World Announces Official N.W.O./ Alex Jones Live!

[druggalo]

yo check out homie from prison planet right now on

coast to coast am with george noory!!

woot woot.... yea he waz jus saying newspaperz world wide announced today ..:eek::eek: a one world government and one world currencey is imminent.

david icke needz tah come back on c2c soon

[crowd control]

Link?

[druggalo]

the intervview iz over now i think he waz on unschedualed just talkk bout the shyt goin down today

http://www.coasttocoastam.com

[druggalo]

shyt is hittin the fan

[zanwaan]

I need more info.
Alex's website isn't working and I cant get coast to coast to play
(no coincidence I'm just thick with computers.)

can I get a news link or something?

[fnulnu]

I need more info.
Alex's website isn't working and I cant get coast to coast to play
(no coincidence I'm just thick with computers.)

can I get a news link or something?

Like this:

http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/5200/2/

Just google news New World Order...Lots of mainstream stuff added in the past few hours.

[fnulnu]

From the link above,as some people don't like clicking links/incase it disappears/archived here for reference etc

Kissinger: Accept new world order or face chaos

As the new US administration prepares to take office amid grave financial and international crises, it may seem counterintuitive to argue that the very unsettled nature of the international system generates a unique opportunity for creative diplomacy.

That opportunity involves a seeming contradiction. On one level, the financial collapse represents a major blow to the standing of the United States. While American political judgments have often proved controversial, the American prescription for a world financial order has generally been unchallenged. Now disillusionment with the United States' management of it is widespread.

At the same time, the magnitude of the debacle makes it impossible for the rest of the world to shelter any longer behind American predominance or American failings. Every country will have to reassess its own contribution to the prevailing crisis. Each will seek to make itself independent, to the greatest possible degree, of the conditions that produced the collapse; at the same time, each will be obliged to face the reality that its dilemmas can be mastered only by common action.

Even the most affluent countries will confront shrinking resources. Each will have to redefine its national priorities. An international order will emerge if a system of compatible priorities comes into being. It will fragment disastrously if the various priorities cannot be reconciled.

The nadir of the international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe. Never have so many transformations occurred at the same time in so many different parts of the world and been made accessible via instantaneous communication. The alternative to a new international order is chaos.

The financial and political crises are, in fact, closely related partly because, during the period of economic exuberance, a gap had opened up between the economic and the political organisation of the world. The economic world has been globalised. Its institutions have a global reach and have operated by maxims that assumed a self-regulating global market. The financial collapse exposed the mirage. It made evident the absence of global institutions to cushion the shock and to reverse the trend. Inevitably, when the affected publics turned to their political institutions, these were driven principally by domestic politics, not considerations of world order. Every major country has attempted to solve its immediate problems essentially on its own and to defer common action to a later, less crisis-driven point.

So-called rescue packages have emerged on a piecemeal national basis, generally by substituting seemingly unlimited governmental credit for the domestic credit that produced the debacle in the first place, so far without achieving more than stemming incipient panic. International order will not come about either in the political or economic field until there emerge general rules toward which countries can orient themselves.

In the end, the political and economic systems can be harmonised in only one of two ways: by creating an international political regulatory system with the same reach as that of the economic world; or by shrinking the economic units to a size manageable by existing political structures, which is likely to lead to a new mercantilism, perhaps of regional units. A new Bretton Woods kind of global agreement is by far the preferable outcome.

America's role in this enterprise will be decisive. Paradoxically, American influence will be great in proportion to the modesty in our conduct; we need to modify the righteousness that has characterised too many American attitudes, especially since the collapse of the Soviet Union. That event and the subsequent period of nearly uninterrupted global growth induced too many to equate world order with the acceptance of American designs, including our domestic preferences. The result was a certain inherent unilateralism – the standard complaint of European critics – or else an insistent kind of consultation by which nations were invited to prove their fitness to enter the international system by conforming to American prescriptions.

Not since the inauguration of president John F Kennedy half a century ago has a new administration come into office with such a reservoir of expectations. It is unprecedented that all the principal actors on the world stage are avowing their desire to undertake the transformations imposed on them by the world crisis in collaboration with the United States.

The extraordinary impact of the President-elect on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a new world order. But it defines an opportunity, not a policy. The ultimate challenge is to shape the common concern of most countries and all major ones regarding the economic crisis, together with a common fear of jihadist terrorism, into a strategy reinforced by the realisation that the new issues like proliferation, energy and climate change permit no national or regional solution.

The new administration could make no worse mistake than to rest on its initial popularity. The role of China in a new world order is crucial. A relationship that started on both sides as essentially a strategic design to constrain a common adversary has evolved over the decades into a pillar of the international system. China made possible the American consumption splurge by buying American debt; America helped the modernisation of the Chinese economy by opening its markets to Chinese goods.

