The Dossier

[synergy777]

THIS IS a ROUGH EDIT, AMMENDANTS WILL BE MADE. WE NEED TO ORGANISE INTO SECTIONS, VERIFY SOURCES. OBVIOUSLY SOME SOURCES ARE OPEN TO DISCERNMENT, HOWEVER THE CORRELATION OF WHATS WRITTEN AND WHATS HAPPENING IS BEYOND DISPUTE. SO EITHER THE CLICHE OF ART IMITATING LIFE IS OCCURING HERE OR SOMETHING ELSE.


Jer 50:2 Declare ye among the nations, and publish, and set up a standard; publish, and conceal not...

PIKES LETTER
http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." 4

MORALS AND DOGMA
http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/apikefr.html

PROTOCOLS OF ZION
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PNAC
http://www.newamericancentury.org/
http://www.newamericancentury.org/publicationsreports.htm

EU
http://www.unizar.es/euroconstitucion/Treaties/Treaty_Const.htm

ADMIRALITY/MARITAME LAW
http://www.admiraltylawguide.com/

AGENDA 21
http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/index.htm

STERN REPORT
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/stern_review_report.cfm

LINKS
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Links/

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ADD, AS ITS A COLLECTIVE EFFORT. SMALL ACORNS, MIGHTY OAKS ETC.

[soglad]

We should instead of posting random links, put a general order to them.

[synergy777]

i was thinking of getting as many links, then doing another post version 2, with them classified/organised eg foreign policy-pnac, legislation/eu/agenda 21 etc, secret doctrines -morals etc, religous-revelatiosn etc. first mass the info, then we edit/improve.

the evolution of the revolution.

1love, peace

[herebynightfall]

synergy, lets go with... or something else

all this has to do. is appeal to, and catch on with people who care.

and be backed up by wholehearted meaning of it.

i posted in beacon that i'm alright at video media.
in this early stage of what is glimpsing at a possible something.
i'm with you. and seems that so glad is too. and what i'm thinking is it cant just be us. this must have been thought of before.

but as you said. cliche art imitating life. i want to change that now.
for it only happens everyday.
all talk and no walk. especially around here.
a lot of people deserve this who cannot take a stand themselves. or won't for whatever the limits they have been held back by.

so we'll see

[synergy777]

look for videos on depleted uranium iraqi kids, fallujah, the using of banned phosporus. there was a brilliant italian documentry concerning these two geneva convention breaking crimes. how about showing the conventions on screen as text, with the acts that breached them as the background. same with guantanmo, show geneva conventions, etc. this way you have the legislation, that international democracatic bodies are supposed to follow, but don't. this is why the whole un sanctions bullshit is a farce, they expect others to follow it, while being above it themselves.

personally i think most of the peopel on these forums are monitoring trolls, as they all profess one love etc, then when it comes to developing threads, pitching in, they do fuck all, to be frank. wolves in sheeps clothing.

also use clips from net, edit them then add haunting soundtracks/instrumentals, eg massive attack, portishead, dj shadow etc. even acoustic stuff, strings etc. me i am a paxman/newsnight fan, their content is spot on, watch that, everyone should!

[synergy777]

if you need any help, let me know.

[herebynightfall]

i'm gunna be gathering info and media based on what you said and whats in my head.

as i was doing this though. i was thinking.

if enough people back us on this. and it is so politically correct in terms that i'm sure you could put it in...

i must be dreaming now but couldnt we send this message and many more, out to places like iran, iraq, and all of these predestined hot spots of the world. because if we did, and the general public knew about it. and we proclaimed OUR peace, no matter what the actions of 'our leaders in government' do or say to their 'leaders in government'

a message of... don't attack us (even though we know that You, the concious people of the nations don't want to) and we will help you back on your feet. help you learn our ways of thinking and why our actions have led to what they have, as we would love to learn about your way of thinking and understand how you as well have been suppressed by these elitist. should you choose to make this pact from one peoples nation to another.

government with us or not. because if our gov'ts are against us on that note than they are no governments of ours to represent us

lol sorry about the rant... just venting but hey its a dream of mine :oP

[synergy777]

"I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!"

Congressman Ron Paul at an event near Austin, Texas on August 30th, 2003

Ron Paul: U.S. In "Great Danger" Of Staged Terror
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2007/130707greatdanger.htm

Congressman & presidential candidate warns of economic collapse precipitated by bombing of Iran

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, July 13, 2007

Presidential candidate Ron Paul says the U.S. is in "great danger" of a staged terror attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation while also warning that a major collapse of the American economy is on the horizon and could be precipitated by the bombing of Iran and the closure of the Persian Gulf.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show, the Texas Congressman was asked his opinion on Cindy Sheehan's recent comments that the U.S. is in danger of a staged terror attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation that will validate the Neo-Con agenda and lead to the implementation of the infrastructure of martial law that Bush recently signed into law via executive order, as well as public pronouncements from prominent officials that the West needs terrorism to save a doomed foreign policy.

