mr_pixie
03-04-2009, 03:09 PM
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=65&Itemid=60
stannrodd
04-04-2009, 01:53 AM
Very easy to explain.
First you should play each video at the real time speed so you can compare them honestly.
Then you should compare like with like. Slowed down clips should also be slowed proportionally to the real speed.
The B52 crash was done at very low speed and the collision with the power lines and wing contributed to the initial combustion of fuel from the wing tanks before total impact.
We don't really know what sort of 767 hit the tower .. was it a military tanker ?? Were there detonations in the plane after impact ?? Who knows.
If we simply take the passenger jet story and look at what the dynamics are .. we have a 767 with full fuel load, for the trans continental flight to LA, it was supposed to be doing.
The plane impacts the tower .. whether you can grasp that or not .. the aircraft is destroyed first, fuel is formed into an explosive mixture with the air and then it ignites into a fire ball.
Jet fuel isn't petrol and will not ignite easily like the more volatile petrol .. so the petrol bomb analogy is a red herring. Jet fuel will ignite once it reaches the necessary mixture with air for that to occur.
That takes a small amount of time and is why the fireball is delayed.
Nothing strange about it at all.
Stann