View Full Version : Not ALL Reptilains/Draco are evil
eshtar
25-11-2008, 10:00 AM
I feel i need to post something like this do to others claiming ALL reptilains are bent on enslavement eating babies ect.. Even Davide Icke states not all are evil. But more netrual Not taking eather side of things. They follow their own laws yes maybe agendas. But to beleive all reptilains are evil to me personaly is wrong. Every race has both good and bad no matter the beings. Humans can do far worse to another human then a reptilain could. The claims that reptilains rape murder and molest children, Humans do the same exact thing sometimes worse. But I do know that there are good reptilains as well just a gut feeling. Reptilains that do look out for humans but in a much different way. How would you react if you saw a reptilain in their true Draco form? you'd probibly take a gun and shoot. (not saying everyone would) Humans have done far worse to this planet then any other being has. These are just my veiws and am not forcing anyone to beleive them.
rhydra
25-11-2008, 12:30 PM
I feel i need to post something like this do to others claiming ALL reptilains are bent on enslavement eating babies ect.. Even Davide Icke states not all are evil. But more netrual Not taking eather side of things. They follow their own laws yes maybe agendas. But to beleive all reptilains are evil to me personaly is wrong. Every race has both good and bad no matter the beings. Humans can do far worse to another human then a reptilain could. The claims that reptilains rape murder and molest children, Humans do the same exact thing sometimes worse. But I do know that there are good reptilains as well just a gut feeling. Reptilains that do look out for humans but in a much different way. How would you react if you saw a reptilain in their true Draco form? you'd probibly take a gun and shoot. (not saying everyone would) Humans have done far worse to this planet then any other being has. These are just my veiws and am not forcing anyone to beleive them.
Well said! Although many seem to have an overriding religion led view about reptilians and Draco. It appears to have taken over from the concept of demons, devil and possessions, there does seem to be a witch-hunt against anything different. Not to mention Hollywood films where the baddie has to have green skin to appeal to the masses. I suppose it is just human nature.
Edit, nice avatar. ;)
eshtar
25-11-2008, 06:13 PM
ya?I guess people fear what is different. reptilians are different mindset and all does that make them evil? no not all eat babies or humans.
disorder2k8
25-11-2008, 06:28 PM
there is no good or evil when you consider things like that on a macroscopic scale, there are just different views of 'progress'
xpleet
25-11-2008, 07:00 PM
...not all are evil. But more netrual Not taking eather side of things.They follow their own laws yes maybe agendas.
That IS evil.
There is no inbetween.
Humans have done far worse to this planet then any other being has.
Is this an excuse?
Humans are not humans anymore since there are a lot Reptilian and other alien incarnations in human bodies. It doesn't matter which alien it is, if it's an Anunnaki then it's basically of no difference between race.
eshtar
25-11-2008, 07:10 PM
umm give me a good reason why being netrual is evil? it is called balance look up taoisim. I cannot stand people spouting all reptilains are evil this and that. It reminds me of thr salem witch trials.
shabun
25-11-2008, 07:52 PM
They are evil and they are out to destroy us. Dont be fooled.
rhydra
25-11-2008, 11:04 PM
God says reptiles are evil, end of, where is that ducking stool. :D
Edit, there are also a few old ladies that own cats nearby where I live, they have to be something to do with it too, casting spells on people and all.
loderlive
26-11-2008, 12:16 AM
God says reptiles are evil
Yes, that is a perception you have been given. Why should I believe that? I will see it from my own eyes. Would you be interested in the perception of me? I see you die. Isn't it better to look from the perception of you? You see me alive.
shenoma
26-11-2008, 02:10 AM
Let's face it, they are handing the planet over to us completely in the near future. None of us can say what the real plan is, and just enjoy the ride I say.:):D
rhydra
26-11-2008, 12:38 PM
OK, there does seem to be a lot of hysteria where reptiles and Draco are concerned, much like anything the tribal/superstitious amongst us don't understand, therefore fear, therfore hate. The "God says reptiles are evil," I mentioned can refer to anything which a hysterical reaction, and it is easy to see how mass hysteria can be caused, leads to otherwise rational people behaving in the most apalling manner.