Each side of the Pacific needs the cooperation of the other in addressing the consequences of the financial crisis. Now that the global financial collapse has devastated Chinese export markets, China is emphasising infrastructure development and domestic consumption. It will not be easy to shift gears rapidly, and the Chinese growth rate may fall temporarily below the 7.5 per cent that Chinese experts define as the line that challenges political stability.

What kind of global economic order arises will depend importantly on how China and America deal with each other over the next few years. A frustrated China may take another look at an exclusive regional Asian structure, for which the nucleus already exists in the ASEAN-plus-three concept. At the same time, if protectionism grows in America or if China comes to be seen as a long-term adversary, a self-fulfilling prophecy may blight the prospects of global order. Such a return to mercantilism and 19th-century diplomacy would divide the world into competing regional units with dangerous long-term consequences.

The Sino-American relationship needs to be taken to a new level. This generation of leaders has the opportunity to shape relations into a design for a common destiny, much as was done with trans-Atlantic relations in the postwar period – except that the challenges now are more political and economic than military.

The complexity of the emerging world requires from America a more historical approach than the insistence that every problem has a final solution expressible in programmes with specific time limits not infrequently geared to our political process. We must learn to operate within the attainable and be prepared to pursue ultimate ends by the accumulation of nuance. An international order can be permanent only if its participants have a share not only in building but also in securing it. In this manner, America and its potential partners have a unique opportunity to transform a moment of crisis into a vision of hope. //01.24.09 //The author was National Security Adviser, 1969-75 and US Secretary of State, 1973-77.

[zanwaan]

I love the information revolution. People take the time for me:D

thanks a bunch

[fnulnu]

Zionist praises:

Gaza & Obama's New World Order

Monday, January 19, 2009
Europe supports Israel against Hamas arms smuggling while urging an accelerated peace process with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
Key European leaders converged on Jerusalem in a strong show of support for Israel against Hamas arms smuggling into the Gaza Strip. But at the same time, they strongly urged Israel to use the outcome of the war in Gaza to jump-start the peace process with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on the West Bank. The IsraCast analysis is that the impressive show of European as well as American backing for Israel against radical Islam is a prelude to a new world order that will be headed by President Barack Obama.

Full article:
http://www.isracast.com/article.aspx?ID=1046&t=Gaza-and-Obama%27s-New-World-Order

[fnulnu]

I love the information revolution. People take the time for me:D

thanks a bunch

Pleasure and you're welcome.

[armchair philosopher]

I did a search for 'New World Order' on Google News after reading this thread. Guess what the first two stories are?

Kissinger: Accept new world order or face chaos - http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/5200/2/

Gaza & Obama's New World Order (from an Israeli news site claiming Europe is supporting Israel to stop Hamas smuggling weapons!!!)
http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&ct=uk/1-0&fp=497b82f120c62f7f&ei=VoV7SZyvKIOUwwGvn_CuCw&url=http%3A//www.isracast.com/article.aspx%3FID%3D1046%26t%3DGaza-and-Obama%2527s-New-World-Order&cid=1295143491&usg=AFQjCNHCSX5bL0tIgRFTT93oPn0a1wSOXg

Now I have always been a bit skeptical about this NWO idea, but these two stories are very suspicious, particularly the Kissinger one.

[the nine]

I did a search for 'New World Order' on Google News after reading this thread. Guess what the first two stories are?

Kissinger: Accept new world order or face chaos - http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/5200/2/

Gaza & Obama's New World Order (from an Israeli news site claiming Europe is supporting Israel to stop Hamas smuggling weapons!!!)
http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&ct=uk/1-0&fp=497b82f120c62f7f&ei=VoV7SZyvKIOUwwGvn_CuCw&url=http%3A//www.isracast.com/article.aspx%3FID%3D1046%26t%3DGaza-and-Obama%2527s-New-World-Order&cid=1295143491&usg=AFQjCNHCSX5bL0tIgRFTT93oPn0a1wSOXg

Now I have always been a bit skeptical about this NWO idea, but these two stories are very suspicious, particularly the Kissinger one.


in what way, armchair?

[free_at_last]

yo check out homie from prison planet right now on

coast to coast am with george noory!!

woot woot.... yea he waz jus saying newspaperz world wide announced today ..:eek::eek: a one world government and one world currencey is imminent.

david icke needz tah come back on c2c soon


You see that word imminent that is Illuminati for a done deal.

If you ever see hear or read that word, fear the worst.

