PDA

View Full Version : Deepak Chopra Blames US For Mumbai...


11indigo11
28-11-2008, 08:25 AM
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Deepak Chopra Blames Washington For Mumbai Terrorist Attacks ...Update: Iran Agrees

This was really twisted.


Deepak Chopra believes "Washington" was responsible for the attacks in Mumbai.
HuffPo and CNN reported:

Chopra: What we have seen in Mumbai has been brewing for a long time, and the war on terrorism and the attack on Iraq compounded the situation. What we call "collateral damage" and going after the wrong people actually turns moderates into extremists, and that inflammation then gets organized and appears as this disaster in Bombay. Now the worst thing that could happen is there's a backlash on the Muslims from the fundamental Hindus in India, which then will perpetuate the problem. Inflammation will create more inflammation.

CNN: Let me jump in on that because you're presuming something very important, which is that it's Muslims who have carried out these attacks and, in some cases, with Washington in their sights.

Chopra: Ultimately the message is always toward Washington because it's also the perception that Washington, in their way, directly or indirectly funds both sides of the war on terror. They fund our side, then our petrol dollars going to Saudi Arabia through Pakistan and ultimately these terrorist groups, which are very organized. You know Jonathan, it takes a lot of money to do this. It takes a lot of organization to do this. Where's the money coming from, you know? The money is coming from the vested interests. I'm not talking about conspiracy theories, but what happens is, our policies, our foreign policies, actually perpetuate this problem. Because, you know, 25% of the world's population is Muslim and they're the fastest growing segment of the population of the world. The more we alienate the Muslim population, the more the moderates are likely to become extremists.

It makes you wonder who he thinks "the right people" are.
America has been going after Al-Qaeda and the nations that harbor and fund terrorists for 7 years now.
To blame the attacks in Mumbai on American policy in Iraq or Afghanistan or wherever is just wrong.

Here is the vid

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=WD1rfL788S4

:cool:

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/11/deepak-chopra-mubai-terrorist-attacks.html

lizzy
28-11-2008, 08:34 AM
Deepak Chopra believes "Washington" was responsible for the attacks in Mumbai.

.......he got that one right.:rolleyes: (no brainer, just take balls to say it...especially as the elite pyschos' can kill his book deals anytime)

fayette
28-11-2008, 08:36 AM
:eek: ARE YOU sure this is the same guy who wrote all those AMAZING spiritual books?

11indigo11
28-11-2008, 08:39 AM
:eek: ARE YOU sure this is the same guy who wrote all those AMAZING spiritual books?\

Check the video

vladmir
28-11-2008, 08:42 AM
i have read all of Deepak Chopras books, and im not impressed, because the ideas he talks about are also talked about in many books that came before him, just in different language. He is simply puts the old wine in a new bottle.
But, having said that, i gotta give Deepak credit for realizing that all roads lead to Washington or Rome or israel.

size_of_light
28-11-2008, 08:57 AM
Oprah wont be happy :mad: and you don't wanna make Big Momma mad...

lizzy
28-11-2008, 09:12 AM
i have read all of Deepak Chopras books, and im not impressed, because the ideas he talks about are also talked about in many books that came before him, just in different language. He is simply puts the old wine in a new bottle.
But, having said that, i gotta give Deepak credit for realizing that all roads lead to Washington or Rome or israel.


;)...agreed...

alfrmo
28-11-2008, 09:42 AM
In my opinion he has got it spot on regarding American funding of both sides in this phoney "war on terror". It will obviously jeopardise many of his book deals but at least he has the integrity to say what he believes. There is always a much bigger motive behind terrorist attacks such as this, and they are generally to politically manipulate conflicts in order to futher the aims of Illuminati control of regions.

goldman
28-11-2008, 09:44 AM
Maybe it's a blood sacrifice/offering for the new black pope Obama, it doesn't come as a surprise how twisted this world really is.