Take the witch hunts in the past, they still go on today. Old people singled out by a fearful and superstitious people unable to understand why they are enduring famine, disease, war look for a scapegoat, many times that scapegoat is in the shape of a widow or other person at the fringe. They are accused of being responsible, obviously there is no evidence other than accusations, by then mob rule has taken over and the conclusion is somewhat inevitable.
The clear fact is that what isn't easily understandable is considered a threat, words like "evil" and "possession" are bandied about, some out of genuine fear of the unknown, some by mischief-making in the hope of mobilising a state of mob rule, keeping the natives so fearful of the unknown that they dare not even peer out of the window to see what lies beyond their own concious limitations. The powers that be depend on keeping humans where they are, on the bottom level of the astral plane, the physical level.
johnthejedi24
28-11-2008, 05:05 AM
If there are 'Neutral" reptilians, than they are not doing anything to HELP THE SITUATION. Just standing by and ignoring what is going on, be you a human or big lizard is being part of the problem.:mad: I have heard accounts of "good" reptilians, even ones who healed other humans ailments, or got them out of a nasty situation. That is good, but if these are just pretty isolated cases it does not speak well for the majority. Some may mean well but it might not be enough.
How would our personal fears and prejudices affect us if we are invaded. Be it real or a false-flag attack. Some of the big lizards may turn out to be the good guys. but we would not accept them becuase of their looks or actions.
lothia
06-12-2008, 10:17 PM
I agree with you Eshtar. I dont think all reptilian are evil. Only a group. I dont like judge a race for the evil of a group. I hope find nice reptilians someday.
eshtar
07-12-2008, 12:18 AM
o you may have found em already maybe one is your gaurdian angel.
lordzoma
07-12-2008, 06:37 AM
Good and evil don't exist in higher dimensions. They are a polarity play. Reptilians are just as bad as any other alien race out there, and they are also just as good.
Light and Dark are two parts of the same thing.
People who view reptilians in general as being evil are clearly light siders.
Good and evil only exist within the polarities. What's good to one is bad to another.
runciter
07-12-2008, 10:04 AM
Good and evil don't exist in higher dimensions. They are a polarity play. Reptilians are just as bad as any other alien race out there, and they are also just as good.
Light and Dark are two parts of the same thing.
People who view reptilians in general as being evil are clearly light siders.
Good and evil only exist within the polarities. What's good to one is bad to another.
this is how the illuminati see things, because they need a justification for their sadism.
tracker
07-12-2008, 10:08 AM
[QUOTE=xpleet;633125]That IS evil.
There is no inbetween.
QUOTE]
either one extreme or the other , thats evil in its own right .
evil and good are points of reference from an individual acording to their own perception.
what you might concider wrong others might concider right .
what you concider bad others concider good .
yes there is common sense , but either this or that ?
thats a totalistic self prisoning do or die mentality .
not all things are your way .
somethings just arent as easy as this or that .
i concider that reply bad , yet you dont , so this is the truth .
any one who cuts chioces by saying its either this or that , is the one in the wrong .
learn to widen your perception and dont be so closed minded and finalistic .:cool:
lothia
07-12-2008, 11:25 AM
o you may have found em already maybe one is your gaurdian angel.
Oh!? Maybe... I hope... Cheers! ;)
rhydra
07-12-2008, 05:21 PM
Or maybe more than a guardian angel, perhaps even closer still. ;)
measle_weasel
08-12-2008, 09:56 PM
I feel i need to post something like this do to others claiming ALL reptilains are bent on enslavement eating babies ect.. Even Davide Icke states not all are evil. But more netrual Not taking eather side of things. They follow their own laws yes maybe agendas. But to beleive all reptilains are evil to me personaly is wrong. Every race has both good and bad no matter the beings. Humans can do far worse to another human then a reptilain could. The claims that reptilains rape murder and molest children, Humans do the same exact thing sometimes worse. But I do know that there are good reptilains as well just a gut feeling. Reptilains that do look out for humans but in a much different way. How would you react if you saw a reptilain in their true Draco form? you'd probibly take a gun and shoot. (not saying everyone would) Humans have done far worse to this planet then any other being has. These are just my veiws and am not forcing anyone to beleive them.
