Australia NWO Articles Thread

[bluestar]

Perhaps it is wise to post a thread showing news articles, posts and links of what the Government/NWO are doing in Australia to help us get a true assessment of their moves and strategies.

This is for australians on the forum to help share information with their friends.

[bluestar]

Will compile some that have been shared on the forum...

Police plan Hummer patrol for violent city centre
Dan Oakes and Cameron Houston
September 9, 2008
Page 1 of 2 | Single Page View

Matthew McEvoy, 24, died after an attack in the city at the weekend.
HUMMER four-wheel-drives will patrol Melbourne's entertainment areas after a major police operation last weekend dubbed "reclaim the streets" failed to quell a spate of vicious brawls, including the fatal bashing of a nightclub patron.

- Hummers to patrol entertainment precincts
- One dead in wave of violence
- Radio operator reports 'mayhem' on streets

Matthew McEvoy, 24, of Cranbourne, died in hospital after being punched and kicked in the head by two men in the smoking area of QBH nightclub at Southbank early on Sunday morning.

The weekend taskforce, which included an additional 70 officers, was unable to cope with a wave of violence, while the ambulance service struggled to respond to several sickening injuries.

A fight involving more than 40 young men outside Festival Hall left several in hospital, while 20 men fought with baseball bats and golf clubs in Swanston Street. A man from Kealba had his jugular severed when he was slashed with a glass at The Loft nightclub in Lonsdale Street.

At about 4am on Sunday morning, a D24 emergency radio operator said it was "mayhem" on Melbourne's streets.

Assistant Commissioner Gary Jamieson announced yesterday that police would soon take delivery of five Hummers on loan, which would be used to raise the police profile around the CBD.

He said police were considering a "drunk tank", possibly at the City Square, where people could be looked after until they were capable of going home.

Mr Jamieson urged the public to support efforts to tackle the problem, including the State Government's trial 2am lockout, and said the problem could get worse over summer.

The Association of Liquor Licensees Melbourne vice-president, Andrew Sumpter, scoffed at the Hummer plan, calling it a "ridiculous stunt".

"Instead of wasting money on Hummers, the Government should be putting 100 extra police officers on our streets. It's time we sent a clear message to inebriated and aggressive people that they will be locked up and they will be fined, if they step out of line," Mr Sumpter said. Continued...


http://www.theage.com.au/national/police-plan-hummer-patrol-for-violent-city-centre-20080908-4c9w.html

[bluestar]

Western Australia have been told that GM crops are to be introduced. The minister of agriculture informed the public at a pubic protest a couple of weeks ago...

[bluestar]

A related GM article

Parties at odds on GM farming
Article -the Australian
WESTERN Australia's political parties have clashed on the contentious issue of genetically modified crops, with Labor promising to continue the state's ban if it wins the September 6 election, while the Liberals vow to go the other way.
Earlier this year, Victoria and NSW joined Queensland in lifting bans on GM canola, but Western Australia and South Australia pledged to remain GM-free.
Premier Alan Carpenter yesterday said he would not accept any move to grow commercial GM crops in WA while there was any doubt about its safety.
"I don't believe you should take any risk with food," he said. "Why put people's health potentially at risk?"
But the Liberals said the ban was denying farmers access to new technologies used internationally. Campaigning in the rural electorate of Moore, north of Perth, Liberal leader Colin Barnett promised to fast-track the planting of GM cotton in the Kimberley's massive Ord river agricultural project and also to trial GM canola if the Liberals won government.
Mr Barnett said he would proceed cautiously, but the present system risked making farmers less competitive.
"It's a big issue for farmers, even a debating point, but GM is now used widely internationally," he said.
"If we don't allow it, we will deny farmers the opportunity to keep up with international trends."
Opposition agriculture spokesman Gary Snook said food security was emerging as one of the most important world issues, and northern agricultural regions had the potential to play a vital role
in providing high-quality food and commodities to meet local and international demand if the issue were properly handled by government.
A nationwide ban on the commercial release of GM canola expired in April.
In June, scientist Gustav Nossal called for a new research effort into GM crops. Professor Nossal said GM organisms had a big role to play in Third World health because better crops could ease protein malnutrition.
He admitted it could take 20 years to change public opinion about GM crops.
Mr Carpenter said Western Australia should not give up the "tremendous advantage" it had in maintaining its GM-free status.
"Europeans don't want GM foods," he said. "We have got a prime position.
"When the Canadians went GM, they lost the European markets and they lost the premium into Japan. We don't need to do that.
"We can maintain GM-free status and gain the advantages that flow from it.
"If it ends up being just Western Australia, good."


