Richard Dawkins hoax video?

[noewhan]

Ok, so he stumbles on a question... And there's a hoax version of it...? Wtf?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uz1CiDDIq4

[dreamweaver]

Dawkins' version of events is here: http://www.skeptics.com.au/articles/dawkins.htm

The guy is quite clearly pausing to think "how do I best answer this?" rather than being "stumped" anyway. Almost every recorded interview has out-takes and to present something like this to make it look like the interviewee didn't have an answer is both rude and dishonest.

[thirdwave]

talk about desperate.

[noewhan]

talk about desperate.

Yes extremely, and stupid considering the technology we have these days. How do they think they can just get away with small things like this?

[alexc]

Yes extremely, and stupid considering the technology we have these days. How do they think they can just get away with small things like this?

I'm sure the Darwinsits expect people to believe THEIR version of events because it's theoretically possible "Expelled" to have fudged the video. It's the classic "it's possible so it MUST be true" dodge.

[tejas]

Dawkins had realised that these were fundamentalist christians he was dealing with.

[geolaureate8]

Dawkins had realised that these were fundamentalist christians he was dealing with.

Hahaha. Yeah, he was probably thinking, "Hmmm, how can I put this in a way that's easy for them to understand?"

And even if he was stumped, it doesn't mean anything. It means he wasn't able to answer the question immediately.

.

[element]

Boo - Freakedie - Hoo

Richard is never a bully himself eh... we're all insane and wicked.

His fanbase is touched in the heart. The guru is attacked!!

[deadskinball]

I'm sure the Darwinists expect people to believe THEIR version of events because it's theoretically possible "Expelled" to have fudged the video. It's the classic "it's possible so it MUST be true" dodge.

When you put all the underhanded tactics togerther into one basket, you'll see plainly and obviously what methods stein uses to make his point.

The movie is a joke... and if that's the best the fanatics could come up with and claim it as a convincing argument... then its very sad and laughable at the same time.

[miracles]

Richard dawkins is part of the illuminati bloodlines scientific arm.

I dont find that funny.

by the way, if you recall, his only answer was that perhaps we we were initially put here by aliens, this is illuminati/luciferian doctrine. He was probably considering whether or not he was allowed to say this or not. These guys get in deep shit from the higher ups for saying things they arent allowed to divuldge.

[revolutionary_jam]

Richard dawkins is part of the illuminati bloodlines scientific arm. Evidence?

[miracles]

Evidence?

The following is a direct quote from an (self confessed) illuminati bloodline official.



Every so often, as per the directives of the Law of our Creator, a brief window of opportunity opens, whereby a select handful of our Family are required to make communication with our subjects, and offer you the chance to ask us any questions you would like answered.

I am double-bound in this duty. It is required of me by The Law of our Creator to offer this opportunity to you at this time, though I am also bound by the Law of (planetary) Free Will and by Family Oaths, that there is only so much I am able to say.

Our realms of influence do not fit (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1) as comfortably into the three boxes of your triangle as you may imagine. There are six disciplines of training (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1) within the Family, and each member of the Family is schooled extensively in all of them, from early childhood. We all have an area of specialty, though we have experience in all spheres. The six spheres or 'schools' of learning are Military, Government, Spiritual, Scholarship (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1), Leadership, and Sciences. In practice, out there on the 'stage' of public life, we hold key positions in all of these main areas of importance. With the addition of a complicit Media machine and ownership of your Financial (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1) establishments, all bases are covered.



Granted this is not Iron glad proof that Dawkins is an illuminati bloodline, however he preaches their doctrine of deceit with, in general, the full support of the worlds media and publishing machines. His book full of trash and tripe is a best seller. How did that happen???

However if you watch the whole video, Dawkins makes the statement, I alluded to in the previous post about us being put here by other beings, this is well known documented illuminiti/luciferian doctrine/bullshit.

Source: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1 (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1)

This little video supposedly exposing creationists is too little to late and is ultimately pointless, the horse has bolted. His answer that we where possibly created and put here by other beings is IRON GLAD evidence of this fact and practically annihilates everying jot and tittle he wrote on evolution. There will be no sequel folks. He's finished.

[revolutionary_jam]

His book was a best seller because it suits the zeitgeist, engineered or otherwise, that doesn't make Dawkins a knowing participant in a conspiracy, it's too far fetched
it's far simpler to find people who are writing the kind of books they want to be written and back them without letting them in on the agenda

I just don't think it's fair to make radical accusations on people when you don't ahve any specific evidence about them. Besides, before the god delusion he wrote some great scientific books.

[alexc]

it's far simpler to find people who are writing the kind of books they want to be written and back them without letting them in on the agenda


The fewer people who are in on a secret, the easier it is to keep.