I dont believe there is enough evidence or possibility of reptilians to even consider if they are good or bad at all. Its like if Ford were coming out with a new car, and nothing beyond that was known, and people calling the car a POS just because it was made by Ford. Its the same principle of judging something without knowing what the hell it is beyond some vague archtype.
So I agree with you.
measle_weasel
08-12-2008, 09:58 PM
Oh, and what exactly is the difference between a draco and a reptile, as I am seeing them referenced together as if they are seperate from one another?
rhydra
08-12-2008, 11:55 PM
Oh, and what exactly is the difference between a draco and a reptile, as I am seeing them referenced together as if they are seperate from one another?
Reptilians are mostly cold blooded, though the muscle power of a cold blooded creature is much stronger than that of a warm blooded one. Draco are mostly warm blooded, they may or may not have wings though are generally 6 limbed and may or may not have tails. Some have breath weapons which consist of a substance which is produced in the body and reacts in the presence of air. They are highly intelligent (reptilians are also highly intelligent, much more than man but are on a different level than the Draco) and far less is known about them than the reptilians. Both have a stand off policy with regards to this planet, their experience, (mostly of the Draco) is mostly confined to incarnations of human beings and astral travel. As far as I know there is no actual physical presence of both on the planet.
measle_weasel
09-12-2008, 12:07 AM
Reptilians are mostly cold blooded, though the muscle power of a cold blooded creature is much stronger than that of a warm blooded one. Draco are mostly warm blooded, they may or may not have wings though are generally 6 limbed and may or may not have tails. Some have breath weapons which consist of a substance which is produced in the body and reacts in the presence of air. They are highly intelligent (reptilians are also highly intelligent, much more than man but are on a different level than the Draco) and far less is known about them than the reptilians. Both have a stand off policy with regards to this planet, their experience, (mostly of the Draco) is mostly confined to incarnations of human beings and astral travel. As far as I know there is no actual physical presence of both on the planet.
Interesting. So "draco" could be loosely defined as what most people would consider dragons and/or derivatives thereof? This sounds like fantasy to me. I love fantasy too, it sure beats this reality. But what basis is there to even consider the existence of "dracos"? I am genuinely interested. Do you have any links that would further describe this line of thought?
rhydra
09-12-2008, 01:01 AM
In theory everything exists somewhere, literally speaking as we live in just one universe of many, possibly an infinite number. However, on a more explainable note, I have been studying the Draco for quite a few years now and the similarities of the Draco between many unrelated civilisations across the globe are particularily interesting. The scales, wings (ability to fly), six limbs, and association with an ethereal world, apart from ours is a common theme. As for evidence, it depends on how hard you wish the evidence to be, mostly it can consist of consistent legends, accounts, modern accounts of the Draco on the astral level etc. I can understand that this might not be enough for many people, I do have a gut instinct myself that there is some fact behind these consistant accounts. It is something that has struck my interest as only about 3 years ago I was extremely sceptical of anything remotely described as "paranormal."
jonnyinfinite
09-12-2008, 01:58 AM
like the Mothmen you mean? Or the Thunderbird? Both could fly without flapping their 'wings'?
This thread is quite interesting but one should consider the root of the behaviour in the 'reptile brain': not much of it is 'good'.
An 'airy-fairy' discussion of good and evil is all well and good, but I don't need a discourse to understand at a deep level that sacrificing babies and tricking millions into war is inherently wrong.
