bob_jones
12-04-2009, 11:58 AM
Here follows an essay written by Robert Alexander Jones that draws a distinction between popular and unpopular capitalism.
Robert Alexander Jones is an intellectual giant of political think of our age and is therefore criticised relentlessly by corrupt and slandering politicians who usually adopt Robert's ideas and phrases while trying to pass them off as their own.
That they do because they do not want to feel they are surpassed greatly by an amateur and so go into denial.
Such is the vastly superior intellect of Bob Jones that he has written this essay using words that will trigger off reactions in those that have been brainwashed by modern education that may cause them to become enraged.
That is quite deliberate as the education system requires its victims to pigeon hole words and marked then as good or bad.
Real education would inspire you to think beyond this primitive mind set and the author has no sympathy for those that have not out grown their education themselves.
It is easy for the state to manipulate people if they are programmed to respond in certain ways to certain words and their responses are predictable and the responder has the illusion of their own mind being at work.
Bob Jones is however a great threat to them as he is himself truly a master of puppets.
One notable theft of his intellectual property is that Michael Howard MP stole Robert's one liner that:-
"People not wanting one of Tony Blair's grandiose dates with destiny but want to see a dentist."
Michael Howard used this in his Party Conference speech in 2004 and it brought him a round of applause.
However in reality Robert is yet to see a dentist....
Read on only if you have an adult mind....
Setting People Free
What was Margaret Thatcher talking about? She said she was setting people free. What she meant was that she was setting people free from the Jewish capitalist system. That is unpopular capitalism a capitalist model that is run by a minority of very wealth Jewish bankers.
Her anti-dote was National Socialism. In that the state was the modus opirandi for setting people free by the introduction of popular capitalism. This was the model of capitalism that set people free from those that lend money for profit. It worked as it was genius.
First of all Margaret Thatcher believed in mass share ownership. And put it into practice. There were millions of people that became share owners under her prestigious leadership. The capitalist system was rigged by an elected government so that people could pay off mortgages and get out of debt to money lenders. And then they could pass on the houses to their children so that they could indulge in capitalism with capital to start with. People were buying shares in the companies they worked for and so were paid dividends on the profits they helped generate.
It was a fascist ideology that provided a workable mechanism for the socialist ideal of reaping the full fruits of your labour.
People were doing so well out of the system they were free to retire at 50 and had capital that they could pass on to their children so that they could start businesses with out debt and if it all went wrong they owned a house outright so would not make themselves homeless in the process of their first go at becoming an entrepreneur.
At last mass property and share ownership became a reality and popular capitalism was a success.
Then came Tony Blair and New Labour.
The first thing they did to get rid of freedom was to put up taxes. This affected the stock market and made private pension under perform so that people that had saved up could no longer set themselves free of the need to labour at the age of about 50.
The big money moved into housing as the returns were not available in the stock market. This sent up the price of houses, making them unreachable for the majority of aspiring Britons (Thatcher's people). It made many millionaires on paper but did nothing for the primary purpose of housing:-To put a roof over your head.
The manufacturing sector that was growing up until 1997 went into rapid decline as the country could no longer use its educational advantage to compete with countries like China. The weight of taxes was too much.
This put up unemployment sharply but the state did what no state should do. They created an army of non-job civil servants to soak up the unemployed. This created the need for even higher taxes to pay the wages. Like the old coal and steel industries of the 1970s except instead of producing coal and steel at a loss, they produced nothing except for state interference in people’s lives. A new red army of cost items whose purpose was to hide the unemployment figures and increase the power of the state to interfere with people’s freedom.
The New Labour party were opposed to freedom from the sate as well as freedom from money lenders. So social services became empowered to haul people off to the old folk’s home and sell their houses to stop them reaching the nirvana of freedom. They would be no rung on the ladder for their children; they were to be recycled into the mortgage sector.
Then came inheritance tax, so that the hardy that stuck it out long enough to die their own homes could not pass houses on to their children. The house had to be sold to pay the tax bill.
