the word hijack was overheard. Hijack isn’t only possible by people, but by computers and technology. The WTC 7 also needed to be destroyed to cover up the evidence of the materials being transported days previously, which still remained from the operation.
In the event that the WTC destruction did not go as planned, and the obvious detonation of the buildings were known, the Muslim maintenance men theory would have still been part of the plot. The names of the so called hijackers (whom have been found alive elsewhere in the world unaware that their names were broadcast by US media as terrorists who died in the hijacking) would have been used as the maintenance men.
However, as the plan was successful. What was not prepared for was the firefighters who began doing what they are paid to do, and police were brought in to confront them and remove them from doing what they were paid to do. Why??? What’s to hide????
Professors have lost jobs over debating the government/media story, musicians have been boycotted by radio stations for merely questioning George Bush. Sound like the holocaust? Loose lips sink ships. Why charge people to debate government propaganda.
The question is why? After the first failed attempt on the Twin Towers in 1993 with fingers again pointed at a fictional Afghanistanian rebel by the Bush Sr admin, why did this attack get re-enacted again in 2001 under Bush Jr's admin? The answer is simple. The plan was stemming two decades ago to develop a transnational pipeline across the Middle East knowing the oils sands were rich in resources there. The plan was strategized between the elite members of Afghanistan, Great Britain, Israel, and the USA political administrations. To accomplish this, first there must be cooperation from a coastal community.....which was Israel, to give way for US military to safely approach land.
Next step is to conquer immediate interior regions of the coast, which is Syria and Iraq. We know that Syria has as well been instigated by Israel as an excuse to start a war with them. Of course, Iraq is now virtually under control, Syria is basically intimidated into submission, and now, only two more countries exist in the way between the coast of the Middle East and Afghanistan. The countries of Iran and Pakistan (just to the South of Afghanistan). Of course, we will see the US military attack Iran and Pakistan, gradually or immediately, no date is officially set until they feel the plan, the strategy, as well as the timing is right.
The plan to destroy the Trade Center was simple, as it was named the “World” Trade Center, key word being WORLD. The WTC was a symbol for international economic relations, and of course was situated on American soil. Objectively, the response was expected to garner mass rally support from US citizens to engage in war with whomever they fingered out as the terrorists. They also originally expected that the destruction of an internationally recognized structure would also garner support from the United Nations. This expectation of course backfired.
The plan was to finger point (fictional) Afghanistan rebels and then overtake the (fictional) terror threat on Afghanistan soil as a guise to start building the pipeline while beginning the campaign to work their way through the other Middle East countries. A very basic war game strategy. Finding a fictional Afghanistan rebel of the powerful Bin Laden family was fabricated as a means to begin placing US military personnel on Afghanistan grounds to begin the operation. Then next strategic step was conquering the land of Iraq, as this country is not nowhere near the size of Iran. So winning a war in the smaller central country between Afghanistan and the Western Coast was vital to American representation on land in the Middle East.
At this point today, they now have American military situated on both sides of Iran, the biggest country in this campaign. Syria and Pakistan are also bordering just around the countries they need to conquer in the Middle East to establish a transcontinental pipeline, so these two countries must also be strategically targeted during the campaign in order to keep them submissive during the takeover.
However, the key to success is Iran!!! They must overtake Iran to win the Middle East and develop the intercontinental pipeline from Afghanistan through to the coastal region of the Middle East, and inevitably be transported to Great Britain and the United States. It's a basic war game. Simple strategy, not overly creative. With support from a coastal entry point and the final position country on your side as an ally, you can attack between and target countries one by one towards the takeover of all countries between Israel and Afghanistan. Basic war game strategy. Milton Bradley and Hasbro gameplan.
Some of the political smoke and mirrors throughout this fictitious war.
How George Bush Jr left as a Governor to win Presidency when in fact the election was rigged by selected media companies to announce and promote GWB as the winner regardless of electoral counts that were officially posted. Of course, the Florida re-vote was a strategy to make everyone talk about Florida and not discuss the fact that numerous states had concerns regarding the official counts as opposed to the media reports.
