For GoldenGoose - Holographic technology Proof.

[queenofleon]

Although you will probably deny this, you can project Holograms into the air, using fog. Many people think this is what chemtrails are about.

http://www.fogscreen.com/en/home/index.html

[goldengoose]

Although you will probably deny this, you can project Holograms into the air, using fog. Many people think this is what chemtrails are about.

http://www.fogscreen.com/en/home/index.html


Most of us recall that September 11, 2001 was a perfectly clear, brilliantly sunny day. No holograms were projected that day.

[leviathanstaar]

goose be certain to provide nothing any more tangible than the idea that there were holograms, yet refute it with simply because you've said so lol.


sigh, its too bad they have to prove DEW THIS of all ways, when clearly the media maniulation and inconsistencies, not to mention terrible acting and mistimings, incorrect locations ect....Much more damning then wether or not there were planes.

The planes thing is causing people to not see the media's dirty, dirty hands that day.

We made them look down the rabbit hole, with no idea what to do when they get stuck.

That is how I feel when I read someone claim "its not possible" or "it simply wanst that way", when they in fact do NOT know.
As opposed to "I dont know for certain, but I dont beleive that"
Wether they were in New York or not.
The CGI run through the anolog singal that day in the fake live shot minutes later are so blatent and sickening, it is only overshadowed by the fake witnesses and liar newscasters.

[queenofleon]

Most of us recall that September 11, 2001 was a perfectly clear, brilliantly sunny day. No holograms were projected that day.

And there I was thinking you were denying the fact the technology exists.

:rolleyes:

[goldengoose]

goose be certain to provide nothing any more tangible than the idea that there were holograms, yet refute it with simply because you've said so lol.


sigh, its too bad they have to prove DEW THIS of all ways, when clearly the media maniulation and inconsistencies, not to mention terrible acting and mistimings, incorrect locations ect....Much more damning then wether or not there were planes.

The planes thing is causing people to not see the media's dirty, dirty hands that day.

We made them look down the rabbit hole, with no idea what to do when they get stuck.

That is how I feel when I read someone claim "its not possible" or "it simply wanst that way", when they in fact do NOT know.
As opposed to "I dont know for certain, but I dont beleive that"
Wether they were in New York or not.
The CGI run through the anolog singal that day in the fake live shot minutes later are so blatent and sickening, it is only overshadowed by the fake witnesses and liar newscasters.


Your incoherence suggests that you should take your meds more regularly. The media you babble about are overwhelmingly liberal and implacably anti-Bush. The mainstream media in America opposed ALL of Bush's policies. It undermined his foreign policy at every trun. The notion that Bush's bitterest foes were complicit in a monstrous crime orchestrated by him is sheer madness.

You know nothing whatever about video compositing. Why humilaiate yourself with such uninformed gibberish? You will NEVER find a compositing expert who swallows your snake oil. The delusional egomaniac Ace Baker was exposed as a fraud by a real video compositing expert, Steven Wright, who showed why the sort of real time compositing you ignoramuses prattle about is impossible.

There are roughly 100,000 "fake" eyewitneses to the crash of Flight 175. Three of them are close friends of mine, and you will NEVER persuade any of them that they work for George Bush. The newscasters are liberal Democrats who despise Bush.

Your fantasy is nonsense. You really need to bring more than your irrational hatred of America to the table.

[goldengoose]

And there I was thinking you were denying the fact the technology exists.

:rolleyes:



Please stop being so silly. It is completely impossible to project holgrams of moving airliners against a sunlit sky. You could, of course, read an article about holograms, but that would destroy your fantasy. There was no "mile-high messiah" in the first Gulf War. That fantasy is not merely incredibly stupid; it is racist. Arabs are not children who can be duped by light shows. Some nut apparently talked about sending up a gigantic orbiting mirror to reflect holograms. It didn't happen.

[leviathanstaar]

Bitter enemies? my incoherence? How often do you normally get before hurling insults about the left right world you live in?

I dont hate America......putting words in other mouths, and immediate inflammoatory attacks is more obvious than ovbious.

Wow that flight had 100,000 witness's live on scene that impressive (lol)

I dont sell snake oil, I share my opinion and nothing more.
Your over dramatization and ad-hom attacks are transparent and useless : /

3 close friends of yours were witness's too? uh-huh.