[miracles]

His book was a best seller because it suits the zeitgeist, engineered or otherwise, that doesn't make Dawkins a knowing participant in a conspiracy, it's too far fetched
it's far simpler to find people who are writing the kind of books they want to be written and back them without letting them in on the agenda

I just don't think it's fair to make radical accusations on people when you don't ahve any specific evidence about them. Besides, before the god delusion he wrote some great scientific books.

Which is all part of the same engineered conspiracy (not conspiracy theory) Conspricy fact.

There are two clearly divided camps on this issue. Its not about being fair, it's about being right or wrong.

Fundamental bible belivers, verses fundamental Evilutionists. That issue is clear. All the rest are just fence sitting conversation watchers and or highly enlightened in their own minds, "new age awakend types" who think they are floating above the whole issue in the gnostic ether. Good luck to them

The god delusion was a radical spit in the face of God, the bible and believers. I dont know about his other books, they may be lauded as master pieces in the "scientific" community, but the god delusion is trash.

[revolutionary_jam]

The God Delusion is not spit in the face of God, God is unoffendable
It's good that the athiest arguments are collected in one place so that people can read them critically and draw their own conclusions and think for themselves

you don't have to agree with it to read it, I didn't

[miracles]

The God Delusion is not spit in the face of God, God is unoffendable
It's good that the athiest arguments are collected in one place so that people can read them critically and draw their own conclusions and think for themselves

you don't have to agree with it to read it, I didn't

True but it doesnt stop people spitting in his face does it?

I didnt say God was offended. Also I know you dont have to agree with something to read it either

[revolutionary_jam]

True but it doesnt stop people spitting in his face does it?Miracles, don't you think people need to live and learn by their own mistakes?

You can't really blame a book or such for peoples behaviour, people read them because they are fascinated with the content and want to broaden their views, it's not like the book can actually make them into something they are not. If they go down the wrong way life will correct them, people on the whole are eventually self-correcting, even if they take the long way round. What do you think? Do you really think the book is a problem?

[guuna]

I was under the impression that this was Ickey's site. Did I blink and it morphed into the Richard Dawkins fanclub?

[miracles]

Miracles, don't you think people need to live and learn by their own mistakes?

You can't really blame a book or such for peoples behaviour, people read them because they are fascinated with the content and want to broaden their views, it's not like the book can actually make them into something they are not. If they go down the wrong way life will correct them, people on the whole are eventually self-correcting, even if they take the long way round. What do you think? Do you really think the book is a problem?

Dude, I dont have a problem with it all, I read it for the reasons you have posted too. No biggie at all. I only posted becuase it was in keeping with the thread topic. Its just conversation.

Mind you if we took the tack of letting people live and learn you and me would have nothing to wax lyrical about...

[element]

I think Richard Dawkins will be referred as ''godlike'' in the future, when he dies..

Like a new Messiah.. :eek:

I have seen, atheist campagnes around here. A good chuckle, especially in this country. Not like there are many religious people around..:D

There are other agendas at work. Atheism is used as a fancy name for an actual...materialist!

Quite clever.

Yes, Mirac. , profit as well.

[miracles]

I think Richard Dawkins will be referred as ''godlike'' in the future, when he dies..

Like a new Messiah.. :eek:

I have seen, atheist campagnes around here. A good chuckle, especially in this country. Not like there are many religious people around..:D

There are other agendas at work. Atheism is used as a fancy name for an actual...materialist!

Quite clever.

Yes, Mirac. , profit as well.

Sorry dude, I amended prev post.. its all about filthy lucre :D

[whatistruth]

Sorry dude, I amended prev post.. its all about filthy lucre :D

Im sorry, but science has proven earth is older than 6000 years and was not created in a week.

Its not all a big conspiracy by every single scientist in the world.


Why dont you worship allah or zeus or horus?
Why jesus?

Come on now creationists, give it up.

[geezer661]

Richard dawkins is part of the illuminati bloodlines scientific arm.

I dont find that funny.

by the way, if you recall, his only answer was that perhaps we we were initially put here by aliens, this is illuminati/luciferian doctrine. He was probably considering whether or not he was allowed to say this or not. These guys get in deep shit from the higher ups for saying things they arent allowed to divuldge.

i bet everybody is illuminati who doesnt agree with yr views

[element]

Im sorry, but science has proven earth is older than 6000 years and was not created in a week.
.
How many Christians believe the earth is 6000 years old..? Only fundamentalists who only see the desert Jews as history only. Miracles said in another thread that he believed the earth was much older.

Don't worry..

i bet everybody is illuminati who doesnt agree with yr views

That's the fundie view alright..! :D