sophia_h
13-02-2009, 03:37 PM
`
`
if we do not hate the germans now,
we shall inevitably fail in our purpose to establish the world
on a basis of peace...we shall hate or we shall fail."
the file on anti-german racism
compiled by michael a. Hoffman ii
(except where otherwise noted).
--------
wipe them all out
the liberal london daily newspaper news chronicle wrote:
"we are in favor of wiping out every living creature in germany--man, woman, child, bird and insect."
(david irving,goebbels: Mastermind of the third reich ,
[london: Focal point, 1996], p. 461).
-----
applauding the mass murder of german civilians
for those who desire evidence of the extent to which harvard prof. Daniel goldhagen's book (hitler's willing executioners) is part of a malignant trend toward a growing genocidal hatred for germans, i furnish the statement of historian david neal miller, who has spoken out prominently in defense of the goldhagen book. In an internet newsgroup, miller gleefully applauded the mass murder of defenseless german civilians at dresden:
"better to apprehend the destruction of dresden as a small moment of exemplary rightness in the massive wrongness of which dresdeners were co-authors . . . (w)e children of the victors might be permitted something akin to joy at the thought of dresdeners and germans as a whole getting the bombing they so ... Richly deserved... I do not predicate my satisfaction with the bombing of dresden on a theory of collective guilt, but on the certitude of the actual guilt of a near-totality of the german people--women, grandparents, non-combatants...a well earned death sentence indeed."
(quoted by ingrid rimland, cf. Zgram, feb. 13, 1997).
---------
"we shall hate or we shall fail"
by rex stout, chairman,
president roosevelt's writers' war board
new york times magazine, january 17, 1943.
"...i hate germans, and am not ashamed of it. On the contrary, in view of what the germans have done, and of what my countrymen are preparing to do to them, i would be profoundly ashamed of myself if i did not hate germans.
"...i hate all germans who, reluctant to join the nazis, nevertheless failed, through lack of courage or conviction, to prevent the nazis from seizing power..."
"those are the germans i hate from the bottom of my soul. Ninety-nine percent of them are in germany.
"it is not true that if we hate the germans now we are helping to fill a reservoir of hate-poison that will infect the future beyond all hope of antisepsis. On the contrary. if we do not hate the germans now, we shall inevitably fail in our purpose to establish the world on a basis of peace...we shall hate or we shall fail."
january 17, 1943.
(researched by alan r. Critchley and michael a. Hoffman ii )
----
revisionisthistory.org
---
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/germanracism.html
.
`
dogsmilk
15-02-2009, 05:05 PM
The video says something about 300,000 being killed at Dresden. This is totally false. It was something like up to 40,000 max or thereabouts. Look it up. You'll find some discussion on HDOT as Evans debunked Irving's original wild claims as part of the Lipstadt trial.
Looking at another thread, Dumbo Dees seems to think it's up to 500,000! By next week it'll probably be over a million!
Anyway, many of the corpses at Dresden were cremated in a manner which looks uncannily similar to the way open air cremations described as occurring in the death camps were - apparently oh-so-implausibly - conducted.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Dresden-pile-of-bodies.JPG
Speaking of which, it's perhaps time to re-post this article which casts serious doubt on whether it happened at all!
February 13, 1999
>
> Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
>
> Today is "Dresden Day."
Apparently Mr. Zundel is unaware that recent research conducted by the courageous and politically incorrect truth-seekers of THE MAD REVISIONIST has revealed startling evidence that the bombing of Dresden and other German cities during the conflict known as World War II is in fact an elaborate German propaganda hoax.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that a few buildings might not have burned down, and that maybe a few people weren't singed or even killed as a result. But revisionists are scorned, and even laughed at, when we ask difficult questions about what really caused the tragedy, and how many people were really killed. Meanwhile, so many establishment lies about this alleged event have been exposed by revisionist research that its hard to take the normatively accepted version seriously.