[bryan]

not to mention terrible acting and mistimings, incorrect locations ect....Much more damning then whether or not there were planes.

The planes thing is causing people to not see the media's dirty, dirty hands that day.



I think the positioning of the choppers for the second 'plane' is THE smoking gun of 9/11, but not many people want to talk about it, even no-planers.



You will NEVER find a compositing expert who swallows your snake oil. The delusional egomaniac Ace Baker was exposed as a fraud by a real video compositing expert, Steven Wright, who showed why the sort of real time compositing you ignoramuses prattle about is impossible.


It's obvious you'll never ever be able to forgive Ace Baker for destroying Steve Wright on air in front of you, even though the pair of you had set him up by requiring him to tell you in advance which clips he was going to use in his demonstration. How many supporters does your video compositing expert have for his imaginative 'automatic gain control' theory for the fade to black, apart from you and mynameis? That theory is a sure sign of desperation.

[narcolepticwatchman]

You know nothing whatever about video compositing. Why humilaiate yourself with such uninformed gibberish? You will NEVER find a compositing expert who swallows your snake oil. The delusional egomaniac Ace Baker was exposed as a fraud by a real video compositing expert, Steven Wright, who showed why the sort of real time compositing you ignoramuses prattle about is impossible.



Why find an 'expert' to give an opinion on real time video compositing when surely the best evidence is to show an example of it or to see if it had been done before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea4eft_3p-I

This is a highjacked live broadcast in the Czech republic. Real time video compositing. I can't wait to hear your response to this.

[goldengoose]

Bitter enemies? my incoherence? How often do you normally get before hurling insults about the left right world you live in?

I dont hate America......putting words in other mouths, and immediate inflammoatory attacks is more obvious than ovbious.

Wow that flight had 100,000 witness's live on scene that impressive (lol)

I dont sell snake oil, I share my opinion and nothing more.
Your over dramatization and ad-hom attacks are transparent and useless : /

3 close friends of yours were witness's too? uh-huh.

Yes, the mainstream media in the U.S. undeniably despise George Bush. It opposed all of his policies virulently, especially his war against Islamic terrorism. To pretend that Bush's ideological opposites were complicit in the imaginary conspiracy operating within the adminsitration is beyond insane.

People promoting baseless myths about the jihadist attacks of 9/11/01 tend to bring their hatred of America and nothing else to the table. After seven years of screaming, the fantasy movement has produced bogus science, distorted quotes, and a blizzard of outright lies--but not a shred of actual evidence for its bizarre claims.

The number of witnesses to the crash of Flight 175 has been estimated at 250,000. I find that figure to be high, reasoning as follows:

The wife of one of my closest friends worked in a 40-story office near 39th Street and 3rd Ave. She and seven of her co-workers watched the plane hit the south tower from their office windows. They were, if memory serves, on the 21st floor. There are 10 windows for each floor on that side of the building. We will assume that everyone above the 10th floor has a clear and unobstructed view of WTC complex (Chelsea is a neighborhood of 3 to 6-story buildings, so I'm being conservative here.) Probably people below the 10th floor would have been able to see Ground Zero very well. We will assume that FEWER than 8 people are clustered by each window. So, for 300 windows, let's take an extremely conservative estimate of 2 (!) people at each window. That gives us 600 witnesses from THAT SINGLE BUILDING. Perhaps there were 1,200. What if there were, somehow, only 300?

Now, let's consider in how many hundreds of office buildings in Manhattan that scene was replicated. How about the people crossing the East River bridges in their cars? How about the people on the streets? Don't forget the people across the river in Brooklyn Heights who were watching from their rooftops. There are also the people in New Jersey who had an unobstructed view.

How many people saw the plane? STOP! Before reflexively blurting out nonsense, ask yourself what you're overlooking. Hint: it's something really BIG.

Give up?

Of the tens of thousands of people whose eyes were fixed on the spectacle at the twin towers, how many called-in to talk radio shows or wrote letters-to-the-editor complaining that they didn't understand all this yelling about a plane? How many people protested that there was no plane?

NOBODY!

This absolutely crushing FACT, of course, means nothing to you, but it explains why your fantasy can NEVER go anywhere.

