How do you feel about "Red Ice Creations"?

[societyisthematrix]

I'm considering joining the www.redicecreations.com subscriber section but I have some major reservations about the host of the radio show.

What's the guy's problem? I've listened to several interviews that he's done and they all seem to be the same: he asks obviously pre-arranged questions, IMHO, which is fine but the only other things he seems to add is, "that's interesting", "right", "exactly", etc. There's no tough questioning, zero skepticism, the guy offers no alternative view to that of the guest, etc.

Does anyone remember the old Saturday Night Live sketch, "Daily Affirmations with Stewart Smalley"? Stewart Smalley would stare at the camera and say, "I like myself I'm a good person and gosh darn it, people like me!" The host of Red Ice Radio is like that except he provides minutely affirmations to the guest, not daily affirmations. "That's interesting", "right", "exactly", etc.

[john white]

I think its brilliant: Heinrick (?sp) just keeps the energy of a job interview going with supportive comments to encourage his guest to speak. great. Thats just what I want: an hour of the guest discussing their thoughts, which I then think about and make my own mind up about without needing a Radio Host to "interpret" it for me: and no adds during the show! Top lads IMO

[heretic]

Doesn't the guy on Red Ice have the same hairstyle as Jeff Rense? :D

[societyisthematrix]

I think its brilliant: Heinrick (?sp) just keeps the energy of a job interview going with supportive comments to encourage his guest to speak. great. Thats just what I want: an hour of the guest discussing their thoughts, which I then think about and make my own mind up about without needing a Radio Host to "interpret" it for me: and no adds during the show! Top lads IMO

I see your point but I wish that he would ask difficult questions like, "How did you come up with that theory?", "What's your evidence for that belief?", "Why do you believe that?", etc. Asking those questions is not having a host "interpret" the information, it's having the host ask the guest to add critical information. Without knowing the hows and whys of how Red Ice's guests come to the conclusions they do, how can you properly analyze the theories for yourself?

[limelady]

Henrik is great....I love him to pieces. He has some fantastic guests too.
Like John W I prefer the interviewer only asks questions when there are pauses - way too many talk-hosts love the sound of their own voices too much!

[jimijams]

how can you properly analyze the theories for yourself?
Simple, do your own research and use intuition..

[societyisthematrix]

Simple, do your own research and use intuition..

It's not that simple because a lot of these researchers have to access to obscure, antiquated texts that are virtually impossible (if not totally impossible) for most people to find.

[seamus]

Yeah i am combing the earth for torrents of ancient hollow earth texts. Very hard to find... if nayone have any besides the R.W. Bernard book, please sharey :) I can't get a library card cos i am living in NY state whilst having a Tennessee license. (no way i am paying 100 bucks for a license when I can get one for 16 dollars)

Of course I have property in TN and visit there from time to time and spend a lot of time out of this state. but that's beside the point. a hundred dollars?!?

s

[king]

I think its brilliant: Heinrick (?sp) just keeps the energy of a job interview going with supportive comments to encourage his guest to speak. great. Thats just what I want: an hour of the guest discussing their thoughts, which I then think about and make my own mind up about without needing a Radio Host to "interpret" it for me: and no adds during the show! Top lads IMO
I agree with this statement.
Henrick allows guest to talk.
compare that with Alex Jones who cuts off the discussion to small shreds.

:)