View Full Version : Aaron Russo- Why did Rockefeller tell him so much?
anoninnyc
07-07-2009, 03:02 AM
I believe everything Russo said, but wonder why Nicholas Rockefeller would have told him all of this? He even said not everyone who is in the Council of Foreign Relations knows. Why him?
lizzy
07-07-2009, 03:15 AM
I think he thought AR would be a good nwo advocate, perhaps he genuinely liked AR and wanted a fellow jew to have a slice of the action.....
Rockerfella under-estimated his humanity.;)
edit.....it also crossed my mind a while back that R might have 'fancied' AR.....but that was just a fleeting thought, because i wondered the same as you a couple of years back. I have also wondered if AR's rejection of this offer had anything to do with this 'onset' of his rapid cancer.
supertzar
07-07-2009, 03:30 AM
It's called hubris. Fatal overconfidence. :)
anoninnyc
07-07-2009, 03:34 AM
thank you both for your input. you are both right.
lizzy
07-07-2009, 03:39 AM
It's called hubris. Fatal overconfidence. :)
Died a hero.
bendoon
07-07-2009, 03:42 AM
Its part of the rules, they have to let us know what they are doing, then if we go along anyway it absolves them of guilt. Thats why they let Alex Jones into Bohemia Grove. Thats why they give advance notification of events like 9/11 and 7/7 in movie posters. Wether people are aware enough to see these warnings is not their problem, they have kept their end of the rules.
Just my opinion.
measle_weasel
07-07-2009, 03:47 AM
Its part of the rules, they have to let us know what they are doing, then if we go along anyway it absolves them of guilt. Thats why they let Alex Jones into Bohemia Grove. Thats why they give advance notification of events like 9/11 and 7/7 in movie posters. Wether people are aware enough to see these warnings is not their problem, they have kept their end of the rules.
Just my opinion.
I dont remember agreeing to any set of rules... what rules are we supposedly playing by?
bendoon
07-07-2009, 03:50 AM
I dont remember agreeing to any set of rules... what rules are we supposedly playing by?
You are just a pawn, its only the players that get the rules. Your job is to figure out who the players are and what they intend to do with you and why.
lizzy
07-07-2009, 03:55 AM
I think bendoon is talking about the fact that they supposed to make known their intentions by some law somewhere......but one has to dig for it , know how to read between the lines..most of what we exchange here is just that type of info.......
But I don't know if that is what AR was doing intentionally......I would perfer to believe he was exposing but perhaps this can be also contrused / considered as "publishing' too.
thoughtonfire
07-07-2009, 03:55 AM
http://www.gelame.com/Impossible%20Objects/photos/Illusion-Chess-Board.jpg
lizzy
07-07-2009, 03:56 AM
You are just a pawn, its only the players that get the rules. Your job is to figure out who the players are and what they intend to do with you and why.
yup, that's a given bendoon..we are not even pawns, we are less than that to them......
measle_weasel
07-07-2009, 04:13 AM
You are just a pawn, its only the players that get the rules. Your job is to figure out who the players are and what they intend to do with you and why.
Who are the "players" on our side, then?
angelx777
07-07-2009, 04:22 AM
he didn't tell him everything, then how otherwise he would have died of chemo scam
Its part of the rules, they have to let us know what they are doing, then if we go along anyway it absolves them of guilt. Thats why they let Alex Jones into Bohemia Grove. Thats why they give advance notification of events like 9/11 and 7/7 in movie posters. Wether people are aware enough to see these warnings is not their problem, they have kept their end of the rules.
Just my opinion.
this blew me away
thanks!!!
They may have a set of rules for each other but I doubt they have a set of rules for us. They don't have to show us shit and we only recognize it after an event so whats the point. Thats just there way of having a laugh at us not set of rules.
fekdemasons
07-07-2009, 01:24 PM
Its part of the rules, they have to let us know what they are doing, then if we go along anyway it absolves them of guilt. Thats why they let Alex Jones into Bohemia Grove. Thats why they give advance notification of events like 9/11 and 7/7 in movie posters. Wether people are aware enough to see these warnings is not their problem, they have kept their end of the rules.
Just my opinion.
In another thread a while ago the movie independence day was discussed.
