What do you term your self as LH? [Communist/Capitalist/Whatever?]
Anarchist Communist
______________
“We are advocates of the abolition of war, we do not want war; but war can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun…………. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy”-- Mao Tse-tung
.
What is Anarchism? On Capital, Property Will and Law. What is to be done?
http://www.luciferia.tv/1ChildrenOftheSlaves/66666666.gif
Lucifer
http://www.luciferia.tv/animation/A.gif
Light of the World.
The 1000 Year Agricultural and Scientific Revolution; the Revolution of Light
The Final Revolutionary War of Economic Salvation.
For a world without money, government or nations.
For Apocalyptic Guerrilla War against Christendom (i.e., Capitalism).
No mercy on they who deserve none.
http://www.luciferia.tv/1ChildrenOftheSlaves/nkorea_missile.gif
Gr. Anarchos. "without archons (rulers) and without arche (government)"
Firstly to simplify, Anarchist Communism is merely 'moneyless stateless collectivism (kibbutzim)' and it is as simple as that. No further defintion is required for those who understand this; however as Anarchism as a political philosophy is generally misunderstood, I will unpack and explain this further.
Primitivism and Syndicalism.
There are the primitivists who emphasise agricultural revolution and the non miracle of the feeding of the 6 billion and then there are the syndicalists who seek technological revolution also. The Israeli Communists (kibbutzists) for example are syndicalists since some kibbutzes manufacture arms and others manufacture food. I share the view of primitivists that agricultural revolution is a priority, however tractors, labour saving machines, computers, medical technology and other products of scientific revolution represent progress and would form part of a future Communist paradise; they are not merely products of Capitalism but of a new scientific and technological humanity; this however would require syndicalism and the division of labour into ‘specialist’ non agricultural fields.
Other types of Anarchists:
Anarcho-Capitalists and 'Libertarians'.
Well obviously Anarcho-Capitalists are not Anti-monetarists (Capital - money) and thus not traditional Anarchists; simply put they are pure Capitalists (monetarists) who don't want any state interfering with private Capitalism; which is pretty close to a definition of neo-conservatism. There would be private police and armies to protect the rich etc. All members of organised crime syndicates (i.e. the mafia) are by default Anarcho-Capitalists whether they define themselves as such or not; after all they want to be free to enslave, bully and oppress others without government interference. Russia today is pretty close to Anarcho-Capitalist (i.e., ruled by the mafia). Anarcho-Capitalism is essentially 'organised crime,' where the criminals don't have to bribe the government or the police since there would be no government and the police would be their employees.
Libertarianism is slightly different, however the consequences would be similar.
Anarcho-capitalism, in my opinion, is a doctrinal system which, if ever
implemented, would lead to forms of tyranny and oppression that have few
counterparts in human history. There isn't the slightest possibility that
its (in my view, horrendous) ideas would be implemented, because they would
quickly destroy any society that made this colossal error. The idea of "free
contract" between the potentate and his starving subject is a sick joke,
perhaps worth some moments in an academic seminar exploring the consequences
of (in my view, absurd) ideas, but nowhere else.
I should add, however, that I find myself in substantial agreement with
people who consider themselves anarcho-capitalists on a whole range of
issues; and for some years, was able to write only in their journals. And I
also admire their commitment to rationality -- which is rare -- though I do
not think they see the consequences of the doctrines they espouse, or their
profound moral failings.
….Noam Chomsky
Punk rockers.
They are mostly just music fans who despise all authority and are not all political Anarchists, however since some punk rockers such as the Sex Pistols defined themselves as Anarchists, in the mind of many, Anarchism is thus associated with them, however few of them in practice advocate Communist collectivism.
Marxists.
Marx who was converted to Communism by the Anarchist Proudhon, held that the Capitalist state must be replaced with a worker's state which would 'wither away' eventually into Anarchist, stateless,moneyless collectivism. Marx was not a total anti-Capitalist (anti-monetarist) since he did suggest replacing money with labour vouchers as a form of temporary rationing, which is still a form of money, however most Marxists do not seem to favour this.
