PDA

View Full Version : A Moon, A Mystery - Iapetus


mr_pixie
29-11-2008, 03:28 PM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pt3WExpXSwg

haukipesukone
29-11-2008, 05:01 PM
The similarity between the moon and Death Star is chilling. Just watching this video would make me laugh, how silly to suggest something like that.

But having seen the Credo Mutwa interview, where he says Darth Maul has got it's appearance from reptilians. Having heard theories before that the moon might be artificial. And probably some other things too that I forget, yeah, could be that that's no moon, that's a space station. Either it's in hibernation or abandoned. Or is it?

apekteina lordosis
29-11-2008, 05:24 PM
jedidiah was the name the prophet nathan gave to king solomon...

that's king solomon.

rhydra
29-11-2008, 05:31 PM
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6306/iapetushexak1.jpg

The hexagonal shapes seem to fit fairly well with the wall.

comawhite015
29-11-2008, 05:58 PM
The 'Moon with a View' website is absolutely amazing. The little picture of Iapetus where it looks like a taiji from it has been my msn avatar for suuch a long time. Totally wicked :D

middleway00
29-11-2008, 09:09 PM
what if this entire universe is artificial? literally, holographic technology. what would you do?

comawhite015
29-11-2008, 09:14 PM
what if this entire universe is artificial? literally, holographic technology. what would you do?

What COULD you do?

I'd just sit there and go 'wowwww' for a bit initially :D

Then probably just walk around poking things.

apekteina lordosis
29-11-2008, 09:56 PM
What COULD you do?

I'd just sit there and go 'wowwww' for a bit initially :D

Then probably just walk around poking things.

because the entire universe is a artificial holograph, m'lud.

middleway00
30-11-2008, 02:51 AM
What COULD you do?

I'd just sit there and go 'wowwww' for a bit initially :D

Then probably just walk around poking things.

lol, who would do the poking?

sunya
30-11-2008, 03:00 AM
Magrathea - anagram Earth Gama.

I think Douglas Adams spoke a lot of truth. Maybe he was murdered.

There could be some weird stuff going on in this solar system.

lordzoma
30-11-2008, 07:32 AM
Robert Morning Sky would call this the ATEN.

It *is* a death star.

hagbard_celine
30-11-2008, 12:22 PM
Magrathea - anagram Earth Gama.

I think Douglas Adams spoke a lot of truth. Maybe he was murdered.

There could be some weird stuff going on in this solar system.

I loved Hitchhikers!:)

I remember reading how Arthur C Clarke's fictional depiction of Iapetus in 2001- a Space Odessey very closely matched how it looks in real life. The thing is that at the time 2001 was published, in 1968, nobody is supposed to have known what Iapetus looked like! The book decribes it as having a black diamond-shaped structure on its surface which is where the story's showdown takes place. But all you can see through the best telescopes is that is a "dark side and a light side".

Did Clarke have insider knowledge?:confused::eek: He did work closely with NASA.

rhydra
30-11-2008, 02:19 PM
I loved Hitchhikers!:)

I remember reading how Arthur C Clarke's fictional depiction of Iapetus in 2001- a Space Odessey very closely matched how it looks in real life. The thing is that at the time 2001 was published, in 1968, nobody is supposed to have known what Iapetus looked like! The book decribes it as having a black diamond-shaped structure on its surface which is where the story's showdown takes place. But all you can see through the best telescopes is that is a "dark side and a light side".

Did Clarke have insider knowledge?:confused::eek: He did work closely with NASA.

Insider knowlege I'm sure, NASA? Maybe not. I think he knew a lot more than he wrote down, a lot more.

mr_pixie
01-12-2008, 11:49 AM
I loved Hitchhikers!:)

I remember reading how Arthur C Clarke's fictional depiction of Iapetus in 2001- a Space Odessey very closely matched how it looks in real life. The thing is that at the time 2001 was published, in 1968, nobody is supposed to have known what Iapetus looked like! The book decribes it as having a black diamond-shaped structure on its surface which is where the story's showdown takes place. But all you can see through the best telescopes is that is a "dark side and a light side".

Did Clarke have insider knowledge?:confused::eek: He did work closely with NASA.

Clarke also said that he could see trees on Mars!

mr_pixie
01-12-2008, 12:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Arthur+C+Clarke%27s++trees+on +marrs&search_type=&aq=f

hagbard_celine
02-12-2008, 11:18 AM
Insider knowlege I'm sure, NASA? Maybe not. I think he knew a lot more than he wrote down, a lot more.

Damn right he did! Nobody was supposed to know what Iapetus looked like before the Voyager probes! He also talks about Reptilian Humanoids in Childhood's End.

hagbard_celine
02-12-2008, 11:20 AM
Clarke also said that he could see trees on Mars!


Yes and in one of his early books The Sands of Mars, now sadly out of print, he describes vegatation on Mars and that grazing animals feed off it.

loki
02-12-2008, 12:53 PM
well concidering the world and everything thing in it including nature its totally mitigated and disigned by way of the fibonacci number system i'd say its extreamly likly that the world is in fact a hologram by reason that its laws have to fall within this mathimatical equation


sounds like a program to me ....

mr_pixie
03-12-2008, 01:56 PM
Maybe clarke knew things because he was a member of the furturist Society ?


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43729

mr_pixie
04-12-2008, 02:27 PM
Some of you might of seen this before.

Mars Presentation.
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-3835552873482653680

2013
04-12-2008, 03:11 PM
well concidering the world and everything thing in it including nature its totally mitigated and disigned by way of the fibonacci number system i'd say its extreamly likly that the world is in fact a hologram by reason that its laws have to fall within this mathimatical equation


sounds like a program to me ....