"I think we're in great danger of it," responded the Congressman, "We're in danger in many ways, the attack on our civil liberties here at home, the foreign policy that's in shambles and our obligations overseas and commitment which endangers our troops and our national defense."


"Every day we're in worse shape and right now there's an orchestrated effort to blame the Iranians for everything that's gone wrong in Iraq and we're quite concerned that the attack will be on Iran and that will jeopardize so many more of our troops, so I would say that we're in much greater danger than we even were four or five years ago," asserted Paul.

The presidential candidate expressed his despair that the situation in Iraq will not change until there is a total collapse of the American economy.

"There's no way we can afford what we're doing, whether it's domestic spending or the international spending and very few people talk about the real cost of this economically speaking....this is unsustainable and it will be a threat to our dollar," said Paul, adding that the onset of the meltdown could be sparked by the bombing of Iran and the closure of the Persian Gulf.



The Congressman added that the collapse was in its early stages with the major indication being a reduction in the living standard of middle class Americans but that "one single major world event" could change things overnight and precipitate a major downturn.

Paul added that there had "not been a national discussion on monetary policy in many many years" and the increasingly bleak outlook for the U.S. economy was also bringing more attention to the solutions the Congressman has proposed for reducing the burden of the mammoth national deficit.

Paul said that national and world events, especially the degrading situation in Iraq, were attracting support for his presidential campaign due to his resolute position on embracing a non-interventionist foreign policy.

The Congressman concluded by surmising that record lows in approval ratings for Bush, Cheney and Congress showed that, "The American people are alive and well and disgusted yet they haven't had good alternatives....it's justifiable, they are looking for true answers and options and quite frankly I think that's probably one of the reasons why our campaign is growing by leaps and bounds right now."

Click here to listen to the MP3 of the interview with Ron Paul.

NWO I TOLD YA SO!

my ethnicity is considered an inferiority, even though i explain with upmost clarity, a higher standard than the authorities, got the moves to counteract every eventuality, i do this shit ease and simplicity, but you ignore and don't listen to me, what you expect to ecape miracously, thats just some blind faith fallacy, hoping for rapture, but you ain't sure, so let me gather the lost, oppressed and poor, this is my duty, to do one last tour, after this, i be kicking it with thor, in valhalla with allah, so stop ya starbuck chatter, this is most a pressing matter, fella. just joking, papoose gets you flowing .lol

[synergy777]

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awYHprN5i52c&refer=home

Iran Asks Japan to Pay Yen for Oil, Start Immediately (Update1)

By Megumi Yamanaka

July 13 (Bloomberg) -- Iran asked Japanese refiners to switch to the yen to pay for all crude oil purchases, after Iran's central bank said it's cutting holdings of the U.S. dollar.
I
ran wants yen-based transactions ``for any/all of your forthcoming Iranian crude oil liftings,'' according to a letter sent to Japanese refiners that was signed by Ali A. Arshi, general manager of crude oil marketing and exports in Tehran at the National Iranian Oil Co. The request is for all shipments ``effective immediately,'' according to the letter, dated July 10 and obtained by Bloomberg News.

The yen rose on expectations for an increase in demand for the currency to buy shipments from Iran, Japan's third-largest oil supplier. Central bankers in Venezuela, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates have said they will invest less of their reserves in dollar assets because of the weakening currency, while the United Nations Security Council is preparing for another round of sanctions against Iran because of the nation's nuclear research.

``What else can Japan do but to accept the request, once the oil producer sent its wish?'' said Hirofumi Kawachi, an analyst at Mizuho Investors Securities Co. in Tokyo. ``The tensions between the U.S. and Iran are escalating, and it's Iran's measure to hedge risk.''

A spokesman for Iran's oil ministry in Tehran said he could neither confirm nor deny that the letter had been sent. Most Japanese oil refiners have until now used U.S. dollars to pay Iran for oil, said the spokesman, who declined to be identified by name because of government policy.

Yen Advances

The yen advanced to 122.15 per dollar at 10:34 a.m. in New York, from 122.42 late yesterday.

The Islamic republic, holder of the world's second-largest oil and gas reserves, has refused to halt uranium enrichment that it says is for use in nuclear power plants to produce electricity. The U.S. says Iran seeks instead to develop an atomic bomb. Enriched uranium can be used to make nuclear fuel or build nuclear weapons.

