Wtc 7

[bobhodge]

After 8 years of pondering, I have decided that I think WTC building 7 may have been the real target of the plane that crashed in penn state. however, something went wrong and the plane crashed. when you consider that WTC 7 was rigged for demolition like the other buildings were its the only rational conclusion. this has probably been mentioned before. your thoughts?

[fanoftruth]

I think that theory is gaining ground yes. WTC7 is such an abvious controlled demolition that it seems odd to take it down as and when they did. My guess it they left it so far into the day to aid the story that fires were causing damage over the course of the afternoon.

There is no way UA93 crashed though - it was clearly either shot down or was never even in the area (though I think the former is far more likely). This points to the shootdown being instigated by people outside of the conspiracy loop if indeed the plane was intended for WTC7.

[drhemp]

I think that theory is gaining ground yes. WTC7 is such an abvious controlled demolition that it seems odd to take it down as and when they did. My guess it they left it so far into the day to aid the story that fires were causing damage over the course of the afternoon.

There is no way UA93 crashed though - it was clearly either shot down or was never even in the area (though I think the former is far more likely). This points to the shootdown being instigated by people outside of the conspiracy loop if indeed the plane was intended for WTC7.

That's what I think, certainly seems the most feasible explanation, a lot more so than daft stories (planted misinformation) of holographic missiles and beam weapons.

[lozz]

Thats the first time i've heard that theory and it just rings true for me. Certainly ties some holes together if its true. good thinking ;)

[bryan]

After 8 years of pondering, I have decided that I think WTC building 7 may have been the real target of the plane that crashed in penn state. however, something went wrong and the plane crashed. when you consider that WTC 7 was rigged for demolition like the other buildings were its the only rational conclusion. this has probably been mentioned before. your thoughts?

Have you seen any evidence that the plane crashed in Shanksville?

[ronisron]

After 8 years of pondering, I have decided that I think WTC building 7 may have been the real target of the plane that crashed in penn state. however, something went wrong and the plane crashed. when you consider that WTC 7 was rigged for demolition like the other buildings were its the only rational conclusion. this has probably been mentioned before. your thoughts?

:) Wow.... that is interesting. WTC 7 is really much lower to the ground than the other two, a very risky plan even with a remote flown drone. There was supposed to be "something" hitting the White House too, if I'm not mistaken. That may or may not have been sensationalism though.

There really isn't any evidence of a plane crash in Pennsylvania that I've seen though. The closest thing to evidence is the admission a few weeks ago by a military officer who said "A" passenger plane was shot down over PA on the morning of 9/11, and there were eyewitnesses who saw a low flying plane being pursued by smaller, military or lear jet type planes, then an explosion. Not at Shanksville though.

[bobhodge]

:) Wow.... that is interesting. WTC 7 is really much lower to the ground than the other two, a very risky plan even with a remote flown drone. There was supposed to be "something" hitting the White House too, if I'm not mistaken. That may or may not have been sensationalism though.

There really isn't any evidence of a plane crash in Pennsylvania that I've seen though. The closest thing to evidence is the admission a few weeks ago by a military officer who said "A" passenger plane was shot down over PA on the morning of 9/11, and there were eyewitnesses who saw a low flying plane being pursued by smaller, military or lear jet type planes, then an explosion. Not at Shanksville though.

its just a theory i was thinking of.....wish is kinda sad i guess. i havent really researched it too much, because well...im lazy. but i guess it would kind of make sense. i mean WTC 7 was rigged to implode, and the other two buildings that had that kind of treatment had planes crash into them. then with the penn state plane we had this over-the-top cover story after the event of how american 'heroes' took over the plane and made it crash. they even made a movie about it. it just seems like something went wrong with that flight and they tried to cover it up quickly with this silly story.

[bryan]

its just a theory i was thinking of.....wish is kinda sad i guess. i havent really researched it too much, because well...im lazy. but i guess it would kind of make sense. i mean WTC 7 was rigged to implode, and the other two buildings that had that kind of treatment had planes crash into them.

If they'd planned to fly a plane into WTC7, you'd think the building would have been rigged to explode from the impact area downwards like the two towers did. Even with a plane crash it would have been hard to explain a perfect demolition into its own footprint.

The most likely theory I've seen is that 7 was supposed to come down a few minutes after the North Tower fell, hidden behind the dust cloud, but something went wrong with the demolition and it took them about seven hours to finish the job off. There's a clip from the TV archives where a journalist was told by a fireman that "another 50 storeys" had come down at 10:45am.