Want to get paid to educate the public:check this

[baron von lotsov]

Six million quid is up for grabs and all you need to do to get your mits on it is to run a project to make the public more aware about climate change and what causes it. Can you do this?

Quote

What is the CCF designed for?

The Climate Challenge Fund (CCF) provides financial support for communications projects seeking to achieve positive changes in public attitudes about climate change. It is designed to help cover the costs of creating and including climate change messages into existing communication channels.


What sort of projects will it support?

The CCF will support a wide range of communications projects across the full range of media. We are interested in reaching new audiences and communities so the fund aims to support work at different levels – national organisations and regional and local level organisations, on their own, or in partnerships. The criteria against which we will be judging applications are set out in paragraph 23 of the CCF Guidance Notes.


http://www.climatechallenge.gov.uk/get_involved/the_fund.html

[foreverspirit]

BARON:

How much will I get paid for informing the public of this:




WEAPONIZED WEATHER
Weaponized Weather
Proposed global warming "solutions" could do double duty as weapons
—By Bennett Gordon, Utne.com


May 3, 2007 Issue

As the world slowly wakes up to the threat of global warming, a few high-profile scientists known as geoengineers are pushing plans for large-scale technological "solutions" to the looming crisis. According to David Shiga, writing for the New Scientist's environmental blog, the various ideas have included a proposal to launch trillions of tiny "sunshades" into space to angle the sun's rays away from the earth and a plan to inject sulfur into the atmosphere to create a sort of global shade. Shiga questions the plausibility of these plans, asking whether "even entertaining these ideas take[s] focus away from practical, if somewhat inconvenient, steps we will have to take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?"

The real problem with geoengineering might be worse than simple distraction. Historian James R. Fleming writes for the Wilson Quarterly that the United States has been pursuing geoengineering technology since the 19th century. Early attempts by American scientists focused on rainmaking to combat droughts, but the projects quickly turned militaristic as the US government realized the potential of turning earth's climate against its enemies.

After World War II, Fleming writes, advances in "cloud seeding" technology were quickly turned against the post-war enemies of the United States. North and South Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, India, Pakistan, the Philippines, Panama, Portugal, Okinawa, and Cuba have all been the targets of US programs of artificial rainmaking, Fleming reports, all under military sponsorship with "direct involvement of the White *House." When evidence of those programs emerged in the 1970s, the United Nations quickly banned the use of environmental modification techniques for hostile purposes.

Today's geoengineering projects, however, are presented as efforts to protect the earth, rather than acts of war. Writing for the electronic engineering magazine IEEE Spectrum, William Gail acknowledges the militaristic history of geoengineering, but still maintains that such projects are needed to combat global warming. In fact, according to Gail, the question is not if these projects will be implemented, but when. "[I]t is inevitable," he writes, "that we will begin to apply our newfound capabilities to actively manage -- even engineer -- climate."

In spite of the United Nations ban, the Wilson Quarterly's Fleming argues, "it is virtually impossible to imagine governments resisting the temptation to explore military uses of any potentially *climate-*altering *technology." When scientists speak of injecting the atmosphere with sulfur, the idea begs the question: Who will control the weather? Fleming points out that many countries, including Russia, may have differing views from the United States on what an ideal environment is (for example, the Russians might want an ice-free Arctic Circle open for trade routes). Should these two nuclear powers end up butting heads over their preferred climates, the so called "solution" to global warming may end up causing more harm than the problem itself.:eek:

Go there >> The Climate Engineers

Go there, too >> Far-Out Schemes to Stop Climate Change

And there >> Climate Control

[foreverspirit]

BARON:

How much for this one?




GLOBALISTS LOVE GLOBAL WARMING
Globalists Love Global Warming
Trilateral Commission, chairman of British Petroleum, CFR, Club of Rome fan hysteria to achieve world government
Planet Prison

A common charge leveled against those who question the official orthodoxy of the global warming religion is that they are acting as stooges for the western establishment and big business interests. If this is the case, then why do the high priests of the elite and kingpin oil men continue to fan the flames of global warming hysteria?

The Trilateral Commission, one of the three pillars of the New World Order in alliance with Bilderberg and the CFR, met last week in near secrecy to formulate policy on how best they could exploit global warming fearmongering to ratchet up taxes and control over how westerners live their lives.

At the confab, European Chairman of the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberger and chairman of British Petroleum Peter Sutherland (pictured top), gave a speech to his elitist cohorts in which he issued a "Universal battle cry arose for the world to address “global warming” with a single voice."

Echoing this sentiment was General Lord Guthrie, director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, member of the House of Lords and former chief of the Defense Staff in London, who urged the Trilateral power-brokers to "Address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide."

Allegations that skeptics of the man-made explanation behind global warming are somehow doing the bidding of the elite are laughable in the face of the fact that Rothschild operatives and the very chairman of British Petroleum are the ones orchestrating an elitist plan to push global warming fears in order to achieve political objectives.

We have a similar situation to the Peak Oil scam, which was created by the oil industry as a profit boon to promote artificial scarcity, and yet is parroted by environmentalists who grandstand as if they are in opposition to the oil companies.

In his excellent article, Global warming hysteria serves as excuse for world government, Daniel Taylor outlines how the exploitation of the natural phenomenon of "global warming" was a pet project of the Club of Rome and the CFR.

"In a report titled "The First Global Revolution" (1991) published by the Club of Rome, a globalist think tank, we find the following statement: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
"Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, stated in his article "State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era," that a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming, as well as terrorism. "Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function," says Haass. "Globalization thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves..."



