What is the Temperature of Starlight?

[mynameis]

Does anyone know?:confused:

[oceanwave]

Does anyone know?:confused:


sorry for being a dickhead,...

...but what is "starlight"?...


(nevermind being a temperature of....)

[mynameis]

Sunlight but without the infra-red heat. Otherwise known as pure white-light or full spectrum light, I think.

[oceanwave]

Sunlight but without the infra-red heat. Otherwise known as pure white-light or full spectrum light, I think.

you 'think'?....

you leave yerself wide open mate... ;)


so basically,..

you are asking an atomical, therefore a physical question in relation to relativity (of this reality?)

like in kelvin temp?

sorry for seeming to be a fuckwit

[ashyr]

depends what arbortary measurement you want it in?

you can have any result you want.

are u talking Celcius?

[i_am]

This means absolutely nothing to me but maybe it does to you

http://amazing-space.stsci.edu/resources/explorations/light/star-light-science.html#ques1c

[oceanwave]

This means absolutely nothing to me but maybe it does to you

http://amazing-space.stsci.edu/resources/explorations/light /:confused:



excactly, i am...

you got it in one

will others? lol

[oceanwave]

http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/8593/cheersnn3.jpg

[heretic]

This guy would know, you should contact him.

http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Sstern.htm

[mynameis]

I was trying to figure this out. It seems this really is the best explanation to the thinking. I hoped something else more radical. In terms of waves for energy star energy signatures each must give off it's own distinct energy wave signature.

That's not what concerns me though. If the waves from a mega distance are supposed to be longer waves from each star's light low wave heat signature, how does the star pinpoint with accuracy it's beams of light that the naked eye can see.

Supposing the distance of heat is diminished, how does that happen and where does that heat energy disappear into the void if the law of conservation is observed? It makes me wonder if the cold vastness of space is actually sustained by the nebula and stars themselves underneath what we can't see, which is the dark matter.

If there is dark matter cooling and absorbing both the heat of the sun transformed into light, while the sun sustains said system to balance the heat given off, then there must be a way to harness said cooling energy like Tesla suggested with wavelength energies that utilize both ends of the electromagnetic spectrum (Cool light without heat and heat without light).

Heat is transferred somewhere from even these super-massive sun giants, but I fail to understand all how these stars heat energy and light escapes it's gravitational fields, unless the speed of heat transference (dark matter) and light (emissions) trumps gravity. It is said that more stuff in the Universe should exist, not taking into account the qualities of gravity's electromagnetic fields.

We still feel the sun's helpful and harmful effects of radiation perhaps the change in the Earth electromagnetic field, as Tesla suggested, it could bring about calamity. How much the face of the planet could change when radiation began dissipating from one area of the planet through electromagnetic reflection back into space? Instant cooling freeze on the surface of the planet.

Thinking of Haarp and could the Earth's field break during a pole shift? I sometimes wonder that during pole shifts are the lack of electromagnetic shields culprits that might throw off all carbon dating methods (It's probably not plausible).

Mankind and nature shows no known way to create sea ice, however reflecting the sun's radiation and heat energy back into space using the Earth's EMF might. It makes me kinda wonder if this has happened before naturally during pole-shifts (I hate coming off like doomsayer). All this is of no special consequences.

I've also been thinking about how the planet is like a ball of clay. The clay contains moisture partially frozen at each end. Sometimes the water is absorbed other times it's free flowing. When dry the clay moisture becomes saltier and when wet the clay becomes less salty by containing more fresh water. Supposedly, the Earth's seas have been becoming progressively more brackish than when they first formed.

It is the saltiness of the sea that makes Gore cower at the possibility of global warming making seas rise with large storms. It's a small farce nonetheless to misunderstand the way the cooling mechanism has been becoming thwarted over millions of years. One more make the sea less salty, remove the salt in the sea, or reflect the heat radiation to get result of global air conditioning.

Nanomachines might be able to help make mroe H20 and restore the water balance to good levels. This would be why in such a short time we've had that Morgellons, Chemtrails, and Al Gore. I dunno, I'll keep pondering this more...


This means absolutely nothing to me but maybe it does to you

http://amazing-space.stsci.edu/resources/explorations/light/star-light-science.html#ques1c