View Full Version : Forced conscription passes senate in US
largejack
24-03-2009, 07:07 PM
Need I say more
hey_jude
24-03-2009, 07:18 PM
No! I feel very sorry for the American people.
This Obama madness is difficult to comprehend.
hank_scorpio
24-03-2009, 07:35 PM
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/March_2009/obama_hitler_stalin.jpg
jesuitsdidit
24-03-2009, 07:43 PM
Need I say more
source?
pduffy4
24-03-2009, 10:07 PM
Same will happen in the UK no doubt:mad:
oiram
24-03-2009, 10:13 PM
source?
He is going tropo!
http://www.infowars.com/audiobox.html
.
richyrichard
25-03-2009, 12:24 AM
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/March_2009/obama_hitler_stalin.jpg
Must you insult the great German Fuhrer by comparing him to Churchill's friend Stalin and the Zionist's house negro?
microverses
25-03-2009, 12:32 AM
HR 1388
Not 100% that this is law...YET.
New York Times article:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/23/national-service-corps-bill-clears-senate-hurdle/
Get the document here:
http://www.govtrack.us/data/us/bills.text/111/h/h1388pcs.pdf
wchen99
25-03-2009, 12:39 AM
that link doesn't say anything about FORCED conscription. its about volunteering.
is this intentional misinformation largejack?
simplysimon
25-03-2009, 12:41 AM
No it's not disinformation. Mandatory 3 months for 18-25 year olds.
Check out the front page on infowars.com (http://www.infowars.com).
wchen99
25-03-2009, 12:43 AM
yeah i read infowars, but i doubt he has access to info that no one else does. no other media outlets refer to mandatory national service.
wchen99
25-03-2009, 12:48 AM
http://www.infowars.com/senate-rubber-stamps-national-enslavement-bill/
''7 million civilian enforcers''
not conscription. 2 different things.
simplysimon
25-03-2009, 12:49 AM
SEC. 120. INNOVATIVE DEMONSTRATION SERVICE-LEARNING PROGRAMS AND RESEARCH.
`(a) In General- From the amounts appropriated to carry out this part for a fiscal year, the Corporation may make grants and fixed-amount grants (in accordance with section 129(l)) with eligible entities for activities described in subsection (c).
`(b) Definitions- For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply:
`(1) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES- The term `eligible entity' means a State education agency, a State Commission, a Territory, an Indian tribe, an institution of higher education, or a public or private nonprofit organization (including community-based organizations), a public or private elementary or secondary school, a local educational agency, or a consortia of such entities, where a consortia of two or more such entities may also include a for-profit organization.
`(2) YOUTH ENGAGEMENT ZONE- The term `youth engagement zone' means the area in which a youth engagement zone program is carried out.
`(3) YOUTH ENGAGEMENT ZONE PROGRAM- The term `youth engagement zone program' means a service learning program in which members of an eligible partnership described in paragraph (4) collaborate to provide coordinated school-based or community-based service learning opportunities, to address a specific community challenge, for an increasing percentage of out-of-school youth and secondary school students served by local educational agencies where--
`(A) not less than 90 percent of the students participate in service-learning activities as part of the program; or
`(B) service-learning is a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency.
From the bill itself service-learning, I believe, is a 3 month course
wchen99
25-03-2009, 12:56 AM
agreed. its a stupid volunteer community type thing, not conscription.
simplysimon
25-03-2009, 12:59 AM
Well the definition of conscription:
Compulsory enrollment, especially for the armed forces; draft.
So it sounds pretty much like conscription to me. You'll be forced to do something and have no choice about it.
wchen99
25-03-2009, 01:16 AM
except, most people think of conscription and think vietnam, or today, iraq/afghan. obama isn't talking about that. you can hardly compare that to some little exercise at a national park in wyoming or wherever.
peter griffin
25-03-2009, 01:25 AM
Will you people stop using Infowars as a credible source?
wchen99
25-03-2009, 01:50 AM
Will you people stop using Infowars as a credible source?
well said. everybody has an agenda. that includes infowars.
twistedconcept
25-03-2009, 02:58 AM
Will you people stop using Infowars as a credible source?
Infowars is generally a good source, as it links to mainstream articles and government reports/documents.
peter griffin
25-03-2009, 07:07 AM
Infowars is generally a good source, as it links to mainstream articles and government reports/documents.
but then it loses credibility when it mentions fema concentration camps and bohemian grove
tyler
25-03-2009, 07:19 AM
You don't believe in FEMA concentration camps? Boy, are you in for a shock!
bones
25-03-2009, 07:20 AM
Will you people stop using Infowars as a credible source?
agreed ive become less inclined to believe what comes from that site.
alot of it is hyped up for ratings .
i could be wrong though.
but lets not get arguing as i do like alex jones and he did show me alot when i first started out on this path.
lynfowars
25-03-2009, 09:49 AM
except, most people think of conscription and think vietnam, or today, iraq/afghan. obama isn't talking about that. you can hardly compare that to some little exercise at a national park in wyoming or wherever.
Who are the 'most people' you talk for?
I am smart enough to know this forced conscription will basically involve a rebranding of the Brownshirts. It is sinister as hell, and given the brainwashing will be as 'voluntary' as the Manchurian Candidate's actions were.
When they drag people from their homes some dark night, be sure to look away, as it will only be for a 'little exercise in a national park'.
lynfowars
25-03-2009, 09:50 AM
Will you people stop using Infowars as a credible source?
NO. Because COINTELPRO want us to, we won't.