[goldengoose]

I think the positioning of the choppers for the second 'plane' is THE smoking gun of 9/11, but not many people want to talk about it, even no-planers.




It's obvious you'll never ever be able to forgive Ace Baker for destroying Steve Wright on air in front of you, even though the pair of you had set him up by requiring him to tell you in advance which clips he was going to use in his demonstration. How many supporters does your video compositing expert have for his imaginative 'automatic gain control' theory for the fade to black, apart from you and mynameis? That theory is a sure sign of desperation.


Your compulsion to make yourself look ridiculous is hard to understand. Your lie is exposed by the shows themselves. Did you forget that the people you hope to con can watch the delusional musician get taken to the woodshed by the expert?

Ace, as you know, got nothing right. Wright, as you don't know, was suggested to me by Ace himself as one of the top names in video compositing. As Ace makes specific claims, Wright asked to be given time to examine each claim to permit a fair assessment of its validity. Nobody thinks that anyone got ambushed here, least of all Ace Baker.

Ace suffered a breakdown after his drubbing, and screeched all sorts of lunatic slanders. The notion, however, that one of the top experts in video compositing has been enlisted by the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy is bit stupid even for many fantasists.

There was, of course, no "fade-to-black." Wright agrees that Kai Simonsen's explanation is better than the one supplied by the engineer Wright consulted. EVERYONE agrees that the issue is trivial. Ace can't begin to figure out where he was going with it, and, obviously, neither can you.

Wright returns to 'Hardfire' this spring with material he didn't have time to use last year.

[goldengoose]

I think the positioning of the choppers for the second 'plane' is THE smoking gun of 9/11, but not many people want to talk about it, even no-planers.




It's obvious you'll never ever be able to forgive Ace Baker for destroying Steve Wright on air in front of you, even though the pair of you had set him up by requiring him to tell you in advance which clips he was going to use in his demonstration. How many supporters does your video compositing expert have for his imaginative 'automatic gain control' theory for the fade to black, apart from you and mynameis? That theory is a sure sign of desperation.


You may think that the positioning of the choppers is yet another smoking gun, but your reasons are, as usual, uninformed nonsense.


Last June, Steven Wright issued the following statement:

It was apparently a mistake to let Ace Baker onto "Hardfire" with video compositing expert Steve Wright and show him and his "no-plane" claims any professional respect. At Baker's request, Wright even let him into his home to show him additional material that was not presented on the show due to lack of time. Baker has repayed the favor with fundamentally dishonest distortions and accusations. Wright, as an expert in video compositing, examined Baker's video "evidence" and declared it not to be a composite. Unable to impugn Wright's obvious credentials on the subject, Baker simply resorts to calling him a liar. How clever.


Finally realizing that Baker's real need is for continued attention, which Baker figures he can get by issuing endless streams of accusations and insults, Wright finally put Baker on his spam list to quiet this aggressive pest. Of course, now Wright has "crawled under a rock" (another accusation). The fact is that Wright has thoroughly demolished Baker's false claims and, with the issue settled, simply has more important things to do with his time, so he refuses to waste time engaging Baker any more.


However, Baker insists on trying to fool a lay audience with his amateur video "analysis" and authentic-sounding prattle. He simply garbles the facts as explained by Wright, then hoots and jeers at the resulting foolishness - which is, in fact, Baker's own foolishness. Here are just a few examples of Baker's attempts to keep the story alive with garbled facts, phony accusations, and fake controversy:


Baker:
As one hilarious note, Wright claims that because Chopper 5 is in an
interlaced video format, it cannot be a composite. By this reasoning,
Jurassic Park DVD shows real live dinosaurs.


Again, Baker has garbled the facts and tries to mislead the lay audience. Jurassic Park was composited at feature film resolution, shot out to film, then the finished film transfered to interlaced video, like all movies. The compositing was not done in interlaced video, and I am sure that Wright's friends at ILM will be enraged to hear Baker claim that it was. This example reveals Baker's persistent ignorance of the material he tries to use as "evidence".


Baker:
"Live compositing not possible" is another hilarious lie by Steve
Wright. What was required is real-time luma key.


