View Full Version : 666 and 'The New World Order'.........
james777
25-06-2007, 11:12 PM
Ok guy and girls. Are we ready for the NWO to come into place? Could we actually stop it if they emplaced this 'order' upon us overnight? Is anyone afraid of this? Would anyone willingly accept the 'mark of the beast'? Would anyone gladly die as a 'non-conformist'?
I'm just curious to see how you guys feel about this. I for one will go on the record and state "I will not willingly accept any type of NWO new religion or new government. I will gladly die rather than give in to this satanic movement, which is an effort to enslave the human race and for the last time, cut us off from God Almighty.
It's coming and we cannot stop it, no matter how much of our 'conscience's' are awaken. There is already too much 'inertia' driving this force. It's a supernatural showdown of good vs. evil and we are the prized possesions for the evil(Lucifer, prison warders). They have already cut themselves off from God and eternal life in the heavens, so now they have sought to destroy the human race for the last 6,000 years.
BE PREPARED and be ready to fight to the end.
mahabaratara
26-06-2007, 12:38 AM
Its possible that that War maybe psychic afterall where have the Billions been actually spent...It isnt as if the Nazi bastards did get the choice of plumb jobs in science and technology after WW2 is it...?
And if it is psychic how are you going to prepare...?
james777
26-06-2007, 12:43 AM
Its possible that that War maybe psychic afterall where have the Billions been actually spent...It isnt as if the Nazi bastards did get the choice of plumb jobs in science and technology after WW2 is it...?
And if it is psychic how are you going to prepare...?
Being a psychic and physical hybrid as you and everyone else is, we have to prepare by making our 'minds' strong, because this is what they'll attack most. We won't even realize it. That's why our minds have to be strong and prepared so we can understand what is happening when it begins to happen. Just to let you know, it's beginning to happen. The physical part of all of this is nothing in comparison to the spiritual magnitude.
Have you ever heard of 'NASA's ; Project Blue Beam'?
cheeb
26-06-2007, 01:00 AM
I feel James has been spending too much time on the computer and came across project bluebeam,
He is now desperatley trying to incorporate it into his beleif system,
Go outside James,
Take in the weather, wet though it may be,
Speak to your fellow human beings,
Realise that the gift you have been given is wonderful.
dont waste it
on other peoples
ideas
pttp
PoE
james777
26-06-2007, 01:08 AM
I feel James has been spending too much time on the computer and came across project bluebeam,
He is now desperatley trying to incorporate it into his beleif system,
Go outside James,
Take in the weather, wet though it may be,
Speak to your fellow human beings,
Realise that the gift you have been given is wonderful.
dont waste it
on other peoples
ideas
pttp
PoE
LOL.....I've been aware of 'Project Blue Beam' for quite some time. It has nothing to do with my 'belief' system. Why are you so interested in 'minding' my personal business anyways?
I live in the South Caribbean and enjoy much of my time outside and also use my wireless connection to enjoy the outdoors while I'm online, not that it's any of your concern or your business.
You seem to have more posts than me, so why are you attempting to tell me how to budget my time? If you paid more attention to what I say instead of trying to figure out why I say it, you may actually have a chance to lose your 'sheepish' reality and make it after all.
cheeb
26-06-2007, 01:17 AM
Sounds nice ,the Carribean,
Sorry James for some reason I assumed you came from England,
Its midnight here ,what time is it there?
mahabaratara
26-06-2007, 01:17 AM
Being a psychic and physical hybrid as you and everyone else is, we have to prepare by making our 'minds' strong, because this is what they'll attack most. We won't even realize it. That's why our minds have to be strong and prepared so we can understand what is happening when it begins to happen. Just to let you know, it's beginning to happen. The physical part of all of this is nothing in comparison to the spiritual magnitude.
Have you ever heard of 'NASA's ; Project Blue Beam'?
Yes I am aware of the psychic field...
Chackras/Kundalini...
Thats why I reckon there is *so* much technology...It disrupts the EM field around us further...Isnt as if poisioning the water and food is enough...
The best "system" I have thus far come across to bridge the gap between the psychic and physical is Polynesian Huna...
I have only just started...
THATS what all the Secret Societies do...Its also Ancient knowledge that the Native tribes had...
As for Bluebeam I think Philadelphia (If true again I dont trust much) is far more dangerous...
james777
26-06-2007, 01:51 AM
Sounds nice ,the Carribean,
Sorry James for some reason I assumed you came from England,
Its midnight here ,what time is it there?
It's nearly 8pm now. About 29 celcius and 88 farenheiht.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/images/smilies/custom/bopidqgm.jpeg
Can I come back now???
Quoting: 4by2godlikeproductions.co....
"The Heart Creates Oneness" http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h109/TravelingMermaid/hibiscus1web2.jpg
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/images/smilies/custom/kormenls.jpeg
Get in the ark then, be4 2 l'ate !!
http://www.ascendpress.org/images/new2.gif New Front Page Art Special thanks to our web artist Brigitte Rondeau! The new art depicts
all 18 kingdoms that support and sustain ascending humans through the new nature dream time planes!
