Reptile eyes

[venividivici2311]

I found this vid on youtube,pretty strange and scary,it doesn't seem that it is some kind of reflection....



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbXO89HNWxs

PS:
Sorry if its a repost...:P

Ex mayor of New York Giuliani scares the shiiite out of me...

[binkbonk]

Those videos showing various people with , supposed reptilian eyes, are the biggest load of crap I've seen on the subject. They are no more than reflections of the lights in the background, used for filming. These lights are bright and they are reflecting off of the individuals pupils. Then the videos are uploaded on the internet and in the process become pixelated, along with other unnatural distortions. Load of crap.

This is not to say that I don't believe there may be a reptilian agenda, and positively, a universal conspiracy of known and/or unknown origins... But these videos are a load of crap.

[gordonfreeman]

This video has been shown and shared so many times on this forum. Mostly everyone knows about that video and it's been repeated.

Seek it out in the Reptilian forums, please.

[lordzoma]

Real. 100%.

Anyone who tells you it's a reflection isn't spiritually advanced enough to see through the veil of their own mind rationalizing events outside of their sphere of awareness.

[dreamweaver]

Those videos showing various people with , supposed reptilian eyes, are the biggest load of crap I've seen on the subject. They are no more than reflections of the lights in the background, used for filming. These lights are bright and they are reflecting off of the individuals pupils. Then the videos are uploaded on the internet and in the process become pixelated, along with other unnatural distortions. Load of crap.

+1

"Proof by YouTube" is ropey at the best of times.

[realfake]

Either way, he's a creepy bastard :D

[barbitone]

his eyes change color as well..... I think it is a very trippy piece of footage.

[armoured_amazon]

I think it is a very trippy piece of footage.

+1

[seercirra]

ive watched this clip many times. anyone who says its a reflection, etc, really needs to wise up. you can see so clearly that he's struggling with his eyes, and has to close them.

edit - oops this isny actually the vid i thought it was. i thought it was the bush snr video, its not, its a collage.

[armoured_amazon]

ive watched this clip many times. anyone who says its a reflection, etc, really needs to wise up. you can see so clearly that he's struggling with his eyes, and has to close them.

I agree; I've watched it several times too.

[dreamweaver]

ive watched this clip many times. anyone who says its a reflection, etc, really needs to wise up. you can see so clearly that he's struggling with his eyes, and has to close them.
I've seen the clip now. It looks like somebody has just done a really bad Photoshop job on those frames. In fact it was so shoddy that I laughed out loud. :rolleyes:

I'm sure the whole posting "reptilian eyes" clips to YouTube phenomenon is just a silly internet meme: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_meme

Anyone who tells you it's a reflection isn't spiritually advanced enough to see through the veil of their own mind rationalizing events outside of their sphere of awareness.

That was exactly the type of argument used against anyone who couldn't see the Emperor's New Clothes. It's the old "appeal to vanity" trick.

[barbitone]

I've seen the clip now. It looks like somebody has just done a really bad Photoshop job on those frames. In fact it was so shoddy that I laughed out loud. :rolleyes:


If your talking about the Bush Senior video then I can vouch personally that the video has not been altered in any way. How do I know? I personally contacted the television station and bought a copy of that interview from them as soon as it was pointed out. It looks exactly the same.

And if you watch some more recent eye shifting videos people have found, they have similar traits such as excessive blinking and sort of trying to look away from the camera....

[binkbonk]

Anyone who tells you it's a reflection isn't spiritually advanced enough to see through the veil of their own mind rationalizing events outside of their sphere of awareness.That's laughable.

You are bragging about how spiritually advanced you are... How spiritual :rolleyes:

[gordonfreeman]

He is advanced, even when he is not bragging. You aren't.

[rhydra]

Just my observation so I could be wrong, but I did notice that the "eye slits" seemed to be completely vertical when their heads were tilted. :confused:

[binkbonk]

He is advanced, even when he is not bragging. You aren't.You couldn't be missing the irony of your post.:o

[binkbonk]

Just my observation so I could be wrong, but I did notice that the "eye slits" seemed to be completely vertical when their heads were tilted. :confused:Exactly. It's a reflection. It only takes a little deduction and common sense to avoid becoming entangled in the sidestepping these videos provide.

[lordzoma]

Some people simply cannot see, even with their eyes.

[thelyran]

...preparing to be disappointed,thinking,this is a waste of broadband...so I watched the video.Those excerpts of George Bush Sr and Rudolph Guiliani...
look credible and authentic.Particulary Bush Sr.Good on you OP.

[chris_com283]

Anyone who tells you it's a reflection isn't spiritually advanced enough to see through the veil of their own mind rationalizing events outside of their sphere of awareness.
Sorry but that just seems a lot of BS. Claiming people who don't believe the same as you as spiritually retarded is just silly. I mean with all the "reptilian images on YouTube people have a right to be critical of them. By the way I think this video to be one of the best I've seen, still think it's got a normal explanation though. Maybe I should watch it some more.