Nobody said live compositing is not possible. The weatherman does it every night on the news. What Wright correctly stated was that lumakeying a pre-recorded jet video clip over a live video feed from a wobbling chopper camera AND motion-tracking it into position AND color correcting it AND matching the video noise AND matching the video interlaced lines - IS impossible in real-time. Baker conveniently ignores this complete list of requirements in his video fakery rants.


Baker:
There is a huge fight brewing between Steve Wright and the executives
at Avid.


False controversy. There is no fight brewing between Steve Wright and the executives at Avid. The Avid executives have never even raised the topic of Baker with Wright. They, like Wright, simply have better things to do with their time than feed Baker's psychosis by responding to his inane allegations and garbled thinking.


Baker:
Avid makes live compositing systems. Steve Wright is calling them
liars. I'm going to push it until someone cries uncle. And it's going
to be Mr. Wright (aka Mr. Wrong).


Wright does not call his friends at Avid liars. Wright calls Baker a bumbling psychotic that cannot get the facts straight who continues to try to fool the lay audience with his phony "analysis". Baker simply needs to invent a controversy that does not exist in a pathetic attempt to get more attention for himself. Avid will wisely ignore Baker.


As we saw on "Hardfire", Baker actually believes that if you find a few people that did not see planes crash into towers, that proves planes didn't. In fact, that proves nothing. The truth is, if you found 1000 people that did NOT see it, but ONE that really did, then that one observer PROVES planes hit the towers. By Baker's logic, if we can find a few people that did not see him born, then he does not exist. We could only wish.


The final nail in Baker's silly coffin is Wright's conundrum, which goes like this: If there exists even one authentic news video, camcorder video, photograph, or eye witness to the planes hitting the towers, then the planes are proven. However, to prove no planes, then every single news video, camcorder video, photograph, and eye witness must be fake. To fake these hundreds of different sources plus keep the perpetrators of those fakes silent all these years is absurd on the face of it. Just like Ace Baker.

[goldengoose]

Why find an 'expert' to give an opinion on real time video compositing when surely the best evidence is to show an example of it or to see if it had been done before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea4eft_3p-I

This is a highjacked live broadcast in the Czech republic. Real time video compositing. I can't wait to hear your response to this.


It's hard to imagine what point you imagine yourself to be making. This clip has nothing to do with "lumakeying a pre-recorded jet video clip over a live video feed from a wobbling chopper camera AND motion-tracking it into position AND color correcting it AND matching the video noise AND matching the video interlaced lines." One can only hope that you already understood that and were just being silly.

[leviathanstaar]

I'm glad you didnt forget to throw insults and question mental health yet again, while only referancing your close friend and his aunts cousins former roomates view of wtc.


The media hated Bush? What? wait let me guess, you're waiting until they remove that evil leftist president so another good conservative can save of from impending jihads?

You just cant see they've been working for the same globalist and coporate agenda, and dont give rats tail about one single left/right issue us folks go on about.

I'd expect to read the attacks you've just made in about 2003, not now.....that being said shouldnt you be on Digg or drudge report arguing for them damn liberals or them damn conservatives.

Funniest part of this is, I'm not a 'no planer'. I believe very well there were planes used that day in countless fashion, and 'perhaps' even on the wtc

Point being is that it's possible and we just dont know, and neither do you.

[goldengoose]

I'm glad you didnt forget to throw insults and question mental health yet again, while only referancing your close friend and his aunts cousins former roomates view of wtc.


The media hated Bush? What? wait let me guess, you're waiting until they remove that evil leftist president so another good conservative can save of from impending jihads?

You just cant see they've been working for the same globalist and coporate agenda, and dont give rats tail about one single left/right issue us folks go on about.

I'd expect to read the attacks you've just made in about 2003, not now.....that being said shouldnt you be on Digg or drudge report arguing for them damn liberals or them damn conservatives.

Funniest part of this is, I'm not a 'no planer'. I believe very well there were planes used that day in countless fashion, and 'perhaps' even on the wtc

Point being is that it's possible and we just dont know, and neither do you.


Yes, the mainstream media despise conservatives in general and George Bush in particular. That fact is undeniable.

Among my circle of close friends, I know only three who saw Flight 175 hit the south tower. Why should I pretend to know more? If I did, I'd say so. If didn't know any, I'd say so. What point can you possibly think you're making?