link... http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24203775-5013404,00.html

[soglad]

Let's not forget...Fluoride is being introduced in December 08 around Queensland. No votes, nothing. Just is, deal with it! :mad:

http://www.health.qld.gov.au/fluoride/

[bluestar]

Bottled water set to get some teeth
By Evonne Barry
Sunday Herald Sun
March 23, 2008 02:00am
TOOTH-protecting fluoride could be added to Australian bottled water within 12 months.
The national food regulator will consider overturning a ban on mineral additives after this week releasing an "assessment report" on the controversial proposal.
The Australian Beverages Council has asked Food Standards Australia for permission to add fluoride to bottled water and water coolers.
If allowed, manufacturers could offer consumers a choice between fluoridated and non-fluoridated water.
Fluoride has been added to Melbourne's tap water for more than 30 years, which the Australian Dental Association credits with a steady decrease in tooth decay.
However, the popularity of bottled water - Australians spent more than $627 million drinking it last year - has since been blamed for a reversal of this trend.
Tony Gentile, executive director of the Australian Bottled Water Institute, said it was about offering alternatives.
"There is a huge area of regional Australia that doesn't have access to fluoridated water, and we want to give people the option.
"For every (manufacturer) who advertises the fact their water has fluoride, I'm sure there will be another advertising that their bottles don't," he said.
Anti-fluoridation groups have thrown their support behind the plan, claiming it could stop campaigns to fluoridate tap water.

Philip Robertson from Water Quality Australia, which protests against tap fluoridation, supports the proposal.
"We have got no problem at all with fluoridated bottled water because it allows people an option," he said.
Public submissions on the bottled water proposal are open until April 30.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23416046-421,00.html

[boots]

Who owns it?

The Rothchilds


http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=ukZhV0UMq0w

I have heard that this place will be the HQ of the NWO when the shit hits the fan.

[boots]

This vid is tops a must watch IMO.


http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=iwcXPjkaHVA


Theses guys are smart and tell it like it is.

[bluestar]

Thanks Boots for helping getting the thread moving...
will watch in tonight

[ownoiz]

Heres Karlene Maywald on WIN Riverland news this week with a masonic symbol around her neck. Apologies for the quality (bad TV reception) but if you look closely you can see its one of these masonic compass and square deals

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/1641/masonicvk4.jpg

Karlene Maywald, Australian politician, is the current South Australian Minister for the River Murray and Minister for Water Security. She also represents the electoral district of Chaffey in the South Australian House of Assembly. As Maywald is the only MP in her party, she is also the state parliamentary leader of The Nationals SA.

http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/9424/km2ka7.jpg


Its quite clear when you see the actual TV footage, and i have seen her wearing it before, trust me its not a photoshop. I wonder if she just picked that necklace out at the jewelry store because she liked the look of it :rolleyes:

Read my post about the Murray Darling Basin (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=613023#post613023) and how Australias food and water is being taken over by the NWO.

...

[dane]

or mabye some cunt tv exec got her to wear it just to let us kno who runs shit
like the usual symbol flaunting these pricks do in movies tv brands adds etc.

[ownoiz]

or mabye some cunt tv exec got her to wear it just to let us kno who runs shit
like the usual symbol flaunting these pricks do in movies tv brands adds etc.

A politician in her position is higher ranking than a TV exec. She knows exactly what she is wearing, i have seen her wearing this before and not just on TV. Todays politicians are puppets for the agenda, they are fully aware of what they are doing. Someone who is not aware of how things have to work cant be a high level politician these days, or they end up like Pauline Hanson (in jail) or worse, the Kennedys. Even in little old Australia.

