View Full Version : checktheevidence.com traffic rockets!
masonfree party
20-12-2008, 08:28 AM
Results:
www.checktheevidence.com
Estimate 13,800 visits in the previous 30 days.
www.trafficestimate.com
christophera
20-12-2008, 08:41 AM
Results:
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
Estimate 180,000 visits in the previous 30 days.
www.myestimate.com
These things feasibly explained.
free fall (http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm)
total pulverization (http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/collapse%20update/collapsed%20to%20dust.mpg)
superfine, heated particulate (http://traprockpeace.org/LettertoMcDermott.pdf)
smooth, square cut column ends x the 1,000's (http://algoxy.com/psych/images/shearedboxcolumns.gif)
heavy steel assemblies heaved hundreds of feet (http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1plumecascade.jpg)
masonfree party
20-12-2008, 09:39 AM
Results:
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
Estimate 180,000 visits in the previous 30 days.
www.myestimate.com
These things feasibly explained.
free fall (http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm)
total pulverization (http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/collapse%20update/collapsed%20to%20dust.mpg)
superfine, heated particulate (http://traprockpeace.org/LettertoMcDermott.pdf)
smooth, square cut column ends x the 1,000's (http://algoxy.com/psych/images/shearedboxcolumns.gif)
heavy steel assemblies heaved hundreds of feet (http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1plumecascade.jpg)
fake 180,000 like your fake truth site...stick to the real evidence mate
christophera
20-12-2008, 05:19 PM
fake 180,000 like your fake truth site...stick to the real evidence mate
If you will examine my site, you will realize it is only evidence. I followed your link. Sorry, that stuff is not based on substancial evidence nor does it feasibly explain anything.
This video explains feasibly more in 16 minutes than any video or site, once again all evidence based.
Twin Tower Deception and Demolition I (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6240504594075547308&q=twin+towers+deception+and+demolition&total=15&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0)
Twin Tower Deception and Demolition II (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5255701680091399090&q=twin+towers+deception+and+demolition&total=15&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1)
andrewjohnson
21-12-2008, 12:02 AM
Hello Christophera - I know your last name too.
Still plugging away after 3 years?
Thought about this yet?
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/pics/erin_track_WI.gif
Got any comments on that? The buildings turned to dust. Did they have any steel in them? If the answer is "yes", how did large proportions of that steel turn into dust? Or will you refer us, like an old damaged vinyl record to "the concrete core" and ignore just about everything else about 9/11. Such as the toasted cars, bent beams, inverted cars, anomalous rust, Deutsche Bank beams wrinkled when there was no fire in that building
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image187fema.gif
- on and on....
And I haven't even mentioned variations in the Earth's magnetic field!
Phew - a bit much for a Saturday night, ay?
Hey ho.
christophera
21-12-2008, 03:29 AM
Hello Christophera - I know your last name too.
Still plugging away after 3 years?
The buildings turned to dust. Did they have any steel in them? If the answer is "yes", how did large proportions of that steel turn into dust? Or will you refer us, like an old damaged vinyl record to "the concrete core" and ignore just about everything else about 9/11. Such as the toasted cars, bent beams, inverted cars, anomalous rust, Deutsche Bank beams wrinkled when there was no fire in that building
- on and on....
And I haven't even mentioned variations in the Earth's magnetic field!
Phew - a bit much for a Saturday night, ay?
Hey ho.
Hello Andrew,
Six years of "plugging away". My site has been up for 5. (http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html)
As long as there is a fire in the house, and people are distracted by misinformation, I will be using evidence to try to inform them of what is really happening with concise or specific reference to structural aspects need to explain what has happened.
Can't find a logical link between planetary magnetic field fluxtuations and the Twins. If there is a link is it a relation semi esoteric associated with and related to 2012 which signals the beginning of magnetic influence exerted on the planet by a celestial object.
Concrete can be fractured to instantly freely fall. With explosives engineered into precision explosive concrete containers, the aggregates turn into shrapnel traveling at about 10,000 foot per second for 30-50 feet.