Take the fact that there are numerous memorial sites in Germany that supposedly mark "mass graves" of civilians alleged to have been killed in these so-called "bombings". Yet not one of these sites have ever been excavated and subjected to impartial forensic examination to confirm that they contain what they are alleged to contain. Appalling, is it not? These Dresden hoaxers obviously have something to hide.
> Fifty-four years ago today, the city of Dresden, which had no strategic
> military significance at all and which had become a huge refugee city for
> civilians fleeing the Red Terror, became a huge fireball in the fiercest
> Allied terror bombing ever.
Indeed, the city of Dresden had no military or strategic significance. Is it therefore not the least bit fishy that the Dresden hoaxers expect you to believe the ridiculous notion that the Allies, while fighting a war that they intended to win, would waste valuable military resources on it?
> David Irving has written about the Dresden Holocaust, and it is a book well
> worth reading - and one you will never forget.
>
> It is estimated by some that as many as 350,000 - 600,000 victims were
> incinerated beyond being identifiable or even recognizable as human remains
> in that Holocaust. Only 35,000 could be identified.
Ah, so only 35,000 victims could be identified, and yet Zundel expects us to believe that another 350,000-600,000 people (why does the number vary so widely, hmmm?) were killed as well, simply because they are unaccounted for. How gullible does he think we are? Does he offer any proof to support this absurd number?
> Many of the pictures that people were served up as "pyres of gassed Jews"
> from Auschwitz and elsewhere in early Allied "atrocity flicks" are, in
> fact, photographs the Wehrmacht took of German victims of the Allied war
> crime of Dresden.
But every revisionist knows that it is physically impossible to burn bodies in open pits. That's why the photos and eyewitness testimonies of Jews being burned outside the kremas at Auschwitz must be fakes, right? So it serves as proof, as well, that the Dresden bombing is a hoax.
> The War Department, describing another city, Hamburg, described how people
> died in such a firestorm:
>
> "Literally hundreds of people were seen leaving shelters after the heat
> became intense. They ran across the street and were seen to collapse very
> slowly like people who were utterly exhausted. They could not get up."
>
> A reporter, Melitta Maschman, wrote of what happened in the City of Darmstadt:
Well, I suppose it is accurate to refer to Melita Maschmann (correct spelling) as a reporter at the time of the bombing. Though it would, perhaps, be more accurate to say that she was a reporter for the Bund Deutscher Madel. In fact, it would be more accurate still to say that she was the head of the BDM Press and Propaganda division in Berlin from 1943 until the end of the war. Interesting how Mr. Zundel is willing to, er, prune information that might cast doubt on the reliability and objectivity of his sources. Particulary when the source in question, in her memoir (Account Rendered: a Dossier on my Former Self) written after the war, was quite open in describing how the Nazis used to brainwash German youth.
> "There was not a house anywhere in the street which had not turned into a
> blazing firebrand. Above the sea of flames, a glowing cyclone raged over
> the town, and whenever it caught the bodies of people in flight, it
> shriveled them in a second to the size of a child, and the next day they
> lay all over the streets, hardly burnt, but like mummified children."
HBO should have saved this lie for its "Tales from the Crypt" program. Preposterous nonsense! So called "eyewitness" testimonies of these alleged bombings of German cities contain so many impossibilities and discrepancies as to make the whole story unbelievable. Sure, all of the survivors pretty much agree on the point that the city was bombed by the Allies, but how reliable are survivors who also testify to "puddles of melted human flesh" and people "glowing blue (or orange) and disintegrating" - and this, in sealed bunkers which were protected from the fire. There have been so many lies told by so-called "Dresden survivors" that all of these testimonies are wide open to reasonable doubt. After all, how much can you trust people testifying against their hated enemies?
And is there a single witness who actually saw a bomb dropped from an American plane land on the city and explode? No. Not one such witness. Who could have survived to have described such a thing? All we have are rumors. I don't want to hear what people thought they heard from inside the bomb shelter, or what they figured might be going on above. I want to know what they saw.
