Would David go on Question Time?

[newspresenter]

Would they want him on telling truths?

For those who don't know, QT is a left wing politically correct quiz show disguised as a general politics show with studio "guests" and audience from the socialist party disguised as members of the general public.

You might think all is lost, but last april they said if the BNP got 2 members elected on the London Assembley, they'd have one on, and 3? weeks ago they had the elected one on a very lefty mainstream show on sunday morning, the one with Nicky Campbell.

How on satans earth does that UNelected sawardi warsaw asian person get on once a fortnight, bonkers.

[nofuture]

I bet they wouldn't allow David Irving on, although they allow Zionazis like Mad Mel on.

[steevo]

Would they want him on telling truths?

For those who don't know, QT is a left wing politically correct quiz show disguised as a general politics show with studio "guests" and audience from the socialist party disguised as members of the general public.

You might think all is lost, but last april they said if the BNP got 2 members elected on the London Assembley, they'd have one on, and 3? weeks ago they had the elected one on a very lefty mainstream show on sunday morning, the one with Nicky Campbell.

How on satans earth does that UNelected sawardi warsaw asian person get on once a fortnight, bonkers.

Are you aware that left and right are an illusion ?

[newspresenter]

I bet they wouldn't allow David Irving on, although they allow Zionazis like Mad Mel on.

When we say David on this site, we refer to Mr Icke.


I use left/right to describe what im saying, not that i believe in it necessarilly.

[marpat]

Would they want him on telling truths?

For those who don't know, QT is a left wing politically correct quiz show disguised as a general politics show with studio "guests" and audience from the socialist party disguised as members of the general public.

You might think all is lost, but last april they said if the BNP got 2 members elected on the London Assembley, they'd have one on, and 3? weeks ago they had the elected one on a very lefty mainstream show on sunday morning, the one with Nicky Campbell.

How on satans earth does that UNelected sawardi warsaw asian person get on once a fortnight, bonkers.

But he already has been on TV several times so its not like they have tried to stop him getting his views over the air.

[steevo]

But he already has been on TV several times so its not like they have tried to stop him getting his views over the air.

I have never seen him on the mainstream tv saying his stuff in any great detail though.

[parmy]

I have never seen him on the mainstream tv saying his stuff in any great detail though.

well apart from the hour long channel 5 docu - was he right shown on primetime i suppose;)

[steevo]

well apart from the hour long channel 5 docu - was he right shown on primetime i suppose;)

In which it didnt go into any great detail.

[marpat]

I have never seen him on the mainstream tv saying his stuff in any great detail though.

I have seen him on TV at least three times.

1) Obviously on wogan

2) A documentary where the camera follows him around. He does actually discuss some issues and it shows him at his talks

3) During morning TV. Two psychologists had done some tests to to create stats to try and prove that certain people were more prone to accepting conspiracy theories. One of them then met Icke on a beach and presented their results.

[marpat]

In which it didnt go into any great detail.

But would he really get nough time to go into detail with his work? If they gave him an hour he would have to focus in certain areas to fit it in. Even then if you make it too in depth you could begin to lose the interest of people who could not follow the theories through. Some people would be more responsive to overviews.

[steevo]

I have seen him on TV at least three times.

1) Obviously on wogan

2) A documentary where the camera follows him around. He does actually discuss some issues and it shows him at his talks

3) During morning TV. Two psychologists had done some tests to to create stats to try and prove that certain people were more prone to accepting conspiracy theories. One of them then met Icke on a beach and presented their results.

As I said already, on mainstream tv Icke has NEVER gone into any great detail of his research.

[steevo]

But would he really get nough time to go into detail with his work? If they gave him an hour he would have to focus in certain areas to fit it in. Even then if you make it too in depth you could begin to lose the interest of people who could not follow the theories through. Some people would be more responsive to overviews.

There are hundreds of Icke videos which are very short (10 minute snippets) and they go into pretty good detail - Enough to probably wake people up. And it is NEVER shown on mainstream tv.

[nofuture]

I saw him on This Morning about three years ago, he said 9/11 was an inside job and from then on they treated him like a retarded kid.

[newspresenter]

I saw him on This Morning about three years ago, he said 9/11 was an inside job and from then on they treated him like a retarded kid.

