Dracula- A Freeman On The Land?

[Ian2day]

I know a bizarre thought. But, hear me out on this. He never went, anywhere overseas, without some soil/land from his home. So to be a Freeman, do you have to have, one square foot of land or soil, with you at all times if going by boat. So by defacto, is Freeman On The Land, a Satanic title. I've seen a copy of the Magna Carta, and it has a seal of King John sat in a Satanic pose under all of the I think Latin writing.

[dondaz]

First it's the suicide guru 'jim jones', now vampires are freemen on the land.:eek:

Just waiting for someone to tell us 'Rob Menard's a reptillion shapeshifter from the lower forth dimension who's out to ensnare us all into a trap so his fellow reppies can suck out our souls to make them more powerful':D

Calling all mods with white coats...:rolleyes:

[ag3nt5mith]

Hmmmm, this got me thinking...

Didn't captain sparrow take a jar of dirt to sea with him, to protect him from the cracken (Not sure how it was to protect him) The reaper of souls (collector of contracts) for Davey Jones.

Thinking again, didn't he put Davey Jones heart in the jar of dirt to stop Davey from accessing it? Can an agent of the sea not touch what is a part of the land??????

Is there some thing in all this? Maybe...

It would seem there are Freemen examples in most of our history, these men may have become the stuff of legends or nightmares as the figure this thread discusses.

To people in the 17th century a Freeman would have looked like a Jedi by the way he used his words to quell the authorities...

Yum, food for thought.

[yozhik]

It would seem there are Freemen examples in most of our history, these men may have become the stuff of legends or nightmares as the figure this thread discusses.

To people in the 17th century a Freeman would have looked like a Jedi by the way he used his words to quell the authorities...

Yum, food for thought.

Only if by being termed a "blood sucker", it referred to his ability to suck the life force from the corporate beings, which of course, would refer to MONEY, not blood! :)

He had to have been independently wealthy; how else could he have maintained a castle? So, a dirt carrying, money liberating, non-compliant Freeman from Transylvania?

Sure puts an interesting twist on history/legend!

[Ian2day]

So would Frankenstein be called, a Freemen on the land!

[yozhik]

So would Frankenstein be called, a Freemen on the land!

Sure; why not?

I fact, to totally confuse, befuddle, dilute and discredit the topic, why don't we also include Jack the Ripper, Jeffrey Darma, Hannibal Lecter, Marquis de Sade and Heinrich Himmler as other pulling-a-rabbit-out-of-my-ass examples?
Jim Jones, and Frankenstein; is this what this has now resorted to?

OK - so have your opinions against the Freeman concept, by all means ... everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, are some naysayers SERIOUSLY proposing these two as viable examples?
TPTB don't need to do their own discrediting when they have the brainwashed masses to do it for them :confused:

[Ian2day]

Sure; why not?

I fact, to totally confuse, befuddle, dilute and discredit the topic, why don't we also include Jack the Ripper, Jeffrey Darma, Hannibal Lecter, Marquis de Sade and Heinrich Himmler as other pulling-a-rabbit-out-of-my-ass examples?
Jim Jones, and Frankenstein; is this what this has now resorted to?

OK - so have your opinions against the Freeman concept, by all means ... everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, are some naysayers SERIOUSLY proposing these two as viable examples?
TPTB don't need to do their own discrediting when they have the brainwashed masses to do it for them :confused:

You really aren't able to spot the difference between Freeman and Freemen? Do you want me to spell the joke out for you again? I thought that I had done that in the first place for everyone. It shows that people seem to miss the all important details when making a reply:rolleyes:

[cafetimes1991]

http://sopranosimage.tripod.com/nosferatu/nosferatu08.jpg

[ag3nt5mith]

So would Frankenstein be called, a Freemen on the land!

Hahahaha, I got this one. ;)

Very slick Ian. :D

[Ian2day]

Sure; why not?

I fact, to totally confuse, befuddle, dilute and discredit the topic, why don't we also include Jack the Ripper, Jeffrey Darma, Hannibal Lecter, Marquis de Sade and Heinrich Himmler as other pulling-a-rabbit-out-of-my-ass examples?
Jim Jones, and Frankenstein; is this what this has now resorted to?

OK - so have your opinions against the Freeman concept, by all means ... everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, are some naysayers SERIOUSLY proposing these two as viable examples?
TPTB don't need to do their own discrediting when they have the brainwashed masses to do it for them :confused:

What I'm saying is that a lot of what Icke looks at is steeped in myth and folklore. So if we take a concept like freeman on the land and look to prominant folklore figures from the past. There may very well be some important info hidden in plain site.

I have seen a copy of the Magna Carter up close and it does have an image of King John sat in a Goats head pose. Hmmm, satanism being of the land, or earth, or World!

As in a Satanic New World Order.Do you see the point I am making here. Satanism is concerned with the land/earth/world/3rd dimension/the 3d five sense plain thus its leaders placing New World Orders. Whereas the spiritual existence or other dimensions are about placing Univesal/Cosmic Orders.

So for us to be sovereign spiritual beings we need to declare ourselves as a Freeman of the Universe and not a Freeman of the land? As that is limiting ourselves to this 3d five sense reality!

Also mixing things up with humour such as Frankenstein being a freemen, is just a bit of fun.

[juddfinn]

So would Frankenstein be called, a Freemen on the land!

Naw! I think the doctors creation would come under the Law dictionary definition of "A Human Being" = "Monster"! :eek: