flip side
02-07-2009, 06:31 AM
I just wanted to highlight a few points about the BBC’s hit piece '7/7 Conspiracy Files'. Good old Aunty Beeb, the holy grail of impartiality? Or not. Here are some quotes I noted from the ‘impartial’ narrator and our dear friend Rachel North. The lady doth protest too much? I think so. Very telling comments indeed.
Narrator:
‘7/7 ripple effect is at the extreme end of the spectrum’
‘For survivors and families the conspiracy theories are pernicious.’ meaning evil for those not quite down with the Beeb’s lingo.
‘Like the 9/11 story about pre-warnings, the 7/7 story is fiction’
‘No evidence of pre-warnings to the attack’
'52 innocent people were killed on 7/7 and 784 people were injured. Although the tragic events are still fresh in peoples minds this hasn’t stopped some conspiracy theorists in their aggressive and ugly persuit in what they think is the truth’ WOW!
‘And there’s concerns conspiracy theories could alienate Muslims from the authorities.
‘Ripple effect is stiring up suspicion about the bombings, sewing decent across Britain. The film viscously targets innocent people falsely accusing them of involvement in an official conspiracy to kill innocent people’
‘Muad Dib has waged a propaganda war to win Britain over to his distorted vision of reality’
‘Muad Dib’s bizarre world view’
‘They (Tony Gosling, Naseem etc) want to stage a meeting to unite Muslims and non muslims around the belief 7/7 could have been an inside job. They’re going to play a video promoting conspiracy theories and stir up more suspicion’
Where's the impartiality?
Rachel North: 7/7 Survivor
‘Conspiracy theories play into the hands of extremists’
‘Inflamatory conspiracy theories’
‘Petrol onto the flames’
‘Conspiracy theorists say I’m a lying, Zionist, bitch, Islamaphobic, predudice, hateful, deceitful, front for the government, source of misinformation’
‘If people in mosque’s think that the government is so antagonistic towards them that they’re actually willing to frame them for a monstrous crime that they didn’t commit, what does that do for levels of trust, that is the problem for the government and anyone in this country.’
‘You may have seen some stuff about the bombers never being in London. You might have heard a story that the train they got on never ran. You may have heard people saying that the bombs were under the train. We’d like to show you our side of the story. Have a look at the evidence and see if you think it’s reasonable…see that would have helped!’
She definately knows what she's doing!
I know she highlighted this herself. But who is this woman working for? A woman calling for a public enquiry, 'but don’t you dare utter ‘conspiracy.’ Gatekeeper, controlled opposition at it’s finest. She will cry ‘conspiracy theories are upsetting to the survivors of 7/7 and hey presto the evidence will of course be disregarded.
So how was the ‘truth movement’ or the ‘conspiracy theorists’ portrayed?
Let’s use Tony Gosling for example, interesting statements from the Narrator such as:
‘Working from an Underground Office’
‘Raising the unthinkable’
Don’t make this guy sound too shifty ay BBC?. They're trying to portray him as demonic.This is all clever propaganda from the Beeb. Also I noticed a couple of close up shots of Tony looking through his glasses at the computer screen. The blurry vision representing a distorted view that they are desperately trying to portray him to hold? Clever.
Moving onto Nick Collostrum (spelling) Interviewed on a dingy car park roof? :confused: Clutching onto the fence, a little twitchy. Ok, this might sound shallow, but look at it from an average Joe’s perspective. This is the way the truth movement is portrayed. His perfectly legitimate questions about train timetable’s undermined by his holocaust denial, somewhat confused demure and that awkward scene where he is stumped by alleged footage of the ‘bombers’ at Kings Cross. Is this the best the BBC could find? Of course it wasn’t and that’s exactly how they like it. 'Take a look at these conspiracy theorists, they are all jew hating, twitchy, muslim extremist, outcast of society nutcases’
Or in fact we are just concerned the Government is deploying Nazi tactics against it's people to promote their war on terror, strip away our freedoms and increase the power of the NWO iron fist? I certainly am not aggressive and I would hedge a bet on the VAST majority of truth seekers being of good nature who care for their fellow man. We want liberty, not conflict. Truth not lies.