The government in Tehran has failed to suspend its nuclear activities after the imposition of two sets of United Nations- sponsored sanctions since December.

Iran isn't alone in wanting to drop the dollar for pricing oil. Russia has been examining plans to price the Urals oil export blend in rubles to curb currency risks. The nation plans to open the Energy Stock Exchange in St. Petersburg in the first half of next year to trade oil in rubles, UBS AG reported June 14.

`New Payment Mechanism'

Iran asked the refiners to use the yen exchange rate quoted at the Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ on the date oil cargoes are loaded. The use of yen-based letters of credit for oil ``has finally been approved'' by the Iranian central bank and the NIOC, according to the letter, titled ``New payment mechanism for Iranian Crude Oil Cargoes.''

Payments from Japanese refiners to Iran rose 12 percent last year to 1.24 trillion yen ($10.1 billion), according to the finance ministry in Tokyo. Japan imported 1.59 million kiloliters of Iranian crude oil in May, the least since June 2006, according to government data.

Iran is cutting its U.S. dollar reserves to less than 20 percent of total foreign currency holdings, and will buy more euros and yen as tensions with the U.S. increase, Central Bank Governor Ebrahim Sheibany said on March 27.

Only Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are larger oil suppliers to Japan than Iran.

To contact the reporter on this story: Megumi Yamanaka in Tokyo at myamanaka@bloomberg.net .

Last Updated: July 13, 2007 10:59 EDT

remember that saddam threatned to do this before they invaded by opening up a iraqi oil bourse, iran has done it, and russia are planning their own one for next year.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awLHuNF1sEq0&refer=home

[synergy777]

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/pms-oil-speech-was-stating-the-truth/2007/07/10/1183833519290.html

OIL is a key reason behind Australia's military involvement in the Middle East, CIA veteran Michael Scheuer told a national security conference in Sydney yesterday.


http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/07/8503C771-9CB3-47DD-8CF8-6158278D9740.html

Turkey: Threats Of Incursion Into Iraq Increase

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=83731

Olmert presses Assad to begin direct talks with Israel
Premier claims Hizbullah 'has lost its will to fight' against jewish state


http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/07/09/syria_urges_syrians_to_leave_lebanon/5875/

Syria urges Syrians to leave Lebanon
BERUIT, Lebanon, July 9 (UPI) -- Syria is calling on its citizens who are in Lebanon to leave the country ahead of an expected military "eruption" expected to take place next week.

[synergy777]

Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961 - Google Search

http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html

Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961

Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

II.

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

III.

Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology -- global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger is poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle -- with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

IV.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present

and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V.

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

VI.

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war -- as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years -- I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

VII.

So -- in this my last good night to you as your President -- I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I -- my fellow citizens -- need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

[synergy777]

How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they
watched everybody all the time. But at any rate, they could plug in your wire
whenever they wanted to.

George Orwell, 1984

[synergy777]

"I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!"

Congressman Ron Paul at an event near Austin, Texas on August 30th, 2003

Ron Paul: U.S. In "Great Danger" Of Staged Terror
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...reatdanger.htm

Congressman & presidential candidate warns of economic collapse precipitated by bombing of Iran

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, July 13, 2007

Presidential candidate Ron Paul says the U.S. is in "great danger" of a staged terror attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation while also warning that a major collapse of the American economy is on the horizon and could be precipitated by the bombing of Iran and the closure of the Persian Gulf.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show, the Texas Congressman was asked his opinion on Cindy Sheehan's recent comments that the U.S. is in danger of a staged terror attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation that will validate the Neo-Con agenda and lead to the implementation of the infrastructure of martial law that Bush recently signed into law via executive order, as well as public pronouncements from prominent officials that the West needs terrorism to save a doomed foreign policy.

"I think we're in great danger of it," responded the Congressman, "We're in danger in many ways, the attack on our civil liberties here at home, the foreign policy that's in shambles and our obligations overseas and commitment which endangers our troops and our national defense."


"Every day we're in worse shape and right now there's an orchestrated effort to blame the Iranians for everything that's gone wrong in Iraq and we're quite concerned that the attack will be on Iran and that will jeopardize so many more of our troops, so I would say that we're in much greater danger than we even were four or five years ago," asserted Paul.

The presidential candidate expressed his despair that the situation in Iraq will not change until there is a total collapse of the American economy.

"There's no way we can afford what we're doing, whether it's domestic spending or the international spending and very few people talk about the real cost of this economically speaking....this is unsustainable and it will be a threat to our dollar," said Paul, adding that the onset of the meltdown could be sparked by the bombing of Iran and the closure of the Persian Gulf.