Evil is defined by action. Yes there is evil potential in humanity, but it wouldn't suprise me that unprovoked murder, random rape etc is not at least in some way manipulated by these demonic beings. Remember, the illuminati reps HATE us. We terrify them, and you fear things you do not understand.
We are destined for much greater: if only we would wake up and realise what we are.
measle_weasel
09-12-2008, 03:18 AM
like the Mothmen you mean? Or the Thunderbird? Both could fly without flapping their 'wings'?
This thread is quite interesting but one should consider the root of the behaviour in the 'reptile brain': not much of it is 'good'.
An 'airy-fairy' discussion of good and evil is all well and good, but I don't need a discourse to understand at a deep level that sacrificing babies and tricking millions into war is inherently wrong.
Evil is defined by action. Yes there is evil potential in humanity, but it wouldn't suprise me that unprovoked murder, random rape etc is not at least in some way manipulated by these demonic beings. Remember, the illuminati reps HATE us. We terrify them, and you fear things you do not understand.
We are destined for much greater: if only we would wake up and realise what we are.
Honestly, it seems like a cop out, a simple desire to pass the buck, and to deny responsibility, when so many people are blaming these so-called evil reptilians. That is one thing that really prevents me from believing any of it, from beyond an intellectual perspective.
Humans inability to accept responsibility, to me, is legendary. Almost every criminal in prison, or out of prison for that matter, if asked as to why they commited the crime they are/were being punished for, will invariably either claim innocence, or admit that they did what the did but with some exonerating reason behind it. It is truly a rare case when a human accepts total responsibility for an action they preformed totally with their own free will, when faced with the negative consequences of their actions. Sometimes a human will accept responsibility. Sometimes 5 mile wide comets will hit the earth. Both are rare events.
Evil is defined by action. Yes there is evil potential in humanity, but it wouldn't suprise me that unprovoked murder, random rape etc is not at least in some way manipulated by these demonic beings.
I tend to think it is simply due to the intrinsic evil within humans hearts that cause such things. "Evil reptiles" are scapegoats, created by those unwilling to accept association, even in a remote sense, to the people who do horrible things. By disassociating the evil aspect from another human, they can feel secure that they themselves are not capable of that evil - an evil that scares them - as it is not part of them, nor their species. Or if they do commit an evil act, they have an excuse; a personally effective denial of responsibility.
"Reptilians" are nothing but an allegory for human evil, and a way to avoid feeling close to that evil that is within us all. And by denying this evil, they will eventually succumb to it without ever knowing the path they were on. In contrast, by acknowledging the evil, it can very easily be avoid. It is the difference between driving towards a cliff and denying there is a cliff ahead of you, and driving towards a cliff acknowledging there is a cliff ahead of you. The denier will always drive over the cliff, but the other will have a choice whether to drive over, or to stop.
This is what I think.
It all really comes down to Know Thyself, doesnt it?
rhydra
09-12-2008, 11:57 AM
I agree with MW. How I see it is that humans have to take account of their own actions, blaming reptilians on evil actions also means that they are not responsible for non evil actions, which puts humans into the realm of inert, non-sentient creatures which when not manipulated are then as dumb as the beasts in the field. As the phrase goes. One cannot have one's cake and eat it, humans are either manipulated but otherwise non sentient or are concious beings capable of free thought. The latter option I am am increasingly coming to doubt.
measle_weasel
09-12-2008, 06:42 PM
I agree with MW. How I see it is that humans have to take account of their own actions, blaming reptilians on evil actions also means that they are not responsible for non evil actions, which puts humans into the realm of inert, non-sentient creatures which when not manipulated are then as dumb as the beasts in the field. As the phrase goes. One cannot have one's cake and eat it, humans are either manipulated but otherwise non sentient or are concious beings capable of free thought. The latter option I am am increasingly coming to doubt.