[mynameis]

According to Henry Kissinger, the various political and economic crises currently conflicting the world offer President-elect Barack Obama an opportunity to create a "new world order." That's what the former Secretary of State told CNBC's Mark Haines in a January 5 interview from the busy floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

"What do you think the most important thing is for Barack Obama?" Haines asked. "... If you had to say, this is going to be the country, or the conflict, or the place that will define the Obama administration, what would it be?" Kissinger replied: "The President-elect is coming into office at a moment when there are upheavals in many part of the world simultaneously. You have India-Pakistan. You have, ah, a jihadist movement."

"But," continued Kissinger, "he can give new impetus to American foreign policy ... I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a 'new world order' can be created. It's a great opportunity. It isn't such a crisis."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3BqK-9ZiU

Haines did not ask Dr. Kissinger to explain what he meant by creating a new world order, nor did he or any of his colleagues in the major U.S. media report on the fact that Kissinger was present at the New York Stock Exchange that morning to celebrate a key milestone in the planned move toward the same new world order. To find out why the gravely voiced eminence gries of the American Establishment was visiting the Wall Street hub of world capitalism one had to turn, paradoxically, to the media mouthpieces of Communist China.

Beijing's Xinhua News Agency, for instance, reported that Kissinger was there as the honored guest of the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations for a ceremony marking the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and China. Dr. Kissinger, of course, was the key figure in that sea-change event, engaging in clandestine trips to Beijing for President Richard Nixon, as well as for his mentor, David Rockefeller, then president of the Chase Manhattan Bank as well as chairman of the powerful Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission. "[At that time] if anyone had told me that I would celebrate an event about the People's Republic of China on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, I would think that could be inconceivable," Kissinger told the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations event attendees. The Xinhua story reported:

According to the renowned strategist, the world has entered an era in which leaders must "keep an eye on the opportunities they have for cooperation." "They should realize that they for the first time in the history can deal with issues on global bases, and not just on their national bases, so this is a great opportunity for them," he explained.

For example, he said, the United States and China now have "a common opportunity because the international economic system has to be rebuilt," and "it can not be done unless the United States and China agree on the agenda of direction."

"There were so many political crises in the world, which require cooperation, and I believe this really can be a beginning of a new era of our relationship," he added.

The world also has many other problems that are "more subtle, more complicated and less direct," and they require U.S.-China cooperation in many ways, Kissinger noted.

"What is needed is a continued development by both leaderships of methods of cooperating and solving the world's problems," he stressed.

What Mr. Kissinger is describing here in somewhat veiled terms is something he and his confreres at the Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission refer to as the new-world-order process of "convergence": the gradual melding together of the various regions and political-economic systems of the world into a world government.

Kissinger puts more specific flesh on the new world order/convergence skeleton in a December 16, 2008 interview with PBS's Charlie Rose, explaining that "crises" such as global terrorism, global economic upheaval, and global environmental deterioration will require moving beyond the nation state and national sovereignty.

Explicit appeals by high-powered new-world-order advocates for world government are coming fast and furious. As we noted last month (here and here) a revealing piece by Gideon Rachman in the Financial Times of London seemed to be signaling that we can expect to see an avalanche of calls by globalist elites for world government to save us, as Kissinger puts it, from the terrifying "abyss" of economic and political turmoil that is supposedly insoluble under our current system of independent nation states.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bKwH3kJew4

See also "Kissinger, Putin, and the 'New World Order.'"

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/election/657-kissinger-urges-obama-to-build-a-qnew-world-orderq

[rich157]

Brown sees 'new world order' after crisis

12 mins ago

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090126/tuk-brown-sees-new-world-order-after-cri-a7ad41d.html

[fnulnu]

Brown sees 'new world order' after crisis

12 mins ago

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090126/tuk-brown-sees-new-world-order-after-cri-a7ad41d.html

lol,it would almost be funny if it wasn't so deadly - three days ago he "confessed" he didn't see the economic crisis coming,now suddenly he's Old Mother Shipton.

[rich157]

Govt smuggle data protection reform into bill

The government is being accused of smuggling a clause into today's coroners and justice bill which will effectively overwrite Britain's data protection laws.

Clause 152 of the bill, which has garnered little media attention due to the headline issues which surround it, grants any government minister the power to enforce the sharing of any information to anyone they please.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/14/20090126/tpl-govt-smuggle-data-protection-reform-81c5b50.html

[hokhmah]

'Global Global Global' Gordon Brown said: "The crisis has given the world a choice: We could allow this crisis to start a retreat from globalisation. As some want, we could close our markets - for capital, financial services, trade and for labour - and therefore reduce the risks of globalisation. But that would reduce global growth, deny us the benefits of global trade and confine millions to global poverty. Or we could view the threats and challenges we face today as the difficult birth-pangs of a new global order - and our task now as nothing less than making the transition through a new internationalism to the benefits of an expanding global society."