The Congressman added that the collapse was in its early stages with the major indication being a reduction in the living standard of middle class Americans but that "one single major world event" could change things overnight and precipitate a major downturn.

Paul added that there had "not been a national discussion on monetary policy in many many years" and the increasingly bleak outlook for the U.S. economy was also bringing more attention to the solutions the Congressman has proposed for reducing the burden of the mammoth national deficit.

Paul said that national and world events, especially the degrading situation in Iraq, were attracting support for his presidential campaign due to his resolute position on embracing a non-interventionist foreign policy.

The Congressman concluded by surmising that record lows in approval ratings for Bush, Cheney and Congress showed that, "The American people are alive and well and disgusted yet they haven't had good alternatives....it's justifiable, they are looking for true answers and options and quite frankly I think that's probably one of the reasons why our campaign is growing by leaps and bounds right now."

Click here to listen to the MP3 of the interview with Ron Paul.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles..._b_popular.htm

KVUE segment on Ron Paul revealing that the Texas Congressman and presidential candidate gets more Google search hits than Paris Hilton or the iPhone. Paul's runaway popularity is growing every day and his chances of beating the other frontrunners are realistic.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...nodoubting.htm

No Doubting Ron Paul's Warning Of Staged Provocation
Debunkers question accuracy of previous article but presidential candidate had spoken in Congress about staged Gulf of Tonkin style provocation

more at the link

VOTE FOR RON PAUL!

Congressman Ron Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in our nation's capital. This is the official website of the Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign.

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

http://www.house.gov/paul/

[synergy777]

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2007/170707Brown.htm

Brown backs a European Treaty without referendum

Tony Paterson
London Independent
Tuesday July 17, 2007

Gordon Brown began his first trip abroad since becoming Prime Minister with a pledge to introduce the European Treaty without calling a referendum in Britain.

Mr Brown, who was in Berlin yesterday for dinner with Chancellor Angela Merkel, said it would be possible to make rapid progress on setting a date for the treaty agreed in principle at last month's Brussels summit. "We will not require a referendum on this. It is something that can be worked on closely by Parliament. I think we can make progress quickly on this," he said.

Mr Brown was welcomed at the Berlin chancellery with full military honours by Ms Merkel. However, the two leaders did not indulge in any of the flamboyant gestures employed in the Franco-German relationship. In keeping with their shared upbringing as children of churchmen, Mr Brown and Ms Merkel simply shook hands.

Mr Brown, who met Ms Merkel several times when he was Chancellor, congratulated the German leader on her success in brokering agreements at the recent Brussels and G8 summits. He also credited her with turning round the German economy which he said had contributed to the euro's current strength. He said that Britain would continue to "periodically review" the idea of switching to the euro.

However, the German media underlined Mr Brown's credentials as a eurosceptic. Several commentators pointed out that, as Chancellor, Mr Brown had intervened to prevent Tony Blair's plans to hold a referendum on the euro in Britain.

Mr Brown's presence was being seen as a clear sign that Britain was poised to break with Mr Blair's pro-Iraq war stance. "Brown seems to prefer a certain distance from the US - more out of conviction than populist need," wrote one newspaper.

Other commentators said the combination of a looming British general election and growing public opposition to the Iraq war had put Mr Brown in a position in which he needed European allies "particularly France and Germany" to find a way out of Iraq.

http://infowars.net/articles/july2007/170707EU.htm

EU banks on 'unreadable' treaty

George Jones
London Telegraph
Tuesday July 17, 2007

The revived EU constitution has deliberately been made "unreadable" to help fend off demands for a referendum, according to the former Italian prime minister, Giuliano Amato.

Mr Amato, who is now interior minister in Italy, has been a central figure in all stages of the year-long process of reviving the constitution, heading the 16-strong group of politicians that helped prepare the new EU treaty.

In comments posted on YouTube yesterday he said "EU leaders had decided that the document to be drawn up by an intergovernmental conference should be 'unreadable'.

"If this is the kind of document that the IGC will produce, any prime minister - imagine the UK prime minister - can go to the Commons and say 'Look, you see, it's absolutely unreadable, it's the typical Brussels treaty, nothing new, no need for a referendum'.

"Should you succeed in understanding it there might be some reason for a referendum, because it would mean that there is something new.''

His remarks are embarrassing for Gordon Brown and will be seized on by politicians demanding that Labour should live up to its manifesto commitment at the last election to allow the British people to vote in a referendum on the constitution.

Neil O'Brien, director of the think-tank Open Europe, said: "This is an extraordinary admission from someone who has been close to the negotiations on the EU treaty. The idea of just changing the name of the constitution and pretending that it is just another complex treaty shows a total contempt for voters."