Looks like she knows Charlie very well also :eek:

They know only a minority will see what they are doing, so they rub it in our faces. She could go on TV in Australia with a NWO baseball cap and most people wouldnt understand.

Another SA minister was wearing an FBI shirt the day they won the election, and the photo of him with the Premier was plasted in Adelaides main newspaper. A F**king FBI shirt the day you win an election!!?! They all know 100% what they are doing.

[ownoiz]

ANTI-BIKIE LAWS. Eliminate those who know you exist. ;)

ANYONE who makes contact with a bikie or a bikie gang at least six times a year will face five years in jail. This can include personal meetings, emails, text messages, faxes or phone calls.

Who defines what a bikie or outlaw organisation is ;) Will there be less drugs and crime, i doubt in. Just a monopoly or shift towards monopoly. Do bikies/gangs kill or maime anywhere near as many people as our governments illegally invading countries on false pretences?

Read more:

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23184257-5006301,00.html




ANTI-HOON LAWS. Vehicle confiscations nationwide.

"It makes sense to have the hoon not only have the inconvenience of losing the use of his car but also have it sitting their in his own driveway, letting neighbours know just what sort of idiotic behaviour the owner has been getting up to," Mr Atkinson said.

FYI (4 non aussies) hoon = street racer. Im not going to condone street racing or speeding (take it to a track if you must) but "excessive engine noise" and "sustained wheelspin" or "stereo too loud" puts too much power in the interpretation of your actions by a police officer. Stereo too loud or take a car to redline legally and within the speed limit and they can take it off your hands.

There is a plus to this though many of Australias best selling cars used to be performance Ford & Holden models purchased by these so called hoons. Who will buy the "hoon" car now and be ridiculed with wheel clamps/confiscations/small penis propaganda ads if they accidentaly turn a tyre and officer dick happens to see you .

Well, er no one it seems anymore, GM holden in financial trouble with poor sales and work stoppage. Ford Victoria same. Cant have your cake and eat it too Napoleon ( AKA Mike Rann ) and Brumby. One down (mitsubishi australia) , two to go. I feel for the emloyees who will ultimately lose they jobs, i hope they find a higher purpose than building gas guzzling overpowered overweight overpriced tariff protected POS , they wouldnt be in this position if our Government was not heavily supporting an unsustainable local industry for decades which exists only because of ridiculously high import tariffs on competitive vehicles, paid for with taxpayers money, another taxpayer funded rort with reasons ;) which i wont go into here.

Read more:

http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/ArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=47624&vf=1




PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT. War on Drugs. We on this forum all know what that means. The FBI shirts sure doing its job now.

Attorney-General Michael Atkinson said that under proposed laws to be introduced early next year, the Government would be able to "declare" a person a drug trafficker. "Once declared traffickers, they can have their assets seized," he said.

So will there be less coke and E :) at the elite parties, TV and film awards, greenrooms, clubs etc YEAH RIGHT , just less players in the game of Monopoly.

Read more:

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,24623846-2682,00.html




$500,000 A YEAR SNIFFER DOGS UNLEASHED. 2 Dogs named Molly and Hooch :rolleyes: (im serious, thats their names) are called into action but wheres the 3rd one they call J (again im serious there is a 3rd dog called J)

Two highly-trained labradors searched motorists and their cars. Police also took swabs from inside cars to test for traces of illegal substances. Police discovered several illegal items, including 50g of cannabis, a small bag of amphetamine and two bongs. Other motorists were issued traffic expiation notices for offences such as driving unregistered cars.

So the cops line the side of a major highway with all those men and their bikes and Landcruisers, wave in every car they see, let molly and hooch have a sniff incase they detect some molly and hooch, and take swabs. Theres our taxpayer money at work right there. But its not all a waste, because, wait for it, THEY FOUND 2 BONGS!..... BRAVO!!!

Read more:

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,24682995-2682,00.html

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23317929-2682,00.html




RACK ’EM, PACK ’EM, STACK ’EM. Three prisoners jammed day and night in a cell designed for one is not pushing prisons to bursting point.
That’s the view of a trio of ministers, Treasurer Kevin Foley, Attorney-General Michael Atkinson, and jails minister Carmel Zollo.

