Ron Paul More Popular Google Seach Term Than Paris

[synergy777]

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/150707_b_popular.htm

KVUE segment on Ron Paul revealing that the Texas Congressman and presidential candidate gets more Google search hits than Paris Hilton or the iPhone. Paul's runaway popularity is growing every day and his chances of beating the other frontrunners are realistic.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2007/140707nodoubting.htm

No Doubting Ron Paul's Warning Of Staged Provocation
Debunkers question accuracy of previous article but presidential candidate had spoken in Congress about staged Gulf of Tonkin style provocation

more at the link

VOTE FOR RON PAUL!

Congressman Ron Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in our nation's capital. This is the official website of the Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

http://www.house.gov/paul/

[synergy777]

"I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!"

Congressman Ron Paul at an event near Austin, Texas on August 30th, 2003

Ron Paul: U.S. In "Great Danger" Of Staged Terror
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...reatdanger.htm

Congressman & presidential candidate warns of economic collapse precipitated by bombing of Iran

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, July 13, 2007

Presidential candidate Ron Paul says the U.S. is in "great danger" of a staged terror attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation while also warning that a major collapse of the American economy is on the horizon and could be precipitated by the bombing of Iran and the closure of the Persian Gulf.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show, the Texas Congressman was asked his opinion on Cindy Sheehan's recent comments that the U.S. is in danger of a staged terror attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation that will validate the Neo-Con agenda and lead to the implementation of the infrastructure of martial law that Bush recently signed into law via executive order, as well as public pronouncements from prominent officials that the West needs terrorism to save a doomed foreign policy.

"I think we're in great danger of it," responded the Congressman, "We're in danger in many ways, the attack on our civil liberties here at home, the foreign policy that's in shambles and our obligations overseas and commitment which endangers our troops and our national defense."

"Every day we're in worse shape and right now there's an orchestrated effort to blame the Iranians for everything that's gone wrong in Iraq and we're quite concerned that the attack will be on Iran and that will jeopardize so many more of our troops, so I would say that we're in much greater danger than we even were four or five years ago," asserted Paul.

The presidential candidate expressed his despair that the situation in Iraq will not change until there is a total collapse of the American economy.

"There's no way we can afford what we're doing, whether it's domestic spending or the international spending and very few people talk about the real cost of this economically speaking....this is unsustainable and it will be a threat to our dollar," said Paul, adding that the onset of the meltdown could be sparked by the bombing of Iran and the closure of the Persian Gulf.

The Congressman added that the collapse was in its early stages with the major indication being a reduction in the living standard of middle class Americans but that "one single major world event" could change things overnight and precipitate a major downturn.

Paul added that there had "not been a national discussion on monetary policy in many many years" and the increasingly bleak outlook for the U.S. economy was also bringing more attention to the solutions the Congressman has proposed for reducing the burden of the mammoth national deficit.

Paul said that national and world events, especially the degrading situation in Iraq, were attracting support for his presidential campaign due to his resolute position on embracing a non-interventionist foreign policy.

The Congressman concluded by surmising that record lows in approval ratings for Bush, Cheney and Congress showed that, "The American people are alive and well and disgusted yet they haven't had good alternatives....it's justifiable, they are looking for true answers and options and quite frankly I think that's probably one of the reasons why our campaign is growing by leaps and bounds right now."

Click here to listen to the MP3 of the interview with Ron Paul.

[Anders Lindman]

Only U.S. citizens can donate:

https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/

It would be cool if Ron Paul got enough donations so that he could compete with the other candidates. I don't know if he is the best candidate, but it would be interesting to see him become a real threat to Clinton, Obama and Berlusconi (oops, sorry I meant Corleone........no wait a minute........Giuliani!)

[parel]

There are a lot of hurdles to overcome if one wants to run a presidential race. Nomination by the party, electoral college, media smears, fickle voters and let's not forget, the election could be stolen or could be won on a technicality.

I like Paul a lot, but if he were ever to make it to president, I believe he would be shot.

[synergy777]

its good to see that some people still hold dear the ideals of democracy over corporate governance/lobbying etc. in this age of cash for honours/questions etc, this age of corporate hospitality, world government, it refreshing to have a person who has the fire and conviction to speak out. also he is credible, he is politician, the proles will have to take note.