Mr Brown yesterday made a slip when he said he had discussed the EU "constitution" with Bertie Ahern, the Irish prime minister, when they met at Stormont.

His officials quickly sought to explain that Mr Brown had meant to refer to the EU treaty rather than the constitution, which he has insisted is not being brought back in its original form.

Mark Francois, the Conservative Europe spokesman, said the remarks "gave the lie" to attempts by Mr Brown to pass off the revival of the constitution as just a reforming treaty. "Many other European leaders have admitted what the Government failed to tell our people - that this is the old constitution by another name."

Mr Francois said the Labour government should "go back to their pledge and grant the British people a vote in a free and fair referendum".

"Gordon Brown in a Freudian slip referred to the EU constitution yesterday - even our own Prime Minister can no longer keep up the pretence," he said.

Diana Wallace, a Liberal Democrat MEP, said she wanted her party to call for a referendum. In a letter in the Yorkshire Post she wrote: "I, for one, believe that even pro-Europeans should embrace a referendum and I hope and expect that the Liberal Democrats as a whole will call for a vote on the mini or reform treaty, or whatever it is finally called."

She said those who refused such a popular debate and vote did the European cause no good in the longer term.

"If we are to have a positive relationship with the EU, we have to be completely transparent about it. We should be discussing the future direction with people and, hopefully, bringing them with us, through the ballot box."

http://www.openeurope.org.uk/

Broken promises: Lessons from 10 years of the Blair Government in Europe
A new briefing from Open Europe argues that the UK Government’s apparent U-turn on the referendum on the EU constitutional treaty is the latest in a long tradition of broken promises from the Government on its EU policy.


http://www.realtruth.org/articles/413-tec.html?gclid=CKqj66rqro0CFQ_ilAodsAzBsg

The European Counterweight

Part 1: A Leaderless Superpower
With its expansion to 25 member states, the European Union is poised to become a vast federal superstate. As it seeks to be a “counterweight” to U.S. Global interests, will Europe replace America as the world’s leading superpower?

[synergy777]

http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm

Pike's Letter to Mazzini

It is a commonly believed fallacy that for a short time, the Pike letter to Mazzini was on display in the British Museum Library in London, and it was copied by William Guy Carr, former Intelligence Officer in the Royal Canadian Navy. The British Library has confirmed in writing to me that such a document has never been in their possession. Furthermore, in Carr's book, Satan, Prince of this World, Carr includes the following footnote:

"The Keeper of Manuscripts recently informed the author that this letter is NOT catalogued in the British Museum Library. It seems strange that a man of Cardinal Rodriguez's knowledge should have said that it WAS in 1925".

It appears that Carr learned about this letter from Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez of Santiago, Chile, who wrote The Mystery of Freemasonry Unveiled.

To date, no conclusive proof exists to show that this letter was ever written. Nevertheless, the letter is widely quoted and the topic of much discussion.

Following are apparently extracts of the letter, showing how Three World Wars have been planned for many generations.

"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions." 2

Students of history will recognize that the political alliances of England on one side and Germany on the other, forged between 1871 and 1898 by Otto von Bismarck, co-conspirator of Albert Pike, were instrumental in bringing about the First World War.

"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm." 3

After this Second World War, Communism was made strong enough to begin taking over weaker governments. In 1945, at the Potsdam Conference between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, a large portion of Europe was simply handed over to Russia, and on the other side of the world, the aftermath of the war with Japan helped to sweep the tide of Communism into China.

(Readers who argue that the terms Nazism and Zionism were not known in 1871 should remember that the Illuminati invented both these movements. In addition, Communism as an ideology, and as a coined phrase, originates in France during the Revolution. In 1785, Restif coined the phrase four years before revolution broke out. Restif and Babeuf, in turn, were influenced by Rousseau - as was the most famous conspirator of them all, Adam Weishaupt.)

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." 4

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, world events, and in particular in the Middle East, show a growing unrest and instability between Modern Zionism and the Arabic World. This is completely in line with the call for a Third World War to be fought between the two, and their allies on both sides. This Third World War is still to come, and recent events show us that it is not far off.

[synergy777]

http://www.rense.com/general77/cong.htm

Congressman Peter DeFazio - 'Maybe There IS A Conspiracy'
By Jeff KosseffThe Oregonian Staff
7-21-7

WASHINGTON -- Oregonians called Peter DeFazio's office, worried there was a conspiracy buried in the classified portion of a White House plan for operating the government after a terrorist attack.

As a member of the U.S. House on the Homeland Security Committee, DeFazio, D-Ore., is permitted to enter a secure "bubble-room" in the Capitol and examine classified material. So he asked the White House to see the secret documents.