Another issue was the day the WTC Towers were destroyed (September 11th was pre-discussed as the date because of the significance to the emergency phone number 911....again, very basic gameplan, nothing creative). Even GWB was so shocked the plan was underway, he couldn't respond for nearly ten minutes as he pretended to listen to little kids in a black community school. See Michael Moore’s movie Fahrenheit 911.
They knew the obvious date of the event and the PR campaign had to have him in a school was an innocent enough promotion of a caring President, or so they thought.
Another recognized problem was the need for Canadian support, which the Liberal Party Leaders of Canada did not provide. The wealthiest supporters of the Bush Jr admin privately financed support for a Conservative campaign to oust the Liberals and win the Canadian federal election where the new Prime Minister Stephen Harper would cooperate with the American agenda. American political parties have assisted other countries to elect Leaders that benefit the American cause, and Canada is no different.
The question of what is needed now with fledgling support from Americans in general is the question GWB admin political analysts are concerned with. The stories regarding weapons of mass destruction, the bouncing back and forth campaign regarding which country now poses the new terror threat from Syria, to Pakistan, to Iraq to Iran is overdone. Numerous people heard North Korea saying they have nuclear warheads that could reach the coastal region of California and even further in than California, yet the American political ring does nothing to combat a real and admitted terror threat of serious nature. So, people overall have become very skeptical. Even the soldiers themselves are questioning the plot of their presence in the Middle East?
So, what is next? How does the USA garner support from their countrymen to invade the biggest country in the war game puzzle? When other countries leaders are aware of the gameplan and are unwilling to actively participate in this war, how do they garner support for more troops from other countries to invade Iran,? The cooperative US, Great Britain, Israel and Afghanistan campaign is too close to turn back now. Iran represents the biggest problem with achieving this mandate? How do they get to finish the next step of this campaign if they can not get enough people to participate in the take over of Iran? If demolishing the Twin Towers and sacrificing thousands of people didn't get the desired results from Americans or the international community, what will gather support?
Here is a suggestion to ask yourself right now. Right or wrong, agree or disagree with the war in Iraq, like or dislike George Bush Jr, if an actual warhead missile destroyed all of New York in a single blast, and, was then collectively identified by numerous countries as coming from Iran, would it scare you into action?
Even though you know your own government is corrupted with tyranny, would the thought that you and your loved ones were under imminent attack influence you? Would an attack like this get your attention to fight alongside a dictator to protect those you love on your homeland? Would an attack against New York killing hundreds of thousands of fellow Americans instantly get you willing to enlist and go to Iran to eliminate the threat that could take your loved ones life in front of your eyes?
Now, the obvious oversight during a state of panic. Would the missile launched from the Middle East be coming from an Iranian enemy, or…. is it possible….a strike like this, would again be initiated by Afghanistan cooperatives, who would send the missile to the eastern coast of New York? A gameplan executed right from the edges of Iraq and Iran’s border, just close enough to Iranian borders to be claimed as being sent from Iran. Would this action be something achievable by a very few trusted top commands from the USA? Are the United States most loyal and trusted personnel attempting to set this plan up quietly while fraudulently pretending to be searching for nuclear warheads? Is it possible that the Afghanistan and US most loyal personnel have a nuclear warhead and the training to commandeer an attack on the Eastern coast of the United States? Is the same media who lied about the first Presidential election also lying about the plots of the US military in the Middle East? Is it possible? That’s the question.
In a state of fear for your loved ones, you may change your views. You might know the possibility exists that the American government co-conspired with Afghanistan allies to target their own people under the guise of enemy attack from Iran rebels. However, you will gladly adhere to American policy to fight in war when your own loved ones are under serious threat. You will most likely change your current views in a heartbeat.
Will you be willing to enlist into military and go to war against a fictional enemy if it means that YOUR OWN loved ones will be secure from terrorist attacks executed by a foreign government, or……………………..even your own government.
So, I ask you, what must now be coming to influence a rally of mass support? And what day would an event like this best take place? One hint: Happy Anniversary.
Sandman / Juryroll.com