The Germans landed on the Moon as early as 1942

[rwederfoort]

The Germans landed on the Moon as early as probably 1942, utilizing their top secret larger exoatmospheric rocket saucers of the Miethe and Schriever type. The Miethe rocket craft was built in dia...


Thats the problem with the WORLD, keep believing the MEDIA, and those Illuminati Blood Lines, and our Governments. HITLER was not Stupid,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdIeFyPy3Ks

Namaste

[olas]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk52tDKELdQ&feature=related

[thedivinetruth]

Wow! I love this site and learning new things. Makes you wonder if most of Nazi technology is extraterrestial! Or maybe the Nazis themselves are. lol

[armoured_amazon]

*subbed* :)

[cerebral jedi]

they were first with the technology

[skunksmash]

great thread........ i had a feeling the moon ruins were ''man made'', but i never thought of the NAZI connection.....;)




:)SK

[astrochicken]

I do believe to understand the nazi's you have to delve in to the vedic connections.

[guivre]

It would explain a lot, and seems like a logical direction to research.

[marpat]

So they could get to the moon but couldnt win the war? where were the producing all of this stuff while their factories were under bombardment and where did they launch from considering the amount of enemy air activity over europe.

What a load of crap. It tooks them a lot of time to actually get the V2 working effectively.

Also, if the Germans were capable of getting to the moon back then why is there such a big issue of the US landing on the moon? this does not fit. If the US took those scientists with all of that knowledge then why would the US need to fake a moon landing many years laters?

[astrochicken]

So they could get to the moon but couldnt win the war? where were the producing all of this stuff while their factories were under bombardment and where did they launch from considering the amount of enemy air activity over europe.

What a load of crap. It tooks them a lot of time to actually get the V2 working effectively.

Also, if the Germans were capable of getting to the moon back then why is there such a big issue of the US landing on the moon? this does not fit. If the US took those scientists with all of that knowledge then why would the US need to fake a moon landing many years laters?


I'm not even going to bother trying.
You have your opinion set in stone, it's in every post you ever make...
stroll in, pose a few questions and pretend to be genuinely interested. Yawn.

[relax]

I'm not even going to bother trying.
You have your opinion set in stone, it's in every post you ever make...
stroll in, pose a few questions and pretend to be genuinely interested. Yawn.

+1

[marpat]

I'm not even going to bother trying.
You have your opinion set in stone, it's in every post you ever make...
stroll in, pose a few questions and pretend to be genuinely interested. Yawn.

But the post makes no sense. Why would the US fake a moon landing if they had access to that technology for some time?

Offer something credible and I might change my mind.

[skunksmash]

they definitely went to the moon, there's no doubt about it...... just like there's no doubt we were warned to stay off it.

i believe the anomaly's in the photo's are there to make you believe there never was a ''manned'' moon mission, they'd rather have us believe they never went at all, than have us asking why they never returned.....IMO ;)


its the lesser of 2 evils (for TPTB)



:)SK

[armoured_amazon]

But the post makes no sense. Why would the US fake a moon landing if they had access to that technology for some time?

Offer something credible and I might change my mind.

Because they might not want the public to see other species that are there?

[marpat]

they definitely went to the moon, there's no doubt about it...... just like there's no doubt we were warned to stay off it.

i believe the anomaly's in the photo's are there to make you believe there never was a ''manned'' moon mission, they'd rather have us believe they never went at all, than have us asking why they never returned.....IMO ;)


its the lesser of 2 evils (for TPTB)



:)SK

But why would they wish people did not know? most people would never even consider the issue.

Why did they never go back? that is a good question though. Perhaps there was nothing worth studying at that time. Maybe cash was required for hardware that would yield far more information.

How is there no doubt that we were warned to stay off it? if there was a warning then those who made the threat did little about it. Could they not have brought the moon lander down with a missile and then NASA would have to make out some sort of accident occured?

[marpat]

Because they might not want the public to see other species that are there?

Speculation

[armoured_amazon]

speculation

Duh. Do you know what the word 'MIGHT' means? :rolleyes:

[marpat]

Duh. Do you know what the word 'MIGHT' means? :rolleyes:

Yes, it means you might be talking crap.

[skunksmash]

How is there no doubt that we were warned to stay off it?


human nature my friend.....;)

there's plenty to exploit on the moon... ''Helium 3'' for one thing, . this fuel would apparently reduce a nuclear reactor to the size of a dustbin....

let alone militarized way stations which every country would have been racing for were it viable.....

if they could of mined or weaponized it before now...they would have.



:)SK

[merlincove]

So they could get to the moon but couldnt win the war? where were the producing all of this stuff while their factories were under bombardment and where did they launch from considering the amount of enemy air activity over europe.