----

This sounds more like a threat to the masses!! i.e. you either accept THEIR twisted, corrupt New World Order... or be exiled from THEIR wicked system and fucking starve and die in abject poverty!!

[cleopatraxxx]

'Global Global Global' Gordon Brown said: "The crisis has given the world a choice: We could allow this crisis to start a retreat from globalisation. As some want, we could close our markets - for capital, financial services, trade and for labour - and therefore reduce the risks of globalisation. But that would reduce global growth, deny us the benefits of global trade and confine millions to global poverty. Or we could view the threats and challenges we face today as the difficult birth-pangs of a new global order - and our task now as nothing less than making the transition through a new internationalism to the benefits of an expanding global society."

----

This sounds more like a threat to the masses!! i.e. you either accept THEIR twisted, corrupt New World Order... or be exiled from THEIR wicked system and fucking starve and die in abject poverty!!

that is exactly what is going to happen: FASCISM- a system that rules where imposition is used or force and if you don't accept it, you become the enemy. these will be the first ones to go to the gulags, guatanamos and all sorts of prisons, and in prison MICROCHIPPING is imposed, just because you BROKE or DIDN't AGREE with THEIR ORDER. Not GOD's, BUT THEIR'S>
they haven't given you the life in this body , they therefor have no right to impose nothing on you.

but now, with a GLOBAL NWORDER, of course THEY RULE.

A.)
ah! by the way, did anyone run the paralleles with the "PEACE" (new world order) THAT ANTICHRIST BRINGs IN? saving the world from the collapsing economies by uniting and changing the system with a one only currency??? how long do you people think this "false PEACE" is going to last before he (the ANTICHRIST is exposed) is exposed and the SECOND COMING of the SOn of GOD happens?

or!
B.)
the approaching NIBIRU is a massive ALIEN ARRIVAL "as PEACE makers" to the Chaos installed by the non acceptance by humanity of the New World ORDER? then they arrive and the "ANTICHRIST DESCENDS", but then deception follows and the Second coming of the Son of God occurs?

which seems more close to present events?

[dedicate]

A. But, 3rd WW (which has not more than begun as now) then the false peace and The Anti-Christ world leader, Second Coming of the Son of God, Judgement, New Age. In that order.

[cleopatraxxx]

A. But, 3rd WW (which has not more than begun as now) then the false peace and The Anti-Christ world leader, Second Coming of the Son of God, Judgement, New Age. In that order.

thank you
i think that makes sense in the current worlds situation,..:(
other than that nothing makes sense
people have become senseless... they don't bother anymore.

cheers dedicate
take care
we are all in bad times
wish it could have been different
unfortunately for our children this is what we leave for them

[jonny78]

So it begins.

Tighten your seatbelts, folks. It's gonna be a bumpy ride from here on out. Lift up your pants legs too, 'cuz the bullshit is gonna be laid thick.

I never desired a career nor a meaningful relationship with anybody. Sure, all those years I felt worthless and lonely...but during that period I had lots of spare time to put the pieces together. Guess things have a way of working out when you just go along for the ride, huh?

Now I kind of pity those folks attached the illusions of career, relationships, and family.

They're not going to see this coming.

[cleopatraxxx]

So it begins.

Tighten your seatbelts, folks. It's gonna be a bumpy ride from here on out. Lift up your pants legs too, 'cuz the bullshit is gonna be laid thick.

I never desired a career nor a meaningful relationship with anybody. Sure, all those years I felt worthless and lonely...but during that period I had lots of spare time to put the pieces together. Guess things have a way of working out when you just go along for the ride, huh?

Now I kind of pity those folks attached the illusions of career, relationships, and family.

They're not going to see this coming.

you ar so lucky not to have attachments of family like kids, i presume that from your statement.
yes, in these times nothing better than be alone and if anything happens and you need to die, you can without fear of leaving small ones behind.

[armchair philosopher]

in what way, armchair?

Well don't get me wrong, I have believed for some time that there are bad people who want to control things - but I've always had a hard time believing it is as organised as the 'NWO'. I can't quite see how these people would get it together without conflicting interests getting in the way.

I always figured there are a few select senior figures in various influential areas (finance, politics, military, business) who exert a lot of influence over the Government, but not for a common cause. I'd say it's more likely that they are all in it for themselves.

To me the NWO seems a bit too much like tarring these people with the same brush - much in the same way as America invented 'Al Qaeda' to group together the various crazy Muslim sects around the world.

However, the articles I found have made me reconsider that view a little more.