PDA

View Full Version : TV licence fee to pay for staff houses!


bicycle
19-01-2009, 04:33 PM
The prices of hundreds of homes owned by BBC employees in London will be guaranteed by licence-fee payers under a relocation package aimed at enticing staff to Salford.

Employees will also receive £5,000 in relocation expenses, up to £3,000 to pay for new carpets and curtains and will keep thousands of pounds in London weighting allowances, it emerged yesterday. The decision to use the licence fee to underwrite property values in a falling housing market has been condemned as unacceptable.

The BBC said last night that it was reviewing the planned relocation terms for 1,630 staff because of the economic downturn. Details of the packages will increase anger at the corporation's decision to move more than 2,500 jobs from London to increase the percentage of programmes made in the “regions and nations”.

The BBC is moving five departments, including sport, children's programmes and Radio 5 Live, to Salford Quays, Greater Manchester. The BBC plans to move half of its production outside London by 2016, with Question Time, The Weakest Link and Newsnight moving to the Pacific Quay complex in Glasgow.
Related Links



Under the “guaranteed house purchase scheme”, employees on permanent contracts will receive up to 95 per cent of the market price for a property. The BBC will incur any loss on the price when the property is sold and will pay for solicitors' fees, surveys and stamp duty, home information packs and building society charges.

The move to Salford, which will cost an estimated £200 million, is believed to have been opposed by a number of star presenters at the corporation. Simon Mayo, the Radio 5 Live afternoon presenter, is reported to have said that he will not move, and has been offered an alternative job on Radio 2. Peter Allen, the presenter of the Drive show, is also said to be unhappy. David Dimbleby, the veteran Question Time presenter, is reported to have expressed concerns about the transfer.

Details of the relocation payments were released after an application under the Freedom of Information Act. Details of the contract between the BBC and Cartus, a specialist relocation contractor, have been withheld by the broadcaster, citing commercial reasons. All staff must decide whether to move by September 30, with most relocating between April and December 2011.

Removal costs will be paid and the BBC is also offering a packing and unpacking service; storage costs will be paid for up to three months.

The BBC says that it expects the guaranteed house purchase scheme to apply only to a minority of staff moving north, but the exact numbers are not yet known. Staff on short-term contracts or who do not own a house will not be eligible. They will be paid a maximum of £8,000 for the move.

Matthew Sinclair, the research director of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: “Guaranteeing staff against falls in the value of London homes [is] a slap in the face to the ordinary taxpayer. Providing this kind of expensive subsidy to staff at the taxpayers' expense isn't acceptable.”

The BBC has told the Government that it is committed to the move north because it “addresses concerns that the organisation is not fully representative of the peoples of the UK”.

A corporation spokesman said: “We are fully aware of the harsh economic situation but we do need to move significant numbers of staff to a new operational centre in Salford. We seek to offer relocation assistance which is comparable to that offered across the private and public sectors.”

* Have your say

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5542507.ece

and justice for all
19-01-2009, 04:57 PM
Yeah... I was just reading that.

Oh... well, you britz carry on being good citizens and pay up.
Not to mention you're also paying for Clarkson’s extravagant excesses and Jonathan Ross’ loud mouth with a lisp. LOL! You guys are too much!

mushroombot
19-01-2009, 05:00 PM
Yeah... I was just reading that.

Oh... well, you britz carry on being good citizens and pay up.
Not to mention your also paying for Clarkson’s extravagant excesses and Jonathan Ross’ loud mouth with a lisp. LOL! You guys are too much!

Not paying for it at this house - TV license got the boot nearly a year ago now. It's time others did the same.

and justice for all
19-01-2009, 05:05 PM
Not paying for it at this house - TV license got the boot nearly a year ago now. It's time others did the same.

Oh I Agree... but how many will make that stance?

You guys need to stop paying en-masse, and beat the crap out of any TV license ‘official’ that shows up... I would say shoot them but you’ve got no guns...

pinkgrapefruit
19-01-2009, 06:21 PM
Not paying for it at this house - TV license got the boot nearly a year ago now. It's time others did the same.

Yep... same here. Hopefully this move will encourage more people to say no to the Telly Tax.

christuffer
19-01-2009, 07:15 PM
Any success stories from people who have fought this poll tax?



Still can't believe that owning a tv set makes me legally obliged to financially contribute to the making of Eastenders and other such drivel.

lottie
19-01-2009, 07:27 PM
Yep... same here. Hopefully this move will encourage more people to say no to the Telly Tax.

me too!!

pinkgrapefruit
19-01-2009, 07:50 PM
Any success stories from people who have fought this poll tax?

Still can't believe that owning a tv set makes me legally obliged to financially contribute to the making of Eastenders and other such drivel.

I wrote a letter to the BBC on behalf of a friend in September, citing what was topical at the time and she has had no response.
I basically stated that I would, no longer trust the BBC to report the News in an un-bias, objective manner. Pointing out the ZERO coverage of the Bilderberg Group and also pointed out the contradictions in the BBC reports of the Geogia/Russia conflict to what I was reading on other sources.

There is a good piece on the TPUC site that is a good read and it'll give you ideas what to say to them.

http://www.tpuc.org/stoppayingtvlicencefees

daria
19-01-2009, 07:58 PM
Hmmm.....how to say this.....throw the fucking thing out; you won't miss it.

world elite
19-01-2009, 08:09 PM
Yes i haven't paid the tv license with the help from tpuc.org since 31 October 2008.

and justice for all
19-01-2009, 08:15 PM
Hmmm.....how to say this.....throw the fucking thing out; you won't miss it.

Oh FFS! A television SET is a freaken appliance, it can be used whichever way you choose. In my case I need it to test my video editing - DVD authoring - and graphics in general, used in that context it's called: "monitor". The set can be used for viewing your own footage, chosen DVDs and play games. Is not the appliance that is the problem, is the external incoming broadcast that is the devil here.

Or... would you throw away your kettle because of the fluoridated water inside it? Nonsense!

daria
19-01-2009, 08:51 PM
Actually I have, or rather would have had, if my folks wouldn't insist in something hot. I am trying to be raw foodist.

I still say, throw it out. Go on, try it.

rebel 66
19-01-2009, 09:13 PM
Just after christmas decided to cancel some standing orders made by my bank. Rates people and water folk were very polite and helpful but the TV licence spokesperson was really rude. Was instantly asked "AND WHAT NOW?" in a very beligerant manner.

Anybody got TV on a standing order and want to cancel it to see if you receive the same response. The man was intimidating and took me aback because I expected a different manner. Also thought he was trying to push me in to answering this question as he asked it again as no response was forthcoming to his first attempt.

Am now awaiting them visiting me.