FAIL.
ekxodus
25-03-2009, 09:50 AM
Have a look at HR 1444 as well
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1444/text
lynfowars
25-03-2009, 09:53 AM
but then it loses credibility when it mentions fema concentration camps and bohemian grove
Are you even daring to suggest that these aren't true?
Do you think people here are fools?
skyline
25-03-2009, 10:00 AM
Same will happen in the UK no doubt:mad:
The TA are recruiting people up to the age of 43 so no doubt it is starting
lynfowars
25-03-2009, 10:03 AM
agreed ive become less inclined to believe what comes from that site.
alot of it is hyped up for ratings .
i could be wrong though.
but lets not get arguing as i do like alex jones and he did show me alot when i first started out on this path.
I am a strong supporter of Jones, and yes, he does use what you may unfairly call hype at times. This is because he is probably the only alt-news source that has used the mainstream media's own methods to shout as loud as they do.
It simply cannot be denied, Alex Jones has woken up more people than all the other alt-news/truthers combined. For that he deserves a bit of slack.
He often has guests on his show who are masters of communicating the NWO agenda and don't ever use hype -the Alan Watt interview from the recent 23rd March show for example.
And of course David Icke is a welcome and popular guest for the same reasons.
No one-source of alt-news has it 100% right every day. But when Jones makes the occasional mistake his critics seem to swarm like flies to make a big play of it. This shows just how afraid they are of him.
Be under no illusions, Jones' enemies, the NWO shills and COINTELPRO forum grunts are pervasive in all the alt-news/truther forums, including this one if other posts here (not yours) are anything to go by. Thankfully, in spite of their vast budgets, they still cannot employ people smart enough to have the subtlety to be undetected.
yozhik
25-03-2009, 10:06 AM
that link doesn't say anything about FORCED conscription. its about volunteering.
is this intentional misinformation largejack?
In a recent interview, Emmanuel described as it being "mandatory" for ALL youths, between the ages of 18 to 25. When pressed on the subject and directly asked if it was "compulsory" ... he said that it wasn't compulsory; when it was done was voluntary, but it was mandatory ... there was choice pertaining to when it was served, but not if it was served.
What exactly is your definition of forced?
Given no choice sounds like a variant of force to me.
alexc
16-06-2009, 05:21 PM
No it's not disinformation. Mandatory 3 months for 18-25 year olds.
Check out the front page on infowars.com (http://www.infowars.com).
And now we see the rise of Obama's browncoats.
sloppy
16-06-2009, 05:55 PM
Cant see it on infowars, link anyone? Or is this just over hype?
curtaincat
16-06-2009, 06:00 PM
Cant see it on infowars, link anyone? Or is this just over hype?
if it is true, it is coming faster than i thought
gilly
16-06-2009, 06:15 PM
It's not hype - Brown announced the same plans for the UK around the same time - I've just searched for that thread, but not had any luck, because I can't remember its title.
beldazar
16-06-2009, 06:16 PM
Are you even daring to suggest that these aren't true?
Do you think people here are fools?
Seconded :rolleyes:
sloppy
16-06-2009, 06:39 PM
It's not hype - Brown announced the same plans for the UK around the same time - I've just searched for that thread, but not had any luck, because I can't remember its title.
Around the same time as when? Im not joining the army they can screw themselves.
gilly
16-06-2009, 08:57 PM
Around the same time as when? Im not joining the army they can screw themselves.
Around the same time as this thread was posted.
http://www.infowars.com/senate-rubber-stamps-national-enslavement-bill/
''7 million civilian enforcers''
not conscription. 2 different things.
Yeah all young, they'l be trained and indoctrinated, and brainwashed. Much like the Hitler Youth. Get em while they're young Obama. He keeps some promises then. When you get the call, tell them to stick it up their arse.
always_rebel
16-06-2009, 10:24 PM
http://www.infowars.com/senate-rubber-stamps-national-enslavement-bill/
“Youth Engagement" ... reminds me of ... Hitler Youth.
decim
16-06-2009, 10:27 PM
“Youth Engagement" ... reminds me of ... Hitler Youth.
You were around in 1922 Germany?
always_rebel
16-06-2009, 10:32 PM
Have a look at HR 1444 as well
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1444/text
1+4+4+4=13
11, 13 and 33
The Illuminati / Freemason Signature
3 14 14 =3+1+4+1+4=13
C N N
3 9 1=3+9+1=13
C I A (Central Intelligence Agency )
4 8 19=4x8=32-19=13
DH S (Department of Human Services)
6 2 9= 6- 2=4+9=13
F B I
14 19 1 = 1+4=5-19=negative14+1=negative13 ?
N S A
1 15 12 = 1+15=16-1=15-2=13
A O L (America On-Line) note the eye in the pyramid.
6 5 13 1 = 6-5=1+13=14-1=13
FE M A (Federal Emergency Management Association)
5 16 1 = 5+1=6+6=12+1=13
E P A (Environmental Protection Agency) This is a shame. Its the only way they could charge us for the air we breathe.
13 9 F = 1+3=4+9=13F F=Freemason
M I 6 (British Intelligence) This one is freemason from front to back
23 8 15 = 2x3=6-8=-2+15=13
W H O (World Health Organization)
10 7 2 This one was very clever. Its reversed. = 2x7=14-01=13
K G B (Russian Intelligence)
14 1 6 20 1 This one is reversed also. = 1x20=20+6=26+1=27-14=13
N A F T A (North American Free Trade Agreement)
14 1 20 15 = 14-1=13-20=negative 7-1=negative 8-5=negative 13 ?
N A T O (North Atlantic Treaties Organization)
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/13_33_freemason_sig.htm
decim
16-06-2009, 10:45 PM
66 79 76 76 79 67 75 83