Trotskyists / Leninists
They do not seem to believe that 'state' must wither away eventually, since they are neo-Marxists rather than fundamentalist Marxists, but they are not anti-Capitalists (anti-monetarists) but state capitalists who believe in the nationalisation of banking, as it is Cuba and North Korea today where there is still a money system.
Chomskyism
Chomsky defines himself as an Anarchist, but but when asked what type of system will replace Capitalism he tends to give confusing or vague answers to the effect of 'well we shall have to wait and see,' so strictly speaking he does not openly propose Anarchist Communism (stateless collectivism) and indeed often criticises Communism. Chomskyism is thus a rather vague and confused form of Anarchism and not traditional Anarchism.
National Anarchists
See for example http://www.folkandfaith.com National Anarchists are political Anarchists and do not believe in nation states but they describe themselves as ‘racial separatists’ and are essentially white supremacists and racists. Fortunately they represent only a tiny minority among the Anarchist movement, since the vast majority of Anarchists are also anti-racists.
Anarchists who believe in Anarchist government.
This is a relatively new phenomenon and not really a political movement; indeed I don’t know of any serious writings by a non statist statist, but I have come across such individuals in Internet debates. These are of course non-Anarchists and indeed the most confused kind among all the above groups who claim to be some sort of Anarchist. They are much like the Christians who propagate Capitalism in the name of Jesus (an anti-monetarist, anti-propertyist, anti-religionist, proto-Anarchist Communist) or the Trotskyists who claim to be anti-monetarists (anti-Capitalists) when in fact they are monetarists albeit state monetarists. Since the term Anarchist is defined in the political sense as the absence of government and Archon (rulers / tyrants), one cannot have a non-government government anymore than one can have an anti-Communist Communist, but this argument seems to mean very little to ‘pro-statist anti-statists (????)’ whatever that means.
Anarchist Christians.
Anarchist Christians tend to view Jesus as an anti-propertyist and an anti-monetarist. Since they are essentially anti-Capitalists, they tend to be viewed by Capitalist Christians as heretics who reject the Capitalist interpretation of Christianity , and by many Anarchists as genuine political Anarchists, though some Anarchists consider ‘god’ to be an ultimate ‘Archon (tyrant). Christian Anarchists reject organised religion, but are theists. Anarchist Communism is a purely political solution and unlike Marxism has no rigid dogmatic metaphysics so it appeals to non-religious Pagans, New Age spiritualists, agnostics ‘and’ atheists alike, however ‘organised religion’ or the rule of the priesthood (who are Archons / authority figures) has no place whatsoever in an Anarchist world.
Governments ‘withering away’
States (tyrannies) do not wither away; they have to be brought down by armed violent revolution.
Thelemites.
Thelemites disregard all laws of state and religion and pursue their own sacrd and natural will, without interfering with the will of others (unless they militantly resist thelemic revoution and in this case Crowley held that cuh heretics should be rightfully executed). While this is certainly Anarchist with regards to the rejection of all written laws, not all are Anarcho-Communists (collectivists), in fact very ferw are; indeed Crowley who was an anti-Communist foresaw a future world ‘ruled’ by a group of ‘spiritual masters,’ which pretty much describes the current world with it’s numerous organised religions which generally defend Capitalism. Never the less almost all Anarchists apart from religious Anarchists are Thelemites whether they define themselves as such or not, since they reject all the laws of the police states and religions and believe that humanity should be free to follow their own natural and therfore sacred intuition.
Anarchist political parties and infiltration by the State Terrorists.
