View Full Version : LONDON BOMBING - Shocking New Evidence Of Fake CCT
mr_pixie
03-05-2009, 10:06 AM
I remember seeing that clip on the news a few weeks after 7/7/2005 and it only showed 3 people walking into the train station.
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
citroen999
03-05-2009, 11:25 AM
hmm.. dont know about fake
looks like two different peices of footage to me, the first one is time stamped and the 2nd one is not.. so could be different days and maybe sky have reported it wrong
Dude there both from the same day he cant arrive at the same train station twice once with a bomb and the other suspects and once without it makes no sense. Also iv seen images from that cctv blown up and they already looked doctored...
flip side
03-05-2009, 11:53 AM
Very very interesting! Ladies and gentlemen, we have a smoking gun!
citroen999
03-05-2009, 12:13 PM
whats the original link on youtube or title of this vid?
flip side
03-05-2009, 12:26 PM
whats the original link on youtube or title of this vid?
http ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j11Uaxh6bUI
without the space after http :)
howie
03-05-2009, 02:41 PM
Tanweer is wearing different trousers
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/hours-before-77-bomber-is-picture-of-calm-1677648.html
If you look at the guy nearest the fence the bottom rail is actualy infront of him.They could easy do a better photoshop.What puzzels me is,why didnt they?
meksar
03-05-2009, 03:13 PM
The official story to 7/7 just like 9/11, is insulting to the intelligence of your average 10 year old. This so called CCTV evidence is a desperate attempt to try and convince the masses that the Orwellian state is necessary for our safety.
wells
03-05-2009, 05:56 PM
If you look at the guy nearest the fence the bottom rail is actualy infront of him.They could easy do a better photoshop.What puzzels me is,why didnt they?
I remember spending a lot of time looking at these images a few years ago, and thinking maybe the person who made these images wanted to deliberately leave a clue. However, after a while my perspective changed and I can see how his arm could just be reaching forward/sideways opening a view of the bar.
The quality just isn't good enough, and at the end of the day you can see whatever you want to see with images like this. Look how much time is wasted on 9/11 images when there are easily a hundred more important areas to focus on.
citroen999
03-05-2009, 06:04 PM
this one has got my head in a spin....
here is what ianw is on about..
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e81/citroen999/7_7_BombTrialL_468x395.jpg
Ian2day
03-05-2009, 07:56 PM
Does an image sometimes not just burn onto the CCD part of a camera like the channel logo can on a CRT television? Would that not explain the bar from the railing jumping in front of the person.
minton
03-05-2009, 08:43 PM
I've just taken a few rough print screens of the footage and circled the person said to be Germaine Lydsay, in each of them.
It shows someone with the same clothing, shoes, baseball cap, etc, but without a white carrier bag at least, approaching the train station, but it's hard to tell if it's the same person or even if it was filmed on the same or if the Sky footage was a reconstruction.
It would certainly be very interesting indeed, if it does prove to be that of Germaine Lindsay arrived at Luton station on his own without a rucksack, as that would mean that the original photograph was doctored to show them all arriving together and with Germaine Lyndsay carrying a carrier bag and a rucksack and the question then would be why that was done and what it hoped to achieve.
http://i41.tinypic.com/3538qpw.jpg
http://i44.tinypic.com/2a4x2ll.jpg
http://i39.tinypic.com/2vafcj4.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/99m3dj.jpg
citroen999
03-05-2009, 11:04 PM
why no time stamp from the new sky footage???
it could have been taken at a different time so i cant see it being proof of fakery..
helloperator
03-05-2009, 11:21 PM
I wouldn't trust any of these videos...just like 911...they have been through so many pairs of hands out there you don't know what's real and what's been tampered with by do gooders or nuts out there on the internet.
paolo
03-05-2009, 11:33 PM
This is a strange image purported to be one of Germaine leaving the station at a clearly timestamped 07.15.20. No evidence of origin as yet
http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t316/dwightheet/LindsayExitsLuton.jpg
From this forum thread
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=134279#134279
howie
04-05-2009, 03:34 AM
This is a strange image purported to be one of Germaine leaving the station at a clearly timestamped 07.15.20. No evidence of origin as yet
From this forum thread
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=134279#134279
Where is that image from? It's not from any of the latest videos I've seen. :confused:
If however, he did go back outside to meet the others between 7:15 & 7:21, Shezhad Tanweer must have passed him that white carrier bag, I'll guess it's supposed to be the same bag Tanweer gets from the petrol station when he buys the snacks but Lindsays bag has a logo.
mr_pixie
04-05-2009, 04:40 AM
I'm finding it a bit confusing myself to be honerst not 100% sure about this video either but something is wrong so we carnt trust the video or stills evidence for 7/7.
citroen999
04-05-2009, 10:49 AM
the original video in this thread is misleading in my opinion...
it gives the impression that the original still/clip is at the same time as the new clip.. the original shows the 4 men walking in at 7.21:54 secs but the new one shows just lindsay walking in by himself at 7.15:20 secs..
looks like lindsay walked in did what he had to do, buy tickets etc at roughly 7.15 then went back out, met the other 3 and returned at roughly 7.20.. easily done within 5 mins
if we knew the time stamp on the sky news footage of him going in alone then this would help confirm...
as for the original yourtube video claiming shock new evidence, i would be wary..
just my thoughts
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18708
sam bless
04-05-2009, 11:29 AM
a photoshopped photograph doesn't absolutely suggest a conspiracy. the news could of just edited the photograph so they had just ONE image on the front of their papers for maximum effect, rather than four smaller ones of people walking into luton station.
i'm not dis agreeing that some of the 'facts' of 7/7 are bold face lies, but....
brainfreeze
04-05-2009, 11:31 AM
a photoshopped photograph doesn't absolutely suggest a conspiracy. the news could of just edited the photograph so they had just ONE image on the front of their papers for maximum effect, rather than four smaller ones of people walking into luton station.
i'm not dis agreeing that some of the 'facts' of 7/7 are bold face lies, but....
No, they passed it off as evidence that the "bombers" boarded the train, which by the way was late that day anyway.
sam bless
04-05-2009, 11:35 AM
fair play, it was just another angle to concider.
minton
04-05-2009, 12:50 PM
This is a strange image purported to be one of Germaine leaving the station at a clearly timestamped 07.15.20. No evidence of origin as yet
http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t316/dwightheet/LindsayExitsLuton.jpg
From this forum thread
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=134279#134279
That is an interesting photograph, especially as it has the time stamp on it.
That could possibly mean that Germaine Lindsay arrived early at the station sometime before 0715 and went in earlier looking for the others without any bags and then came out again and eventually met up with the others and got his bags before going in again as shown in the CCTV footage time stamped as 0721. That would also explain the Sky footage as that could have shown him arriving at this earlier time and looking around for the others, but it's hard to tell anything much from the Sky footage without a definite time stamp on it.