Watch the movie THE NINES , im on one about this film lately , it is amazing check it out . :D

2013
04-12-2008, 03:22 PM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pt3WExpXSwg

Notice how the first pics of Iapetus look like the yin yang symbol .Light dark duality .What if Saturn as the Illuminati ruling planet Satan is lord of this world , not just he planet earth but the whole holographic universe .The duality of iapetus is the blue print for this particular area. The rings of Saturn could be an earlier attempt at imprisoning the energy of the planet as in revelations Satan being cast into the bottomless pit and bound ? Saturn ruling time maybe it has something to do with 3 dimensional concepts . Any thoughts on this anyone ?:D

hagbard_celine
07-12-2008, 05:37 PM
Some of you might of seen this before.

Mars Presentation.
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-3835552873482653680

The link doesn't work,Pix.

hagbard_celine
07-12-2008, 05:38 PM
Oh, I can see it in the quote.

mr_pixie
08-12-2008, 06:50 PM
The link doesn't work,Pix.

It does work i've just tested it! you just have press play a few times ::confused:

hagbard_celine
10-12-2008, 09:17 PM
It does work i've just tested it! you just have press play a few times ::confused:

Thanks, Pix:)

Unfortunately my PC is in repair at the moment; I'm writing this in an internet cafe, but as soon as it's better I'll watch that.

lightblessins
12-12-2008, 12:02 PM
the moon is one big draconian space ship.

mr_pixie
12-12-2008, 02:10 PM
Thanks, Pix:)

Unfortunately my PC is in repair at the moment; I'm writing this in an internet cafe, but as soon as it's better I'll watch that.

Carnt you watch it in the internet caf'e ? I go to my local on-line centre and Library for my internet.

hagbard_celine
14-12-2008, 02:32 AM
Carnt you watch it in the internet caf'e ? I go to my local on-line centre and Library for my internet.


I can but I'd rather wait until I'm at home and I can relax in front of my own PC.

luten2012
14-12-2008, 11:26 AM
How will anyone ever take us folk seriously about this when we as members of the public cannot provide the technology to go and prove any artificial objects in our solar syatem. NASA do - but we don't.

Unfortunately most people have the 'believe it when I see it' attitude - But they don't even go looking for these things in the first place and what's more they wouldn't even know what they were looking for if they did.

Now, I have no doubt that this moon is totally manufactured in some way. Something by instinct just does not feel right about it. The fact that it only ever shows one light side at all times begs the question what's on the other damn side?? NASA feed us the usual claptrap - "Oh, there's just ice on the other side" which totally goes against their 'believe it when you see it attitude' because they haven't actually seen any damn ice! They just assume as usual and tell us a bunch of hypothetic assumptions or otherwise cover stories.

It frustrates the hell out of me that the ancient and primitive societies of our World were able to discover and share this information as a whole - but fast forward thousands of years later and our people would most likely prefer to watch Eastenders.

Most of them wouldn't even believe you when you said ancient civilisations had superior knowledge of our universe never mind suggesting that some objects in our solar system could have been artificially made...and how much research do they do when they decide not to believe you...NONE...nope, they arses remain comfortably sealed in front of the idiot box...X-Factors on darling. Big Woop! :mad:

(Sorry had to rant)

Peace.

hagbard_celine
15-12-2008, 05:18 PM
How will anyone ever take us folk seriously about this when we as members of the public cannot provide the technology to go and prove any artificial objects in our solar syatem. NASA do - but we don't.

Unfortunately most people have the 'believe it when I see it' attitude - But they don't even go looking for these things in the first place and what's more they wouldn't even know what they were looking for if they did.

Now, I have no doubt that this moon is totally manufactured in some way. Something by instinct just does not feel right about it. The fact that it only ever shows one light side at all times begs the question what's on the other damn side?? NASA feed us the usual claptrap - "Oh, there's just ice on the other side" which totally goes against their 'believe it when you see it attitude' because they haven't actually seen any damn ice! They just assume as usual and tell us a bunch of hypothetic assumptions or otherwise cover stories.

It frustrates the hell out of me that the ancient and primitive societies of our World were able to discover and share this information as a whole - but fast forward thousands of years later and our people would most likely prefer to watch Eastenders.

Most of them wouldn't even believe you when you said ancient civilisations had superior knowledge of our universe never mind suggesting that some objects in our solar system could have been artificially made...and how much research do they do when they decide not to believe you...NONE...nope, they arses remain comfortably sealed in front of the idiot box...X-Factors on darling. Big Woop! :mad:

(Sorry had to rant)

Peace.

I know what you mean. We may have progressed in some ways during the last couple of millennia, scientifically and technologically, but we regressed in a lot of ways too, especially spiritually. Whereas ancient cultures had clear open skies, with no electric lights or smog to block the view of the Heavens, our own view is almost toally obscured by pollution, both chemical, including chemtrails, and light.:( Someone who's lived their lives in a Western city will see no more than 100 of the brightest stars and planets when they look up, and it's easy to imagine that many of us don't understand that there are so many more!:(:rolleyes: (Maybe the Elite are aware of this and are quite grateful that pollution depribves us of one of the great transcendental joys ancient people had, even if they didn't engineer pollution, whether by products of industry or chemtrails, for this specific purpose.) We effectively live at the bottom of a muddy pond.

Our perception of anything beyond that very restricted personal view is provided to us by offical astronomy and the government space agencies. Well, we've done that one already haven't we!:D;)

Of course one could argue that ancient civilizations didn't have the powerful telescopes we have, but I think this is more than negated by the fact that their ability to see the night's sky in its full glory have them a powerful psychic connection with the universe that today we mostly lack. They didn't have telescopes, but could enjoy this connection. We have the telescopes, but our personal connection to the universe is lost.

(My PC is still in repairs.:(:mad: I hope nothing serious is wrong.)