Such organisations are easily infiltrated by the state terrorists, as has been the case for example with the Anarchist ‘Class War’ in the UK. Anarchism is a political philosophy not a ‘political party.’ I know many Anarchists in London and on the Internet but I don’t know anyone personally who belongs to a political party. For example the UK Anarchist Federation is a political cult with 66 members in the UK on the last (and only) time I attended a meeting and yet there are probably 10’s of thousands of Anarchists in London alone. The fact that the Anarchist Federation considers state terrorist black operations such as 911 and 7/7 to be ‘conspiracy theories’ and seems to go along with the government propaganda is entirely suspect.
I speak from a European perspective, and most anti-Capitalists in Europe among the young generation (I am 50) appear to be Anarchists who have rejected Marxist statism and materialistic dogmatism. If you are in London for a week you will find numerous Anarchist events, squat parties etc, but among the Marxists, you will have to look very hard for them. Take a look at myspace for example, there are more Anarchist groups than there are Marxist groups and there are more groups who are anti-Capitalist in general than there are groups who propagate Capitalism.
The World Socialist Movement
In London if one hangs out at Speakers Corner or attends anti-Capitalist rallies it is hard not to bump into the World Socialist Movement http://www.worldsocialism.org/ whom I would describe as 'puritanical Marxists and anti-Leninist Communists' who consider themselves to be Anarchists and consider Marx to have been ultimately an Anarchist (anti-statist), however this all hangs on Marx's 'the state shall wither away' position. I have been excommunicated from their Internet debating forum years ago, so it clear that they don't agree with my politics, nor me with theirs, however since I understand the arguments made by Marxist puritans, let me say this.
Marxist Labour vouchers vs. Anarchist Communist 'rationing.'
Marx claimed 'ultimately (in the end)' that he was a non-monetarist, as are all Anarchist Communists. The WSM rightfully defines all forms of 'State Capitalism (where the state takes over the issue of money) as Leninism and as anti-Marxism. Marx's position was that in the early stages of revolution, the people would starve (and probably revolt against the new proletarian dictatorship) unless 'labour vouchers' were introduced to replace money.
For example if the dictators (the economic masters) work 40 hours they would receive 40 labour vouchers and ditto for factory workers (the economic slaves). However this was merely meant to be temporary and transitionary since Marx was ultimately a non-monetarist. Of course in the Soviet Union the alleged proletarian dictatorship simply took over banking, avoided the introduction of 'labour vouchers' became corrupt and tyrannical and eventually some had more money than others (including dollar shops in Moscow), and you had to bribe an 'official' if you wanted a flat or a telephone etc. I really don't see how 'labour vouchers' would stop corruption any more than state Capitalism, since labour vouchers are still a form of money. Obviously in the early stages of revolution, some form of rationing would be necessary, leading to possible corruption among the rationers and their possible transition into a new police state which would have to be resisted.
Rationing in Capitalism through the use of 'money.'
In Capitalism of course the private Usuryists (loan sharks) are the 'rationers,' and this has led to a situation where something like 0.01% or less of the population are the rationers and the majority of the world starves and suffers extreme poverty, so this is 'extreme' corruption. We in the First World are mostly the beneficiaries of this system so we suffer less economically.
Marxist Statism. 'The state will wither away'
The 'contradiction:' if on one hand the police states of the armed violent monetarists (Capital=money or property that has a Capitalist value) can 'only' be overthrown by armed violent anti-monetarists, why then is it that it will not be necessary to overthrow the dictatorship of armed violent so called anti-monetarists? Realistically can you imagine Kim Jong Il's police state just 'withering away' into independent collectives? The Soviet Union did not 'wither away' into independent collectives, but into hardcore Capitalism and the rule of the bankers, pims and the mafia; Gorbachev is now a multi-millionaire (he was bribed); the state withered away into an elite of corrupt billionaires leaving the male proletariat often destitute and unemployed, and the women often fleeing economic hardship into a life a sex slavery in the brothels of Western Europe.
No, the state will not wither away. States will have to be eradicated.
