Prince Bloodlust beats dogs with a stick.

[rhydra]

Link. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1102099/Prince-Dog-Beater-Outrage-Edward-repeatedly-lashes-gundogs-4ft-stick.html)

He approached the dogs with his shotgun tucked under his arm and a 4ft stick raised menacingly in the air. He then brought it down sharply several times towards them.

One of the dogs ran off and was seen cowering as Edward chased after it and took another swing at it.

They don't just like to kill, they like the sadistic pleasure of causing pain and suffering too. I'd say he needs a good beating but he'd most likely enjoy it and he's probably got servants to do that for him.:mad:

[antinwo]

Sick bastard give me the stick I know what I'd do with it:mad:

[romas]

Some people just don't deserve their human form...

[resistance]

TBO i think that this is just another piece of anti dog/gun/hunt propaganda, and unfortunately more people than ever are falling for it, ''truth'' movement or not.

[xaroz]

This is ridiculous :eek:
Now people are complaining that he is cruel towards dogs, whilst shooting other animals...

Get me off this planet now!!

[rhydra]

This is ridiculous :eek:
Now people are complaining that he is cruel towards dogs, whilst shooting other animals...

Get me off this planet now!!

I'm not, he's cruel to all animals, his sort don't seem to respect their own species either.

[lightgiver]

What a wanker,i hope he as a licence for the shotgun.

[brainfreeze]

When animal attacks man we put it down. Some people need more than simply pushing down the stairs

[orderoutofchaos]

Shame it ddnt take his fucking throat out.

[chris_com283]

One of the dogs ran off and was seen cowering as Edward chased after it and took another swing at it.
He goes after it again after he's already disiplined them. Clearly just wants to hurt them.

At the end of the drive, the dogs went off to pick up the dead birds, but these two dogs looked like they were squabbling over one pheasant.
Not something to lose your temper over. I don't think he should be allowed to keep animals.

It’s about time the Royals got the message that most people regard the shooting of birds for sport as repellent.
This is just for the fun of it and not for food? That I would disagree with. Though I'm pro hunting and am cautious of ant-hunting statements.

Eight years ago the Queen was also accused of cruelty after she was photographed wringing the neck of a pheasant at Sandringham.
What's wrong with that? After shooting it the dog brought it back. She noticed that it was still alive and so she switfly killed it. Much better than allowing the poor thing to die in great pain.

[twistedconcept]

I've lost all hope. Some of the comments at the bottom of the article are pathetic. Will the cowards in this country stop defending this inbred, foreign, psychopathic family? I despair.

[newspresenter]

Wheres the concreate eveidence the prince bloke hit an animal?

[brainfreeze]

Wheres the concreate eveidence the prince bloke hit an animal?


Photographic evidence no longer evidence enough Mr Presenter?

[pandamania]

and he is the "nice guy" of the Windsors...

I was told once that all the Royal males have their faces smeared with the blood of a slaughtered fox when their are like 7 or 8 and Charles did his to his own two spawn. No idea if this is true or not but makes sense.

[le chuck]

The man who cant wipe hs own arse,

Does he stick his wife like that when she is nauthy. :eek:


He is a brainless twerp.

[humito]

Wheres the concreate eveidence the prince bloke hit an animal?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1102397/Prince-Edward-face-RSPCA-probe-lashing-dogs-stick.html

[humito]

that second pic shows contact

[lordzoma]

Nice to see the lightsiders are out in full force again.

Congratulations - he beat his dogs with a stick. He can train his dogs however he wants to.

Dogs are an inferior life form and do not have to be treated equally, because they are certainly not equal.

Being upset over animal 'cruelty' = light side orientation.

Beating the shit out of a dog for no reason = dark side orientation.

Hitting your dog because you're training it is a fucking balanced approach. It's his CHOICE to hit the dog. Outrage of this sort is despicable to say the very least.

That news article makes me sick. Welcome to a culture of insanely perverse voyeurism and nonviolence.

Feel free to note the irony of the lack of complaints for the dead pheasant, and bullshit outcries over an unhurt dog. Psychopathic lightsider hypocrites.

THINK before you speak.

[brainfreeze]

Nice to see the lightsiders are out in full force again.

Congratulations - he beat his dogs with a stick. He can train his dogs however he wants to.

Dogs are an inferior life form and do not have to be treated equally, because they are certainly not equal.