How about the way they twisted the words of Bruce Lait, another slightly stuttery, spectacled, ballroom dancer, love how they slipped that one in?! Like Rachel, he is a 7/7 survivor. His account is different in that he witnessed the explosion come from under the train:
‘I noticed that there was a hole from the explosion, it came from under the train’
Narrator counters:
‘Bruce ‘thought’ he saw evidence of a bomb under the train’
&
‘Bruce doesn’t know whether he actually saw evidence the bomb was underneath the carriage and not in Tanweers rucksack as the authorities said’
So Bruce makes a statement and the BBC twist his words and throw doubt over his comments and use that to dispel his account? Why dont the BBC use this approach to Rachel North? :rolleyes:
This program set out to debunk the Ripple Effect and the truth movement. They partially debunked a few theories. In my eyes the Kingstar van is a MASSIVE red herring. As is the poster ‘Outright Terror, bold & brilliant.’ Why did the BBC focus on such issue’s but ignore the smoking gun of the documented shootings in Canary Wharf? Very telling.
The Conspiracy files attempts to claim the Government had got the train times wrong. Funny how it was only retracted when pressure was mounting from the public. Isn’t it curious how the statement from the head of the Mossad, General Meir Dagan was retracted from the AP? Dagan initially reported that he received a warning from Scotland Yard at 8.40am and let Netanyahu know. You know they’re on the ropes when the official story is amended. The narrator then concluded there was ‘no evidence of pre-warnings of the attack.’ What, so nowadays all you have to do is retract evidence and everything is now hunky-dory?! It’s not good enough BBC.
Why does Peter Power change his story from 1000 people working on the day of the exercise drill down to 6 in an office 4 years later? Why only now speak out and release the name of his client which he claims is Reed Elsevier http://www.reed-elsevier.com/Pages/Home.aspx
More use of words like ‘menacing’ and ‘worrying’ about conspiracy theorists. The narrator describes the evidence as ‘false allegations against him.’ Brilliant!
It’s a shame about Muad Dib. Why do prominent truth figures in the UK seem to end up with a Messiah complex? Is there a mind control program going on? He has raised some very big questions. The public deserve a truly free and open inquiry not led by Rachel North. I feel her past is entrenched in Common Purpose NLP? Just a hunch.
Truth is dragged through the dirt. We are now being portrayed as the dangerous one's?
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
I’ll leave you with the closing comment from Brian Paddick. Note the subtle undertones.
‘It is important for the police, the secret services and the government to realise how important conspiracy theories are to Muslims and how important it is to do everything they can to counter and act on them'
Narrator:
‘7/7 ripple effect is at the extreme end of the spectrum’
‘For survivors and families the conspiracy theories are pernicious.’ meaning evil for those not quite down with the Beeb’s lingo.
‘Like the 9/11 story about pre-warnings, the 7/7 story is fiction’
‘No evidence of pre-warnings to the attack’
'52 innocent people were killed on 7/7 and 784 people were injured. Although the tragic events are still fresh in peoples minds this hasn’t stopped some conspiracy theorists in their aggressive and ugly persuit in what they think is the truth’ WOW!
‘And there’s concerns conspiracy theories could alienate Muslims from the authorities.
‘Ripple effect is stiring up suspicion about the bombings, sewing decent across Britain. The film viscously targets innocent people falsely accusing them of involvement in an official conspiracy to kill innocent people’
‘Muad Dib has waged a propaganda war to win Britain over to his distorted vision of reality’
‘Muad Dib’s bizarre world view’
‘They (Tony Gosling, Naseem etc) want to stage a meeting to unite Muslims and non muslims around the belief 7/7 could have been an inside job. They’re going to play a video promoting conspiracy theories and stir up more suspicion’
Where's the impartiality?
Rachel North: 7/7 Survivor
‘Conspiracy theories play into the hands of extremists’
‘Inflamatory conspiracy theories’
‘Petrol onto the flames’
‘Conspiracy theorists say I’m a lying, Zionist, bitch, Islamaphobic, predudice, hateful, deceitful, front for the government, source of misinformation’
‘If people in mosque’s think that the government is so antagonistic towards them that they’re actually willing to frame them for a monstrous crime that they didn’t commit, what does that do for levels of trust, that is the problem for the government and anyone in this country.’
‘You may have seen some stuff about the bombers never being in London. You might have heard a story that the train they got on never ran. You may have heard people saying that the bombs were under the train. We’d like to show you our side of the story. Have a look at the evidence and see if you think it’s reasonable…see that would have helped!’
She definately knows what she's doing!