David Icke interview on This Morning show - YouTube

[marpat]

There are hundreds of Icke videos which are very short (10 minute snippets) and they go into pretty good detail - Enough to probably wake people up. And it is NEVER shown on mainstream tv.

But its not like his work is repressed is it. Like you say, its on video, he sells books and he has also had some time on the air. Even if he did not go into any depth that does not mean that people may not take an interest in him and actively see where he is coming from. It only needs a spark to create a fire!! I reckon that if he was on TV for an hour just going over subjects generally then some people may be interested enough to go and find out more. If people are not interested then even if he went into great depth they would still be disinterested.

[lightgiver]

Question time is fixed anyhow,they never discuss anything on the MSM these days,pile of garbage propaganda.;)

[steevo]

But its not like his work is repressed is it. Like you say, its on video, he sells books and he has also had some time on the air. Even if he did not go into any depth that does not mean that people may not take an interest in him and actively see where he is coming from. It only needs a spark to create a fire!! I reckon that if he was on TV for an hour just going over subjects generally then some people may be interested enough to go and find out more. If people are not interested then even if he went into great depth they would still be disinterested.

Moving the goalposts again Marpat :rolleyes: This isnt about books, it's about TV.
Using your logical fallacies yet again. You need to learn some different ways of wasting people's time. Youre so obvious.

[thetruthseeker]

As I said already, on mainstream tv Icke has NEVER gone into any great detail of his research.

He appeared on Good morning once with Philip Schofield and Fern Britton but they were both very sceptical about what he had to say.

[steevo]

He appeared on Good morning once with Philip Schofield and Fern Britton but they were both very sceptical about what he had to say.

I know, I saw that.

[thetruthseeker]

But its not like his work is repressed is it. Like you say, its on video, he sells books and he has also had some time on the air. Even if he did not go into any depth that does not mean that people may not take an interest in him and actively see where he is coming from. It only needs a spark to create a fire!! I reckon that if he was on TV for an hour just going over subjects generally then some people may be interested enough to go and find out more. If people are not interested then even if he went into great depth they would still be disinterested.

You are right, all it took for me was after I watched the channel 5 documentary "David Icke: Was he right" and I wanted to know more.

I had largely forgotten about David Icke only remembering that I heard he had disapeared I think only to re-emerge with some controversial views and remember watching Wogan and he was in the news about his interview with Terry Wogan and after that I never saw him on TV after that until the channel 5 programme. When you really listen to his explanation of why he said what he did on Wogan and what he was going through at the time you fully understand why he said what he did.

[newspresenter]

fern britton on QT tonight, FERN BRITTON, who the hell is she. And like all the rabble on that show, she turned up looking for the longest applause, wearing something fairly trendy, but could be deemed general dress, and claimed she was part of those struggling to pay the mortgage :eek: Fern earns what, £15,000 a week, her husband is a professional chef who also appears on This Morning and Can't Cook, Wont Cook.

WHY, WHY is she on QT??????????????????????????????

WHO is fern britton??????????????????????????????? (the muppet in the above video)

WHO is David Icke?


WHAT is going on in our society when people like Fern and Shamy Chacrabarti get on QT, its a farce, and WE the general public pay like slaves for the overall running costs of our society, THINK PEOPLE, THINK?

[tampaman]

As I said already, on mainstream tv Icke has NEVER gone into any great detail of his research.

Icke only scratches the surface in what he has to say when he does and 8 hour presentation where only he speaks. So what level of detail are you expecting from mainstream TV?

I think Icke gets quite a bit of air time on mainstream TV and radio considering hes not exactly flavour of the week to most. TV stations put on what people want to see and like it or not for most that's not Icke. If Icke was as big as some think he is he would get more air time. I certainly don't subscribe to the idea he gaged or anything like that. Not saying you do either.

As Fern whats her name was mentioned does any one remember when she had her own show where Icke spoke for and hour or it could have been half hour?

[steevo]

Icke only scratches the surface in what he has to say when he does and 8 hour presentation where only he speaks. So what level of detail are you expecting from mainstream TV?

I think Icke gets quite a bit of air time on mainstream TV and radio considering hes not exactly flavour of the week to most. TV stations put on what people want to see and like it or not for most that's not Icke. If Icke was as big as some think he is he would get more air time. I certainly don't subscribe to the idea he gaged or anything like that. Not saying you do either.

