THE BIRDS Pt.1: Morphing Stealth UAVs of the 9/11

[rwederfoort]

http://www.911conspiracy.tv ::: Naudet 1st WTC Attack ORBS - exotic technology exposed and explored - Revision finds orbs below the skin of the fake birds. Not UFOs. Old version deleted. ::: Moor...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3WPm1vstog

[dave52]

I love this future tech angle. I saw the morphing birds thing ages ago. It definitely deserves some consideration...!

[christophera]

Does anyone have any idea of how this information can be used?

I mean which official agency is going to recieve the information and how would the information be presented?

[secondsun]

Does anyone have any idea of how this information can be used?

...you could print it out on lots of bitmaps and use it as toilet paper!

[stannrodd]

...you could print it out on lots of bitmaps and use it as toilet paper!

I for one wouldn't wipe my backside on it .. I have values !!

Stann :)

[911conspiracytv]

For those who know 9/11 was an "inside job," timed perfectly with numerous war games (one having been played out a few months earlier [June] "Amalgam-Virgo (http://www.911conspiracy.tv/features/Amalgam_Virgo_war_game_doc.pdf)," in which a [conventional] rogue UAV strikes a building), it's not too far a leap of the imagination to see the many bizarre bird scenes in 9/11 video and photographs as evidence of military vehicles.

Not only does the technology exist, it is probably more advanced than we can imagine. And, assuming these morphing UAVs were used in the most photographed event ever, only a few lone "conspiracy nuts" would think to point them out (or listen to those who point them out).

http://i662.photobucket.com/albums/uu347/911conspiracytv/Fisch_Robert_bird-cu_516pjpeg.jpg
Detail of bottom right of this photo:
http://old.911digitalarchive.org/images/files/516.500px.pjpeg
image source (http://old.911digitalarchive.org/images/details/516)

These "birds" fly fast. (see this raw footage playlist (http://www.youtube.com/user/911footage#play/user/1E57DD12BA493C85)). They project shadows through solid objects (see Part 1 in HQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3WPm1vstog&fmt=18))... and they are captured in many of the 2nd WTC attack videos (http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html) flying by the towers in time with "Flight 175," and in a few of the WTC "collapse" videos, flying in and out of dust clouds (see Part 8 in HQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUPDZScdgbY&fmt=18), a few minutes in... also where the birds can be seen flashing... yes, lighting up in the dark).

Feel free to help refine my video series by debunking my claims. I've tried to update the videos where mistakes have been made.

For some reading on the subject of "notbirds," or biologically inspired UAVs used on 9/11, check out this thread:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/971637/1/


I found this thread by checking on referral links to my website http://www.911conspiracy.tv. So, this is my first post here.
:o

[stannrodd]

Not only does the technology exist, it is probably more advanced than we can imagine.

So you are stating with certainty that a technology exists .. yet you can only state with some ill-defined probability that it is more advanced than we can imagine.

OK How do you know it exists and how do you know that it is probably more advanced than I can imagine. .. FFS .. is this another webfairy load of snake droppings?

Stann

[911conspiracytv]

Next?
:p

[stannrodd]

How about the proof ??

Stann

[christophera]

stanimal is paid to be ugly in dimissing the concrete core evidence and gamit is paid to do the technical stuff like photoshopping and bogus dimensional crap. Notice they don't acknowledge one another very often, but always appear at whatever forum I'm posting at in opposition to the concrete core with no independantly verified evidence of the supposed steel core columns.

If I were a mod, the second time gamit pretended it hadn't seen a piece of evidence, or gotten an answer to a question by asking the same question again, it would be banned. It is implied that this forum exists for people to debate facts and evidence reasonably in search of truth.

I believe I do see them participating in promoting junk theory, not so far as to get very involved in nonsense like NPT, because that would marginalize them too much to argue substance such as achitecture. Generally, it could be shown that they promote useless information and work to dismiss useful information or prevent people from realizing its use.

:eek: Who woulda' thunk it?

[dave52]

So you are stating with certainty that a technology exists

Did you watch it Stann...?