On Wednesday, DeFazio got his answer: DENIED

"I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack," DeFazio says.

Homeland Security Committee staffers told his office that the White House initially approved his request, but it was later quashed. DeFazio doesn't know who did it or why.

"We're talking about the continuity of the government of the United States of America," DeFazio says. "I would think that would be relevant to any member of Congress, let alone a member of the Homeland Security Committee."

Bush administration spokesman Trey Bohn declined to say why DeFazio was denied access: "We do not comment through the press on the process that this access entails. It is important to keep in mind that much of the information related to the continuity of government is highly sensitive."

Norm Ornstein, a legal scholar who studies government continuity at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said he "cannot think of one good reason" to deny access to a member of Congress who serves on the Homeland Security Committee.

"I find it inexplicable and probably reflective of the usual, knee-jerk overextension of executive power that we see from this White House," Ornstein said.

This is the first time DeFazio has been denied access to documents. DeFazio has asked Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., to help him access the documents.

"Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right," DeFazio said.

[danielg]

personally i think most of the peopel on these forums are monitoring trolls, as they all profess one love etc, then when it comes to developing threads, pitching in, they do fuck all, to be frank. wolves in sheeps clothing.
Developing threads in a forum full of converted isn't the same as using ability to inform the unconverted on other forums, that is truely pitching in. Spending all day posting propaganda matrix links and debating origins of melanin could be said to be the same as you're accusing others of, i.e 'fuck all'.... to be frank.

[synergy777]

converted with levels of ignorance on this forum, please, as for debating melanin, that old chestnut, move on danny boy, it still hurts you don't it. most of the people still cling to the false aryan crap, from mars, its infantile. you not converted, you not even awake mate, to be honest you don't debate, add, just troll. where are you on the eu referendum, hitler/tavistock, you are just an entertaining diversion, carry on jester.

please give me your 50p psycho analysis, lol

see all you can do is bring the melanin/racist angle, which i use as a joke, and you converted people take it seriously. when its a political, historic discussion, your intellectual gravitas tends to go missing, rather conspicous by your absence aren't we. as for being all wise, danny boy, how about being all good, christian, and forgiving me, lol

[danielg]

where are you on the eu referendum, hitler/tavistock
For what its worth to you, have read the original constitution, Hitlers War, IBM and the holocaust, Wall street and the rise of Hitler... also read dozens of Tavistock Publications - only a fraction of Tavistock is cyncially motivated.
http://www.statewatch.org/euconstitution.htm

[synergy777]

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/index.htm

This website is the result of research which began shortly after September 11th 2001, at which time it soon became apparent that the "War on Terrorism" is merely a smoke screen that masks a hidden agenda. That agenda being the plan to shake-up the Middle East in favour of US "interests", primarily being the security of natural resources, which are known to be in decline due to increasing global demand. The neoconservatives in Washington see this as vital if American global leadership is to continue. By declaring a 'War on Terrorism' the Bush administration, was in fact going to invade other countries under the pretence of 'fighting the war on terror'.

To kick-start this plan would require one catastrophic event to galvanise the people into supporting a war. 9/11 served as this pretext, but who, exactly, was responsible for the attacks? Al-Qaeda? Osama bin Laden? The Taliban? Saudi Arabia? Pakistan's ISI? The Muslim Brotherhood? MI6? the CIA?

Maybe all of them, in some way, were involved....


Project for the New American Century [website]

- In 1997 a group of neoconservatives founded the 'Project for the New American Century' (PNAC) - A PNAC document entitled 'Rebuilding America's Defenses', details what steps should be taken to ensure that America remains the global leader. It states that to preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades a transformation must take place involving new technologies and operational concepts, and that this transformation "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" - The Bush administration is loaded with PNAC members -


Oil- Global conventional oil production is on the brink of terminal decline (unconventional oil is more expensive to produce, but large amounts of it exist in South America and Canada) - The rate of oil discovery has been falling since the 1960's - The vast majority of the world's remaining conventional reserves are located in the Middle East and Central Asia - Over 60% of oil consumed by the US is imported - By 2015 the UK too, will be importing over 50% of its oil requirements - According to independant Geologist Dr Colin Campbell, the global decline will start by 2010 "It starts with a price shock due to control of the market by a few countries, and it is followed by the onset of physical shortage, which just gets worse and worse and worse" - watch this BBC documentary