Statists (tyrants) will have to be fought by armed violent revolutionaries, however in the age of nuclear guerrilla weapons where there exists a universal knowledge of practical physics, the anti-Statists should in the end always have the upper hand. The problem is not merely monetarism but statism (tyranny). There have been after all, non-monetarist systems which were simply 'slave societies' with a monarch, and though Marx ultimately believed in total non-monetarism, he had an unrealistic faith in the power of ‘temporal’ tyranny.
Materialism and non-spiritualism.
Dialectical Materialism is a 19th century pre-Einsteinian, pre-quantum physics position. Materialism in the philosophical sense is also a position of faith. Mass can be converted to Energy and Light, and it is by no means a fact that the ‘stuff’of the universe is mass (matter). Marxists insist on atheism, apart from some Liberation Theologians (Christian Communists) who accept Marxist economics and reject his atheism.
Marx's essential Communist beliefs (armed violent revolution and 'eventually' anti-monetarism and 'eventually' anti-statism) which all Anarchist Communists may sympathise with, Marx plagiarised from the Anarchist Communists anyway. Away with Marx; most young anti-Capitalists in Europe are now anti-Marxist Anarchists anyway; it is growing trend.
Ultimately in the aftermath of the inevitable forthcoming nuclear war, the Marxists, the Anarchists and even the Muslims may form ‘ad hoc’ alliances against the police / military / statists but in the end they are destined to clash.
The Anarchist Communist Kropotkin's three categories of Laws.
1: Laws to protect the government.
The definition of an Anarchist region is one where there would be no statists, thus there would be no need for laws to protect the tyrants and their mercenaries (their police state, military, tax collectors and assorted bureaucracy / useless eaters etc.).
2: Laws to protect private property.
Similarly with propertyism, one cannot be a propertyist unless one is militant and have mercenaries (police) to protect one's property. Since the masses will always in their hearts seek to disempower those who enslave them for the purposes of exploiting their labour, leaving the labour slaves impoverished at the expense of a few, and since private propertyism is a militant ideology, the propertyists would have to be eliminated, thus there would be no need to have laws to protect them.
3: Laws to protect the individual from harm (Natural Law).
This is simply common sense. There is no need to create written laws to this extent. This is as it would have been in the mythical Garden of Eden. For example in a world without religious, private property and statist laws, a mother will still demand ‘do not harm my children, do not enslave them, do not starve them, etc., etc., these are of course not the written laws of a police state, but never the less most mothers, unindoctrinated by religion and police statism would probably agree with them.
What is Authority (tyranny)?
The Anarchist (against the Archons / authority figures) Kropotkin once stated that he would never challenge the ‘authority’ of an engineer, since was not an engineer; he did not have that type of expertise and would rather leave bridge building and construction to the trained experts; an engineer is an expert in a certain type of science, not an Archon (tyrant) who claims to be an expert in enslaving people and ruling over them or an expert in God or religious morality
4: Sexual Laws
In addition to Kropotkin’s 3 types of law, we also have to consider the eradication of the millions of religious laws (I will not elaborate), and especially sexual laws; these are simply laws which produce an effective and miserable slave
Sex is the most powerful instinct in man. The politician and the priest have understood from the very beginning that sex is the most driving energy in man. It has to be curtailed, it has to be cut. If man is allowed total Freedom in sex, then there will be no possibility to dominate him. To make a slave out of him will be impossible.
Have you not seen it being done? When you want a bull to be yoked to a cart, what do you do? You castrate him, you destroy his sex energy. And have you seen the difference between a bull and an ox? What a difference! An ox is a poor phenomenon, a slave. A bull is a beauty; a bull is a glorious pheonomenon, a great splendor. See a bull walking, how he walks like an emperor! And see an ox pulling a cart.
The same has been done to man. The sex instinct has been curtailed, cut, crippled. Man does not exist as the bull now, he exists like the ox, and each man is pulling a thousand and one carts. Look and you will find behind you a thousand and one carts, and you are yoked to them.
