Smoking banned in Homes Belmont California

[timezone]

Smoking Banned In Homes - Adopts Hitler’s Policy

http://www.prisonplanet.com/smoking-banned-in-homes-california-adopts-hitlers-policy.html

[comawhite015]

Oh now that is just silly!

How the hell are they going to reinforce that. They're dreaming.

[debs67gb]

ffs i feel bad enuff sticking me head out the door to have a toot these days - wont walk down the street cos sick of people fookin tutting about second hand smoke grr- I'll be bolloxed if theyre gonna come into MY property (without breaking trespassing laws lol) to tell me not to smoke! hehehe

[bim11]

Oh now that is just silly!

How the hell are they going to reinforce that. They're dreaming.

By bringing in more troops. Obama promised to bring tens of thousands of troops back from Iraq for a reason ;)

(it's re-enforce by the way)

[unusual_suspect]

Ok, smoking may be bad m'kay, but wtf?

[comawhite015]

(it's re-enforce by the way)

're-enforce' is a variant.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reinforce

*pokes tongue out* ;)

[fnulnu]

Not according to my dictionary.

"reinforce" is just a spelling variation.Your post was fine as-was :)

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reinforce

Oh,lol we posted at the same time & you edited the "thanks".Sorry,glad you looked it up.

[comawhite015]

"reinforce" is just a spelling variation.Your post was fine as-was :)

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reinforce

Oh,lol we posted at the same time & you edited the "thanks".Sorry,glad you looked it up.

*chuckle* I knew I was right, dammit ;)

Teamwork, baby!

[drhemp]

I was in Plymouth the other day at the City Business Park owned by Plymouth City Council (helping my mate move his stuff, as he got evicted coz the council thought his cactus plants were cannabis) and noticed the sign by the entrance that stated 'no smoking was permitted in the car park', and no smoking was allowed on any land owned by Plymouth City Council.

Plymouth City Council is controlled by Common Purpose, in fact it was the activities of Common Purpose in Plymouth that originally alerted anti-Common Purpose campaigner Brian Gerrish about this corrupt and criminal organisation.

[limelady]

Smoking Banned In Homes - Adopts Hitler’s Policy

http://www.prisonplanet.com/smoking-banned-in-homes-california-adopts-hitlers-policy.html

Two words sums this up.

Police State.

[unusual_suspect]

Two words sums this up.

Police State.

Yes, it's worrying when you consider that it is fine to drink an apartame laden diet coke anywhere.

[debs67gb]

If I have to hang out of the attic window to smoke ill be really pished off :)

[fnulnu]

*chuckle* I knew I was right, dammit ;)

Teamwork, baby!

heh heh I always spell it reinforce,too.Who needs extra hyphens,eh?

As for the smoking ban indoors - what a load of bollo.

[limelady]

Yes, it's worrying when you consider that it is fine to drink an apartame laden diet coke anywhere.

Indeed it is. This is because such toxins as aspartame and fluoride are ON the agenda, and smoking (apparently) is not. :rolleyes:

[unusual_suspect]

Indeed it is. This is because such toxins as aspartame and fluoride are ON the agenda, and smoking (apparently) is not. :rolleyes:

This is what makes me wonder if smoking is as bad as they say it is, rat poison in water = good, smoking = bad, that doesn't add up.

Anyway, smoking makes you look cool :D

[the nine]

mabe they are trying to reduce the risk of more forrest fires..;)

[unusual_suspect]

mabe they are trying to reduce the risk of more forrest fires..;)

Do people have forests in their houses in California?

[debs67gb]

*tries not to set the moors on fire* lol

[fnulnu]

Indeed it is. This is because such toxins as aspartame and fluoride are ON the agenda, and smoking (apparently) is not. :rolleyes:

It really makes me wonder if smoking protects us from something they might be trying to mess with...Or is it simply the fact they've discovered these new ways to poison,kill and save paying us our pensions,so they can use smoking to introduce endless asinine laws,because they know the majority are damned if they do,damned if they don't?

[the nine]

Do people have forests in their houses in California?

well, i think probably not..but them movie stars with all their wealth..fuck knows!

anyway, thanks for you facetiousness, but people in california have 'houses in the forrest'...maybe some of them stand at the door smoking, flicking the fag... oh yeah, food for thought.

[unusual_suspect]

well, i think probably not..but them movie stars with all their wealth..fuck knows!

anyway, thanks for you facetiousness, but people in california have 'houses in the forrest'...maybe some of them stand at the door smoking, flicking the fag... oh yeah, food for thought.

Well, yeah maybe, you have to dispose of burning things sensibly, it's still no reason to tell flks what to do in their own homes.

[limelady]

It really makes me wonder if smoking protects us from something they might be trying to mess with...Or is it simply the fact they've discovered these new ways to poison,kill and save paying us our pensions,so they can use smoking to introduce endless asinine laws,because they know the majority are damned if they do,damned if they don't?

I am suspicious of their motives for the very same reason you are.

Its never added up to me when you consider the same health authorities have allowed killer trans-fats along with the many other dangerous toxins that now present in our food supply, some of which have even been promoted by these authorities....and example of which would be margarine - a 'plastic' food made from GM grains, touted/pushed/marketed to the people as being better for our hearts than natural products that humans have been eating (heart-disease-free) for centuries. :rolleyes:

We have every right to be suspicious. :cool:

[the nine]

Well, yeah maybe, you have to dispose of burning things sensibly, it's still no reason to tell flks what to do in their own homes.

I wasnt agreeing, just being a tad silly..:)

[fnulnu]

I am suspicious of their motives for the very same reason you are.

Its never added up to me when you consider the same health authorities have allowed killer trans-fats along with the many other dangerous toxins that now present in our food supply, some of which have even been promoted by these authorities....and example of which would be margarine - a 'plastic' food made from GM grains, touted/pushed/marketed to the people as being better for our hearts than natural products that humans have been eating (heart-disease-free) for centuries. :rolleyes:

We have every right to be suspicious. :cool:

That's absolutely true,plus food is the number one cause of cancer.