You are completely wrong. We do know with certainty that Flights 11 and 175crashed into the twin towers. There is no serious controversy about this historical fact.

[leviathanstaar]

Ive read/heard several attempts at public information act requests from the FBI not releasing info about said planes.

Couldnt tell you if they are right or wrong.

See, if this accumulation of things had not been presented, then scoffed without review by this main stream media there would be no reason for suspicion.

Yet, there is. From the people that profited to the first responders they still wont help.

The evidence vs what I admit can seem outlandish is indeed shaky, but not impossible.

The version the television told us is indeed what the real fantasy is.
Public documents revealing military flase flags througout the years, but "not this time though no way"!

It would have been easy as pie for them to be clear and transparent about the details and investigation, and instead that is not at all what went on.
That's one of the most difficult things I have ever had to accept, and it is now Barrak Obama's turn to sell the rest of the agenda while the U.S, and the world for that matter is robbed.

At least with a conservative puppet like Bush, his charisma would only go so far. But just like conservatives, the liberalists wont dare admit Obama was a mistake and that they've been shammed, as though its a personal insult to thier decision making skills. Even after watching him repeal on nearly everything he said, then fill his inner circle with known neo-conservatives and CFR members. No they would rather ignore the evidence and call you a nut when you show them.

Now that they have left cover again, all the things they wanted under Clinton and couldnt have, are available thanks to millions of well meaning good conservatives under Bush who have been repeatedly lied to.

[goldengoose]

Ive read/heard several attempts at public information act requests from the FBI not releasing info about said planes.

Couldnt tell you if they are right or wrong.

See, if this accumulation of things had not been presented, then scoffed without review by this main stream media there would be no reason for suspicion.

Yet, there is. From the people that profited to the first responders they still wont help.

The evidence vs what I admit can seem outlandish is indeed shaky, but not impossible.

The version the television told us is indeed what the real fantasy is.
Public documents revealing military flase flags througout the years, but "not this time though no way"!

It would have been easy as pie for them to be clear and transparent about the details and investigation, and instead that is not at all what went on.
That's one of the most difficult things I have ever had to accept, and it is now Barrak Obama's turn to sell the rest of the agenda while the U.S, and the world for that matter is robbed.

At least with a conservative puppet like Bush, his charisma would only go so far. But just like conservatives, the liberalists wont dare admit Obama was a mistake and that they've been shammed, as though its a personal insult to thier decision making skills. Even after watching him repeal on nearly everything he said, then fill his inner circle with known neo-conservatives and CFR members. No they would rather ignore the evidence and call you a nut when you show them.

Now that they have left cover again, all the things they wanted under Clinton and couldnt have, are available thanks to millions of well meaning good conservatives under Bush who have been repeatedly lied to.


What you have written here makes no sense whatever. It's unfortunate that you can't grasp the reality of Barack Obama. You do have plenty of company, however. Yeah, Obama's surrounded himself with lots of neo-conservatives. I can think of...well, I thought I could think of one.

[abababba]

If someone is arguing the planes were holograms, why are there so many posts about eye witnesses? The eye witnesses would obviously just see the hologram.

There is obviously a dispute about whether holograms are possible but the fact that there were eye witnesses doesn't provide any information about holograms versus real planes.

[goldengoose]

If someone is arguing the planes were holograms, why are there so many posts about eye witnesses? The eye witnesses would obviously just see the hologram.

There is obviously a dispute about whether holograms are possible but the fact that there were eye witnesses doesn't provide any information about holograms versus real planes.


This is not a debate. Holograms have absolutely nothing to with the attacks of 9/11/01. The sky that morning was brilliantly clear. Nobody sane thinks that holograms can be projected against a sunlit sky--even Ace Baker understands this much.

[queenofleon]

This is not a debate. Holograms have absolutely nothing to with the attacks of 9/11/01. The sky that morning was brilliantly clear. Nobody sane thinks that holograms can be projected against a sunlit sky--even Ace Baker understands this much.

You remind me of a wind up doll...I just watch you go.:D

Given the nature of your posts, I think you are the one with mental health problems. You are EXTREMELY aggressive, and feel the need to attempt to degrade people. Why is that?

you are actually a very nasty person goose. Have you sacrificed some children lately? :rolleyes:

Goose, regardless of what you think, I am totally sane, I have never been medicated in my life. Some of us just have the ability to think outside the box.