[nessa felagund]

I've been watching his campaign closely ever since that first republican candidate debate that (by all internet polls) Ron Paul won.

Not only does he talk a good talk, he backs it up with his actions. His congressional record speaks volumes.

Thanks for all the links about him, Synergy777. I encourage everyone who is interested to check out his campaign website. Loads of information about Dr. Paul and his service in Congress. It's worth checking out especially if you are a US Citizen.

[john white]

There are a lot of hurdles to overcome if one wants to run a presidential race. Nomination by the party, electoral college, media smears, fickle voters and let's not forget, the election could be stolen or could be won on a technicality.

I like Paul a lot, but if he were ever to make it to president, I believe he would be shot.

Paul knows that risk: and would we let them get away with that shit another time? We are not a bunch of trusting hicks like people were in 1963

[synergy777]

we now shoot back, lol this guy could save america, and severely hinder the nwo's plans. a peaceful liberation is still on the cards, trust. the nwo are way behind schedule, they are starting to realise higher powers have higher functions.

maybe their boss/satan, sold them false hope, lol, heck we know he has.

[Anders Lindman]

I don't seriously think that anyone would expect Monica Clinton to be the next American president. Nor someone called Osama Obama. Maybe a green joker called Al GORE will pop up at the last minute to steal some votes, waving a global warming tax threat pamphlet. :confused:

[synergy777]

well he who controls the software, controls fate, electronic votes, lol

[synergy777]

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2007/170707Paul.htm

Antiwar Ron Paul Rakes in Military Donations?
Quarterly Reports Indicate Paul Raised More From Military Than Other Republicans

Iraq Slogger
Tuesday July 17, 2007

Congressman Ron Paul has defined his Republican presidential candidacy with a staunchly critical stance on the Iraq war, saying during the June 5 debate in New Hampshire, for example, that it was a "mistake to go and a mistake to stay."

Paul has often reiterated his views that US security has been worsened by its military presence in Iraq, and that Bush's pre-emptive war doctrine represented one of his administration's greatest moral failings.

One might think such criticism of the war and the Commander-in-Chief's leadership would make Paul a pariah to the military community, however, the latest figures indicate the antiwar Republican is receiving more donations from employees of the US military than any other Republican candidate.


The Presidential campaigns just released their quarterly campaign finance reports, leaving much of the mainstream media remarking on Paul's surge in online donations from his healthy Internet following, though the $2.3 million he raised still has him trailing far behind the front runners.

But a closer look at the reports reveals a less obvious but more remarkable development--the antiwar Republican received nearly 50% of the money donated by employees of the US military.

The site that crunched the numbers on the quarterly reports did not count donations coming from the US Marine Corps, which adds $1600 to the total of $15,825 total they report McCain raised from employees of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Veterans Administration. That failure slightly alters the conclusions they draw on the totals, since Paul received no money from Marines. Even so, the overall percentages indicate that the underdog candidate, whose overall fund raising cache is dwarfed by the leading pack of candidates, has appealed to segments of the military community.

VOTE FOR RON PAUL!
THE NWO'S SPARTACUS!

GODSPEED RON PAUL.

[h1s_l0rdsh1p]

He's telling you what you want to hear.

I'm sorry but Bush did the same. Watch a video on youtube called Bush vs Bush. It was on the daily show with jon stewart.

[h1s_l0rdsh1p]

By the way. Maybe he has been getting more traffic lately, but according to this:
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Ron+Paul&word2=Paris+Hilton

Paris beat Ron by 8,200,000 hits... Then again, she's been in the public eye longer.

[synergy777]

he is doing a better job than us, we should support him.

[h1s_l0rdsh1p]

he is doing a better job than us, we should support him.

Look, what I'm saying is, is that he could be unieque. However, this is always the option that he is only telling people what they want to hear. Allot of people are starting to catch on to the NWO, and don't want it. So waht do you do, do like Eisenhower:
"Mothers of America, your husbands had to die in Europe, but I will not let your sons die!"

That was one of his winning quotes.
What happened? WW2. Later, we found out he knew it would happen. He told them what they wanted to hear.

Learn from history. Fool me once, shame on you... Because I'll stab you.

[herebynightfall]

I've integrated Ron Paul into my thread. Check it.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6329

[synergy777]

off for a ciggie, will do when i get back.

