Who owns the Federal Reserve Banks?

[Anders Lindman]

"The Federal Reserve Banks are owned by private member banks"

From: Federal Reserve System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But what private banks? Can anybody list these private banks? Not a list over the Federal Reserve Banks, but a list of the private member banks who owns the Federal Reserve Banks. A complete and up to date list, please.

[garth]

check out Eustance Mullins/Ezra Pounds book the secrets of the federal reserve here (http://www.usa-the-republic.com/banks/federal%20reserve.txt) it lists the forming shareholders, both banks and individuals.

This site (http://www.geocities.com/northstarzone/FED.html) confirms the list

The FED creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press and charges U.S. taxpayers interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud. Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well kept secret, has been revealed: 1. Rothschild Bank of London 2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg 3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin 4. Lehman Brothers of New York 5. Lazard Brothers of Paris 6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York 7. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy 8. Goldman, Sachs of New York 9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam 10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.

[Anders Lindman]

check out Eustance Mullins/Ezra Pounds book the secrets of the federal reserve here (http://www.usa-the-republic.com/banks/federal%20reserve.txt) it lists the forming shareholders, both banks and individuals.

This site (http://www.geocities.com/northstarzone/FED.html) confirms the list

Thanks. Looks interesting. I think the paper version of the book is needed because the charts are not included in the text file. Maybe it would be worthwhile for me to buy the book to learn more about the Federal Reserve. Reading the whole text on the computer would be too burdensome.

[hapax]

Most of the charts are here (http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/federalreserve.htm).

Also check out:

The Federal Reserve By Thomas D. Schauf, CPA (http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/fr2.htm);

Money and the Federal Reserve System: Myth and Reality by G. Thomas Woodward, CRS Report for Congress (http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/fr7.htm);

The Real Story of the Money-Control Over America by Sheldon Emry (http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/fr1.htm)- excellent summary without the historical complexity;

Court Rules Federal Reserve is Privately Owned: Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (1982) (http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/fr6.htm);

The Origins of the Federal Reserve by M.N.Rothbard (http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/images/rothbard.pdf).

At least we know whom to put up against a wall first when the revolution comes.

[Anders Lindman]

At least we know whom to put up against a wall first when the revolution comes.

Maybe not put up them against the wall. That sounds a bit Nazi or Communistic. But throwing them out of the temple as Jesus did may be appropriate.

[cruise4]

No No... putting them against the wall is the correct approach!

[Anders Lindman]

No No... putting them against the wall is the correct approach!

Hehe. Even if the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers et.al. would be 'evil' I don't think that Nazi or Communistic methods should be used in any circumstances. My strategy is to try to change the rules for the monetary system, or at least investigate if the rules that we have today really are beneficial for society, and I would even allow the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers to continue with their business if they followed the new rules.

[hapax]

Hehe. Even if the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers et.al. would be 'evil' I don't think that Nazi or Communistic methods should be used in any circumstances. My strategy is to try to change the rules for the monetary system, or at least investigate if the rules that we have today really are beneficial for society, and I would even allow the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers to continue with their business if they followed the new rules.


You would ALLOW the Rotschilds and the Rockefellers to continue if they followed the new rules??

It's more a question of whether the Rotschilds and Rockefellers would ALLOW you and your family to LIVE if you dared to change the current rules or even criticise them.

Btw. I would never use "Communistic" methods....

[Anders Lindman]

You would ALLOW the Rotschilds and the Rockefellers to continue if they followed the new rules??

It's more a question of whether the Rotschilds and Rockefellers would ALLOW you and your family to LIVE if you dared to change the current rules or even criticise them.

Btw. I would never use "Communistic" methods....

The banking elite must follow the law. If the law says that charging interest on the creation of money is illegal, then not even the Rothchilds or the Rockefellers would be able to charge interest on money-creation.

[hapax]

The banking "elite" MAKES the Law. Our current financial system functions for their benefit and NOT for ours.

Proof: Usury banking is legal. According to Christianity (and Islam) it should be illegal.

This is the cause of, and the essence of the age-old conflict between the Christian Church and the Jews. Why else do you think the Jews were thrown out of every Christian country? It's not blind prejudice against Jews, but the fact that their system of usury banking (based on Deuteronomy 23:20 and the Talmud) means Jews will preferentially get richer while Christians and everybody else gets poorer.