Why can’t you yoke a bull? The bull is too powerful. If he sees a cow passing by, he will throw both you and the cart, and he will move to the cow! He will not bother a bit about who you are, and he will not listen. It will be impossible to control the bull. Sex energy is life energy; it is uncontrollable. And the politician and the priest are not interested in you, they are interested in channeling your energy into other directions. So there is a certain Mechanism behind it--it has to be understood.
Sex repression, tabooing sex, is the very foundation of human slavery. Man cannot be free unless sex is free. Man cannot be really free unless his sex energy is allowed natural growth.
These are the five tricks through which man has been turned into a slave, into an ugly phenomenon, a cripple.
The first is:
Keep man as weak as possible if you want to dominate him. If the priest wants to dominate you or the politician wants to dominate you, you have to be kept as weak as possible. And the best way to keep a man weak is not to give love total freedom. Love is nourishment..."
"...Second:
Keep man as ignorant and deluded as possible so that he can easily be deceived..."
"...The third secret:
Keep man as frightened as possible. And the sure way is not to allow him love, because love destroys fear--’love casteth out fear.’ When you are not in love you become more interested in security, in safety. When you are in love you are more interested in adventure, in exploration...."
"...The Fourth:
Keep man as miserable as possible--because a miserable man is confused, a miserable man has no self-worth, a miserable man is self-condemnatory, a miserable man feels that he must have done something wrong. A miserable man has no grounding--you can push him from here and there, he can be turned into driftwood very easily. And a miserable man is always ready to be commanded, to be ordered, to be disciplined, because he knows ’On my own I am simply miserable. Maybe someody else can discipline my life.’ He is a ready victim."
"And the fifth:
Keep men as alienated from each other as possible, so that they cannot band together for some purpose of which the priest and the politician may not approve. Keep people separate from each other. Don’t allow them too much intimacy. When people are separate, lonely, alienated from each other, they cannot band together. And there are a thousand and one tricks to keep them apart.
For example, if you are holding the hand of a man--you are a man and you are holding the hand of a man and walking down the road, singing--you will feel guilty because people will start looking at you. Are you gay, homosexual or something? Two men are not allowed to be happy together. They are condemned as homosexuals. Fear arises. If your friend comes and takes your hand in his hand, you look around: ’Is somebody looking or not?’ And you are just in a hurry to drop the hand..." Osho
Lucifer
Fire plague and poisoned waters
www.myspace.com/luciferhorus
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law."
—AL. I. 40.
"thou hast no right but to do thy will. Do that, and no
other shall say nay." —AL. I. 42–3.
"Every man and every woman is a star." —AL. I. 3.
There is no god but man.
..>..>
..> 1. Man has the right to live by his own law—to live in the way that he wills to do:to work as he will:to play as he will:to rest as he will:to die when and how he will.
2. Man has the right to eat what he will:to drink what he will:to dwell where he will:to move as he will on the face of the earth.
3. Man has the right to think what he will:to speak what he will:to write what he will:to draw, paint, carve, etch, mould, build as he will:to dress as he will.
4. Man has the right to love as he will:—"take your fill and will of love as ye will,when, where, and with whom ye will." —AL. I. 51.
5. Man has the right to kill those who would thwart these rights...>
"Love is the law, love under will." —AL. I. 57
____________________________
'The revolution will have to be (Anarchist) Communist or it will be drowned in blood and will have to begin all over again'
'Either the State forever, crushing individual and local life, taking over in all fields of human activity, bringing with it its wars and its domestic struggles for power, its palace revolutions which only replace one tyrant with another.....Or the destruction of all states and new life starting again in thousands of centres on the principle that the lively initiative of the individual and groups of that Free Arrangement The choice lies with you'.Kropotkin, 'Conquest of Bread'
On the Pan-German banner is written: Retention and strengthening of the State at any cost. On our banner, the social-revolutionary banner, on the contrary, are inscribed, in fiery and bloody letters: the destruction of all States, the annihilation of bourgeois civilization, free and spontaneous organization from below upward, by means of free associations, the organization of the unbridled rabble of toilers, of all emancipated humanity, and the creation of a new universally human world....Bakunin
ZEITGEIST 2:ADDENDUM The Money System
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=7065205277695921912&hl=en&fs=true
Addendum
Alternatives to Capitalism.