[cruise4]

Have you seen much of Ron Paul, Lordship? Have a look at his voting record. Check the numerous videos and interviews. This man is consistent and I believe genuine. Sometimes a spade is a spade. Ron paul for president ! Shame he can't stand over here. All our politicians seem like a bunch of cowards, liars or idiots. I will never understand what makes the British vote as they do.

[Anders Lindman]

By the way. Maybe he has been getting more traffic lately, but according to this:
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Ron+Paul&word2=Paris+Hilton

Paris beat Ron by 8,200,000 hits... Then again, she's been in the public eye longer.

Nice search term tool! I wonder how the traffic is measured. Maybe not fully accurate. Still, Ron Paul has a massive search traffic.

If Ron Paul in addition to his popularity on the web would begin to get support from the corporate world, and especially from the big and powerful companies, then he would surely become a strong candidate.

As I understand it, Ron Paul will promote a free business world. That would suit modern companies. The old way of doing business was often profit-only driven, meaning that companies would use their freedom in a childish way and do anything to make profit as long as they could get away with it. That's a sign of immaturity in leadership and a disregard of responsibility.

[h1s_l0rdsh1p]

Nice search term tool! I wonder how the traffic is measured. Maybe not fully accurate. Still, Ron Paul has a massive search traffic.

If Ron Paul in addition to his popularity on the web would begin to get support from the corporate world, and especially from the big and powerful companies, then he would surely become a strong candidate.

As I understand it, Ron Paul will promote a free business world. That would suit modern companies. The old way of doing business was often profit-only driven, meaning that companies would use their freedom in a childish way and do anything to make profit as long as they could get away with it. That's a sign of immaturity in leadership and a disregard of responsibility.


But we already have a free business world. It's capitalism run amock. And also, no offense, but if coporations support him, then kiss it all good bye because then he has to follow THEIR agenda, not what he says he'll do.

[Anders Lindman]

But we already have a free business world. It's capitalism run amock. And also, no offense, but if coporations support him, then kiss it all good bye because then he has to follow THEIR agenda, not what he says he'll do.

I wouldn't call what we have today sound business. I call it a pyramid scam. I suspect that things like stockmarkets for example are rigged to the max. We need an open free market with a minimal set of clear rules for how to play the game. There are many nasty people out there, and many nasty companies, so some form of regulation is needed. And the top scam is the dept-generating banking pyramid. That has to be regulated as well.

And if Ron Paul will be able to stick to what he promotes, he wouldn't let simpleminded business interests dictate to him what to do.

[h1s_l0rdsh1p]

I wouldn't call what we have today sound business. I call it a pyramid scam. I suspect that things like stockmarkets for example are rigged to the max. We need an open free market with a minimal set of clear rules for how to play the game. There are many nasty people out there, and many nasty companies, so some form of regulation is needed. And the top scam is the dept-generating banking pyramid. That has to be regulated as well.

Their shouldn't be a game. Period.

Why is life a game? It's an expierence.

I don't see the point of promisery note trading for goods when we can trade goods for goods.

[Anders Lindman]

Their shouldn't be a game. Period.

Why is life a game? It's an expierence.

I don't see the point of promisery note trading for goods when we can trade goods for goods.

Trading goods for goods is too cumbersome and inefficient. I would like to see a free open and competitive market with rules that prevent companies from using workers in a negative way. One such rule would be a minimum wage level for employees. And a welfare system that makes sure no one has to live below a certain minimum level.

[synergy777]

http://infowars.net/articles/july2007/170707Neo-Cons.htm

Confessions Of The Neo-Cons:Pray for Fox news, want war dissenters in gas chambers

Steve Watson/Infowars.net
Tuesday, July 17, 2007

A recent exposé in the London Independent, when stripped of its heavily lefty leaning bias, has provided a stark picture of neocon worshippers in America today as a bunch of bigoted wannabe elites who have swallowed whole the mantra of the Bush cabal and now believe that real conservatism consists of invading every oil producing country in the world and killing American citizens who protest.

Johann Hari's recent article, while being laced with overly liberal padding, contains at its heart a detailed picture of the fallout of the neoconservative hijacking of America in the 21st century.