Taylor also points out future British Prime Minister Gordon Brown's admonishment that only a "new world order" (world government) can help fight global warming.

Other attendees at the recent Trilateral meeting raised the specter of climate change as a tool to force through tax hikes.

Calling on the United States government to adopt a "carbon monoxide control policy," former CIA boss and long term champion of creating a domestic intelligence agency to spy on Americans John Deutch, argued that America should impose a $1-pergallon increase in the gasoline tax under the pretext of fighting pollution.

The lapdog media have proven adept in the past at taking their orders from the elitists in pushing higher taxes in the name of saving the environment.

"When the TC called on the United States to increase gas taxes by 10 cents at a meeting in Tokyo in 1991, The Washington Post, which is always represented at TC and Bilderberg meetings, called for such an increase in an editorial the following day," reports Jim Tucker.

Tucker writes that an essential means of achieving global government by consent over conquest, as has long been the ultimate goal of the elite, is by "fanning public hysteria" over climate change, encouraging further integration by forcing countries to adhere to international law on global warming. Such restrictions have prevented the development of third world nations and directly contributed to poverty, disease and squalor by essentially keeping them at a stone age level of progress, as is documented in The Great Global Warming Swindle documentary.

People who still trust the platitudes of politicians and elitists who implore us to change our way of life, cough up more tax money, and get on board with the global warming religion save being linked with Holocaust denial, are as deluded and enslaved as the tribes of Mesoamerica who, unaware of the natural phenomenon of a solar eclipse, thought their high priests could make the sky snake eat the Sun, and therefore obeyed their every demand.

Globalists love global warming! Oil industry kingpins, Bilderbergers and Rothschild minions have all put their weight behind it. This is a fraud conceived, nurtured and promulgated by elite, and to castigate individuals for merely questioning the motives behind climate change fearmongering by accusing them of being mouthpieces for the establishment is a complete reversal of the truth.:eek:

There is nothing more important for you at this time than to seek higher than you have done to date. We must be uncompromising and unconditionally consecrated to the Truth -...EXPANDED AWARENESS

[foreverspirit]

Baron:

How much for this one


Bummer for the United Nations, Al Gore, and Rupert Murdoch. It appears a growing list of meteorologists, climate researchers, astrophysicists, geophysicists, botanists, and other scientists are reversing course on so-called climate change. “Many former believers in catastrophic man-made global warming have recently reversed themselves and are now climate skeptics,” writes Marc Morano.

However, over at the United Nations, the growing tide of skepticism is considered little more than heresy. “A former chief of the U.N. World Health Organization who also is a former prime minister of Norway and a medical doctor has declared an end to the climate-change debate,” reports United Press International. “Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, one of U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s three new special envoys on climate change, also headed up the 1987 U.N. World Commission on Environment and Development where the concept of sustainable development was first floated.”

“This discussion is behind us. It’s over,” Brundtland declared. “The diagnosis is clear, the science is unequivocal—it’s completely immoral, even, to question now, on the basis of what we know, the reports that are out, to question the issue and to question whether we need to move forward at a much stronger pace as humankind to address the issues.”

In other words, dissent—or even common sense—will not be tolerated by the emerging class of “sustainable development” autocrats, determined to usher in once and for all a one world government.

It’s not enough that Brundtland and her colleagues have managed to scare the dickens out of grade schoolers, as many of them believe “global warming is the atomic bomb of today…. Fears of an environmental crisis are defining their generation in ways that the Depression, World War II, Vietnam and the Cold War’s lingering ‘War Games’ etched souls in the 20th century,” notes the Washington Post. Thanks to Al Gore’s propaganda film, many 8-year olds are paralyzed by “obsessions with dying polar bears,” while “psychologists say they’re seeing an increasing number of young patients preoccupied by a climactic Armageddon.” In order to keep this fear-mongering on a roll, Brundtland and the “sustainable development” crowd are declaring the climate change argument is nothing less than a fait accompli.

“Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so,” Czech Republic president Vaclav Klaus recently said during an interview. “It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it’s a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It’s neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment.”

Tim Booth, posting on the Meetup messageboard in response to criticism of my Climate Change: An Inconvenient Globalist Scam, is spot on when he writes: “The point is that the globalists are using something we do not know to be true as a reason to increase tyranny.”

Indeed, climate change and “sustainable development” are frauds designed to herd us into “sustainable” high-tech panopticon ghettos while the vast majority of the world is “re-wilded,” that is to say held off limits to all but a very small number of elite who, like Ted Turner and Prince Philip, want us culled down to a manageable number, say 500 million or so worldwide.:eek:

[space monkey]

For your considerations:http://www.weatherwars.info/soho.htm

[space monkey]

At the confab, European Chairman of the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberger and chairman of British Petroleum Peter Sutherland (pictured top), gave a speech to his elitist cohorts in which he issued a "Universal battle cry arose for the world to address ?global warming? with a single voice."

http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/1015/braveheartfl0.gif (http://imageshack.us)

Yeah, sing it bitch.

[baron von lotsov]

Use your brains. Say you do an exhibition of the science of global warming and also alternative energy sources. You just quote the raw scientific facts to the public and say you are going to do this in your proposal. Then you quote the facts that the government are not mentioning. You get the idea. You get paid up front, you get promoted by the media and then red faces. You have the whole ship of fools completely kippered with 5 grand hanging out of your pocket for your efforts.