In one scene Jeff Goldbloom is on board Airforce one with the President. The camera points to the clock on his laptop which surprise , surprise shows the time at 9.11 am.
Meant nothing at the time but it was a method of planting the warning. As you say , follow the rules.
rosix
07-07-2009, 01:27 PM
what bendoon has referenced is what I believe to be right - apart from the fact that it gets sheeple to think like this:
"OH FUCK OFF IF THEY REALLY WERE SO EVIL AND HAD REALLY CONCOCTED SUCH A SICK MASTER PLAN THEN WHY DO THEY DROP ALL THESE 'HINTS' THEN MATE?? YOU'RE BARMY!"
lizzy
07-07-2009, 02:31 PM
http://www.gelame.com/Impossible%20Objects/photos/Illusion-Chess-Board.jpg
thankyou thoughtonfire...Zbigniew Brezezinski's.......The Grand Chessboard is a perfect example of the elite pyschopaths disclosure of their plans.
lizzy
07-07-2009, 02:33 PM
what bendoon has referenced is what I believe to be right - apart from the fact that it gets sheeple to think like this:
"OH FUCK OFF IF THEY REALLY WERE SO EVIL AND HAD REALLY CONCOCTED SUCH A SICK MASTER PLAN THEN WHY DO THEY DROP ALL THESE 'HINTS' THEN MATE?? YOU'RE BARMY!"
hi roxix.....yup, they have the herd at every turn......
bendoon
07-07-2009, 03:03 PM
Who are the "players" on our side, then?
That would depend who's side you are on, you have the choice, not them.
the itinerant shrubber
07-07-2009, 03:10 PM
They know we're apathetic and stupid and that we get all our information via the TV. It doesnt matter who he tells.
Is the Russo interview ever going to be put on TV or published in a newspaper? Course not.
No worries.
januspolanski
07-07-2009, 03:14 PM
Maybe they made a mistake. Maybe they are not so perfect and all knowing like they'd have us believe.
They've underestimated people's intelligence in carrying out 911 and thought people too stupid to wake up to their game but it's happening everywhere.
911 was probably so tempting for them taht they couldnt help do it. With that one event they've been able to do so many things.
Invade Iraq and Afghanistan stealing the Oil?Opium and profiting immensly through companies like Haliburton.
Secured their pipeline from Caspian Sea.
Squashed all the evidence from the $2.3 trillion dollars gone missing.
Etc etc etc
911 will be their downfall.
Maybe the elite aren't so smart and perfect with all these subplots that some here would have us believe.
song_of_susannah
07-07-2009, 04:04 PM
They like laughing at us, they consider us dumb cattle, blind and ignorant to their devious schemes, hence the term eyes wide shut. They know most people can't see for looking and even when shown won't believe it anyway.
Unfortunately the majority of the population refuse to move out of their comfort zones and do some serious thinking.
rosix
07-07-2009, 04:49 PM
they didn't necessarily underestimate "us" with regards to 911 - maybe there was some deciding somewhere that they needed to give more 'clues' and/or more obvious ones. What's more likely is that they purposefully made 911 so 'obvious' so that it would further brand (with a hot-iron, like with livestock) the sheeple against anti-establishment theories or general conspiracy theories. Think of how your average Joe Bloggs views anyone who has even a half-reasonable alternative view - as a total conspiracy nut. For some of us, it was impossible to keep quiet about 911, among other things with it being so bleeding obvious, so in expressing so we have woken some up but the ones not woken up are driven more against us. I know this was badly worded but hopefully it made sense!
rockit
07-07-2009, 10:18 PM
I think there's something in the idea that they have to tell us in some way in order for their plans to work, or more accuratey I think, to not affect them detrimentally. It does explain all the symbolism.
I'm of the opinion that you only get treated how you allow yourself to be treated and in my experience this is always the case.
IMO I think there's an underlying "law" if you like to this reality whereby you can pretty much do anything to anyone who lets you do it, and Karma or whatever only becomes relevant when you're doing things to people against their will. Magik, law of attraction, visualization, any way of using your own energies to sculpt the outer reality is the same I reckon and let's face it these people have a head start on the rest of us in those areas.
It's the same way the legal system works. If you blindly go along with it then they can F**k you, but you still have the choice to make it work for you if you wish.