No, the Dresden myth relies almost entirely on hostile eyewitness testimony and questionable "confessions" by those alleged to have done the dirty deed. There is not a single survivor account of the Dresden bombing that has ever stood up to hostile cross-examination, and I challenge you to find one.
> These German victims' wartimes stories are not known. They left no diaries.
>
> They perished in the flames of the devastating inferno of March 16, 1945 -
> among the thousands of victims of this Allied atrocity the following women
> and children named "Anna":
<snip: list of names>
> I would like you to honor and remember these German victims of a deliberate
> Allied policy with genocidal overtones in a few moments' worth of silence.
While I'm sure that Mr. Zundel considers it good history to tug at the heart strings in the hopes of disabling our ability to think rationally and critically, this tactic will not work any better than the diary of Anne Frank. It stands that he has yet to show us one proof... one single proof... that any one of these persons died as a result of Allied bombs.
In light of the fact that I have shown that the Dresden story has no non-biased eyewitnesses and no conclusive physical evidence, it appears that alternative explanations for the destruction are entirely plausible. It could have been caused by someone smoking in bed (smoking is more common in continental Europe than it is in, say, North America). Also, it is entirely plausible that the German Air Force bombed the city themselves by accident (as they did to Freiburg), and then tried to cover up their heinous error by blaming the disaster on their hated enemies.
Its not looking good for the Dresden hoaxers now. Where is the proof that this city was bombed by the Allies? Considering the gravity of the charges, is it really so much to ask?
http://www.revisionism.nl/Dresden/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm
Some people might think on the back of that horrific pile of corpses that a satirical article concocting ludicrous arguments from incredulity - in tried and tested denier style - to argue it never happened is in very poor taste.
And those that do might wish to then stop and think why denial may upset some people...
And hang on, this awful wave of anti-German racism apparently consists of –
*some guy appaently making crass comments about Dresden back in 1995 who did not go unchallenged, e.g. -
Re: David Neal Miller's response to Roland Wagner
I find David Miller's judgments on the subject of Dresden's destruction
appalling. Mr. Miller evidently believes that when we recognize the moral
ambiguities involved in obliterating an entire city we dissolve the stigma
attached to Nazi Germany's crimes. I argue, however, that recognizing those
ambiguities is exactly what makes us superior to the Nazis and gives us the
moral high ground necessary for judging them.
Even if convined Nazis were skulking about Dresden the indiscriminate
destruction of a city that also harbored thousands of non-combattants
remains morally dubious. It was as wrong for the allies to fire bomb a
city that had no military value as it was for the Nazis to bomb
indiscriminately. Admitting that the United States made bad moral choices
in pursuing a just war does not denigrate the memory of the Nazis'
victims, it makes true remembrance possible. If too many Germans forgot
that morality must guide each individual irrespective of the political
conditions, we should not repeat their errors through self-righteous
recollections of our own. If we are not willing to subject ourselves to
moral scrutiny then we have little foundation upon which to judge others.
That war can have a vicious logic should not overthrow the moral codes the
allies were supposedly fighting to uphold.
Moreover, even if Dresden's firestorm was condign punishment for the Nazis
does Mr. Miller assume that everyone in Dresden was a party fanatic? One
would hope that historians have moved beyond the sort of rigid "us vs.
them" characterizations that were also at the root of the Nazi world view.
(You lived in Dresden? Too bad. Burn.) Evidently, Mr. Miller has not.
Nonetheless, I was still mildly encouraged to see him note that the
immolation of the "not-yet-corrupted young" should be a minor exception to
the glee that wells up in him at the thought of Dresden's flames. There is
hope.
Michael J. Sauter
http://www.h-net.org/~german/discuss/veday/sauter.txt
*Daniel Goldhagen's highly controversial book (what is it with you and the 90s???) which, at least as I understand it (haven't read it) hinges on a thesis that Germans had an inherently anti-semitic culture (not the Germans are evil par se) which has been received very badly by Holocaust scholarship, near universally rejected and is pretty much out on its own. He is widely regarded as using sources very badly and does not have much respect as a scholar. He was being conflated with Hilberg in one of your other terminally ignorant articles, which is kinda ironic as Hilberg thought HWE was shit.