SpiritualSchoolofAscension (http://www.ascendpress.org/index.htm)
http://www.ascendpress.org/images/webbackground5.gif
Report: Ideal breakfast has ham, cheese 17:02 ,Medicine & Health
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A scientific study of British students' eating habits has found eating ham and cheese for breakfast can significantly improve cognitive functioning.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The high protein in the breakfast will release into the system slowly, and therefore it will suppress the appetite for longer, and prevent children from snacking," he told the newspaper.
Copyright 2007 by United Press International
[Full version] (http://pda.physorg.com/lofi-news-breakfast-cognitive-release_102009745.html)
From a Few Genes, Life’s Myriad Shapes
By CAROL KAESUK YOON
Published: June 26, 2007 (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/science/26devo.html?_r=2&ref=science&oref=slogin&oref=slogin)
Science
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/06/25/science/26cov.large1.jpg
synergy777
26-06-2007, 05:50 PM
edit your pictures always chill me out, the one with all the animals, and the one with dna helix. as for the breakfast, egg and bacon my fave. i can cook an awesome fry up, with a mix of indian seasonings (add them to the eggs and beans), the best.
Praise The Artist! 4:cool:Pictures!
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif Science
Essay
Darwin Still Rules, but Some Biologists
Dream of a Paradigm Shift
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/06/25/science/26erwin.xlarge1.jpg
By DOUGLAS H. ERWIN
Published: June 26, 2007 (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/science/26essay.html?ex=1340510400&en=560c387dfae2a80e&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss)
Is Darwin due for an upgrade? There are growing calls among some evolutionary biologists for just such a revision, although they differ about what form this might take. But those calls could also be exaggerated. There is nothing scientists enjoy more than the prospect of a good paradigm shift.
Skip to next paragraph
Related
Evolution Is ... (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/science/26evoquotes.html) (June 25, 2007)
Paradigm shifts are the stuff of scientific revolutions. They change how we view the world, the sorts of questions that scientists consider worth asking, and even how we do science. The discovery of DNA marked one such shift, the theory of plate tectonics another.
Many scientists suffer from a kind of split personality. We believe that this is the most exciting time to be working while yearning for the excitement of a revolution. What ambitious scientist would not want to be part of a paradigm shift? Not surprisingly, this yearning occasionally manifests itself in proclamations that a revolution is at hand.
To understand the current tumult it helps to understand how our evolutionary framework developed. It was constructed from the 1930s to 1950s by early geneticists, paleontologists and others, who disagreed about the efficacy of natural selection in driving evolutionary change (Darwin’s big idea) and about the nature of the underlying genetic variation upon which natural selection could act. What they came to agree on was called the modern synthesis, and it established an intellectual zeitgeist that continues today, and has been continually adapted, in the best evolutionary fashion, to encompass new discoveries.
That synthesis holds that mutations to DNA create new variants of existing genes within a species. Natural selection, driven by competition for resources, allows the best-adapted individuals to produce the most surviving offspring. So adaptive variants of genes become more common. Although selection is often seen, even by biologists who should know better, as primarily negative, removing poorly adapted individuals, Charles Darwin understood that it was a powerful creative tool.
It is the primary agent in shaping new adaptations. Computer simulations have shown how selection can produce a complex eye from a simple eyespot in just a few hundred thousand years.
In the past few years every element of this paradigm has been attacked. Concerns about the sources of evolutionary innovation and discoveries about how DNA evolves have led some to propose that mutations, not selection, drive much of evolution, or at least the main episodes of innovation, like the origin of major animal groups, including vertebrates.
Comparative studies of development have illuminated how genes operate, and evolve, and this places less emphasis on the gradual accumulation of small genetic changes emphasized by the modern synthesis. Work in ecology has emphasized the role organisms play in building their own environments, and studies of the fossil record raise questions about the role of competition. The last major challenge to the modern synthesis came in the 1970s and 1980s as my paleontological colleagues, including the late Stephen Jay Gould, argued for a hierarchical view of evolution, with selection occurring at many levels, including between species.
Transitions between species documented by the fossil record seemed to be abrupt, perhaps too abrupt to be explained by the modern synthesis. If this were generally true, it could render irrelevant much of natural selection occurring within species, because just as mutations are produced randomly with respect to the needs of a species, with selection shaping these into new adaptations, new species might evolve randomly with species selection shaping them into evolutionary trends. This challenge was greeted with less than fulsome praise by evolutionary biologists studying changes within species. The resulting hubbub has yet to fully die down. But the newer work cuts closer to the core of the modern synthesis, and is potentially more revolutionary, because it addresses the fundamental question of how really new things happen in the history of life. What brought about the origin of animals, or the invasion of land?
