danster82
06-06-2009, 04:41 PM
Why statutory laws have evolved into the oppressive machine we see today I believe is due purely because of the ability to be irresponsible. If the world was full of responsible people we could happily operate under common law which to summarise is to cause no harm, injury, or loss to another individual.
We all know the irresponsible type at a guess I would say it primarily makes up 10% of the population naturally speaking but has infected at least 30+% as irresponsibility is something advocated by our modern media culture.
Lets take a simple example which is a regular accurance in the freeman movement the parking ticket. Now all imagine a road you know only just wide enough for two lanes to pass slowly. The irresponsible person will park on this road without consideration for others which I guess is the definition of irresponsibility. This could potentially cause havoc in terms of grid lock traffic and potentially an accident which would cause harm and injury and thus common law would cover that scenario yet most likely it would just cause traffic which common law would lack any control over. The responsible persons world view goes beyond themselves and they are aware to varying degrees the needs of others, more selfless so they will consider this and know not to park there as they are more conscious of the situation.
So I see our statutory laws mainly as the result of the irresponsible individuals amongst us which through their ever day actions create the need for ever increase laws which the responsible amongst us get tarred with. So like people on forums such as this are aware the cause of everything which is manifest has its roots in a state of consciousness.
The irony in more recent times is the irresponsible amongst us have capitalised on this trend as only the irresponsible would be happy to earn copious amount of money through fines and fees. This money control obviously has to be undone but statutory laws themselves I think a balanced perspective is neeeded.
When I look around I do see the majority as mature enough to govern themselves yet, I think you will still get the people dumping in the rubbish areas littering on the streets driving sports cars at 120mph and so on and so on I foresee that it will be the irresponsible that will tar the freeman movement because the knowledge they will gain they will use in an attempt to get a "1up" on society and then those examples will be used as reasons to taint the freeman.
I guess this is just an ongoing thought I dont yet have a conclusion.
We all know the irresponsible type at a guess I would say it primarily makes up 10% of the population naturally speaking but has infected at least 30+% as irresponsibility is something advocated by our modern media culture.
Lets take a simple example which is a regular accurance in the freeman movement the parking ticket. Now all imagine a road you know only just wide enough for two lanes to pass slowly. The irresponsible person will park on this road without consideration for others which I guess is the definition of irresponsibility. This could potentially cause havoc in terms of grid lock traffic and potentially an accident which would cause harm and injury and thus common law would cover that scenario yet most likely it would just cause traffic which common law would lack any control over. The responsible persons world view goes beyond themselves and they are aware to varying degrees the needs of others, more selfless so they will consider this and know not to park there as they are more conscious of the situation.
So I see our statutory laws mainly as the result of the irresponsible individuals amongst us which through their ever day actions create the need for ever increase laws which the responsible amongst us get tarred with. So like people on forums such as this are aware the cause of everything which is manifest has its roots in a state of consciousness.
The irony in more recent times is the irresponsible amongst us have capitalised on this trend as only the irresponsible would be happy to earn copious amount of money through fines and fees. This money control obviously has to be undone but statutory laws themselves I think a balanced perspective is neeeded.
When I look around I do see the majority as mature enough to govern themselves yet, I think you will still get the people dumping in the rubbish areas littering on the streets driving sports cars at 120mph and so on and so on I foresee that it will be the irresponsible that will tar the freeman movement because the knowledge they will gain they will use in an attempt to get a "1up" on society and then those examples will be used as reasons to taint the freeman.
I guess this is just an ongoing thought I dont yet have a conclusion.