[chris_com283]

Ok this convinced me. With the people with the "normal" eyes you see a reflection one one side of the pupil. With others I'm guessing there would be a light reflection on both sides of the pupil, which I saw in a high resolution photo of Al Gore. Ok these videos do look impressive, but when you think about it, it just seems to be reflections or something so easily noticable you detest being grouped in the same catergory as them.

The one artifact I'm still confused about it the "Fox" one. When Fox videos are transfered to YouTube there's a whole load of distortions. Plus there's the reporter who moved out of camera as soon as a similar distortion occured. Fox news does seem to be aware of this. Did you see the video with the female reporter hissing? That was pretty weird.

[venividivici2311]

I aint saying its real or not,but it just looks very real!And you know what,even if its CONFIRMED REAL bye an insider i think there will still be some people disbelieving it because its way out of this world,if youre saying youre thinking "outside the box"why don't you just think outside AND FURTHER AWAY FROM THE BOX :p , people would make some excuses because they are thought to think IN THE BOX,but thats just my opinion :D

[ustane]

If you look carefully there is a rippling and shifting in areas of the face and subtle nodules above the left brow

[binkbonk]

If you look carefully there is a rippling and shifting in areas of the face and subtle nodules above the left browReflections and "Digital distortion"...

This topic is ridiculous, you simply cannot judge something that is so visually integral, from a pixilated low quality Internet video.
To me it's a purposeful distraction that creates an easily disputed straw man argument at the front of the whole reptilian discussion, taking credibility away from the real possibility that shape shifting reptilians, do run the planet and nefariously control our destiny.

If you saw this first hand, while looking at the persons eyes, I would still question whether you were seeing things or not. And when your only reference is poor quality digital uploads, I definitely won't be accepting it as proof...

To me, this whole slit eye's on youtube phenom, is tantamount to "rods". Remember "rods"? The little rods floating around that you could find in pictures? All it was, was digital distortion!

[chris_com283]

I thought the rods were due to flies being caught of a low shutter speed camera.

[barbitone]

I've photographed rods. I've also photgraphed all kinds of bugs and birds. All with the same camera in the same places with the same shutter speed and everything. They appear in shots that I try to take with nothing in them. At the time and can see nothing, but when I look at my shots I get these, flying centipede looking things.

I can post pics if you like....

[binkbonk]

I've photographed rods. I've also photgraphed all kinds of bugs and birds. All with the same camera in the same places with the same shutter speed and everything. They appear in shots that I try to take with nothing in them. At the time and can see nothing, but when I look at my shots I get these, flying centipede looking things.

I can post pics if you like....Ok, so you believe in rods too...:rolleyes:

Slow shutter speed is part of it, but it has to do with digital. Mostly digital video cameras. There was never a rod's phenomenon until digital video cameras.
http://www.assap.org/newsite/articles/Flying%20rods.html

We are not witnessing Bush Sr desperately trying to keep himself from shapeshifting on national tv... Not happening.

[barbitone]

Ok, so you believe in rods too...:rolleyes:

Slow shutter speed is part of it, but it has to do with digital. Mostly digital video cameras. There was never a rod's phenomenon until digital video cameras.
http://www.assap.org/newsite/articles/Flying%20rods.html

We are not witnessing Bush Sr desperately trying to keep himself from shapeshifting on national tv... Not happening.

I didn't say I "believed" in rods did I? I said I have photographed flying centipede looking things that I could not see at the time. I have many of these.
They have leg looking things that aren't blurred. Have you done your own tests with cameras or have you just read someone elses words and "believed" them?

[rhydra]

It's my understanding that any shifts, should any occur, do so in the mind's eye, it can't be captured with camera equipment.

[lordzoma]

Of course it can be copied with a video camera. What do you people think you are staring at.

Jeez - sleepwalkers just won't wake up.

[binkbonk]

Jeez - sleepwalkers just won't wake up.Wow, lay it on me then. Please share your great wisdom... Maybe I'll be able to become as "awake" as you.:rolleyes: (pmps,fl)

Although, in my opinion, you have a box full of meaningless nonsense, and due to your ego you think it's a treasure... Check your ego, bro.

[lordzoma]

Lol. Ego? Just because I know I'm aware doesn't mean I have an ego.

The only one defending an ego is you.

[binkbonk]

Lol. Ego? Just because I know I'm aware doesn't mean I have an ego.Your ego is causing you to brag, and your ego is influencing you to make false claims. You are claiming you are aware, which is actually anti-awareness. If you were truly aware, you would be fully aware that all any of us have is based in speculation and formulated from a large amount of conjecture.

Your self assuredness is actually making you more blind than aware and imo you aren't much more than a walking contradiction at this point.

[binkbonk]

Lol. Ego? Just because I know I'm aware doesn't mean I have an ego.

The only one defending an ego is you.And please lay some of this awareness on me... Unless of course you're too proud to share.:rolleyes: