PDA

View Full Version : 130 years old. But what has she learned?


void
10-04-2009, 05:44 PM
"Do you remember Tsar Nikolai's era? When the Red Army came and when Vladimir Lenin died? Well I do. So take a guess how old I am.". Meet Sohan Dosova - the newly found treasure of Kazakhstan. She is 130 years old, at least she is according to her documents. The Soviet passport issued in the early 1980s states that Sohan Dosova was born in the Karaganda region on 27 March 1879.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7979599.stm

Physically living long seems preferable to many, but is the 'length' of life important? Or the 'quality' of life and what has been learnt, important? To me, the later. I know some people in their 50s who act more like they're 15 year olds at timess, and don't appear to have learnt very much from life by their manner and actions. Just repeating the same old patterns again and again like those patterns still work, yet moaning about the end results.

If she has learnt a lot, then please share it. Write it down. The observations of elderly people are often very valuable, as they look back at what they have done/seen and can advise on what was a waste of time, and what the most essential things are. I once worked in a nursing home as a handyman.

I got to know several of the old women who came there to die. Along the way I met ones who were totally broken, and ones who were wise and could look back at life and now know what really was important in life. I'll never forget one saying to me that she wished she'd danced a lot more, kissed more people, and been far less serious uptight and formal. She could point out many things she felt was not worth a moment of anyone's attention.

It was always the little things she cherished the most, as I do myself today.

Anyway....130 years old.

darketernal
10-04-2009, 06:18 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7979599.stm

Physically living long seems preferable to many, but is the 'length' of life important? Or the 'quality' of life and what has been learnt, important? To me, the later. I know some people in their 50s who act more like they're 15 year olds at timess, and don't appear to have learnt very much from life by their manner and actions. Just repeating the same old patterns again and again like those patterns still work, yet moaning about the end results.

If she has learnt a lot, then please share it. Write it down. The observations of elderly people are often very valuable, as they look back at what they have done/seen and can advise on what was a waste of time, and what the most essential things are. I once worked in a nursing home as a handyman.

I got to know several of the old women who came there to die. Along the way I met ones who were totally broken, and ones who were wise and could look back at life and now know what really was important in life. I'll never forget one saying to me that she wished she'd danced a lot more, kissed more people, and been far less serious uptight and formal. She could point out many things she felt was not worth a moment of anyone's attention.
It was always the little things she cherished the most, as I do myself today.

Anyway....130 years old.

Wow to the part in bold. When I get old I want to be able to look back at my life and say that I never turned a good thing down, and tried to enjoy the things that matered. We get hung up on the most insignifigant things sometimes, and they are things we may look back on in 20 or 40 years and say "wow I should have gone for that.. why didn't I? My life might have been so much happier" or "I sure wasted too much time worrying about that, when it really wasn't worth it in the long run.".

cafetimes1991
10-04-2009, 06:20 PM
Yes, heard about this a little while ago. I wish I could live to that age anyway (just one hundred and thirteen years to go!), so I'd better cut down on the cigarettes.

measle_weasel
10-04-2009, 06:25 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7979599.stm

Physically living long seems preferable to many, but is the 'length' of life important? Or the 'quality' of life and what has been learnt, important?

I would prefer both, personally. Choosing one over the other, to me, would be like choosing "which do you want, food, or water? You cant have both!" One without the other tends to waste the one youd end up with. If you lived for a long time, but learned nothing, the life you lived might be considered wasted, but if you learn a bunch and die young, your life might be considered stolen.

cafetimes1991
10-04-2009, 06:27 PM
Wow to the part in bold. When I get old I want to be able to look back at my life and say that I never turned a good thing down, and tried to enjoy the things that matered. We get hung up on the most insignifigant things sometimes, and they are things we may look back on in 20 or 40 years and say "wow I should have gone for that.. why didn't I? My life might have been so much happier" or "I sure wasted too much time worrying about that, when it really wasn't worth it in the long run.".

Excellent post^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^