"flips the finger*

Also, I have a brilliant memory, a fantastic memory, and I have been convinced I remembered something accuratley, only to realise that infact the situation was not how I remembered it at all. Time and personal perception does that, you seem to think you are so up on science, ask a scientist.

Who is to say your freinds didnt see the hologram as abbaba said? Who is to say they didnt see a very large missile and the endless mind programming the media have done since convinced them that is what they saw? I know you wont accept this, BUT YOU DIDNT SEE THE PLANE EITHER. You are going on SECOND HAND info yourself. So ultimately you know jack shit goose.

It is hard to argue with someone like you, who doesnt believe in the NWO. Because from that standpoint you cant see that the media is a tool, and they create divisions to seperate us and cause conflict. Who cares what they premote as long as they are causing conflict and devision? Devide and conquer. They have been using it since the days of old.

If you dont believe in an agenda, you see no need for 9/11 to be an inside job, even though you are confronted by endless holes in a far fetched official story.

Ask yourself who benefits? The "jihads" didnt did they?

You swallow the official story and call us insane? hahahahahahaha, you have gone from annoying me to becoming hilarious. What a joke you are.

But thanks for filling my thread up!!

[gamolon]

queenofleon,

Did you post this article just for informational purposes or do you think that this is how the planes were projected?

[queenofleon]

queenofleon,

Did you post this article just for informational purposes or do you think that this is how the planes were projected?

I posted it because goose was denying that the technology exists, that was proof it does.


I have NO IDEA how they were projected if at all, it is my personal opinion though that for all the reasons I have stated before that no planes were used.

I posted it because goose seems to think he is some authority on all knowledge, and wont open his mind to the technological progress that is kept from the masses. According to him the technology doesnt exist, I am showing him it does.

[dave52]

According to him the technology doesnt exist, I am showing him it does.

And what can be shown, what is currently in the public domain is probably really old tech.

[queenofleon]

And what can be shown, what is currently in the public domain is probably really old tech.

Exactly Dave, you can guarantee they are sitting on the advanced stuff. Us meer civilians arent allowed to know are we!

:rolleyes:

[goldengoose]

You remind me of a wind up doll...I just watch you go.:D

Given the nature of your posts, I think you are the one with mental health problems. You are EXTREMELY aggressive, and feel the need to attempt to degrade people. Why is that?

you are actually a very nasty person goose. Have you sacrificed some children lately? :rolleyes:

Goose, regardless of what you think, I am totally sane, I have never been medicated in my life. Some of us just have the ability to think outside the box.

"flips the finger*

Also, I have a brilliant memory, a fantastic memory, and I have been convinced I remembered something accuratley, only to realise that infact the situation was not how I remembered it at all. Time and personal perception does that, you seem to think you are so up on science, ask a scientist.

Who is to say your freinds didnt see the hologram as abbaba said? Who is to say they didnt see a very large missile and the endless mind programming the media have done since convinced them that is what they saw? I know you wont accept this, BUT YOU DIDNT SEE THE PLANE EITHER. You are going on SECOND HAND info yourself. So ultimately you know jack shit goose.

It is hard to argue with someone like you, who doesnt believe in the NWO. Because from that standpoint you cant see that the media is a tool, and they create divisions to seperate us and cause conflict. Who cares what they premote as long as they are causing conflict and devision? Devide and conquer. They have been using it since the days of old.

If you dont believe in an agenda, you see no need for 9/11 to be an inside job, even though you are confronted by endless holes in a far fetched official story.

Ask yourself who benefits? The "jihads" didnt did they?

You swallow the official story and call us insane? hahahahahahaha, you have gone from annoying me to becoming hilarious. What a joke you are.

But thanks for filling my thread up!!


Yes, I sacrifice children regularly. Like Hitler, however, I love dogs. Indeed, I wouldn't dream of harming any animals. And none of my friends think I'm the least bit nasty.

You don't think outside the box at all. You just make up stuff. If there is a "NEW" World Order, then logically there must be something new about it. Hmmmm, last time I looked, the Russians were still not our friends, the Chinese were seeking to supplant us as the premier economic and military power, and the jihadists were screaming "Death to the Great Satan!" I'm afraid your "new" order is very old.