[B]Afghan Pipelines

- Afghanistan is located in a prime position for the transportation of the vast amounts of cheap oil & gas from the Caspian Basin - A UNOCAL-led consortium competing with Argentinian firm Bridas, proposed to build pipelines through Afghanistan years ago - In 1997 Taliban officials visited UNOCAL HQ in Texas to discuss the agreement [BBC] - Negotiations between UNOCAL and the Taliban were conducted by Enron through Saudi intelligence [JohnLoftus] - Confronted with the Taliban's refusal to accept US conditions, the US told them: "either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs" [AsiaTimes] - FBI Counter-Terrorism Chief John O'Neill resigned from the FBI in disgust, stating that he was ordered not to investigate Saudi / al-Qaeda connections because of the Enron pipeline deal (O'Neill was among the 3000 people that died at the World Trade Centre) [JohnLoftus] - The US installed Afghan leader Sir Hamid Karzai [BBC] , a former UNOCAL consultant [AsiaTimes] - A pipeline agreement has now been signed [BBC] - This pipeline may have saved Enron from collapse by providing cheap gas to one of its 'loss making' power stations in India [CorpWatch] - The invasion of Afghanistan was planned before Sept 11 [BBC] - Taliban leaders & al-Qaeda fighters were flown to safety with secret US approval during the war [NewYorker] - Opium production has increased by 1400% [BBC] - Who benefits from the Afghan opium trade? [GlobalResearch]



[B]Iraq

- Under former CIA 'hitman' Saddam Hussein, Iraq was the first OPEC member to start trading oil for euros instead of US dollars, thus threatening the strength of the US petro-dollar [Observer] - By changing Iraq's regime and removing the country from OPEC, this will loosen the stranglehold that OPEC has on world oil prices - The elusive weapons of mass destruction were sold to Hussein by Western companies right up until the late eighties [Times] [SundayHerald] - Iraq has vast and easily accessible conventional oil reserves, the second largest in the world - The US now appears to be building permanent bases in Iraq [BBC]


[B]
Terror Hijackings

- On the morning of Sept 11 2001, CIA official John Fulton and his team at the National Reconnaissance Office were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building [AssociatedPress] - Vigilant Guardian and Vigilant Warrior were two other exercises being run by NORAD that same morning [Cooperativeresearch] - There was confusion as to whether the hijacked planes were part of an exercise - When it was known that airliners were being hijacked, fighter-jets launched late from distant bases, flew to defend their nation at a fraction of their top speed - [VanityFair] [NORAD/AssociatedPress] - Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda have connections to the CIA, MI6, and the Pentagon [Guardian] [Independent] [Guardian] [GlobalResearch] [Cooperativeresearch], Le Figaro reported a claim that, whilst in hospital for kidney treatment in July 2001, bin Laden was met by the local CIA officer in Dubai [Guardian] - CBS News reported a claim that he also underwent secret kidney dialysis at a military hospital in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on the day before Sept 11 [CBS] [Reuters] - During the months before the attack, Pakistan's ISI Chief Gen. Ahmad (intelligence service), allegedly instructed an aide to wire transfer $100,000 to hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta [AsiaTimes] [TimesofIndia] - On the morning of Sept 11, Ahmad was at a meeting on Capitol Hill hosted by the chairmen of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees [WashingtonPost] - It has been claimed that some of the hijackers were trained at secure US military bases [Newsweek] - The CIA have overturned refusal of visa applications in Saudi Arabia, to people with terrorist connections - FBI agents were forced to close down investigations into the bin Ladens and terror networks by the US government [ABC] [Guardian] [Time]


[B]The Saudi Connection

- Fifteen of the hijackers were Saudi citizens and reports link Saudi intelligence to some of them [Guardian] [CNN] [SMH] [CBC] A US congressional report suggested that people connected to the Saudi govt might have given financial support to the hijackers [Observer] [CooperativeResearch] - The Bush family and the Saudi royal family have a very cosy relationship [CraigUnger] - Western intelligence agencies have a long standing relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood, an extremist right-wing organisation [JohnLoftus] [CooperativeResearch] - The Saudis were no friends of Saddam Hussein [BBC] - Saudi Arabia, which has the world's largest conventional oil reserves, is under threat from Islamic revolt - In 2003, the US removed most of its military presence in Saudi Arabia [BBC] [USAToday]



[B]Foreknowledge?

- Ringleader Mohamed Atta was identified as an al-Qaeda operative in 2000 by a US military intelligence unit called 'Able Danger' [CNN] [ABCNews] - Detailed warnings were given to the US in advance of the attacks by at least 11 countries. Mossad even provided names of four of the hijackers [Telegraph] - Straight after the attacks, United Airlines’ stock prices plummeted. At the time it was reported that suspicious 'put options' had been purchased. Basically, if you buy put option shares you are taking a gamble that those shares are going to drop in price, because you can then sell them at the original high price but purchase them at the new low price. The amount of these put options bought was way above the norm. Investigations into who was responsible for these deals lead to Deutsche Bank/Alex Brown Inc. The bank’s chairman up until a few years ago was former CIA executive director, Buzzy Krongard [Independent]



[B]Pre-planted explosives?