Accordingly both free fall and total pulverization are explained here. Two of the most profound phenomena of 9-11. The issues of "toasted cars, bent beams, inverted cars, anomalous rust, wrinkled beams" will never yield explanations for free fall and pulverization. I don't ignore those things, they just don't have any value in explaining the most important aspects of the event.
The Twin Towers had no steel core columns inside the core area. There was steel there but it was not core columns. It was elevator guide rail support steel. Below is an image looking through the core are and no core columns are seen, We do see very fine vertical elements which are rebar exposed by deonations of other rebar that had viable explosive coating. Those standing were exposed to freezing weather during a harsh winter of 1969. Before it was realized that they may have lost their viability, new horizontal rebar (with fresh C4 coating) was tied in place, the core was formed and poured.
http://home.comcast.net/~jeffrey.king2/spire_dust-3.jpg
The information about the harsh winter of 1969 was from a documentary titled "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers", 2 hours in length that aired on PBS.
You wil notice that my concrete core page has some additions of video links that prove the core was a steel reinforced cast concrete tube.
http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
BTW, there were custom, optimized cutting charges built into every third floor that cut the columns which did exist. They surrounded the core and had substancial foundations while being 100% deep fillet welded together. The spire is comprised of such a column outside the NW corner of WTC 1 core. (http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1spirecorewall.jpg) In the image the concrete shear wall can be seen on the left and the spire on the right.
Those cutting charges mostly exhausted through the box tubes they were cutting every 1/3 second, this image (http://mouv4x8.club.fr/11Sept01/A0069b_3_towerexplo1_explosion_below.jpg) shows dark clouds that actually have near vertical striations in them showing how they are emitting from separate vertical sources.
Those columns at those cuts were turned to dust.
Otherwise, no steel was turned to dust, a lot was outright melted from thermite in the basement tho.
christophera
21-12-2008, 03:42 AM
Here is a post from another message board where a thread has been going for over a year. Those supporting the steel core columns have no evidence and rely on extensive ad homimnum, fakery and misrepresentation. I'm going to ask you to present evidence of steel core columns in the core area from images of 9-11 if you believe they existed. Evidence will not show them, but will show concrete surrounding the core.
This poster finally saw through all of that and assimilated some very substancial evidence which convinced them.
What we see is a still from a helicopter that shows a massive triangular piece of concrete toppling into the core area. Then an animated .gif from a video that shows the same piece from much closer at about the same elevation.
Maybe you can answer a few questions about Chris' past statements.
Nope...not going there. While I'm just tickled pink that you value my opinion so highly, those are questions you really should direct specifically to Chris. All I care about are FACTS...something the 9/11 Truth Movement gets so precious few of...
All I know is that I NOW see definite, irrefutable photographic evidence of what can be nothing other than elements of concrete construction in MASSIVE proportion. It's the only conclusion that can truthfully and logically be made from what is shown.
I don't care that the PBS video is still missing...I don't care what the dubious Silverstein plans show....I don't care if Chris has lied to his mother 1000 times in the past...and I don't care if he was the 2nd gunman in the grassy knoll...this issue has NOTHING to do with Chris as much as you try to pretend that it does.
Except for the fact that he's right about these CONCRETE CORES.
Static Annotation of Chris' Triangular Conrete pic:
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww168/S_N_A_F_U/wtc1corefall2.jpg
Slower animation sequence of WTC1 core wall destruction:
http://i716.photobucket.com/albums/ww168/S_N_A_F_U/core_animation_75.gif
masonfree party
21-12-2008, 10:17 AM
Chris..why didn't you let the last sequence of images carry on a few secounds longer and you'd see the columns referred to the 'spire' turn to dust before your very eyes...why deny the obvious mate..i guess money is more important to you...its what the zionists worship
christophera
22-12-2008, 03:21 AM
Chris..why didn't you let the last sequence of images carry on a few secounds longer and you'd see the columns referred to the 'spire' turn to dust before your very eyes...why deny the obvious mate..i guess money is more important to you...its what the zionists worship
At 32 seconds I see a shock wave knock the concrete off of the spire at it falls. Detonations below.
9/11 WTC North Tower Core, HAVE YOU SEEN IT? - YouTube