1: Labour Theory of Value.
There are fundamentalist Marxists who wish to see an allegedly temporary government introduce a form of rationing termed ’labour vouchers.’ Marx equated labour hours with value and went to great lengths calculating how much labour would go into a particular machine or a commodity; this became it’s calculatable ’value.’ Clearly, in ideal conditions you would not swap a kilo of marijuana for a kilo of potatoes (some people might if they were starving, but not in ideal conditions); neither would you swap a kilo of gold for a kilo of marijuana (well ’I’ certainly would if I had an abundance of gold, but not in ’ideal conditions).
2: Sharing and Bartering
Bartering certainly occurs on a primitive scale among farmers in the Somerset countryside where I live. Favours are exchanged and there is mutual co-operation.
I am not sure how many chickens you could get for a pig, or how many pigs for a horse, but it is quite an effective system on a primitive level. Two farmers might have two different machines that each wants to use occasionally, so they share.
This might work out quite well among agriculturalists sharing potatoes for carrots, but for other items, such a system would be much less straightforward.
Les us say you wish to buy a tractor or a combine harvester. You would have to pay the tractor dealer with something with which he could pay the manufacturer for the tractor, and this would have to be something with which the manufacturer would be able to pay his electricity bills, his workers in wages etc.
So at this point it all sounds very messy and quite unrealistic.
3: Anarcho-Capitalism.
So here we are again back to Anarcho-Capitalism.
Here there are no government regulations. No banking regulations. No banking licences. Anyone could theoretically start their own loan sharking institution and issue currency. It seems rather confusing.
In addition, there would still be private property, rich and poor, land owners and the landless and homeless. There would be those who would have to become labour slaves for food and those who would be labour masters and demand labour slavery in return for some form of Capital which could be exchanged for food.
But ultimately the question still has to be asked, how would a particular currency in a world of millions of currencies be considered valuable?
Capital as ’Promissary Notes’ for ’anything.’
A farmer in Texas who issues currency would have to state on the currency what the paper I.O.U. is exchangable for. His currency might state ’I promise to pay the bearer a ton of potatoes, ’ or a ’ton of beef’ or its equivalent in labour hours. This system is of course open to fraud, since he could simply write out more I.O.U’s that he is capable of producing. Further if a farmer in New York was offered this I.O.U, it would be a complex matter since he would have to ensure that the farmer in Texas was capable of making good his promissary notes. Further all persons and companies who supplied the farmer with electricity, phone, computers, tractors, labour would have to go through the same process and take the same risk of ending up with a ton of rotting potatoes dumped on their premises. It is a rather messy and impractical solution which I think most farmers and their suppliers would simply laugh at.
Capital as Precious metal promissary notes.
The current system we have is one where only a select few elite bankers can issue such promissary notes; originally they were backed by precious metals, but even this original system was subject to fraud and the creation of ’reserve banking, ’ where only a small percentage of the precious metals were held in reserve.
There are elite banks and non-elite banks. Today elite banks do not work on a reserve system, they simply issue currency at the touch of a computer mouse. Thus have the Capitalists taken over the world though ’confidence (a ’con’) in their paper and credit.
The Anarcho-Capitalist counterproposal to such a confidence trick by a few elite bankers would seem to lead to a world where there were millions of such confusing confidence tricks.
In summary, Anarcho-Communism is a rejection of forms of bartering, token-ism, Capitalism in any form or labour vouchers; it is quite simply about collectives sharing resources, much as it was in the early days of the Israeli kibbutz.
Love and Light
Lucifer
http://www.luciferia.tv/animation/A.gif
Fire, plague and poisoned waters.
___________
"Every man and every woman is a star." That is to say, every human being is intrinsically an independent individual with his own proper character and proper motion.