An Independent Weekly investigation showed last Friday that SA has the worst prison system in the country, a dismally failing rehabilitation program, the nation’s longest jail terms and the worst overcrowding in the country.

Nothing more to add on this one the article says it all..

Read more:

http://www.independentweekly.com.au/news/local/news/political/rack-em-pack-em-stack-em-jail-comments-outrage/767466.aspx




And dont forget the big ones




THE PORT ARTHUR MASSACRE How to disarm a nation using a green beret and a retarded patsy 101.

http://home.overflow.net.au/~nedwood/portarthur.html




COMPULSORY SUPERANNUATION John Howard made us give our money to the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. And they spent it all, much to fund wars. And you aint getting much of it back.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superannuation_in_Australia




PAULINE HANSON JAILED Did this non-illuminati person seriously think she could run for office. WHAT A FREAK :D This was the best example of bipartesan politics i have seen, Kim B and Johnny H working together to find a reason to (illegaly, even by their legal system) lock her up.

http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/feature_stories/article_1446.asp?s=1


...

[bluestar]

thanks ownioz for the posts...

[ownoiz]

BANK DEPOSIT GUARANTEE. Making sure we keep our money in their banks so they have access to the funds.

THE Government will guarantee the $600-$700 billion deposits in Australian financial institutions in a move to shore up local confidence

The financial crisis has scared many people off from leaving their cash in the bank, they are stashing it elsewhere or converting it to other assets. THIS IS NOT WHAT THE BANKS WANT, THEY ARE NOT HAPPY. If you do your research on who the major shareholders of the Australian banks are, you will trace back either directly, or via companies behind companies, to the likes of JP Morgan Chase/Rothschilds/Rockefellers etc. THEY WANT ACCESS TO OUR CASH, SO THEY CAME UP WITH THIS GUARANTEE TO OFFER US 'SECURITY' in hopes they can continue to entice us to pay for our own enslavement.

Both sides of politics argue that IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE A STRONG BANKING SECTOR for the good of the economy, so we should all help the banks by putting our money in and agreeing to the government supporting them in other ways. THE BANKS ARE CRYING POOR, if you look at their profits, WHO REALLY OWNS THEM AND WHAT THEY ARE WORTH :eek: , AND HOW MUCH THEY PAY EXECUTIVES this is BS. And the 'value for our shareholders' crap doesnt cut it anymore since the shareholders have seen their holdings plummet in value, we give them our money and what do we get in return?? WE ARE HIT WITH RIDICULOUS BANKING FEES EVERYDAY AND SHARE PRICES THAT HAVE ESSENTIALLY MADE US NO PROFIT, at todays share prices investors may as well have stuffed their cash into they mattress the last few years.

Read more:

http://business.theage.com.au/business/rudds-700-billion-bank-guarantee-20081012-4z5r.html?page=1


...

[bluestar]

Armed Police On Melbourne Trains/Trams

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John Ferguson
December 02, 2008 12:00am

EXCLUSIVE: ARMED police will flood Melbourne's trains and trams in a public safety blitz.
At least $30 million will be spent on extra uniformed and undercover police after complaints that too many stations are unmanned and not enough is done to deal with high crime rates.
Police will decide where the 50 extra officers will go but troubled lines such as Hurstbridge, Frankston, Pakenham and Lilydale are certain to be included.
The extra transit police will be armed with guns and capsicum spray.
The Herald Sun believes the crackdown will be part of the Victorian transport plan, to be unveiled this month, and has solid backing from Premier John Brumby.
The Premier travelled on the train system to experience first-hand the challenges facing commuters.
The extra numbers will swell transit police ranks to 250.
There will also be a dramatic increase in the use of closed-circuit TV and improved lighting, as well as longer staffing of stations. By the middle of next year, all CCTV cameras will be upgraded to digital and dozens of stations will be staffed from first train to last.
Police are expected to use the improved CCTV on Friday and Saturday nights, when revellers flood the city and alcohol-related offences soar.
But the crimes are not linked just to violence.
The Herald Sun revealed recently that transit crime was double that in NSW – 9559 incidents to 4766.
Public Transport Minister Lynne Kosky has signed off on the increased numbers as part of the multi-billion dollar transport package.
The transport plan will be one of dozens detailed by the Government with up to $20 billion worth of projects likely to be unveiled.
Key projects being considered include an east-west tunnel from Hoddle St, linking the Eastern Freeway with CityLink.
__________________