It remains impossible to project a hologram against a sunlit sky. There is no disagreement on this issue.

[stannrodd]

It remains impossible to project a hologram against a sunlit sky. There is no disagreement on this issue.

Correct ..

QED

Stann :)

[queenofleon]

Yes, I sacrifice children regularly. Like Hitler, however, I love dogs. Indeed, I wouldn't dream of harming any animals. And none of my friends think I'm the least bit nasty.

You don't think outside the box at all. You just make up stuff. If there is a "NEW" World Order, then logically there must be something new about it. Hmmmm, last time I looked, the Russians were still not our friends, the Chinese were seeking to supplant us as the premier economic and military power, and the jihadists were screaming "Death to the Great Satan!" I'm afraid your "new" order is very old.

It remains impossible to project a hologram against a sunlit sky. There is no disagreement on this issue.


Firstly, after writing that you were nasty I felt that I had judged you, which I really shouldnt, that makes me no better than you in terms of the way you attack people so I appologise there. I considered it is just your passion for the subject that makes you so aggressive, but as I say it isnt my place to judge, so I retract that statement, even though you come across that way sometimes.

Secondly, I know the NEW WORLD ORDER isnt new. That is how they package it for the sheeple. This reaches back as far as babylon and the same nazi's from the second world war are still major players today. So please dont patronise me like I have not looked into this. The fact is democracy is an illusion. They give us the illusion of choice, problem reaction solution.

As for the NPT, it is my opinion it was a missile, and that CGI was at work. If you can open your mind to consider that they do have technology way beyond what we are told, if you can consider that we know nothing, regardless of education, then anything is possible. That is what I mean by thinking outside the box. I have considered the RPT and it just doesnt wash with me. THAT'S MY OPINION. You can attack me, attempt to degrade me all you like, it is aboslutely no skin of my chinny chin chin mate. You carry on. This is a place of debate, we do not have to agree. You actually really amuse me, you need to chill, or get laid. One of the two.:D

Have you researched project bluebeam at all Goose?

[goldengoose]

Firstly, after writing that you were nasty I felt that I had judged you, which I really shouldnt, that makes me no better than you in terms of the way you attack people so I appologise there. I considered it is just your passion for the subject that makes you so aggressive, but as I say it isnt my place to judge, so I retract that statement, even though you come across that way sometimes.

Secondly, I know the NEW WORLD ORDER isnt new. That is how they package it for the sheeple. This reaches back as far as babylon and the same nazi's from the second world war are still major players today. So please dont patronise me like I have not looked into this. The fact is democracy is an illusion. They give us the illusion of choice, problem reaction solution.

As for the NPT, it is my opinion it was a missile, and that CGI was at work. If you can open your mind to consider that they do have technology way beyond what we are told, if you can consider that we know nothing, regardless of education, then anything is possible. That is what I mean by thinking outside the box. I have considered the RPT and it just doesnt wash with me. THAT'S MY OPINION. You can attack me, attempt to degrade me all you like, it is aboslutely no skin of my chinny chin chin mate. You carry on. This is a place of debate, we do not have to agree. You actually really amuse me, you need to chill, or get laid. One of the two.:D

Have you researched project bluebeam at all Goose?


Neither of us is a video compositing expert. That's why I accept the opinion of Steven Wright, a top professional with over a quarter-century of experience in feature films. Wright came to my attention when Ace Baker asked him to examine his theories. Wright concluded that Ace is an enthusiastic amateur who gets many things wrong. The plane in the Chopper 5 video cannot be a composite. Check out the two 'Hardfire' shows I hosted last year. Wright is returning next month to show the material he didn't have time to use in the debate.
Please understand that Wright works in the video industry. He has no political axes to grind.

Oh, and tens of thousands of people SAW the plane hit the south tower.

[bryan]

Firstly, after writing that you were nasty I felt that I had judged you, which I really shouldnt, that makes me no better than you in terms of the way you attack people so I appologise there. I considered it is just your passion for the subject that makes you so aggressive, but as I say it isnt my place to judge, so I retract that statement, even though you come across that way sometimes.


Don't feel bad about it. He doesn't believe the things he writes. He's a perp.