I know she highlighted this herself. But who is this woman working for? A woman calling for a public enquiry, 'but don’t you dare utter ‘conspiracy.’ Gatekeeper, controlled opposition at it’s finest. She will cry ‘conspiracy theories are upsetting to the survivors of 7/7 and hey presto the evidence will of course be disregarded.
So how was the ‘truth movement’ or the ‘conspiracy theorists’ portrayed?
Let’s use Tony Gosling for example, interesting statements from the Narrator such as:
‘Working from an Underground Office’
‘Raising the unthinkable’
Don’t make this guy sound too shifty ay BBC?. They're trying to portray him as demonic.This is all clever propaganda from the Beeb. Also I noticed a couple of close up shots of Tony looking through his glasses at the computer screen. The blurry vision representing a distorted view that they are desperately trying to portray him to hold? Clever.
Moving onto Nick Collostrum (spelling) Interviewed on a dingy car park roof? :confused: Clutching onto the fence, a little twitchy. Ok, this might sound shallow, but look at it from an average Joe’s perspective. This is the way the truth movement is portrayed. His perfectly legitimate questions about train timetable’s undermined by his holocaust denial, somewhat confused demure and that awkward scene where he is stumped by alleged footage of the ‘bombers’ at Kings Cross. Is this the best the BBC could find? Of course it wasn’t and that’s exactly how they like it. 'Take a look at these conspiracy theorists, they are all jew hating, twitchy, muslim extremist, outcast of society nutcases’
Or in fact we are just concerned the Government is deploying Nazi tactics against it's people to promote their war on terror, strip away our freedoms and increase the power of the NWO iron fist? I certainly am not aggressive and I would hedge a bet on the VAST majority of truth seekers being of good nature who care for their fellow man. We want liberty, not conflict. Truth not lies.
How about the way they twisted the words of Bruce Lait, another slightly stuttery, spectacled, ballroom dancer, love how they slipped that one in?! Like Rachel, he is a 7/7 survivor. His account is different in that he witnessed the explosion come from under the train:
‘I noticed that there was a hole from the explosion, it came from under the train’
Narrator counters:
‘Bruce ‘thought’ he saw evidence of a bomb under the train’
&
‘Bruce doesn’t know whether he actually saw evidence the bomb was underneath the carriage and not in Tanweers rucksack as the authorities said’
So Bruce makes a statement and the BBC twist his words and throw doubt over his comments and use that to dispel his account? Why dont the BBC use this approach to Rachel North? :rolleyes:
This program set out to debunk the Ripple Effect and the truth movement. They partially debunked a few theories. In my eyes the Kingstar van is a MASSIVE red herring. As is the poster ‘Outright Terror, bold & brilliant.’ Why did the BBC focus on such issue’s but ignore the smoking gun of the documented shootings in Canary Wharf? Very telling.
The Conspiracy files attempts to claim the Government had got the train times wrong. Funny how it was only retracted when pressure was mounting from the public. Isn’t it curious how the statement from the head of the Mossad, General Meir Dagan was retracted from the AP? Dagan initially reported that he received a warning from Scotland Yard at 8.40am and let Netanyahu know. You know they’re on the ropes when the official story is amended. The narrator then concluded there was ‘no evidence of pre-warnings of the attack.’ What, so nowadays all you have to do is retract evidence and everything is now hunky-dory?! It’s not good enough BBC.
Why does Peter Power change his story from 1000 people working on the day of the exercise drill down to 6 in an office 4 years later? Why only now speak out and release the name of his client which he claims is Reed Elsevier http://www.reed-elsevier.com/Pages/Home.aspx
More use of words like ‘menacing’ and ‘worrying’ about conspiracy theorists. The narrator describes the evidence as ‘false allegations against him.’ Brilliant!
It’s a shame about Muad Dib. Why do prominent truth figures in the UK seem to end up with a Messiah complex? Is there a mind control program going on? He has raised some very big questions. The public deserve a truly free and open inquiry not led by Rachel North. I feel her past is entrenched in Common Purpose NLP? Just a hunch.
Truth is dragged through the dirt. We are now being portrayed as the dangerous one's?
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
I’ll leave you with the closing comment from Brian Paddick. Note the subtle undertones.
‘It is important for the police, the secret services and the government to realise how important conspiracy theories are to Muslims and how important it is to do everything they can to counter and act on them'