As Fern whats her name was mentioned does any one remember when she had her own show where Icke spoke for and hour or it could have been half hour?

Of course he is gagged.

[marpat]

Of course he is gagged.

How has he been gagged? I have seen him on TV a few times, he says exactly what he wants in his talks, he goes on radio and sells loads of books which are very detailed. He is not gagged in any sense.

[steevo]

How has he been gagged? I have seen him on TV a few times, he says exactly what he wants in his talks, he goes on radio and sells loads of books which are very detailed. He is not gagged in any sense.

I havent heard Icke on mainstream radio for quite a long while now. Have you ? And please answer the question, without moving the goalposts.

[alien77]

Question time is fixed anyhow,they never discuss anything on the MSM these days,pile of garbage propaganda.;)


Question time is fixed...i agree...
The whole BBC is fixed....
And yes "question time" has its own Agenda....
Its a rubbish programme , designed to brainwash the masses....with a fixed agenda.....
And yes that agenda is left wing..

[alien77]

Would they want him on telling truths?

For those who don't know, QT is a left wing politically correct quiz show disguised as a general politics show with studio "guests" and audience from the socialist party disguised as members of the general public.


How on satans earth does that UNelected sawardi warsaw asian person get on once a fortnight, bonkers.

I agree... how does that asian woman get on the show almost every week????
The programme is a left wing set-up job....
People shouldnt watch it unless they are Left wing, or want to be brainwashed into being left wing...

[alien77]

fern britton on QT tonight, FERN BRITTON, who the hell is she. And like all the rabble on that show, she turned up looking for the longest applause, wearing something fairly trendy, but could be deemed general dress, and claimed she was part of those struggling to pay the mortgage :eek: Fern earns what, £15,000 a week, her husband is a professional chef who also appears on This Morning and Can't Cook, Wont Cook.

WHY, WHY is she on QT??????????????????????????????

WHO is fern britton??????????????????????????????? (the muppet in the above video)

WHO is David Icke?


WHAT is going on in our society when people like Fern and Shamy Chacrabarti get on QT, its a farce, and WE the general public pay like slaves for the overall running costs of our society, THINK PEOPLE, THINK?

Yeah the BBC .. is just a mini soviet Union...

The so called British broadcasting is nothing of the sort....

[marpat]

I havent heard Icke on mainstream radio for quite a long while now. Have you ? And please answer the question, without moving the goalposts.

Maybe they think he has nothing to offer. Why doesnt he push himself more into the public view anyway. I am sure if he pushed hard enough he could get some attention.

[steevo]

Maybe they think he has nothing to offer. Why doesnt he push himself more into the public view anyway. I am sure if he pushed hard enough he could get some attention.

I said WITHOUT moving the goalposts! :p

[marpat]

I said WITHOUT moving the goalposts! :p

I did not set any goalposts so how can I move them? I think it is you who are trying to set them

[steevo]

I did not set any goalposts so how can I move them? I think it is you who are trying to set them

Round and round and round and round and round and round we go. Welcome back anyway Marpat, even though you have never been away ;)

[adbasque]

In which it didnt go into any great detail.

first They allowed him on T Wogan back in the late 80s early 90s, and then recently again on Terry Wogan, but both occasions were to discredit him as a lunatic, and discredit every conspiracy theorist out there.

They didn't invite him to go into details, T Wogan was trying to hijack all the points DI was trying to make throughout the interview, Maybe Terry Wogan didn't have much choice, perhaps deep down or in private he does believe him.

The first time around I think TW didn't believe him, he wanted to make a joke out of him, but recently he showed him more respect than the last time, even though he tried several time to interrupt him, when DI tried to get into th nitty gritty of things.

So no, if they invite him is because they want to make a mockery out of him and us.

[hagbard_celine]

I think David was on QT once wasn't he?:confused:

[adbasque]

I think David was on QT once wasn't he?:confused:

I can't honestly remember if he was or not, but then, David Icke needs more than an hour TV programme to even scrape the surface of the whole conspiracy.

I have seen him on another channel on controversial tv, I believe it was channel 200 on Sky

I watched his interview for about 2 hours, at my brother in law's house, I haven't had a TV for almost 4 years now.

