View Full Version : What is the real reason for war?
clipwip
22-07-2007, 07:38 PM
Hey everyone, I'm new here, so if this has already been touched upon, direct me to another thread.
I once heard Robert Fisk say something to the effect that "the only point of war is death and destruction on as large a scale as possible."
At the time, I thought he wasn't really being serious. Surely war is fought for massive profits and/or geostrategic maneuvering at least, right? But, the financiers of wars have their hands on the printing presses of our currencies. They don't need the money. It doesn't matter who wins, b/c the Masters of War fund both sides and win by default.
The more I think about it, the more I think Fisk may have hit the nail right on the head. It seems the real reason for war is basically a massive orgy of death and destruction. Energy for higher-dimensional beings?
Any thoughts?
Ian2day
22-07-2007, 07:47 PM
Michael Tsarion goes into the symbolism that is used in war etc in one of his videos. Do a search on video google. It may briefly be covered in his 2012 video but I think that he goes more in depth in one of his older videos.
clipwip
22-07-2007, 07:49 PM
Michael Tsarion goes into the symbolism that is used in war etc in one of his videos. Do a search on video google. It may briefly be covered in his 2012 video but I think that he goes more in depth in one of his older videos.
Yes, I am somewhat familiar with his work. Where exactly is this energy being channeled to?
phoenixchilde
22-07-2007, 07:57 PM
I don't know about actually wanting death and destruction. I've always seen a great deal of sense in the military-industrial complex. No offense, but your argument against it doesn't work. They may have their fingers in the printing of money, but they can't just print more and give it to themselves. If they did that, the inflation rates would go up enough to counteract their own efforts. Think of the value of a dollar not so much as an absolute value, but as a percentage of the amount of dollars in the world. The more dollars available, the less the value of each dollar. Does that make sense?
Ian2day
22-07-2007, 08:00 PM
I could be wrong as it has been a while since I watched his videos. I think he says that it is for Satanic or Luciferian reasons. The elites draw power from all the soldiers that are sacrificed with the symbolic numbers and insignia on the uniforms. that sort of thing. That it is sacrificial in nature and that it is a way and a means to give power to the manifestation of their will.
clipwip
22-07-2007, 08:03 PM
I don't know about actually wanting death and destruction. I've always seen a great deal of sense in the military-industrial complex. No offense, but your argument against it doesn't work. They may have their fingers in the printing of money, but they can't just print more and give it to themselves. If they did that, the inflation rates would go up enough to counteract their own efforts. Think of the value of a dollar not so much as an absolute value, but as a percentage of the amount of dollars in the world. The more dollars available, the less the value of each dollar. Does that make sense?
Yes they can print it out for themselves. Then they buy assets with real value before the economy has time to react to the excess cash.
clipwip
22-07-2007, 08:05 PM
I could be wrong as it has been a while since I watched his videos. I think he says that it is for Satanic or Luciferian reasons. The elites draw power from all the soldiers that are sacrificed with the symbolic numbers and insignia on the uniforms. that sort of thing. That it is sacrificial in nature and that it is a way and a means to give power to the manifestation of their will.
Maybe you could comment on another thread I started: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6519
clipwip
22-07-2007, 08:07 PM
Yes they can print it out for themselves. Then they buy assets with real value before the economy has time to react to the excess cash.
Hell, they don't even have to print anything, just tweak some digits on a computer.