Thoughts?
bendoon
07-07-2009, 10:46 PM
The movie Oceans 11 was released around 3 months before 9/11/01, on another forum in early 2005 I saw someone give a very detailed explanation of how the poster for Oceans 11 was a coded warning about 9/11. Some of the posters rubbished the idea since obviously anyone can look through movie posters after an event and find one that fits or make it fit, to prove the theory you would have to predict the event before it happened using the movie poster.
So anyway I thought well I will give a try and had a look through some posters for new release movies and see if there are any clues as to what might be happening in the next few months. This was April 2005 and for some unexplainable reason I kept being drawn to the poster for Be Cool, I figured out from the poster that something was going to happen in Scotland or London on the 7th of July of that year. I told three people, my partner and a couple of friends that "something will happen in London or Scotland on the 7th of July, I am not sure exactly but people will be killed and when you hear about you will know instantly what I meant" The reason I had to tell someone was probably for selfish reasons but also to kind of confirm I wasn't going mad and that when it did happen (I was that sure) that they would believe other things I had been trying to tell them.
Well, you might think I just made that up for attention or whatever, but the only reason I have mentioned is just to say how I know 100% in my own mind that they do have to tell us what they are up to. The reasons why and who says they have to is another matter but I have opinions on that.
measle_weasel
08-07-2009, 01:57 AM
That would depend who's side you are on, you have the choice, not them.
Who are the "players" in general, then? If the NWO promoters could be grouped as one set of "players", then who is the set of "players" that are opposing them, if we all are just "pawns" and not considered good enough to be "players"?
decode reality
08-07-2009, 03:23 AM
The movie Oceans 11 was released around 3 months before 9/11/01, on another forum in early 2005 I saw someone give a very detailed explanation of how the poster for Oceans 11 was a coded warning about 9/11. Some of the posters rubbished the idea since obviously anyone can look through movie posters after an event and find one that fits or make it fit, to prove the theory you would have to predict the event before it happened using the movie poster.
So anyway I thought well I will give a try and had a look through some posters for new release movies and see if there are any clues as to what might be happening in the next few months. This was April 2005 and for some unexplainable reason I kept being drawn to the poster for Be Cool, I figured out from the poster that something was going to happen in Scotland or London on the 7th of July of that year. I told three people, my partner and a couple of friends that "something will happen in London or Scotland on the 7th of July, I am not sure exactly but people will be killed and when you hear about you will know instantly what I meant" The reason I had to tell someone was probably for selfish reasons but also to kind of confirm I wasn't going mad and that when it did happen (I was that sure) that they would believe other things I had been trying to tell them.
Well, you might think I just made that up for attention or whatever, but the only reason I have mentioned is just to say how I know 100% in my own mind that they do have to tell us what they are up to. The reasons why and who says they have to is another matter but I have opinions on that.
This has intrigued me BIG STYLE. What was it you saw in the poster that made you mention that particular date? Please detail more asap! Thanks.
illuminumnuts
08-07-2009, 03:28 AM
Russo seemed liked a nice guy. I guess he just liked him and misjudged him. Life would be boring if they never recruited anyone. Part of their fantasy I presume.
ownoiz
08-07-2009, 03:51 AM
Its part of the rules, they have to let us know what they are doing, then if we go along anyway it absolves them of guilt. Thats why they let Alex Jones into Bohemia Grove. Thats why they give advance notification of events like 9/11 and 7/7 in movie posters. Wether people are aware enough to see these warnings is not their problem, they have kept their end of the rules.
Just my opinion.
I think bendoon is talking about the fact that they supposed to make known their intentions by some law somewhere......but one has to dig for it , know how to read between the lines..most of what we exchange here is just that type of info.......
I agree with this also. There are always hints as to whats coming or agendas. For me in Australia, even former Australian PM John Howard and the things he would say in the media, was an example of this.
.
yoyoinmyhead
08-07-2009, 08:25 AM
Well lets hope we are wrong because they're talking about a nuclear attack now. :(
Ian2day
29-07-2009, 06:36 AM
They like to mix disinfo with reality to throw us off. So they validate one piece of info if it suits an agenda. This then is attached to everything else as being valid. Its a form of strawman.