Some people have suggested that explosives were used to bring down the towers and building seven. Having extensive knowledge of building construction, theDossier does NOT believe that this is the case. The people who support this demolition theory have no understanding of the basic principles of structural engineering. They fail to grasp the relevance of the buildings' unique designs, the damage caused by the impacts and the resulting fires. It's quite possible that this theory is disinformation, and one would do well to steer clear of this ridiculous notion.

[soglad]

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk..._cover-ups.htm

John Pilger - The War on Democracy (2007)

This film explores Washington's relationship with countries such as Venezuela, Bolivia and Chile. It examines the theme of disenchantment with democracy, concentrating on those parts of the world where people have struggled with blood, sweat and tears to plant democracy, only to see it brutally crushed. Archive footage demonstrates how democracy has been wiped out in country after country in Latin America since the 1950s

That's a broken link mate :D

[synergy777]

i fixed it mate, lol sometimes they don't post correct. check the pilger thread. also i just got in touch with ya myspace.

[synergy777]

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/video_cover-ups.htm

[dondaz]

Hey Synergy, I just got around to this thread. Very informative. Albert Pike was a plotter, I read that stuff on him somewhere before. Good to refresh the memory here and there on some things. Keeps you on your toes eh?


i was thinking of getting as many links, then doing another post version 2, with them classified/organised eg foreign policy-pnac, legislation/eu/agenda 21 etc, secret doctrines -morals etc, religous-revelatiosn etc. first mass the info, then we edit/improve

You talking a Library of catagorised information here? Great idea!
personally i think most of the peopel on these forums are monitoring trolls, as they all profess one love etc, then when it comes to developing threads, pitching in, they do fuck all, to be frank. wolves in sheeps clothing.

Oh yes! Selling their souls for a morgage on a house that they'll lose to their slave masters.


i must be dreaming now but couldnt we send this message and many more, out to places like iran, iraq, and all of these predestined hot spots of the world. because if we did, and the general public knew about it. and we proclaimed OUR peace, no matter what the actions of 'our leaders in government' do or say to their 'leaders in government'

This is a good idea actually. Just like over here, if the masses can be woken up to the systems of control manipulating their countries then the more likely good people will come forward and not allow the illuminati access to their countries at all.

Nice one Synergy:)

[synergy777]

if they see official papers/policies, eg agenda 21, pnac, etc i think they would be able to see the intentions of the policies and how they fit together in the grand scheme of things.

[synergy777]

KEVIN CAHILL

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8112&highlight=kevin+cahill

[synergy777]

ukip is the only alternative out of the established parties.

http://www.ukip.org/ukip/index.php

Nothing less than a fight for survival

Annabelle Fuller says the affront to democracy of the EU "Reform Treaty" is something that everyone should have seen coming, not just those who have always fought to retain the sovereignty of the nation state

http://www.eutruth.org.uk/

The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty in 2008

The sixth and final treaty has now been named: its is the Reform Treaty, due to be signed by the Queen in the Summer of 2008. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel.

Merkel and former French President Giscard d’Estaing are among many European ministers who have confirmed the Treaty is the EU Constitution, almost unchanged. If they are right, it will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU dictatorship the power to close it.

This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital.


The Countdown to abolition

Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty.

Foreign ministers will agree its terms on 7-8th September at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There will be a summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hope to sign the Treaty, but definitely before December 2007. This should be Gordon Brown’s signature.


The Queen and Parliament to abolish Britain summer 2008

They plan to ratify the Reform Treaty in the Summer of 2008. This means Westminster will pass the treaty, and the Queen will sign it behind our backs, as she has the other five treaties.

No referendum

The EU has chosen this sixth Treaty instead of pushing through it’s constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations.

Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a single document with absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices will add up to something like 100,000 complex and unreadable pages.


The EU remains illegal

Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation.

The EU will always be illegal in Britain; but once the EU has complete power and control here, we can no more get rid of it than we could Germany, had their planned illegal occupation of Britain in 1940 been successful.


You have one year left

Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just one year left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship.

Around 45 million British people are against the abolition of our nation, and with the little European voting that has been allowed, it seems clear over 200 million of its victims don’t want the EU. But we will never be given the choice. YOU have to decide to act yourself.

There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time.


are we ready to defend this nation or is just beer fuelled rhetoric?

[synergy777]

bump

[synergy777]

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2008/05/who-owns-federal-reserve.html

Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence
Published 1976

Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York.

The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914.

These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.

click on the link for charts.