Being upset over animal 'cruelty' = light side orientation.

Beating the shit out of a dog for no reason = dark side orientation.

Hitting your dog because you're training it is a fucking balanced approach. It's his CHOICE to hit the dog. Outrage of this sort is despicable to say the very least.

That news article makes me sick. Welcome to a culture of insanely perverse voyeurism and nonviolence.

Feel free to note the irony of the lack of complaints for the dead pheasant, and bullshit outcries over an unhurt dog. Psychopathic lightsider hypocrites.

THINK before you speak.

No complaints from me about the pheasant because it's food, it was dead, not injured and being knocked about.

I don't agree with you though I respect your opinion, however, the curled lip and sneer doesn't go amiss, so I wish you a good day and give you a WIDE birth.

[lordzoma]

Oh ok,

So what you're saying is:


Even though the end result is the same (dead pheasant)

the purpose behind the result is what gives it meaning.



Seems rather occultic doesn't it?



So shooting a kid in the head for no reason whatsoever

is different from shooting a kid in the head for revenge?

different from shooting a kid in the head to save someone's life?


Killing an animal out of anger

is different from killing an animal out of hunger?


When end results are identical - identifying whether something is 'better or worse' has to do with the perception and the polarity position of the observer.


Someone who is DARK polarity

may find it is OK to

shoot the kid for revenge

but it is NOT OK to shoot the kid to save someone's life.

Someone who is LIGHT polarity

may find it is OK to kill an animal for food

but it is NOT OK to kill an animal out of anger.



Polarity changes the meaning but does not change the result.


LIGHT and DARK polarity are two sides of the same coin.

It is the balanced approach which is the appropriate one, because it incorporates all sides of all coins into the end result.


Kill the animal for food.

Beat the animal to train it.

Shoot the kid to save a life.

Actions balanced by meaning.

[brainfreeze]

Oh ok,

So what you're saying is:


Even though the end result is the same (dead pheasant)

the purpose behind the result is what gives it meaning.



Seems rather occultic doesn't it?



So shooting a kid in the head for no reason whatsoever

is different from shooting a kid in the head for revenge?

different from shooting a kid in the head to save someone's life?


Killing an animal out of anger

is different from killing an animal out of hunger?


When end results are identical - identifying whether something is 'better or worse' has to do with the perception and the polarity position of the observer.


Someone who is DARK polarity

may find it is OK to

shoot the kid for revenge

but it is NOT OK to shoot the kid to save someone's life.

Someone who is LIGHT polarity

may find it is OK to kill an animal for food

but it is NOT OK to kill an animal out of anger.



Polarity changes the meaning but does not change the result.


LIGHT and DARK polarity are two sides of the same coin.

It is the balanced approach which is the appropriate one, because it incorporates all sides of all coins into the end result.


Kill the animal for food.

Beat the animal to train it.

Shoot the kid to save a life.

Actions balanced by meaning.

I'm sorry, I can't and don't want to get into a discussion with you. Your examples are of the extreem and don't make sense to me, but they obviously do to you I get a bad vibe from you that makes me want to REACT as appose to rationalise.

The man was not training his dog, he was beating it with a stick!

Freeking tangent about killing kids...tsk!

[lordzoma]

If anything I say makes lightsiders repel, it means I'm succeeding.

Lightsiders ABHOR balance.

The Prince is ANYTHING but balanced. He is very VERY dark and wears a cloak of light, like most dark siders on this planet.

But take a look at the responses that exist in this thread early on:

His simple dark action

(hitting a dog with a stick)

elicits a strong lightside response

"Some people just don't deserve their human form..."

"Some people need more than simply pushing down the stairs"

"Shame it ddnt take his fucking throat out."

Lightsiders refuse to allow others to do as they wish, in order to make things 'better' for them.

In many ways, light is far more controlling than the dark.

[pinkfreud]

he needs to be whipped where it hurts the most.


and then more.


edit: Killing an animal out of anger

is different from killing an animal out of hunger?



hmm. i agree with that, it's pure hypocrisy.

[brainfreeze]

If anything I say makes lightsiders repel, it means I'm succeeding.

Lightsiders ABHOR balance.

The Prince is ANYTHING but balanced. He is very VERY dark and wears a cloak of light, like most dark siders on this planet.

But take a look at the responses that exist in this thread early on:

His simple dark action

(hitting a dog with a stick)

elicits a strong lightside response

"Some people just don't deserve their human form..."