[ownoiz]

This was originally posted on http://peoplesmandate.essentialsecurity.com.au/Great_Australian_Water_Con.html

Farmers (and others,) please read and study this article closely, and save it.
I will be as brief and concise as possible.

Australians are at this very moment being subjected to the greatest con in the history of this country!
Greater even than the infamous Port Arthur con, where they took our guns away from us.

I am speaking about the Great Australian Water-Con, where the evil, neo-conservative
Federal Government is in the process as I write, of undertaking a devious and deceitful plan take our
water away from us.
That’s right, our water! Moreover, the socialist State Governments are (surprise, surprise!) going
along with this plan, whilst pretending, in some cases, to oppose it!

Now in order to grasp and understand just exactly when and how this Great Australian Water-Con
has been, and is being structured, and how it has been, and is being engineered, it is necessary to go
back a couple of decades or so, back into the 1970’s.
(Remember, these neo-con Illuminati globalists think and plan very long-term.
A decade is nothing to them.
This is the technique of the Fabians,
that of (as former prime minister and Fabian Bob Hawke gloating referred to it)
“the inevitability of gradualism.”

Let us then go back then, to the 1970’s, and pick up and put the pieces together, so that we get a very
clear picture of what has gone on, and what is still going on as we write, and how we in Australia are
being set up, and used as a testing ground, or “laboratory” for the globalisation programme of the
neo-cons of the New World Order.

Now this testing ground, or laboratory, consists of many facets, not just water.
It includes complete takeover of all primary production, as well as secondary industries.
We will concentrate only on water. If they can control water, they can control almost all of the people,
and primary industry.

Many people may not be aware that as far back as December 1977, over 60 countries
(including the USA) in an international meeting, signed off on an agreement, forbidding the use of
weather modification as weapons of war!
(Interestingly, nothing was mentioned about other uses, such as drought, to force a takeover of all
water in such countries, as Australia, and others!)
Moreover, the USA managed to get their *HAARP* programme out of the agreement and make
it exempt (more later.).

Now, why would these countries even bother to bring such a subject up, much less draw up an
agreement, and sign off on it, if such technology was not already a reality?
Moreover, the elite in each country was aware that it existed.
Otherwise no-one would have even spoke about it, let alone draw up an
agreement and signing off on it!

This technology is already up and running, and has been for some 40 years!
It just hasn't been made public!

One of the more known of these centres of technology is that of the *HAARP* programme,
based at Gakona, in Alaska. The *HAARP* unit, along with several other smaller ones, one in Russia,
several in Europe, and one in Scandinavia, have been operating for over 35 years.

Although the HAARP transmitter has many uses, weather and climate control is a very important one
and Australia is doubtless being used as a testing ground for such climate and weather control, and has
been for some ten years or more. Hence the drought over much of Australia.
The really strong weather effects in the tropics, such as cyclones, etc., are strong enough to overcome
any effect of *HAARP* but the effect can be, and is being felt, in many other, particularly drier parts of
the country, where the weather is much more delicate, and only a relatively small change in the upper
atmosphere will have a significant effect on the climate, and the weather, causing severe drought.

The secretive globalist elite here in Australia are all aware of this and are, deviously and deceitfully
using it to their advantage, in order to take over our water supply, as part of the programme for the
New World Order, as you will see. You will remember that only some months ago,
John Winston Howard got off the plane from the USA, and announced on television that the
Snowy River scheme would be privatised. When some expressed concern, he emphasised,
it's a done deal!.