Hari, reporting from the annual cruise organised by the staunchly neocon publication the 'National Review', details casual comments made by attendees that highlight how the self made reality of right wing lobbyists and elites has filtered through to a bandwagon of greasy ladder climbing yuppies who consider total servitude and worship of the globalist run government to be the key to a strong and healthy American society

Some of the highlights of the article follow:

I lie on the beach with Hillary-Ann, a chatty, scatty 35-year-old Californian designer. As she explains the perils of Republican dating, my mind drifts, watching the gentle tide. When I hear her say, " Of course, we need to execute some of these people," I wake up. Who do we need to execute? She runs her fingers through the sand lazily. "A few of these prominent liberals who are trying to demoralise the country," she says. "Just take a couple of these anti-war people off to the gas chamber for treason to show, if you try to bring down America at a time of war, that's what you'll get." She squints at the sun and smiles. " Then things'll change."

Hillary-Ann and many others like her may get her wish should the Michael Chertoff's "gut feeling" and the other daily warnings that there is going to be a major terror attack turn out to be accurate.

Hari also discovers that many of these mindless fools cannot get enough of their daily neocon media brainwashing and literally worship the mouthpieces that deliver it to them:

To my right are two elderly New Yorkers who look and sound like late-era Dorothy Parkers, minus the alcohol poisoning. They live on Park Avenue, they explain in precise Northern tones... One of the Park Avenue ladies declares that she gets on her knees every day to "thank God for Fox News".

Some are less happy with Fox news however, take Robert Bork, Ronald Reagan's one-time nominee to the Supreme Court, who is clearly unhappy with the unbalanced reporting on Fox:

mumbles from beneath low-hanging jowls: [B]"The coverage of this war is unbelievable. Even Fox News is unbelievable. You'd think we're the only ones dying. Enemy casualties aren't covered. We're doing an excellent job killing them."

Hari also details low ranking CFR member, editor of Commentary, and arch neocon Norman Podhoretz's comments on the Iraq war as he declares that it has been "an amazing success":

He waves his fist and declaims: "There were WMD, and they were shipped to Syria ... This picture of a country in total chaos with no security is false. It has been a triumph. It couldn't have gone better." He wants more wars, and fast. He is "certain" Bush will bomb Iran, and " thank God" for that.... He goes on to insist that "nobody was tortured in Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo" and that Bush is "a hero".

Another cruiser who laughably considers himself to be a traditional American conservative states:

"The civilised countries should invade all the oil-owning places in the Middle East and run them properly. We won't take the money ourselves, but we'll manage it so the money isn't going to terrorists."

Among various other ridiculous declarations that Al Qaeda is taking over the world and that all Muslims are terrorists, the crux of the piece lies in the following statement:

There is something strange about this, and it takes me a few moments to realise exactly what it is. All the tropes that conservatives usually deny in public – that Iraq is another Vietnam, that Bush is fighting a class war on behalf of the rich – are embraced on this shining ship in the middle of the ocean. Yes, they concede, we are fighting another Vietnam; and this time we won't let the weak-kneed liberals lose it. The writer Dinesh D'Souza... says, in a swift shift to domestic politics, "of course" Republican politics is "about class. Republicans are the party of winners, Democrats are the party of losers."

Though Hari wrongly labels these neocon worshippers as "conservatives" it is telling that he discovers that they consider themselves to be "joining the winning team". They know deep down that true American values are being obliterated but have decided to embrace what is being offered to them instead. Trapped in a false left/right paradigm and failing to see that there is only one "team" that they cannot join, in reality these people are looked upon as nothing more than useful idiots by the elite masters they pander to.

Meanwhile real conservatives such as presidential candidate Ron Paul, whose whole campaign is structured around reigning in big government, restoring the Republic at home and abruptly halting military interventionism abroad, are looked upon by these twisted neocon underlings as traitors who hate America and should be gassed to death.

Renowned and trusted conservatives such as Paul Craig Roberts and even Ron Paul himself are now desperately trying to warn the American people that this administration has been hijacked and is willing to use false flag terror events to bring about the end of the Republic. They urge an instant restoration of the American constitutional system.

The false conservatives however continue to tell us that we must give up our liberties and support the expansion of government power to monolithic proportions.

This is the reality of the greatest threat to freedom in America in the 21st Century and what we must move to combat if liberty is to win out. To these soulless followers of the globalist elite, war is the new peace, slavery is the new freedom, ignorance is the new strength and blind worship of tyranny is the new conservatism.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2766040.ece