*Some quote allegedly from a newspaper which is cited as being on p.461 of Irving's Goebbels book yet there's no sign of it on p.461 – look for yourself
http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Goebbels/Goebbels.pdf
*Comments attributed to Rex Stout - I don't know if the quotes are accurate, but he was certainly very anti-German. Not the sort of behaviour you'd expect from a Quaker.
This is supposed to be some big dossier on some huge, evil anti-Germanism? The sheer hypocrisy in moaning about anti-German comments yet endorsing anything negative said about the Jews is obvious and by now rather to be expected. Has it occurred to you a better world might be one where the only prejudice is being against prejudice?
But well Soph, perhaps for once we can agree on something – I'd suggest;
a/The Dresden bombing and other mass bombings of German cities were awful and killed a lot of innocent people. There was not even any military justification for Dresden and it was basically a war crime. The Germans engaged in mass bombing too, but it was snide the way the Allies sought to avoid prosecuting for this or having mass bombing recognised as a war crime because they blatantly devastated cities themselves.
b/I'd say that people railing against Germans generally and approving of killing German civilians is bang out of order and should be condemned. I can understand such comments against the enemy in the context of war – war tends to bring out harsh statements to whip people up – but this does not make it right.
So we can (presumably) agree that attacking Germans generally is wrong.
I wonder then if we could continue with our newfound mutual understanding – I would invite your opinion on these quotes, picked at random.
When the first truckload arrived my hand was slightly trembling when shooting, but one gets used to this. When the tenth load arrived I was already aiming more calmly and shot securely at the many women, children and infants. Considering I have two infants at home, with whom these hordes would do the same , if not ten times worse. The death we gave to them was a nice, quick death compared with the hellish torture of thousands upon thousand in the dungeons of the GPU. Infants were flying in a wide circle through the air and we shot them down still in flight, before they fell into the pit and into the water. Let's get rid of this scum that tossed all of Europe into the war and is still agitating in America...I am actually already looking forward, and many say here that after our return home, then it will be the turn of our own Jews. Well, I'm not allowed to tell you enough.
Walter Mattner, letter to his wife from Belorussia, October 1941
From Browning the origins of the final solution p.298
Make short work of the Jews. What a pleasure, finally for once and for all to be able to tackle the Jewish race physically. The more that die, the better
Speech by Hans Frank, November 26th 1939
ibid p.45
During the course of extensive discussions with SS-Brigadefuhrer Zenner and the very competent Leiter of the SD, SS-Obersturmbannfuhrer Dr jur.Straunch, it was established that we have liquidated about 55,000 Jews in the past ten weeks. In the Minsk area the Jews have been completely eradicated, without any negative effect on the workforce. In the mainly Polish area of Lida 16,000 Jews have been liquidated, in Slonim 8,000 Jews. Our preparations for the liquidation of the Jews in the Glebokie area were disrupted when the rear army area pre-empted us, liquidating 10,000 Jews whom we had been due to eradicate systematically, without any prior liaison with us. (A report on this incursion has already been submitted). On 28 and 29 July about 10,0000 Jews were liquidated in the city of Minsk, 6,500 of them Russian Jews – for the most part old people, women and children – and the rest Jews unfit for work, who had mostly been sent from Vienna, Brunn, Bremen and Berlin in November of last year to Minsk on the Fuhrer's orders
Wilhelm Kube to Hinrich Lohse, 31st July 1942
From Dressen & Reiss the good old days p.180
The ever greater panic spreading among the Jews due to the great heat, overloading of the train cars, and stink of dead bodies – when unloading the train cars some 2000 Jews were found dead – made the transport almost unworkable
Reserve Lieutenant Westerman, September 14th 1942
Browning Ordinary Men p.35 – couldn't be bothered to type out more of the rather long report – this part is preceeded by a description of shooting Jews who managed to break out of the train. It was en route to Belzec.