Every man and every woman has a course, depending partly on the self, and partly on the environment which is natural and necessary for each. Anyone who is forced from his own course, either through not understanding himself, or through external opposition, comes into conflict with the order of the Universe, and suffers accordingly. Illustration: A man may think it his duty to act in a certain way, through having made a fancy picture of himself, instead of investigating his actual nature. For example, a woman may make herself miserable for life by thinking that she prefers love to social consideration, or "vice versa". One woman may stay with an unsympathetic husband when she would really be happy in an attic with a lover, while another may fool herself into a romantic elopement when her only true pleasures are those of presiding at fashionable functions. …….
A Man whose conscious will is at odds with his True Will is wasting his strength. He cannot hope to influence his environment efficiently. Illustration: When Civil War rages in a nation, it is in no condition to undertake the invasion of other countries….A man who is doing this True Will has the inertia of the Universe to assist him. Illustration: The first principle of success in evolution is that the individual should be true to his own nature, and at the same time adapt himself to his environment….. Man is ignorant of the nature of his own being and powers. Even his idea of his limitations is based on experience of the past, and every step in his progress extends his empire. There is therefore no reason to assign theoretical limits to what he may be, or to what he may do…. The question of Magick is a question of discovering and employing hitherto unknown forces in nature. We know that they exist, and we cannot doubt the possibility of mental or physical instruments capable of bringing us into relation with them.
Aleister Crowley
Magick In Theory And Practice
________________
Nb., I should point out that Mao, Crowley and Osho (cited in the above essay) were not Anarchists: I merely cite points of agreement.
http://www.luciferia.tv/animation/A.gif
__________________
For Anarchist Communism
The 1000 Year Agricultural Revolution and the Revolution of Light.
The non-miraculous of the feeding of the 6 billion.
http://www.luciferia.tv/1ChildrenOftheSlaves/anarchism2sm.jpg
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bakunin/BakuninCW.html
Collected Works of Michael Bakunin
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/kropotkin/KropotkinCW.html
Collected Works of Peter Kropotkin (The Prince)
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/goldman/GoldmanCW.html">
Collected Works of Emma Goldman </a>
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/proudhon/ProudhonCW.html
Collected Works of Joseph Proudhon
Video: Numerous online Anarchist films.
<a href="http://www.londonfreetv.com/documents/menu.html">http://www.londonfreetv.com/documents/menu.html</a>
http://www.luciferia.tv/animation/A.gif
For a world without nations, governments, money or any means of barter or exchange where all property is shared in common.
For kibbutzism (agricultural collectivism)
________________________________________
On the Military Strategy of the State Terrorists. Sept 11th and other ‘false flag’ military operations.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947&q=alex+jones&hl=en
Alex Jones: Video archive:
http://infowarsforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=937">http://infowarsforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=937
http://www.luciferia.tv/1ChildrenOftheSlaves/loosechange.jpg
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en
Sept 11th video: a black op by the US military: broadband
911 Truth: video archives
http://infowarsforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=939
http://www.belowgroundsurface.org/
____________________
Videos by Lucifer
http://3.gvt0.com/ThumbnailServer2?app=vss&contentid=2ed2cef8e6166403&offsetms=10000&itag=w160&hl=en&sigh=VmR2YWotgszPQuvd3zhnaBqSarU
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4162680054846428815&hl=en
Liberation Theology Video: Anarchist Jesus Part 1. Runtime: 2 minutes
http://3.gvt0.com/ThumbnailServer2?app=vss&contentid=3601540b8b70871b&offsetms=15000&itag=w160&hl=en&sigh=GJRGjaKp8T6vndP-wZ6dbnz83sY
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2669487853657952105&ei=5NkLStDrIZej-Aast8X8DA&q=liberation+theology+lucifer&hl=en
Liberation Theology Video: Anarchist Jesus: Part 2. Runtime: 2 minutes