I doubt very much they'll invite him, if they do invite him for an hour programme without interrupting him, he can open the tin of worms once and for all, even the sceptics will sit down and take notice, especially with what happened with the economy and the banker's bailouts etc..

He could easily sit there and say to them I did warn you that was coming, at that moment a lot of people will bloody take notice, because now it hit them where it hurts the most their wallets.

[marpat]

It would be quite nice if Icke popped into the forum once in a while to asnwer such things himself rather than people debating whether he would or not.

[hagbard_celine]

It would be quite nice if Icke popped into the forum once in a while to asnwer such things himself rather than people debating whether he would or not.

I was once a member of Jon Ronson's forum (http://www.jonronson.com/forum.html) and he used mto regularly contribute. That wasn't so bad because there were only about 100 active memebers. But here there might be clustering effect if David came on himself and all the threads would ge nuked.. I saw a bit of that when somebody on ATS was thought to be Robbie Williams.:eek::D

Maybe part of David's plan is that we never know what he thinks and we're not meant to. We have to find our own way. It's a kind of internet Prime Directive.

[mr_pixie]

I think David was on QT once wasn't he?:confused:

I vaugley remember it about 10 years ago. He wasnt given enought time to explain things.

[merlincove]

I vaugley remember it about 10 years ago. He wasnt given enought time to explain things.

Yeah, but one david icke answer would take up the whole show. :rolleyes:

He definatley should be getting air time and be allowed to go on imo.

[steevo]

I vaugley remember it about 10 years ago. He wasnt given enought time to explain things.

I dont ever remember Icke being on Question Time. Obviously I could be wrong.

[adbasque]

I dont ever remember Icke being on Question Time. Obviously I could be wrong.

I don't remember him on QT either.
Unless I missed it on the day, and I used to watch that QT every Thursday
Just to have a laugh and watch what the sheeple have to say about themselves.

[mr_pixie]

I dont ever remember Icke being on Question Time. Obviously I could be wrong.


I dont think he went down well but maybe I'm misstaken and I dreamt it?

[wakeupworld]

I believe Question Time in the early days of being presented by Robin Day was actually transmitted live, which is certainly NOT the case now.
Maybe David has been asked to appear on it but has turned the offer down and quite rightly in my opinion.

The programme is edited by the propaganda channel and is practically a waste of time for truth-seekers.

[wispa]

David would not lower himself and go on 'Question time'.

[steevo]

If Icke did go on question time, there would be the rent-a-crowd mob of fascist "anti-fascists" making alot of noise.

[marpat]

David would not lower himself and go on 'Question time'.

He lowered himself enough to go on Wogan. Is he so arrogant that he will refuse a debate?

[steevo]

He lowered himself enough to go on Wogan. Is he so arrogant that he will refuse a debate?

Marpat, that is a very hypocritical thing to say.

[marpat]

Marpat, that is a very hypocritical thing to say.

How? somebody reckons he wouldnt loweer himself to go on and I am asking is he so arrogant to refuse debate?

Please explain what you mean rather than using a cheap shot

[marpat]

If Icke did go on question time, there would be the rent-a-crowd mob of fascist "anti-fascists" making alot of noise.

But surely all of the information he has would silence them

[steevo]

But surely all of the information he has would silence them

It would.

[steevo]

How? somebody reckons he wouldnt loweer himself to go on and I am asking is he so arrogant to refuse debate?

Please explain what you mean rather than using a cheap shot

I think that you know very well what I mean Marpat :p :-

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=87037&page=23

[marpat]

It would.

Its just a pity we wont get the chance to see that happen. I think it could be a very interesting show. I wonder if people can email them with suggestions

[steevo]

Its just a pity we wont get the chance to see that happen. I think it could be a very interesting show

Yes it would. I cant see them letting that one happen, unless there is mass editing going on.

[marpat]

I think that you know very well what I mean Marpat :p :-

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=87037&page=23

I could not be bothered with you pointless posts. There was nothing worth debating. You were just reacting emotionally by posting lots of questions and hoping that I would tie myself down.

[steevo]

I could not be bothered with you pointless posts. There was nothing worth debating. You were just reacting emotionally by posting lots of questions and hoping that I would tie myself down.

lol :D