We even encourage debt by doing the shopping. Personal debt is at a record high. But here the state is not to blame. It is individual choice that has allowed the irresponsible to run up huge debts. It is a democracy after all and people voted for a government that is intent on taking freedom away. They voted for life long slavery to money lenders. And that is what they have got.
But then along came George Bush with his 9/11 atrocity.
This was designed to give the Jewish capitalist system an excuse to attack Islam as it is against the law in Islam to lend money for profit.
That is the theme and reasons behind it. The Bilderberg group were responsible for 9/11.
It is not Islam that they dislike but the popular capitalism. As seen when they tried to use their media power to topple the elected government of Belarus.
Alexander Lukashenko is the Belarus' answer to Thatcher. They have popular capitalism and 2% unemployment. They have 5% fixed interest rate mortgages and have a home owning democracy.
Belarus is not being run in the interests of unpopular capitalism and so false allegations of electoral fraud were made in a bid to topple the government that people in Belarus had voted for. The truth is not a conspiracy theory. The truth is Lukashenko is popular and so people keep voting for him.
Iran is only providing an excuse for America to attack them by developing nuclear facilities. But the reader should be aware that the motive to invade Iran is not weapons of mass destruction but the New World Order's desire to sweep away Islamic capitalism and install unpopular capitalism in its place.
In third world counties you can see unpopular capitalism at its worst. People live hand to mouth fending off debt that they have no choice but to take on to grow crops. They have no opportunity to get out of debt and reach the nirvana of having their own capital and so the freedom to invest without debt. Or even enough capital to meet their subsistence needs.
It is the same in the UK.
The capitalist system is rigged so that most people can not meet their basic needs for housing and food without becoming a slave to money lenders. The gap between rich and poor is wider than ever.
Democracy could remedy the situation but for that a Conservative Party leader of vision and courage that is incorruptible and genuinely out for the people needs to come along.
Not someone that colludes in bogus terrorism to help spread the unelected march of unpopular capitalism around the world.
Written By Robert Alexander Jones 12/11/07
Robert Alexander Jones is an intellectual giant of political think of our age and is therefore criticised relentlessly by corrupt and slandering politicians who usually adopt Robert's ideas and phrases while trying to pass them off as their own.
That they do because they do not want to feel they are surpassed greatly by an amateur and so go into denial.
Such is the vastly superior intellect of Bob Jones that he has written this essay using words that will trigger off reactions in those that have been brainwashed by modern education that may cause them to become enraged.
That is quite deliberate as the education system requires its victims to pigeon hole words and marked then as good or bad.
Real education would inspire you to think beyond this primitive mind set and the author has no sympathy for those that have not out grown their education themselves.
It is easy for the state to manipulate people if they are programmed to respond in certain ways to certain words and their responses are predictable and the responder has the illusion of their own mind being at work.
Bob Jones is however a great threat to them as he is himself truly a master of puppets.
One notable theft of his intellectual property is that Michael Howard MP stole Robert's one liner that:-
"People not wanting one of Tony Blair's grandiose dates with destiny but want to see a dentist."
Michael Howard used this in his Party Conference speech in 2004 and it brought him a round of applause.
However in reality Robert is yet to see a dentist....
Read on only if you have an adult mind....
Setting People Free
What was Margaret Thatcher talking about? She said she was setting people free. What she meant was that she was setting people free from the Jewish capitalist system. That is unpopular capitalism a capitalist model that is run by a minority of very wealth Jewish bankers.
Her anti-dote was National Socialism. In that the state was the modus opirandi for setting people free by the introduction of popular capitalism. This was the model of capitalism that set people free from those that lend money for profit. It worked as it was genius.
First of all Margaret Thatcher believed in mass share ownership. And put it into practice. There were millions of people that became share owners under her prestigious leadership. The capitalist system was rigged by an elected government so that people could pay off mortgages and get out of debt to money lenders. And then they could pass on the houses to their children so that they could indulge in capitalism with capital to start with. People were buying shares in the companies they worked for and so were paid dividends on the profits they helped generate.