runciter
28-11-2008, 09:47 AM
In my opinion he has got it spot on regarding American funding of both sides in this phoney "war on terror". It will obviously jeopardise many of his book deals but at least he has the integrity to say what he believes. There is always a much bigger motive behind terrorist attacks such as this, and they are generally to politically manipulate conflicts in order to futher the aims of Illuminati control of regions.

what he doesn't say is that america is under complete zionist control.

anthony65
28-11-2008, 10:36 AM
In my opinion he has got it spot on regarding American funding of both sides in this phoney "war on terror". It will obviously jeopardise many of his book deals but at least he has the integrity to say what he believes. There is always a much bigger motive behind terrorist attacks such as this, and they are generally to politically manipulate conflicts in order to futher the aims of Illuminati control of regions.

He's actually very diplomatic about how he describes the US role. He goes on to describe how US money for Saudi flows through Pakistan to the terrorists, which is really very generous to the US and when you think about it, way too generous...

Why should US money flow as petro dollars to Pakistan?

The US has been pumping money directly into Pakistan for many years.

What is Chopra saying here? That the US shouldn't buy oil from the Arabs?

The US inspired and funded Islamic militants in the 80's.

The US supported Pakistan for years, even when it was clear that the Pakistani's were funding the Taleban.

How can they deny any of this?

The following is taken from Wikipedia...

Afghanistan
Main article: Operation Cyclone

Brzezinski, known for his hardline policies on the Soviet Union, initiated in 1979 a campaign supporting mujaheddin in Pakistan and Afghanistan, which were run by Pakistani security services with financial support from the CIA and Britain's MI6. This policy had the explicit aim of promoting radical Islamist and anti-Communist forces to overthrow the secular communist People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan government in Afghanistan, which had been destabilized by coup attempts against Hafizullah Amin, the power struggle within the Soviet-supported parcham faction of the PDPA and a subsequent Soviet military intervention.

In 1998, Brzezinski was interviewed by the French newspaper Nouvel Observateur on the topic of Afghanistan. He revealed that CIA support for the mujaheddin had started before the 1979 Soviet invasion, knowingly increasing the probability of a Soviet invasion. Brzezinski saw the invasion as an opportunity to embroil the Soviet Union in a bloody conflict comparable to America's experience in Vietnam. He referred to this as the "Afghan Trap" and viewed the end of the Soviet empire as worth the cost of strengthening militant Islamic groups.

He went on to say in that interview, "What is most important to the history of the world? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?" When the interviewer questioned him about Islamic fundamentalism representing a world menace, Brzezinski said, "Nonsense!" [20][21]

In his 1997 book The Grand Chessboard, Brzezinski says that assistance to the Afghan resistance was a tactic designed to bog down the Soviet army while the United States built up a deterrent military force in the Persian Gulf to prevent Soviet political or military penetration farther south (see: the Carter Doctrine).

gremlin
28-11-2008, 10:59 AM
i could never tell the difference between a pakistani and a indian, like sayig i could never tell the difference between a Glaswegian and someone from edinburgh, but yet both sides hate each other.

kweli
28-11-2008, 11:19 AM
i have read all of Deepak Chopras books, and im not impressed, because the ideas he talks about are also talked about in many books that came before him, just in different language. He is simply puts the old wine in a new bottle.But, having said that, i gotta give Deepak credit for realizing that all roads lead to Washington or Rome or israel.

Aye, I used to be into DC some time back, but came to the same conclusion - - just old ideas wrapped up in a new age style. But like you say.. credit where it's due, i guess. :confused:

synergy777
28-11-2008, 12:49 PM
deepak chopra took vedic philosophy, and rebranded it, a great businessman, not a guru. religion is india's biggest export.

planetsadhana
28-11-2008, 02:17 PM
def good businessman , I do enjoy some of his books, but anyhow...hes just written his best with that statement, not far off the truth IMO

checkmate
28-11-2008, 02:28 PM
I do agree with his summation that in some respect the US is responsible for these attacks. It's all about money and instilling fear worldwide to expand the powers of security and anti-terrorist organizations and taking away our rights.