Get sterilized in 90 seconds...

[chris]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpdIOYtbl8s&eurl=http://www.outlawjournalism.com/&feature=player_embedded

[rossus]

yes?

sterilization is not necessarily a bad thing :)

[lessgov2007]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpdIOYtbl8s&eurl=http://www.outlawjournalism.com/&feature=player_embedded

Personally, when I think of Eugenics I tend to think of government enforced policies. Unless the government is going to use forced sterilization then I don't see where this falls under the category of Eugenics. A woman choosing to use birth control to prevent pregnancy isn't much different than a woman who chooses to become sterilized by choice. Now if you can take the choice part away from the woman then it would be a Eugenics program.

[chris]

yes?

sterilization is not necessarily a bad thing :)

Eugenic propaganda is.

Personally, when I think of Eugenics I tend to think of government enforced policies. Unless the government is going to use forced sterilization then I don't see where this falls under the category of Eugenics. A woman choosing to use birth control to prevent pregnancy isn't much different than a woman who chooses to become sterilized by choice. Now if you can take the choice part away from the woman then it would be a Eugenics program.

Sure it is...It's catigorised as 'positive eugenics.'

Woman need their menstral cycle, it is one of the reasons why woman live longer.

[lessgov2007]

Eugenic propaganda is.



Sure it is...It's catigorised as 'positive eugenics.'

Woman need their menstral cycle, it is one of the reasons why woman live longer.

Never read any science that woman live longer due to their menstrual cycle. If I were to guess at this, this follows along the old idea that bleeding helps a person in some way. Which, I have tried to find proof of but could not find any. Maybe you can offer some sources as to how the menstrual cycle directly relates to women living longer?

[limelady]

Eugenic propaganda is.



Sure it is...It's catigorised as 'positive eugenics.'

Woman need their menstral cycle, it is one of the reasons why woman live longer.

But this clip told us that women can have this procedure without it affecting their natural hormonal cycles. In other words, her hormones have been left in tack, so the only difference is a lack of blood accumulating each month to indicate menstruation, without which conception cannot be completed.

Hopefully this procedure may also have a beneficial effect for those who suffer extreme estrogen overload that results in such painful medical conditions as Endometriosis - a debilitating condition where excess menstrual blood makes its way into places its not meant to go.

Endometriosis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If woman have unusually heavy bleeding each month (as the woman in the video did) it can be an indication of estrogen dominance, therefore taking hormonal contraception (one of the main causes of estrogen dominance) for the remainder of her reproductive years could be a very dangerous and life threatening situation for her, as estrogen related cancers (also known as reproductive cancers) have been steadily on the increase since the 1960, pre The Pill and HRT.

There are of course other reasons for the rise in estrogen-related cancers as well, but for women, The Pill and HRT are two of the worst culprits.

[ex sheep]

yes?

sterilization is not necessarily a bad thing :)

might be for you :)

[rossus]

might be for you :)
i know, might be :)

[chris]

Never read any science that woman live longer due to their menstrual cycle.

If I were to guess at this, this follows along the old idea that bleeding helps a person in some way. Which, I have tried to find proof of but could not find any. Maybe you can offer some sources as to how the menstrual cycle directly relates to women living longer?

It is pretty well documented that bloodletting has beneficial effects...


http://www.medicalacupuncture.org/aama_marf/journal/vol16_3/article5.html

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/health_science/articles/2004/10/05/bloodletting/

http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200413/000020041304A0320935.php


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13756092

Stupid indians make you wanna pay...

http://ccras.nic.in/Publications/20081015_ClinicalResearch15.htm

There's plenty more...

If you look into Rakta Moksha that is covered a lot more which is still practiced today for more inner mechanisms and also more of a holistic view rather than an allopathic procudure.

However, we are not arguing bloodletting or the detoxifying method of properly applied use of it. We are talking about how we are burning womens uterus in order that a natural cycle which all women should be going through is artificially inhibited. Plus the fact that this is yet another 'get sterilised' articles which is obviously being paid for by big pharma which are the number 1 contributors to fake news (beating the pentagon).

[chris]

might be for you :)

lol

But this clip told us that women can have this procedure without it affecting their natural hormonal cycles. In other words, her hormones have been left in tack, so the only difference is a lack of blood accumulating each month to indicate menstruation, without which conception cannot be completed.

Hopefully this procedure may also have a beneficial effect for those who suffer extreme estrogen overload that results in such painful medical conditions as Endometriosis - a debilitating condition where excess menstrual blood makes its way into places its not meant to go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endometriosis

If woman have unusually heavy bleeding each month (as the woman in the video did) it can be an indication of estrogen dominance, therefore taking hormonal contraception (one of the main causes of estrogen dominance) for the remainder of her reproductive years could be a very dangerous and life threatening situation for her, as estrogen related cancers (also known as reproductive cancers) have been steadily on the increase since the 1960, pre The Pill and HRT.

There are of course other reasons for the rise in estrogen-related cancers as well, but for women, The Pill and HRT are two of the worst culprits.

Do you think burning her womb is the answer? How about not eating estrogen mimicking plastics or GM soya or drinking drugged up milk/cheese...

[limelady]

lol



Do you think burning her womb is the answer? How about not eating estrogen mimicking plastics or GM soya or drinking drugged up milk/cheese...

Indeed Chris eliminating those things would of course be beneficial, so too would be using a natural form of progesterone to help balance out her over-reactive estrogen levels. But then there is still the on-going dilemma of birth control to consider for the next 20 odd years of her reproductive life.

Unfortunately many in her situation will opt for The Pill as it has been 'sold' to women because of its convenience and ease of use. Other forms of birth control come with their own problems, and to many people the various methods are unsatisfactory for one reason or another, including failure rates.

So I see this procedure as just another personal option for women to consider. While bearing in mind no invasive medical procedure is ever 100% safe, and considering its so new, personally I'd be inclined to hang back for a while to see if a) its as medically safe as they are touting, and b) if a statistical birth control failure rate emerges within a few years of introducing this new procedure. :)