What a load of crap. It tooks them a lot of time to actually get the V2 working effectively.

Also, if the Germans were capable of getting to the moon back then why is there such a big issue of the US landing on the moon? this does not fit. If the US took those scientists with all of that knowledge then why would the US need to fake a moon landing many years laters?

hm, intersting thread.

for the longest time i've been looking at the space shuttle and asking myself why the us gvt and nasa continue to use such an antiquated method of launching a 'space' craft.

Marpat, you ask where th nazi's would launch from, consider that they were not utilising the apparent proven method that we see being used today.

if they had ufo style craft then why would they launch like the shuttle or any other generic rocket formula? A disc shaped object could be launcehed from Baden Baden way beyond the reach of alied planes, out over the med and not be seen by the allies.

why do we continue to see variants of this, Voyager one, launched over 35 years ago in todays technological era of space readiness?

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/voyager1_launch.jpg

the launch of the space shuttle relies mainly on the same physics, why, 50 years on are nasa still reliant on getting a bird into the sky using the same basic technology as the germans used in their v2 rockets?

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/untitled-1.jpg

If this can cruise at the edge of the atmosphere

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/765px-Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird.jpg

then why do nasa expect us to believe that the boosters et al that we see on the shuttle are a requirement needed to equip todays birds into space

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/space_shuttle_13.jpg

if germany had disc like craft technology back in the day,

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/nazi25ksaucer.jpg

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/Anazi3D.jpg

a disc is a better equiped form to move from through the air and into space, it doesn't need a vertical take off, it has a better effect in creating a re-entry into the atmosphere, it has all the benefits and none of the drawbacks of contempary space going craft.

i say again, if this can fly at the adge of the atmosphere

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/765px-Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird.jpg

why not build a craft like this

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/Anazi3D.jpg

to fly to the moon rather than what we currently understand?

[armoured_amazon]

Yes, it means you might be talking crap.

How infantile.

[rwederfoort]

THE USA was TOLD not to go the MOON, because teh DRAGONIONS were there already, it was their BASE a HOLLOW moon base,
Thats why they Lied of landing, every thing has to do with TEchnology.

The GERMAN knew about the ATLANTIANS the ARYANS racee

They wer not stuppid, we also are doing the same what the Germans are doing searching for the ATLANTIANs technology,

Namaste

[asha loka]

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/untitled-1.jpg

If this can cruise at the edge of the atmosphere

http://i667.photobucket.com/albums/vv35/merlincove/765px-Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird.jpg

then why do nasa expect us to believe that the boosters et al that we see on the shuttle are a requirement needed to equip todays birds into space

Perhaps because it's because low earth orbit is anywhere from 20 to 600 miles beyond the edge of the atmosphere.

Or because the Shuttle needs a speed of 17,000mph to reach low earth orbit, while the Blackbird's top speed is 2,200mph.

Or perhaps because the Shuttle carries a 25 tonne payload, while the SR-71 carried a couple of guys, and a palette full of cameras.

Stop me if I'm going too fast for you here.

Meanwhile, I still haven't seen anyone explain how the Nazis lost WWII when they supposedly had a saucer design which would have made it easy for them to bomb the living crap out of any city in the entire world.

[marpat]

human nature my friend.....;)

there's plenty to exploit on the moon... ''Helium 3'' for one thing, . this fuel would apparently reduce a nuclear reactor to the size of a dustbin....

let alone militarized way stations which every country would have been racing for were it viable.....

if they could of mined or weaponized it before now...they would have.



:)SK

You give excuses for going there but you dont provide any information on why people were warned not to go there.

Why put weapons on the moon? the flight time of a missile from the moon would take a long time and therefore a prepared enemy may be able to organise a defence. At least they would have a long warning of the threat and could begin hiding or escaping.

Bases in space would costs huge amounts of cash and I cant honestly see any use for them. I can see why the moon could be useful but not as a military base.

[marpat]

THE USA was TOLD not to go the MOON, because teh DRAGONIONS were there already, it was their BASE a HOLLOW moon base,
Thats why they Lied of landing, every thing has to do with TEchnology.

The GERMAN knew about the ATLANTIANS the ARYANS racee

They wer not stuppid, we also are doing the same what the Germans are doing searching for the ATLANTIANs technology,

Namaste

But this is only a theory

[lightgiver]

So they could get to the moon but couldnt win the war? where were the producing all of this stuff while their factories were under bombardment and where did they launch from considering the amount of enemy air activity over europe.

What a load of crap. It tooks them a lot of time to actually get the V2 working effectively.

Also, if the Germans were capable of getting to the moon back then why is there such a big issue of the US landing on the moon? this does not fit. If the US took those scientists with all of that knowledge then why would the US need to fake a moon landing many years laters?