The procedure is a pretty barbaric one and not to be described here more definitely. Not much will remain of the Jews. On the whole it can be said that about 60 per cent of them will have to be liquidated whereas only about 40 per cent can be used for forced labor."
Goebbels, March 27th 1942. Very famous quote.
One way or another - I will tell you that, quite openly - we must finish off the Jews. The Fuhrer put it into words once: "should united Jewry again succeed in setting off a world war: then the blood sacrifice shall not be made only by the peoples driven into war, but then the Jew of Europe will have met his end". I know that there is criticism of many of the measures now applied to the Jews in the Reich. There are always deliberate attempts to speak again and again of cruelty, harshness, etc.: this emerges from the reports on the popular mood. I appeal to you: before now I continue speaking; first, agree with me on a formula: we will have pity, on principle, only for the German people, and for nobody else in the world. The others had no pity for us either. As an old National-Socialist, I must also say that if the pack of Jews were to survive the war in Europe while we sacrifice the best of our blood for the preservation of Europe, then this war would still be only a partial success. I will therefore, on principle, approach Jewish affairs in the expectation that the Jews will disappear. They must go. I have started negotiations for the purpose of having them pushed off to the East. In January there will be a major conference on this question in Berlin (Wannsee - Jan. 42) to which I shall send State Secretary Dr. Buhler. The conference is to be held in the office of SS Obergruppenfuhrer Heydrich at the Reich Security Main Office. A major Jewish migration will certainly begin.
But what should be done with the Jews? Can you believe that they will be accommodated in settlements in the Ostland? In Berlin we were told: why are you making all this trouble? We don't want them either - not in Ostland or in the Reichskommisariat; liquidate them yourselves! Gentlemen, I must ask you to steel yourselves against all considerations of compassion. We must destroy the Jews wherever we find them and wherever it is at all possible, in order to maintain the whole structure of the Reich...the views that were acceptable up to now cannot be applied to such gigantic, unique events. In any case, we must find a way that will lead us to our goal and I have my own ideas on this.
The Jews are exceptionally harmful feeders for us. In the Government-General (Poland & surrounding occupied areas), we have approximately 2.5 million, and now perhaps 3.5 million together with persons who have Jewish kin and so on. We cannot shoot these 3.5 million Jews, we cannot poison them, but we will take measures that will somehow lead to successful destruction; and this in connection with large-scale procedures which are to be discussed in the Reich, the Government-General must become as free of Jews as the Reich. Where and how this is to be done is the affair of bodies which we will have to appoint and create, and on whose work I will report to you when the time comes.... .
Hans Frank, December 16, 1941
Another famous quote, but just lifted it from here
http://www.datasync.com/~davidg59/frank.html
The matter (of the executions of the Polish elites) had already been decided by the Fuhrer; the commander of the army (meant as "ground force") had been informed that if the Wehrmacht refused to be involved, it had to accept the pressure of the SS and Gestapo. Therefore, in each military district, civilian commanders would be appointed who would carry the responsibility for ethnic extermination." (added in pencil: political cleansing)
Gen.Wilhelm Keitel to the head of military intelligence, Adm Wilhelm Canaris, September 12 1940
From Friedlander the years of extermination p.13
The purpose of the Russian campaign (is) to decimate the Slavic population by 30 million
Heinrich Himmler, 1941
From Aly & Heim architects of annihilation p.237
Believe me, I could come out with pages and pages of this stuff.
So we can agree Dresden was awful and we should recognise that slaughter.
We can agree lambasting Germans is bang out of order, even if you're reduced to dredging stuff up from 10 years ago.
I'd also suggest we can clearly see from this small selection here something, shall we say, a bit not cricket in Nazi attitudes to Jews and Slavs (And of course other 'inferior' or 'asocial' groups can be added...)
Do you agree?