The Achilles’ heel of the modern synthesis, as noted by the philosopher Ron Amundson, is that it deals primarily with the transmission of genes from one generation to the next, but not how genes produce bodies. The recent discoveries in the new field of evolutionary developmental biology, or evo-devo, that the gene Pax-6 controls the formation of eyes in mice and humans, Nkx2.5 heart formation, and a suite of other genes the formation of the nervous system, has provided a means to investigate the genetic and developmental mechanisms influencing how the form of organisms has evolved, not just their genes. Perhaps the most exciting area in evolution is in exploring how rewiring the circuitry of genes produces different arthropod appendages, or wingspots on butterflies.
1 2 Next Page »
Douglas H. Erwin is a senior scientist at the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution and a research professor at the Santa Fe Institute.
(Page 2 of 2)
Eric H. Davidson, a colleague of mine at CalTech, has dissected the network of interactions between the genes that build the gut of sea urchins and starfish during development. When he compares these gene networks, there is a core of about five genes whose interactions are essential to forming the gut, and which have been preserved for some 500 million years.
Skip to next paragraph
Related
Life as We Know It ... (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/25/science/26timeline.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) (June 25, 2007)
One advantage developmental biologists have over paleontologists is that they can experiment on the development of these animals. Most of the genes in this network can be removed, and the developing embryo finds a way to compensate. But these five core genes, which form what Davidson calls a kernel, cannot be modified: change any one of them and no embryo forms at all. There is no reason to think that there was anything unusual about how this kernel first evolved some 500 million years ago (before sea urchins and starfish split into different groups), but once the kernel formed it locked development onto a certain path. These events, small and large, limit the range of possibilities on which natural selection can act. These questions about mechanism were not even being asked under the modern synthesis.
The failure to consider how biodiversity grows reflects an even more troubling flaw in the modern synthesis: it lacks any real sense of history. This may sound odd, as evolution is about history. A geologist would describe evolutionary theory as uniformitarian: “The present is the key to the past.” This is the principle we use that by understanding how processes operate today we can understand past events. Evolutionary theory assumes that the processes we can study among fruit flies disporting themselves in a laboratory capture the broad sweep of evolutionary change.
But just as the erosive power of a river changes the future options for the course of the river, so evolution itself changes future evolutionary possibilities. This can happen in simple ways, as termites construct their own environment by building termite mounds. These mounds may last for dozens or hundreds of years and provide a sort of ecological inheritance for generations of termites.
The first cyanobacteria turned carbon dioxide into oxygen and set off a revolution that completely changed the chemistry of the oceans and atmosphere. Most species modify their environment and this often changes how selection affects them: they construct, at least in part, their own environment. As evolutionary biologists we have little understanding of what these processes mean for evolution.
Does all this add up to a new modern synthesis? There is certainly no consensus among evolutionary biologists, but development, ecology, genetics and paleontology all provide new perspectives on how evolution operates, and how we should study it. None of these concerns provide a scintilla of hope for creationists, as scientific investigations are already providing new insights into these issues. The foundations for a paradigm shift may be in place, but it may be some time before we see whether a truly novel perspective develops or these tensions are accommodated within an expanded modern synthesis.
«
Douglas H. Erwin is a senior scientist at the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institution and a research professor at the Santa Fe Institute.
. Sphere: Related Blogs & Articles Next » (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/science/26essay.html)
Psalm 106:1
Parallel Translations (http://scripturetext.com/psalms/106-1.htm)
Praise ye the LORD. O give thanks unto the LORD; for...
Praise ye Jehovah. Oh give thanks unto Jehovah; for he is good; For his lovingkindness endureth forever. Let the Lord be praised. O give praise to the Lord, ...
YLT: Praise ye Jah, give thanks to Jehovah, For good, for to the age, [is] His kindness.
GOD'S WORD® is a copyrighted work of God's Word to the Nations.
synergy777
26-06-2007, 06:47 PM
Natural selection, driven by competition for resources,
even their theory for evolution is based on adaption for resource allocation, lol every system they have, has an enthrophic core. this enthoropic core dovetails with functions of our reptile core, coincidence? i thought adadption was nature/nurtue, eg climate/environmental adaptions.
when the truth is systems of a universal creative nature. even simple bacteria can evolve/mutate to counteract antibiotics, look at hosptitals and their bugs.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/Rainbow1_-_NOAA.jpg/800px-Rainbow1_-_NOAA.jpg
mada88
26-06-2007, 08:46 PM
Numbers and symbols aren't negative or positive remember that.
bigus_dickus
26-06-2007, 09:06 PM
have we already accepted the mark?
is it time in our front lobes and on our wrist watches?
the three sixes, the second, the minute, the hour.
the whole astrological system of 12+1.
the calendar..
aznality
27-06-2007, 08:46 AM
Why not just merge the 1st and 3rd option? I'm sure most of us will say 'over my dead body' to it anyway. No one will just say 'no' and leave it at that.
james777
28-06-2007, 04:50 AM
Why not just merge the 1st and 3rd option? I'm sure most of us will say 'over my dead body' to it anyway. No one will just say 'no' and leave it at that.
ya, good point. I realized this later.