PDA

View Full Version : PENTAGON TREASON 9/11/01 - Dick Eastman


halliburton crusher
25-06-2009, 07:10 PM
http://www.rense.com/general86/hight1.htm

ronisron
25-06-2009, 08:49 PM
:eek: GREAT find. I'm starting to believe that there was a large passenger jet that did a fly over of the Pentagon, while a smaller object approached and slammed into the area where the jet supposedly crashed. I wasn't sure at first, my first exposure to that idea was the "Pentacon" video. There was a lot of similar info in that doc, but I wasn't totally convinced. It seems there are two main ideas in the conflicting eye witness testimonies; there was a large jet or there was a small plane or missile. Maybe it was both.

Dick Eastman also wrote a letter to the DNC, berating them for believing in and backing Obama, after he had gone ahead and appointed his "rival", the murderous, treasonous Hillary Clinton as Sec'y of State.

matrix911
26-06-2009, 09:02 AM
:eek: GREAT find. I'm starting to believe that there was a large passenger jet that did a fly over of the Pentagon, while a smaller object approached and slammed into the area where the jet supposedly crashed. I wasn't sure at first, my first exposure to that idea was the "Pentacon" video. There was a lot of similar info in that doc, but I wasn't totally convinced. It seems there are two main ideas in the conflicting eye witness testimonies; there was a large jet or there was a small plane or missile. Maybe it was both.

Dick Eastman also wrote a letter to the DNC, berating them for believing in and backing Obama, after he had gone ahead and appointed his "rival", the murderous, treasonous Hillary Clinton as Sec'y of State.

CIT the ones who have proven the NOC path, claims the only thing that blew up the pentagon, was pre-placed charges timed with a fly-over and the pentagon footage was doctored and photo-shopped.

christophera
26-06-2009, 10:02 AM
http://www.rense.com/general86/hight1.htm

Were most of these things known years ago?

When the FCC destroyed the flight controller interview tapes, did that mean no governmental accountability relating to planes would or could be had?

ronisron
26-06-2009, 04:04 PM
CIT the ones who have proven the NOC path, claims the only thing that blew up the pentagon, was pre-placed charges timed with a fly-over and the pentagon footage was doctored and photo-shopped.

The CIT theorized that there were charges, not proved.

They make an interesting point, it's possible that during the construction on that side, that charges were being planted so as to take no chances with the collapse, but I think they flew "something" into that side for effect. Something punched through those 5 walls.

matrix911
26-06-2009, 04:15 PM
The CIT theorized that there were charges, not proved.

well i think the term "claimed" is closer to theorized than proved... which was my intention.


They make an interesting point, it's possible that during the construction on that side, that charges were being planted so as to take no chances with the collapse, but I think they flew "something" into that side for effect. Something punched through those 5 walls.

I tend to agree with that as well... however they contend that a military shaped charge could have created such a hole.

evillive
27-06-2009, 09:06 AM
Heres some good resolution pictures off pentagon:

http://images.google.fi/imgres?imgurl=http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/Pentagon%2520folder%25202/VDOTview.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic7.htm&usg=__xA23BOwuR_Z51O4n7AJbZQC-GWU=&h=362&w=800&sz=252&hl=fi&start=3&um=1&tbnid=VAA0Rb1DWR-FGM:&tbnh=65&tbnw=143&prev=/images%3Fq%3DChristopher%2BLandis%26hl%3Dfi%26sa%3 DN%26um%3D1

Some interesting stuff...

frase
27-06-2009, 01:47 PM
Im sorry to say that looks like. a fairly huge explosion...Much like a jet crash.
These are great pictures.
Thanks for posting.

triotec
27-06-2009, 06:23 PM
Yes, very nice pictures

christophera
27-06-2009, 06:24 PM
Were most of these things known years ago?

When the FCC destroyed the flight controller interview tapes, did that mean no governmental accountability relating to planes would or could be had?

Just asking, ......... because if the above is true, then the pentagon information is useless at this time and the government is specifically blocking and more truth from that area.

If those posting need more truth, they will cease to entertain an issue that will not see any use or resolve at this time and instead focus on information which actually has a defined usage.