A war that was financed by you know who,and a staged war.

Lets get the facts eh marpat.

http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html

Ben Rich - 'We Can Travel
Among The Stars'

"We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an Act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity...Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do."

http://www.rense.com/general79/among.htm

[marpat]

A war that was financed by you know who,and a staged war.

Lets get the facts eh marpat.

http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html

Whatever. I guess if those are your 'facts'

[marpat]

A war that was financed by you know who,and a staged war.

Lets get the facts eh marpat.

http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html

Ben Rich - 'We Can Travel
Among The Stars'

"We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an Act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity...Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do."

http://www.rense.com/general79/among.htm

I think you are talking shite really.

[lightgiver]

I think you are talking shite really.

Ha Ha.

Give up ,you will never succeed ,Ha Ha.:p

Prove it.

You are full of shite. Military my ass.

[merlincove]

Perhaps because it's because low earth orbit is anywhere from 20 to 600 miles beyond the edge of the atmosphere.

Or because the Shuttle needs a speed of 17,000mph to reach low earth orbit, while the Blackbird's top speed is 2,200mph.

Or perhaps because the Shuttle carries a 25 tonne payload, while the SR-71 carried a couple of guys, and a palette full of cameras.

Stop me if I'm going too fast for you here.

Meanwhile, I still haven't seen anyone explain how the Nazis lost WWII when they supposedly had a saucer design which would have made it easy for them to bomb the living crap out of any city in the entire world.

if the BB can spin around low atmosphere at mach 3 then why are we asked to believe the shuttle needs mach 17 / 18 to escape the atmosphere?

all i was saying is that what nasa show to us is the face of space exploration, and i feel that behind the face is the real deal.

lockhead have built some spectacular machines, but bar the BB and the Stealth's they are still building those planes around a tried and tested 'basic' form.

is it too much to stretch the mind to see that a disc shaped object doesn't need the boosters, can be equiped with lochead engines for speeds of mach 5 - 7 (depending on which Aurura missinfo you read) and will be more than adequate to escape the atmosphere, which btw is pretty thin up there and whose pressures are nowadays easilly overcome.

Branson as been wangin on about virgins transatlantic space plane for over a decade, up into the near reaches of space, tip, wait for the earth to spin beneath it and drop back in to land on the eastern seaboard, less than 2 hours. Will that be equipped with all those boosters?

if we were to believe modern physics in repect of space exploration, then we are being asked to believe that a variant of the combustion engine, where a force is exerted upon the flat face of an object to affect propulsion, in this case a force creating an ignition and a thrust against the earth and gravity rather than a force creating an ignition and a thrust against a piston (it is the same basic principle - create a big enough bang and you can move a big enough object) then nasa's advents are little more than refined internal combustion engines that have been around for 100 years. And to take that a step further: the internal combustion engine itself is a pretty complex piece of kit but agian is little more than a design on the sail from ships that have been around for thousands of years which create a resistance to a given force.

So my point is still, why continue to believe that nasa's launch capability is the best way when it has already been recognised that it isn't that reliable or even useful as it only has a limited capability.

You wouldn't need a 20t payload to get to the moon, all you'd need is a coupla guys in space suits and a camera or two - exactly what the blackbird carries ~ is that to fast for you ? :rolleyes:

And we are talking moon expolration here, not chucking 20t satalite's up into the sky.

if a hammer will do the job why use a bulldozer - except a bulldozer might be more fun and spectacular.

imo nasa have been bullshitting the world for a long time. They continue to use the bulldozer when the entire world can see that that bulldozer is OTT and not so suited for the job in hand. It looks antiquated, tell me that it doesn't. It is 50 year old technology. The BB and stealth planes are what they allow us to see, the aurora is a conspiracy misslead to either sidetrack us or get us used to the idea of it.

The space shuttle is a convenient side step, it is accepted. Throw an aurora onto the screen 20 years ago and say hey this is what we've designed to go to the moon boys and girls, aint it cool? Do you like the new shape, like nothing you have ever seen before?Well yeah, but we can't tell you where or how we designed it, or where we got the idea's. No better to stick with what people expect, antiquated booster system on a shuttle that looks remarkably like a plane. Don't confuse the sheeple to much, don't let them know that the technology to get to the moon has existed for 60 + years. Keep the staus quo.

Respect :D

[marpat]

Ha Ha.

Give up ,you will never succeed ,Ha Ha.:p

Prove it.

You are full of shite. Military my ass.

You are a loser, a has been. Your problem is that you are bitter because of your health conditions and you take your resentment out on me.

I will never succeed? thats rich coming from somebody who has already failed.