It was a fascist ideology that provided a workable mechanism for the socialist ideal of reaping the full fruits of your labour.
People were doing so well out of the system they were free to retire at 50 and had capital that they could pass on to their children so that they could start businesses with out debt and if it all went wrong they owned a house outright so would not make themselves homeless in the process of their first go at becoming an entrepreneur.
At last mass property and share ownership became a reality and popular capitalism was a success.
Then came Tony Blair and New Labour.
The first thing they did to get rid of freedom was to put up taxes. This affected the stock market and made private pension under perform so that people that had saved up could no longer set themselves free of the need to labour at the age of about 50.
The big money moved into housing as the returns were not available in the stock market. This sent up the price of houses, making them unreachable for the majority of aspiring Britons (Thatcher's people). It made many millionaires on paper but did nothing for the primary purpose of housing:-To put a roof over your head.
The manufacturing sector that was growing up until 1997 went into rapid decline as the country could no longer use its educational advantage to compete with countries like China. The weight of taxes was too much.
This put up unemployment sharply but the state did what no state should do. They created an army of non-job civil servants to soak up the unemployed. This created the need for even higher taxes to pay the wages. Like the old coal and steel industries of the 1970s except instead of producing coal and steel at a loss, they produced nothing except for state interference in people’s lives. A new red army of cost items whose purpose was to hide the unemployment figures and increase the power of the state to interfere with people’s freedom.
The New Labour party were opposed to freedom from the sate as well as freedom from money lenders. So social services became empowered to haul people off to the old folk’s home and sell their houses to stop them reaching the nirvana of freedom. They would be no rung on the ladder for their children; they were to be recycled into the mortgage sector.
Then came inheritance tax, so that the hardy that stuck it out long enough to die their own homes could not pass houses on to their children. The house had to be sold to pay the tax bill.
We even encourage debt by doing the shopping. Personal debt is at a record high. But here the state is not to blame. It is individual choice that has allowed the irresponsible to run up huge debts. It is a democracy after all and people voted for a government that is intent on taking freedom away. They voted for life long slavery to money lenders. And that is what they have got.
But then along came George Bush with his 9/11 atrocity.
This was designed to give the Jewish capitalist system an excuse to attack Islam as it is against the law in Islam to lend money for profit.
That is the theme and reasons behind it. The Bilderberg group were responsible for 9/11.
It is not Islam that they dislike but the popular capitalism. As seen when they tried to use their media power to topple the elected government of Belarus.
Alexander Lukashenko is the Belarus' answer to Thatcher. They have popular capitalism and 2% unemployment. They have 5% fixed interest rate mortgages and have a home owning democracy.
Belarus is not being run in the interests of unpopular capitalism and so false allegations of electoral fraud were made in a bid to topple the government that people in Belarus had voted for. The truth is not a conspiracy theory. The truth is Lukashenko is popular and so people keep voting for him.
Iran is only providing an excuse for America to attack them by developing nuclear facilities. But the reader should be aware that the motive to invade Iran is not weapons of mass destruction but the New World Order's desire to sweep away Islamic capitalism and install unpopular capitalism in its place.
In third world counties you can see unpopular capitalism at its worst. People live hand to mouth fending off debt that they have no choice but to take on to grow crops. They have no opportunity to get out of debt and reach the nirvana of having their own capital and so the freedom to invest without debt. Or even enough capital to meet their subsistence needs.
It is the same in the UK.
The capitalist system is rigged so that most people can not meet their basic needs for housing and food without becoming a slave to money lenders. The gap between rich and poor is wider than ever.
Democracy could remedy the situation but for that a Conservative Party leader of vision and courage that is incorruptible and genuinely out for the people needs to come along.
Not someone that colludes in bogus terrorism to help spread the unelected march of unpopular capitalism around the world.
Written By Robert Alexander Jones 12/11/07