Agreed, though they make a choice, rhydra, and the vast majority choose to be manipulated and controlled by forces they cannot even understand (through willful ignorance). Why? Because it is easier to not make your own desicions; it is the path of least resistance to have some other force guide your motions. It is easier on the mind to not know who your oppressors are and why they do it. Humans are like electrons in this way. Predictable, manipulatable, and extremely powerful in large numbers, all based on the premise that they will follow the path of least resistance as if there was no choice to be made.
Everyday I recognize a little more, just how easy it was for a small few to get the world to were it is now.
You see, free will requires effort, and energy. To make a choice to resist, requires opposing the force that pushes you, and that is difficult, and even painfull. I dont think its an issue of sentience, though it may be, but more an issue of... laziness.
Denial is easier than ackownledgement
passivicity is easier than action
submission is easier than resistance
complacency is easier than change
and passing the buck is easier than accepting responsibility.
To be controlled is a choice.
faulconandsnowjob
19-12-2008, 08:22 AM
I agree that not all Reptilians are dark. Aren't there 6 races of Reptilians? Some are of the light.
noobcybot
20-12-2008, 12:06 AM
"Reptilians" are nothing but an allegory for human evil, and a way to avoid feeling close to that evil that is within us all.
Hey Measle, why do you think the agena use sacrificial rituals?
faulconandsnowjob
20-12-2008, 12:41 AM
"Reptilians" are nothing but an allegory for human evil, and a way to avoid feeling close to that evil that is within us all.
Speak for yourself! Not all of us have evil w/in us.
measle_weasel
20-12-2008, 07:51 PM
Hey Measle, why do you think the agena use sacrificial rituals?
I have heard that some people believe that when a thing dies, especially suddenly, all its energy, so to speak, is released. When the energy is released, something can apparently be done with it by third parties, such as using it to summon other entities, or communicate with other planes in a more direct way then usual.
But I dont know for sure, since Im not part of the agenda, have never spoken with the agenda, nor have I witnessed all the agendas activities.
measle_weasel
20-12-2008, 07:56 PM
Speak for yourself! Not all of us have evil w/in us.
Its that denial that will eventually destroy you.
I used the metaphor of two cars going towards a cliff in one of my other posts. Youre the car who denies that there is a cliff ahead, and you eventually drive over it. The other car, who acknowledges the cliff ahead, can choose to drive over the cliff, just like the one who denied it was there, or can choose to avoid the cliff all together.
noobcybot
20-12-2008, 08:06 PM
Nope, some people genuinely dont have an evil bone in their body. Lighten up dude.
faulconandsnowjob
20-12-2008, 08:29 PM
^ Yeah, I agree. Some people are of the Light.
I have heard that some people believe that when a thing dies, especially suddenly, all its energy, so to speak, is released. When the energy is released, something can apparently be done with it by third parties, such as using it to summon other entities, or communicate with other planes in a more direct way then usual.
David Wilcock talked about how when someone dies, it "punches a hole" into another dimension. Perhaps souls can be summoned that way.
measle_weasel
20-12-2008, 08:35 PM
Nope, some people genuinely dont have an evil bone in their body. Lighten up dude.
If some people do not have an evil "bone" in their bodies, which I assume you mean to mean that they are completely incapable of doing any evil, then that would mean they are beings without free will, as they would be unable to freely choose to be good or evil. I dont believe anyone is without free will, thus I believe all beings have the potential for doing evil.
faulconandsnowjob
20-12-2008, 09:04 PM
If some people do not have an evil "bone" in their bodies, which I assume you mean to mean that they are completely incapable of doing any evil, then that would mean they are beings without free will, as they would be unable to freely choose to be good or evil. I dont believe anyone is without free will, thus I believe all beings have the potential for doing evil.
This is a free will universe, but some people choose light over dark, good over evil. Some people are w/out evil in them. Believe it or not, it doesn't change that fact.
measle_weasel
20-12-2008, 09:18 PM
This is a free will universe, but some people choose light over dark, good over evil.
If they made the choice to be good, then they had the potential to be evil, and still do.
Some people are w/out evil in them.
