tjohn
19-07-2009, 07:54 AM
Got the following email a few days ago.
.........................
For more information on Reinvestigate 911 go to www.reinvestigate911.org
16 July 2009
REINVESTIGATE 911 BREAKS INTO PARLIAMENT
In a breakthrough for campaigners, a meeting has been held in the new Parliamentary extension Portcullis House at which speakers challenged the official story of the 9/11 attacks. This was the first time since the attacks nearly eight years ago that MPs and Peers heard - on their own premises - the widespread view outside it: that 9/11 might have been an inside job.
A follow up meeting is pencilled in for November 2. Reinvestigate 911 is calling for members of the public to alert their MPs to this and ask them to attend.
A previous meeting was abandoned after the MP who had booked the room cancelled at short notice, after apparently being pressured. One UK based intelligence expert and 9/11 sceptic who frequently addresses academic audiences described the meeting as a breakthrough.
Only a few MPs and Peers attended the meeting in person, but others sent assistants, gave support for future meetings or asked for a report of the meeting. This includes well known and senior figures, but to protect politicians from the predictable attacks and smears from those who support the official 9/11 story, organisers are not releasing names at this stage.
November 2 is pencilled in for a follow up meeting, with foreign politicians and experts expected to attend. In the runup to that meeting Reinvestigate 911 will be exploring with sympathetic MPs and Peers various plans for raising Parliamentary and media interest in discovering the full story behind the 9/11 attacks.
The meeting on Monday July 6 was addressed by Ian Neal and Ian Henshall, co-ordinators of Reinvestigate 911, and Neils Harrit an associate Chemisry professor from the University of Copenhagen. Ian Neal said that 9/11 was more relevant than ever as the war in Afghanistan grinds on, governments continue to demand more surveillance powers, and torture by the CIA and its allies continues to go unpunished. All these abuses are, politicians argue, justified by the 9/11 attacks.
Ian Henshall said that Reinvestigate 911 is calling for a genuinely independent investigation and does not speculate as to what the full 9/11 story may turn out to be. He listed a large number of failings and omissions by the official 9/11 Commission many of which have led to alternative theories. Because the evidence field for the 9/11 attacks is so broad, he was confident the case could be solved fairly quickly by a body with the right powers. As an example he cited the body proposed by the current New York referendum initiative.
Neils Harrit said that he had published around 60 chemistry papers in top journals over the last 40 years. When he saw video of WTC building 7 collapsing in a few seconds symmetrically into its own footprint, he became suspicious and set out to examine the dust for signs of a controlled demolition. After months of intense peer review he and seven other researchers have published their findings: tiny iron spheres and other microscopic particles which, pending an alternative explanation, point strongly to advanced thermite based materials and temperatures far in excess of any office of kerosene based fire.
---------------------------------------
Ian Henshall
.........................
For more information on Reinvestigate 911 go to www.reinvestigate911.org
16 July 2009
REINVESTIGATE 911 BREAKS INTO PARLIAMENT
In a breakthrough for campaigners, a meeting has been held in the new Parliamentary extension Portcullis House at which speakers challenged the official story of the 9/11 attacks. This was the first time since the attacks nearly eight years ago that MPs and Peers heard - on their own premises - the widespread view outside it: that 9/11 might have been an inside job.
A follow up meeting is pencilled in for November 2. Reinvestigate 911 is calling for members of the public to alert their MPs to this and ask them to attend.
A previous meeting was abandoned after the MP who had booked the room cancelled at short notice, after apparently being pressured. One UK based intelligence expert and 9/11 sceptic who frequently addresses academic audiences described the meeting as a breakthrough.
Only a few MPs and Peers attended the meeting in person, but others sent assistants, gave support for future meetings or asked for a report of the meeting. This includes well known and senior figures, but to protect politicians from the predictable attacks and smears from those who support the official 9/11 story, organisers are not releasing names at this stage.
November 2 is pencilled in for a follow up meeting, with foreign politicians and experts expected to attend. In the runup to that meeting Reinvestigate 911 will be exploring with sympathetic MPs and Peers various plans for raising Parliamentary and media interest in discovering the full story behind the 9/11 attacks.
The meeting on Monday July 6 was addressed by Ian Neal and Ian Henshall, co-ordinators of Reinvestigate 911, and Neils Harrit an associate Chemisry professor from the University of Copenhagen. Ian Neal said that 9/11 was more relevant than ever as the war in Afghanistan grinds on, governments continue to demand more surveillance powers, and torture by the CIA and its allies continues to go unpunished. All these abuses are, politicians argue, justified by the 9/11 attacks.
Ian Henshall said that Reinvestigate 911 is calling for a genuinely independent investigation and does not speculate as to what the full 9/11 story may turn out to be. He listed a large number of failings and omissions by the official 9/11 Commission many of which have led to alternative theories. Because the evidence field for the 9/11 attacks is so broad, he was confident the case could be solved fairly quickly by a body with the right powers. As an example he cited the body proposed by the current New York referendum initiative.
Neils Harrit said that he had published around 60 chemistry papers in top journals over the last 40 years. When he saw video of WTC building 7 collapsing in a few seconds symmetrically into its own footprint, he became suspicious and set out to examine the dust for signs of a controlled demolition. After months of intense peer review he and seven other researchers have published their findings: tiny iron spheres and other microscopic particles which, pending an alternative explanation, point strongly to advanced thermite based materials and temperatures far in excess of any office of kerosene based fire.
---------------------------------------
Ian Henshall