[911conspiracytv]

How about the proof ??

Stann


When I say the technology exists, I mean that "smart materials" have been developed along with flapping wing aircraft.

http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/CRG_morphingwings.gif
- http://www.crgrp.net/morphingsystems.shtml

More on morphing aircraft technology is seen in this NASA educational video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7TJtIzdL50 from the Destination Tomorrow series.

But this is only an introduction to the idea.

[helloperator]

This is a joke right?

[911conspiracytv]

Nothing to see here?

Watch as numerous "birds" fly TOWARD the exploding building, seconds after the 2nd plane hits. Why, you ask?

http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence37.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence38.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence39.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence40.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence41.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence42.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence43.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence44.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence45.jpeg
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/images/Fairbanks_birds_jpegs/Fairbanks_bird_sequence46.jpeg
Fairbanks footage slow motion (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0emwFKYVmA&fmt=18)

Why? To do work for their operators.

The building damage had to be perfect, in order to explain the building "failure" planned to occur at the precise location of "impact." The almost correct jet engine (http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/1829738/1/) that would launch out of the 81st floor NE corner window... was already placed. The impact had to be so perfectly located, that risking the use of a real airliner outweighed the risk of using top-of-the-line technology to create the illusion of such an event.

THE BIRDS OF SEPTEMBER 11
Bird Poop OR Notbird Proof? (http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/971637/1/)

conventional UAV seen at WTC7 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyiXkoKZvQY&fmt=18)

[stannrodd]

Did you watch it Stann...?

Yes ... but do you feel better now that U knew I did ? ...

I look at this way ..

It's good information versus bad information .. and how that is pushed and interpretted.

Just old fashioned I guess .. but that's slightly off topic

Stann

[secondsun]

This is a joke right?

...no!... i remember being in Trafalgar Square when a motorbike back fired!... 300 Kevlar and Carbon Fibre pigeons fucked off pretty quick! http://i29.tinypic.com/148g7s4.jpg

[dave52]

Yes

Then you will have seen that, in principle, the tech exists. Do you think it reasonable to assume that if a technology is presented to the public, then an extrapolation of that technology, a more advanced version, is probably already being used by the military...?

[helloperator]

What a joke!

[dave52]

This is a joke right?

Is it...?

What a joke!

Oh... you've answered your own question... Well done.

[helloperator]

Mechanical birds, robot birds if you will...like bird terminators...this one's for the birds

[dave52]

Mechanical birds, robot birds if you will...like bird terminators...this one's for the birds

Did you watch the movie...?

[911conspiracytv]

bump

It seems this thread is feared.

[stannrodd]

bump

It seems this thread is feared.

How do you figure that ??

It's simply very obvious that what is claimed is a bit far fetched and can be explained in far simpler ways.

Stann

[911conspiracytv]

You're right. But far fetched doesn't mean false. It is a difficult truth to convey... especially when full understanding is impossible. The footage collection speaks for itself, I think.
http://www.youtube.com/user/911footage#play/user/1E57DD12BA493C85

Thanks for watching.

[helloperator]

Maybe Alfred Hitchcock's movie was a foreshadowing commisioned and financed by the NWO. It was the birds! The birds did it!

[secondsun]

It seems this thread is feared.

..yep!... we`ve all just jumped into the Fjord`s like Lemmings!

[911conspiracytv]

..yep!... we`ve all just jumped into the Fjord`s like Lemmings!

I'm smiling, at least!:)

[stannrodd]

You're right. But far fetched doesn't mean false. It is a difficult truth to convey... especially when full understanding is impossible. .. .. Thanks for watching.

Far fetched .. to me means .. umm .. borderline consideration ..

I agree that it may be false .. or not false .. ??

especially when full understanding is impossible. ..

Good point huh..

Stann :D

[graflok]

bump

it seems this thread is feared.

:D

[911conspiracytv]

I thought that comment of mine would draw some attention. I know it's not true, sadly. Even people who know I'm right don't want to openly support the research.