Please read Martin Luther's views (http://reactor-core.org/jewish-lies.html) on this matter. Please read Pope Benedict XIV's 1751 proclamation (http://www.revisionisthistory.org/pope1.html) on this matter. Please consider the words and actions of Jesus Christ in throwing the moneylenders out of the Temple.

Despite the clear words of Jesus, Luther and many Popes concerning the evils of usury banking, the authorities of today choose to follow Jewish practice and Jewish law. That's why we're in this mess today.

The promotion of Bolshevik Communism by the bankers (http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/) took place for a similar reason - all real money (gold) and real assets fell into the hands of Wall Street and friends, while the Russian people and the rest of the USSR's population were herded into Gulags or into slave-factories where they were paid in fake "monopoly" money with which they could buy nothing in empty shops (while the CPSU elite had its own special shops and facilities).

One of the main reason the Jews declared war on Hitler's Germany in 1933 (http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html) was because Hitler desired to end dependence on Jewish usury capital and remove Germany from the international banking system. In the eyes of the bankers this was Hitler's only real crime. The 1923 German experience of total financial ruin caused by hyperinflation brought about by a private central bank (http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/hyperinflation-e.html) led to this entirely understandable and correct decision on the part of Hitler and his National Socialist government. The bankers later tried to rein in Hitler by various dealings, but to no avail - in the end after Hitler decided to act against his neighbours and the USSR in particular they chose to get Stalin and US/UK Freemasonry to destroy Germany and Eastern Europe instead (the US/UK bombed it, then the Red Army plundered, murdered and raped its way through it).

The USA also faces a stark choice today - allow the complete disintegration of its currency and its economy while watching the criminal bankers escape to Israel with the real money (=gold); or rise up in armed rebellion overthrowing their corrupt sick system and its Bush puppet regime and reasserting true constitutional principles and a proper banking system. In other words the US is headed for a proper anti-Zionist National Socialist government (not a moment too soon, in my opinion).

[Anders Lindman]

It's so strange that usury is allowed today. Bankers demand that millions of people work for slave wages to pay interest on debt, while they themselves can dish out bank loans, from small to huge, out of thin air and then demand interest for the 'fine' 'job' they have done.

I think I will start creating loans to people myself. Anyone wants a loan? If you want to buy a house I can create a ¢1,000,000 loan. This is what I will do:

1) I will type 1,000,000 EUR into the computer.

2) The 1,000,000 EUR will magically be created without me having to do anything more than doing the typing (some minute of work).

3) You can then borrow all this money from me, but you have to pay it all back!

4) Then you say: "But why should I pay back the loan with my hard-earned money? You just created that money from nothing by typing on a keyboard!!! How fair is that? I will have to work many, many years to be able to pay back only a fraction of the loan while you just typed on a keyboard! You didn't have any real money at all!!!"

5) Then I will say: "It's worse than that. Not only will I demand hard-earned money from you to pay back my phony loan; in addition to that you will have to pay interest on the loan month by month - It's called usury. I am entitled to use usury. You are not. Get used to it."

[Anders Lindman]

I
I think I will start creating loans to people myself. Anyone wants a loan? If you want to buy a house I can create a ¢1,000,000 loan.

In fact, this is not such a bad business idea. I can create loads and loads of loans. In that way I can lend out say one trillion Euros.

This means that I will own one trillion Euros worth of real estate. And the good thing is that people will have to pay interest, so they will have to pay me 100 trillion Euros. Of course, it's totally impossible for the people to pay back so much money, because in order to pay all that interest they will have to borrow even more money from me leading to even more debt and interest that in turn they will also not be able pay without borrowing even more money.

Consequently, in the end all the real estate will lead to foreclosure, which means: Legal proceeding by which a borrower's rights to a mortgaged property may be extinguished if the borrower fails to live up to the obligations agreed to in the loan contract.

So not only will I get ever more filthier rich, I will also in the end get all the real estate too! That's inevitable. Doesn't this sound like a good business plan? Anyone wants a loan?

[Anders Lindman]

So not only will I get ever more filthier rich, I will also in the end get all the real estate too! That's inevitable. Doesn't this sound like a good business plan? Anyone wants a loan?

Darn. It looks like I already have some competition:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279

[cruise4]

Yes... I'm offering loans too:D Mine carry less interest than Anders!

Special Offer: Get a free Parker Pen with all loans. This month only!