"Some people need more than simply pushing down the stairs"

"Shame it ddnt take his fucking throat out."

Lightsiders refuse to allow others to do as they wish, in order to make things 'better' for them.

In many ways, light is far more controlling than the dark.


You my darling seem to be looking to feed on negativity. I have no food for you, maybe someone else does :)

Angel Blessings.

[father ted]

No complaints from me about the pheasant because it's food, it was dead, not injured and being knocked about.


That's not true, this made the brit headlines as well as Icke's. She tortured the "pheasant" by gradialy beating it with her walking cane, whilst lightly laughing (being amused).

[father ted]

From the sunday mirror:
THE Queen sparked outrage yesterday when she clubbed a pheasant to death with her walking stick. Shocked onlookers watched as she picked up the injured bird which had been shot by a member of a shooting party. Then she finished it off by raising her walking stick - which she has used since a knee operation last month - and hitting it repeatedly on the head.

The bird took several minutes to die and the Queen was seen laughing and joking with friends after the incident at her Sandringham estate in Norfolk.

I think resistance might be onto something, if they ban hunting in general, there should be less reason for carrying firearms. More firearms to be taken away from the public.

[brainfreeze]

That's not true, this made the brit headlines as well as Icke's. She tortured the "pheasant" by gradialy beating it with her walking cane, whilst lightly laughing (being amused).

You're speaking of a different incident to what I am speaking of. I was not refering to the queen/pheasant incident but the Prince out pheasant hunting with his dog incident.

[father ted]

You're speaking of a different incident to what I am speaking of. I was not refering to the queen/pheasant incident but the Prince out pheasant hunting with his dog incident.

Sorry I did not realise:o

[brainfreeze]

Sorry I did not realise:o

Peace :)

xxx

[resistance]

I really cant understand where most of you are coming from, TBO i think many of you are just taking the bait and giving the typical knee jerk reaction that is required from this sort of headline.
Have any of you ever been hunting? have any of you shot pheasant with working dogs? Do any of you own guns? dogs? live in the country?
Have any of you ever shot a rabbit for dinner? used a dog for retreiving? the list goes on.... i suspect that 99% of you have not.
When will you so called ''enlightened'' people stop taking the bait, never, because too many of you are too stupid to sense the big fat hook that is attached to all this anti hunt/gun propaganda.
Thats all i'm going to say, i'm not going to get involved in pointless knee jerk opinionated talk, so good bye on this thread for me.

[lightworks]

why dont someone do us all a favour and wring the queens neck?

[rhydra]

it's also the same people who are shooting all the birds of prey, poisoning eagles, hawks and buzzards so that they can kill pheasants. If someone solely hunts for food, fair enough, if that's their thing most people who hunt are cruel per se, there are a few what we called hoorahs who think causing pain and upsetting people is awfully jolly. Those need to be stamped out.

[brainfreeze]

I really cant understand where most of you are coming from, TBO i think many of you are just taking the bait and giving the typical knee jerk reaction that is required from this sort of headline.
Have any of you ever been hunting? have any of you shot pheasant with working dogs? Do any of you own guns? dogs? live in the country?
Have any of you ever shot a rabbit for dinner? used a dog for retreiving? the list goes on.... i suspect that 99% of you have not.
When will you so called ''enlightened'' people stop taking the bait, never, because too many of you are too stupid to sense the big fat hook that is attached to all this anti hunt/gun propaganda.
Thats all i'm going to say, i'm not going to get involved in pointless knee jerk opinionated talk, so good bye on this thread for me.

Oh assumption never did anyone any good. You want our life stories and gun licences? Some of us have them. Some of us have witnessed hunts and have had close associations with gun dogs too. Hunting is not only a hobby of the elite. In my eyes it's not very nice but I'm not thrusting my opinion on anyone, just giving it.

I may hold a different view to you but I don't assume you're stupid. That would be too easy to do :p

[twistedconcept]

it's also the same people who are shooting all the birds of prey, poisoning eagles, hawks and buzzards so that they can kill pheasants. If someone solely hunts for food, fair enough, if that's their thing most people who hunt are cruel per se, there are a few what we called hoorahs who think causing pain and upsetting people is awfully jolly. Those need to be stamped out.

Hunting for food is different.

To kill an animal for 'fun' is abhorrent.