Or are you not going to give one inch in your love of totalitarian racial dictatorship?
dogsmilk
16-02-2009, 07:30 PM
but if one who has repeatedly shown it is not sane
has to OBSESSIVELY beg me for responses so it can
perpetrate vile attacks is also stalking my posts
it only succeds in displaying to all of us its OWN insanity
Uh yeah, because my post on this thread is so utterly deranged isn't it? Look love, I have no interest whatsoever in 'begging' you for a response; if you are unable to defend the material you choose to copy and paste, that's your problem. I'm not stalking your posts. Do you really want me to go to the trouble of highlighting all your recent posts I haven't responded to? I can if you like. I mean here
yes a thriving film industry
AH supported all the arts and saw the potential of
hollywood but disdained the common character of most of
the roles especially for women.
He hoped the films made in Germany would rival the crass ones
from hollywood and invited artists and writiers to Germany to
make quailty films
He also had a screeningroom at Berchtesgarten and often had
guests in to view a film sent in from directors or stars in several
nations including America.
His dinner table was filled with artists, writers, the brilliant people,
and conversation was enlightened and jovial. He was renowned for
being witty and charming, tho quite shy.
There are many diaries surviving with descriptions of the visits people
enjoyed at his country home as well as reports the SS kept on who
came and went. The guests loved him and the camaraderie and
relaxed yet refined atmosphere. AH did much private support of
artists and writers from his own private funds and sometimes
mused that at end of the WAR when he could retire he would get back
to his painting.
So Germany during the National Socialist era was a time of
abundance up to late 1943 and music, dance, theater, art, writing, were
the social focus, Old World ELEGANCE and courtly manners the accepted
behavior for the wealthy and honorabe conduct for the Folk. Crime was
almost non existent, people were happy.
There are many videos on the TUBE. Many books and personal diaries that
speak in great detail of a watershed time. Visitors from many nations
marvelled at the miracle of a rebuilt Germany and the adoration for the
man who made it happen. Sports and athletics, wholesome diet and
environmental conservation were part of the philosophy and daily
regimen for schools and homes. It wasnt a utopia but it was a prosperous
and content people with a view to a bright future.
Then Judea declared WAR on Germany.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53873
You betray either simply incredible ignorance or flagrant lying.
Are you seriously trying to tell me you know nothing about the Nazi drive to get rid of so-called 'degenerate' art. Which included (by no means exclusively) the evils of Negro jazz (though the Jews were behind it of course)
http://www.riverwalkjazz.org/images/content/pagebuilder/11217.jpg
Brrrrrr!!!!!!
What will those Jews think of next??
By 1936, 3/4 of German films were funded by the Film Credit Bank. And if they didn't like what your film would be saying, you didn't get any funding. Simple as.
And what of Goebbels' rather crafty vision of using the German film industry as a propaganda device. Goebbels disliked triumph of the will because it was too crass. He reckoned
That is the secret art of propaganda: to permeate the person it aims to grasp, without his even noticing that he is being permeated. Of course propaganda has a purpose, but the purpose must be concealed with such cleverness and virtuosity that the person on whom this purpose is to be carried out doesn't notice it at all
cited Evans the Third Reich in power p.127
Needless to say, you are a poor pupil of your master propagandist.
They used films to put across messages they wanted to permeate public consciousness. For example, I accuse - where a guy kills his wife who has MS - was an attempt to make the public more positive about their 'euthanasia' ideas, even though it didn't concern the impersonal medicalised murder they inflicted on disabled and mentally ill people.
Your depiction of Nazi Germany as some kind of Hollywood depiction of the age of chivalry is frankly hilarious.
Hitler did watch a lot of films though, I'll give that. And apparently he did have a stash of Mickey Mouse cartoons.
Then Judea declared WAR on Germany.
LOL. I'd love to spend just five minutes being you. I bet it's really hectic.
I tend to be interested in the Holocaust, so I post on a lot of - not all - Holocaust threads. Comprende?
and lack of education about the platforms and REAL actions
of any system I subscribe to.