Sure, they may do no acts of evil by choice, and that is preferable if you want to live in a good universe, but that does not mean they do not have the potential to do evil if they so choose.
Believe it or not, it doesn't change that fact.
If you believe that it is "fact" that some people are "without evil", and do not have the potential for evil, back up your statement of fact with supporting evidence. To be a fact, whatever is in question must be provable, not just an opinion.
faulconandsnowjob
20-12-2008, 09:45 PM
If they made the choice to be good, then they had the potential to be evil, and still do.
Technically having a choice to do something evil is not the same thing as being evil or having evil in you, or even being capable of evil. Evil is antithetical to some people. It repels them, & they would never choose it.
If you believe that it is "fact" that some people are "without evil", and do not have the potential for evil, back up your statement of fact with supporting evidence. To be a fact, whatever is in question must be provable, not just an opinion.
Yeah, it's a fact that you are disputing.
fact [fakt]
–noun
...
5. Law. Often, facts. an actual or alleged ... circumstance, ...
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fact
question of fact
–noun
a question concerning the reality of an alleged ... circumstance ...
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=question%20of%20fact&db=luna
I don't know if one can prove that not everyone has evil in them, but I doubt that you will be able to "prove" that "everyone" does. Again, I would say, speak for yourself. I think you are generalizing too broadly based on your own experience.
If some people do not have an evil "bone" in their bodies, which I assume you mean to mean that they are completely incapable of doing any evil, then that would mean they are beings without free will, as they would be unable to freely choose to be good or evil.
This is what Spinoza basically argued. He didn't think there was free will b/c some people would never make certain choices. However, as great a philosopher as he was, I have to disagree. I do believe this is a free will universe. We can make choices. Just b/c some of us would never choose evil doesn't change the free will we have in making that choice.
measle_weasel
20-12-2008, 11:39 PM
Technically having a choice to do something evil is not the same thing as being evil or having evil in you, or even being capable of evil. Evil is antithetical to some people. It repels them, & they would never choose it.
If I held out my hands, and in one hand was an apple, and in the other, nothing, and said to you: "You can choose either the apple or the orange, and you must take one, but not take both", then what choice would you have? There is no orange, thus you are incapable of choosing to take the orange, meaning you never had any choice at all.
Yeah, it's a fact that you are disputing.
...
I don't know if one can prove that not everyone has evil in them, but I doubt that you will be able to "prove" that "everyone" does.
If something is unprovable, its not a fact. And if you are not even sure something can be proven or not, why would you be stating it as fact?
Im not trying to prove anything. I never said anything was a fact. What I am stating here, is my opinion. Im asking you to prove your statement, because you said it was a fact. Im just wondering what research and objective data you have that let you come to that conclusion.
Again, I would say, speak for yourself. I think you are generalizing too broadly based on your own experience.
Im generalizing based on logic, with an assumption of the existance of free will. Though even if I based it somewhat on personal experience, I would say the same thing. I have met many good people, some who you and others might identify as not having an evil bone in their bodies. Those people, I dont believe I have ever witnessed an "evil" act done by, nor do I know of one in their past. But does that mean it cant, and wont, happen, just because it hasnt happened in the past? No matter how unlikely it would seem for those people to commit an act of evil, its possible, because they have the free will to choose.
This is what Spinoza basically argued. He didn't think there was free will b/c some people would never make certain choices. However, as great a philosopher as he was, I have to disagree. I do believe this is a free will universe. We can make choices. Just b/c some of us would never choose evil doesn't change the free will we have in making that choice.
I might agree.
It seems we are arguing whether choosing to never choose a certain option makes you incapable of ever choosing that option. Since we both seem to agree there is free will, then what is stopping the person in question from making a free will choice to abandon their prior decision, and make a new one? How can you answer this question with any certainty without know entirely what free will is, and how it operates?
