PDA

View Full Version : Mark of Cain = Reptilian Brain


lala_says_so
01-07-2009, 05:37 AM
I've been on an "Annunaki" kick lately, & started reading up on all the Sumerian/Babylonian deities.

Anyway, when I came across a page for the infamous "Ba'al/Moloch" infant-sacrifice God, it compared the Binding of Issac (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_of_Isaac)to such practices.

Children were sacrificed to Moloch in times of Great War because they believed it would "appease" the Gods; saving lives in the process [think Wanted's "Kill one, save a thousand"] - not 'cause they were sick masochists [though, I beg to differ]




The Reptilian Brain is our "Fight or Flight" - just survive, mechanism. When shit hits the fan, we can't even control our response [hence, riots/mob panic]

What if, when God asked Abraham to sacrificed Issac, he was testing to see if a righteous man like Abraham possessed a reptilian brain/could overcome it?


I think, in the "Days of Sodom" - the real sin wasn't just homosexuality [besides, the conspiracy theorist in me knows "seeking strange flesh" was Reptilians] - it was a society founded on Reptilian brain values.


They were inhospitable, formed a violent mob rather quickly, and tried to rape angels! - Either 'them Salt Pillars were salt of the methamphetamine variety, or there was something severly wrong with the way Sodomites thought [as in, brain chemically].

In the Koran, when Lot was leaving Sodom, his wife's demise had nothing to do with turning around; she simply flat-out refused to leave. She considered his genuine warnings an absurd notion. ["Lot, you crazy conspiracy theorist! - What's next? I should warn my sister; 'cause Gomorrah' might get submerged!"]


It doesn't necessarily matter if one's more "pure" than another [i.e. non-reptilian blood], I think it has to do with thinking with your soul & finding the strength to overcome your reptilians desires. [Ex: You might want to punch someone, but you're aware violence solves nothing]


- Wow, that's a little preachy; but doesn't it make so much sense?

I mean, the Mark of Cain "helped build cities" & fight or flight certainly would help an army/lead to civilization growth.

& if we didn't have it, without a doubt half the problems in the world would simply vanish. [That's ok, I don't need oil, hm, I think I'll pass on the extra land - hey, how'about I share?]

metacomet
01-07-2009, 05:51 AM
Yes, Cain killed Abel because his reptilian brain allowed him to. Greed and jealousy are emotions bred of the R-complex. The same region of the brain responsible for aggression in Alligators is shared within humans as well.

So yes I can totally understand this theory that the R-complex is a mark of Cain.

Where would this mark have come from? Cain and Abel were direct descendants of Adam and Eve, and Adam and Eve were 'tricked' by the serpent. They became aware of their nakedness because they took on the 'ego' form of mind, which is the forbidden fruit offered to them by the snake (reptilian consciousness).

I think Cain may have inherited in particular the potency of that forbidden fruit that Adam and Eve took on.


I think it's also important for people to realize that Adam and Eve don't have to have been 'real people'... they could simply be symbolic representations of male and female humans. Just like Cain and Abel don't necessarily have to have been 'real people'... they may be symbolic representations of the polarity in humans... some are good, some are evil. Some peaceful, some violent. Some have inherited a 'mark' or enlarged reptilian complex and others may end up victims to such people.

lala_says_so
01-07-2009, 09:36 AM
Yes, Cain killed Abel because his reptilian brain allowed him to. Greed and jealousy are emotions bred of the R-complex. The same region of the brain responsible for aggression in Alligators is shared within humans as well.

So yes I can totally understand this theory that the R-complex is a mark of Cain.

Where would this mark have come from? Cain and Abel were direct descendants of Adam and Eve, and Adam and Eve were 'tricked' by the serpent. They became aware of their nakedness because they took on the 'ego' form of mind, which is the forbidden fruit offered to them by the snake (reptilian consciousness).

I think Cain may have inherited in particular the potency of that forbidden fruit that Adam and Eve took on.


I think it's also important for people to realize that Adam and Eve don't have to have been 'real people'... they could simply be symbolic representations of male and female humans. Just like Cain and Abel don't necessarily have to have been 'real people'... they may be symbolic representations of the polarity in humans... some are good, some are evil. Some peaceful, some violent. Some have inherited a 'mark' or enlarged reptilian complex and others may end up victims to such people.

I always felt "Adam and Eve" were a metaphor, as well [similar to the Epic of Gilgamesh]

Like, if we had everything, or were immortal; would we really be happy?

God gives us hardships so we'll appreciate heaven.

I mean, if you've never been without, or never felt pain, how would you understand how much God loves you? [again, sorry for the preachiness, I'm a causality of Catholic School]



I find it interesting that Reptilians fear/are defensive towards individuals that see through their rouse, or go against the reptilians agenda. [The Devil was willing to make Jesus King of the world, just to shut him up]

If they're "so right" than why do they want people to remain naive/misinformed? [Pretty much the entire Bible is tales of enlightened individuals flipping Reptilians off]


Also, the whole "tricked by the serprent" thing applies to Issac's twin sons Esau & Jacob.

Esau had the Guardian angel Samael [Blind God/Dragon? IDK, he's supposedly Lilith's husband] & is certainly in the "Reptilian" state of mind. [he tried to kill his brother in rage, however, Rebecca stopped him]

& unless it's implied Rebecca had a fling with a certain evil [actually, I think I read a Fallen Angel romance novel based on that], the "serpent" Esau possessed was, like you said, just his ego.