"It will make 9/11 Truth look bad." Or, "It distracts from more important issues." Issues like what? I show you that the most technologically advanced methods possible were employed at 8:46 AM on 9/11, fully bypassing politics and overly-debated issues....

Ridicule is the number one debunking tactic. Never arguing the facts.


So, now for some news:

An interesting new find in the 1st strike footage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPziQbhRBsM

While watching the DVD, one can plainly see a composite layer moving out of sync. This cut and paste job was done for one reason. To cover up the "birds."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tj7QUaSWX9Q

[dave52]

They were cool - thanks for the vid links.

[stannrodd]

Wow Dave .. did you really enjoy that crap ??

Stann:D

[dave52]

Wow Dave .. did you really enjoy that crap ??

Stann:D

Yes Stann, I did. I'm sorry you didn't.

[stannrodd]

Dave

I did look at all/most of that stuff ages ago and already made up my mind then, .. that most .. if not all of it, can be explained more simply .. ! I haven't really changed from that view .. because nothing new has been proposed that I see as being relevant to change that view.

It's the old Occam's Razor routine really.

Call me old fashioned .. but don't call me late for breakfast matee .. heh heh !!

Stann :D

[dave52]

I did look at all/most of that stuff ages ago and already made up my mind then

That's fair enough. I find the new tech stuff very interesting. You may not agree with the vids, but seeing that the tech is already available, I see no reason why it wouldn't have be used.

I often look at 9/11 as more than just a false-flag event. It was also a test of the new tech. The UAVs, the real time tv fakery, the pushing of false information onto live radar to confuse traffic control. Then, there was the demolition of the towers - could've been DEW or some new sort of new explosive etc. Couple all that with the psyop of the event, the false witnesses on the ground to push the official story, the Naudet's mockumentary, the involvement of the complicit media, maybe even some aspects of Project Bluebeam.

I suspect that the Perps were pretty pleased with the outcome.

[stannrodd]

I suspect that the Perps were pretty pleased with the outcome.

I suspect you are right ..

The outcome .. I guess .. provided the inertia for the murderous actions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Though I can't quite figure Afghanistan in terms of the outcome .. because the USA is their biggest market for their primary illicit produce .. opiates.

Iraq was simply about OIL.

Did you know that Tasmania the southern island state of Australia is actually the worlds largest producer of legitimate opiate production on the planet. ?

Stann

[dave52]

The outcome .. I guess .. provided the inertia for the murderous actions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Though I can't quite figure Afghanistan in terms of the outcome .. because the USA is their biggest market for their primary illicit produce .. opiates.

Iraq was simply about OIL.

The Caspian Oil Pipeline had a lot to do with it. The US were in negotiations with the Taliban before the Taliban started talking to (I think) an Argentinian Oil company. Opiates is another thing altogether, but we'd have to get into the CIA and drug running for that. The Taliban were destroying the Poppy fields before 9/11 and production was way down. Nice and healthy again now of course.

[stannrodd]

More profitable than broccoli .. I guess

Stann

[911conspiracytv]

The video link in the first post is now dead, along with my old YouTube account, so...

For anyone whose mind isn't closed to the idea, here's some new videos on the subject:

http://www.youtube.com/user/911CTV#grid/user/38EC41974DA3D1C7 (playlist)

Birds don't fly toward explosions. Not even on 9/11.

THE BIRDS Pt. 3 (in 3 short parts): 9/11 UAVs & the 2nd WTC Attack
a:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZhgE26frH8
b:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVNgDs8zpis
c:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwgOmniQfJA


THE BIRDS Pt. 4a: 9/11 UAVs & the WTC "Collapses" -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtD-ETAxx9A --

The newest finds in "collapse" footage: First, a flock of birds changes direction to fly into the WTC 2 dust cloud in the final seconds of collapse... (as a dozen others fly out of the cataclysmic area 15-20 seconds after collapse initiation, when they could have been long gone if they were worried about their life.) Awesome proof to me. Anybody else?


AIR FORCE RESEARCH VIDEO -- "Micro Air Vehicles" ... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=33b_1245784175 -- to help answer those questions like "WHY BIRDS?"