If you were 100% certain that something could not be done by a certain person, then you would have to have foreknowledge of all future events, from here, to eternity, and beyond. Without that foreknowledge, how do you know someone would never do something? We both agree there is free will, and I would assume you would agree that just because something has not happened in the past, does not mean it cannot happen in the future. So why say something will never happen, when its possible that it will?
faulconandsnowjob
21-12-2008, 12:23 AM
I know not everyone has evil in them b/c I know I do not have evil in me. You can either believe that or not. It's your choice! :D
eshtar
21-12-2008, 11:01 AM
(no offence) but everyone I don't care who or what you are, everyone has a darkside within them weather they want to acknowlage that or not. Even the so called Pleadians have a dark side. If antyhing was pure pure light with no dark what so ever, they in fact won't even beable to exist. it is a Balance and if someone ONLY had Light in them it would be the worst inbalance of all. They would be drones no purpose not even within themselves if there nws no dark. Light cannot exist without Dark. Now like you say beleive it or not. but everyone has a darkside.
rhydra
21-12-2008, 01:22 PM
The line between good and evil runs through the human heart=Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Not only the human heart but all intelligent beings who have the capability to make decisions. The difference between good and evil is not one which can easily be distinguished.
Myself, I see good as taking the decision to cause as little damage as possible to others and to do as much good as possible.
But the other side would be to prevent a greater suffering, what would one do then?
Supposing you are given a button which would terminate the life of a child, that child is going to grow up to be a mass murderer. You either kill a child or do nothing and fail to prevent the deaths of more people.
That brings one into the realm of greater and lesser evil, the means justifying the end which is probably the mantra of many a dictator. I suppose Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot never saw themselves as bad people, just people who were doing what needed to be done for a "greater good."
In such I don't think that mankind is in any way able to cast judgment on the reptilian species, the Draco, or indeed, his own species.
noobcybot
21-12-2008, 05:55 PM
Life is not an equation Weasel. A balancing act maybe.
shenoma
21-12-2008, 09:55 PM
That is not a very good what-if, like the question: do you beat your wife. There is no way of knowing what a person will be. Instead of killing the unborn, it would take much more work to help raise the child to know what is right and wrong. It has the right to life and not to be judge for actions it has yet to even make. It could grow up and save the world, who knows, and that is my point. And maybe even the so-called evil acts it might do have a bigger purpose that we don't understand and shouldn't judge either, who knows.
But the other side would be to prevent a greater suffering, what would one do then?
Supposing you are given a button which would terminate the life of a child, that child is going to grow up to be a mass murderer. You either kill a child or do nothing and fail to prevent the deaths of more people.
That brings one into the realm of greater and lesser evil, the means justifying the end which is probably the mantra of many a dictator. I suppose Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot never saw themselves as bad people, just people who were doing what needed to be done for a "greater good."
In such I don't think that mankind is in any way able to cast judgment on the reptilian species, the Draco, or indeed, his own species.
faulconandsnowjob
21-12-2008, 11:13 PM
I feel sorry for those of you who can't accept that not everyone has evil in them. I can only imagine that it is your religious upbringing that has conditioned you to believe that.
rhydra
21-12-2008, 11:24 PM
I feel sorry for those of you who can't accept that not everyone has evil in them. I can only imagine that it is your religious upbringing that has conditioned you to believe that.
As I put before, no one thinks that they are being evil, everyone sees themselves as the good guys (gals), no one actually sees themselves as evil even when they do harm to others, there is always some justification.
malkor
21-12-2008, 11:40 PM
The use of the word "evil" to describe anything is a matter of perspective. The concept of a very advanced alien civilization killing humans may be seen as no different than humans wiping out an ant colony to pave a highway.
The construction crews will go about their business. Most humans won't care. Some insect-rights activists (are there any?) may get upset. From the perspective of the ants, the construction crews are evil, the activists are good and the rest being neutral fall in the 'evil' category by default.
Now, categorically speaking, the construction crews are not necessarily evil, but if they are here to wipe out my colony for whatever reason, I would consider them an enemy to be destroyed at any opportunity because they wouldn't hesitate to destroy me.