I also see great logic in the Roman REPUBLIC on which
NSDAP AND the American Republic are based.
So because I believe these systems have good
bases is that also proof I an insane
Well I'm no big expert, but I feel I have a reasonable understanding of how fascist dictatorship works. And there's scant little I can see that represented a 'good base' in National Socialism. Maybe the thought of a guy with a bad tache telling what to think and who to hate makes you feel all safe and frees you from the troublesome burden of personal responsibility, I dunno.
If you want to tell me about it - preferably using your own words rather than something you simply copied off a Nazi website - I'll happily discuss it with you.
I'd also be interested to hear exactly what comparisons with Rome and America you perceive.
along with the billions thru
history who see these systems the same way?
Dubious statistics aside, has it occurred to you that many people on this forum bemoan the way the majority of the populace just do as they're told and act happy while death is enacted in their name? Maybe you should start a thread telling everyone to shut the fuck up as there are millions, billlions who don't share the views expressed on this forum or at least speak out about them...right?
are the attacks on me based then
SIMPLY on a mad mans HATE for an
intelligent woman?
a threat to its need to be superior ?
it keeps teling us how superior it is
in its knowledge
Actually, I've pointed out a couple of times I'm not particularly knowledgeable and it's true; I'm not.
I also don't know if you're actually female and my personal opinion is that you're probably of fairly low intelligence.
I don't hate you either. I think you're funny.
I also think I am not superior or inferior to any life form on this planet. With the possible exception of Nazis and other totalitarians who are heading backwards down the evolutionary ladder.
some of the attacks from others here
are outright racist and bigoted on my ancestry
I must have missed those.
But otherwise:
http://tsfiles.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/pot-kettle-black.jpg
I dont think this would stand against any other poster here
and I am wondering why its allowed to stand against me
when I have reported it.
the TROLLS cant be blocked but seems there
ought to be a limit to how far they can go
in personal attacks
this one in this thread is so obvious in its stalking
and attacking
after it was told firmly I will have NO INTERACTIONS
WITH THOSE WHO BELIEVE THEY CAN ABUSE ME
Yes, I tend to find online Nazis/deniers that patrol forums such as this one peddling their wares tend to make big speeches about how they're all freedom of speech and just want impartial historical enquiry then go bonkers and want censorship when they get replies they don't like. True colours methinks.
Sad, really.
IT SHOWS ITS own NEED for a whipping post
and THATS a borderline personality disorder
Actually, crudely put, the diagnosis of BPD requires the presence of five or more symptoms from a list of nine which I'm afraid it's simply impossible to ascertain from posts on an internet forum. You may be interested to learn that 'needing a whipping post' isn't among them. The section concerning it starts on page 706 of the DSM IV TR should you wish to consult it. Sorry, but I couldn't be bothered to look up the comparable section in the ICD 10.
Otherwise, I wish you all the best with your private psychiatric practice.
If it were a neighbor I would get a restraining order ! LOL.
It's such a shame you can't just put people in concentration camps isn't it?
sophia_h
20-02-2009, 05:24 PM
`
Dresden 16.2.2008 memory march
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0vz_J0DyBk&feature=related
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0vz_J0DyBk&feature=related
ihmisivihass
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=ihmisivihass
March 04, 2008
Vzpomínkový pochod při výročí bombardování Drážďan - účast cca 6.000 lidí,
Memory march in Dresden 16.2.2008, cca 6.000 people participated...
song by
Bound for Glory "Dresden" :
February 13th, 1945
The destruction of a city,
in which all was left to die
The silence was broken
by the Allied bombers' sound
A once-mighty city
was turned to rubble in the ground
The Allies tried to put an end
to this city's pride
And above the burning ruins
the Red flag was flying
The survivors were starving,
for they had nothing to eat
Their shelters were gone,
they had to live on shattered streets
Now it's 45 years later,
to your heritage you must stay pure
Communism is the disease
and we are the cure
..