It was only when a group of us managed to activate opposition all over Australia to such a scheme,
that he - again deviously - backed off, and has gone quiet on the subject - for now.
Make no mistake, the subject will be brought up again in a few years.
(Slowlee, slowlee, catchee monkee!)

Now you will realise why people like John Winston Howard, et al, keep repeating phrases like
Climate change is here to stay, to frighten us into signing off on transferring water control to the
federal government, who in turn will transfer ownership and of course, with it, control, to privatisation
read corporatisation, that means, they will later hand it over to international banks and corporations,
all as part and parcel of their plans of the New World Order. John Winston Howard is of course,
a self-confessed globalist, and is up to his ears in this plan.
This climate and weather change is deliberate, and man-made.

Enter Malcolm Turnbull. A Sydney Rhodes scholar, lawyer, multi-millionaire, arch-republican, and
utterly ruthless merchant banker for for the international Jewish bankers Goldman Sachs in Australia,
Malcolm Turnbull, much to the chagrin a large number of of his fellow liberals of long standing in his
federal electorate in Sydney, in c1993-4, stacked his electorate with hundreds of new members,
won the plebiscite, removed the sitting liberal member, and won the seat for the liberal party at the last
federal election scam.

Now why would a multi-millionaire, with a position as manager for an international bank in Australia,
plus his own merchant bank, give up his position, to take up a position as an insignificant, novice,
back-bencher in Canberra? Out of the goodness of his heart perhaps?
Those who know Malcolm Turnbull know very well that that is not the case.

He no sooner took up his seat in Canberra, than Howard made him secretary for water, then more
recently catapulted him to the position of Minister for the Environment, including of course, water.
This was, and is, of course, all part of the Howard, Turnbull, globalist neo-con New World Order plan.

The scene is now set. Malcolm Turnbull, as part of the conspiracy - for that is what it is - dons his
akubra (probably the first time he has worn one in his life), goes out into the country with the
TV cameras, and gets his photo taken alongside an irrigation channel, and tells us that the
federal government must take over the Murray-Darling system.
This is a prelude to taking over all of the water throughout Australia.

[cheeney1]

The Whole country is one big Facist Hubla, the Attitude Astounds me for what i have seen so far,:rolleyes:

People here need to get with the programme and loose this she'll be right Mate Attitude FFS :mad:

Otherwise People, Your Dog Tucker :eek:

[vera susa]

The Whole country is one big Facist Hubla, the Attitude Astounds me for what i have seen so far,:rolleyes:

People here need to get with the programme and loose this she'll be right Mate Attitude FFS :mad:

Otherwise People, Your Dog Tucker :eek:

Sorry 'mate' but that's the post of a 'dick head'...

WE KNOW WE RUN THE SHOW and that it's
THE REST of THE WORLD that's DOG MEAT!

So, how are the NORTH EUROPEANS going to
SURVIVE the FIRST WINTER when RUSSIAN
GAS/OIL Pipes aren't MAINTAINED...let alone
BLOWN UP?


Oh sorry, just realized this thread is supposed to be
a "COUNTER" to the ONE THREAD FULL
of COMMON SENSE, TRUTH, about what
IS REALLY GOING ON IN THE WHOLE WORLD.

here's a randon page to start from;
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11956&page=1008

[ownoiz]

I hope this hasn't already been posted, i couldn;t find anything on it on here.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24568137-2862,00.html

Kevin Rudd plans to introduce mandatory internet censorship. Hows this, in the name of RETAINING freedom of speech? They are planning this sneaky attack under the guise of 'child porn' and believe me once it has begun it only gets worse. The next thing you know sites such as this will be blocked out because they 'promote terrorism' or some other poor excuse. This is very bad move, australians and others i encourage you to SPEAK OUT against this tyranny. :mad:


http://www.nocleanfeed.com/

http://www.efa.org.au/

.

[accuracy]

NWO God-Free Schools
Coming To Oz


Exclusive to Rense.com
12-13-8

For those who refuse to acknowledge reality. The New World Order is real and Australia is a the leading edge.

Australian schools are about to introduce 'humanist classes' to deny any God or supernatural deities. These classes are to indoctrinate Australian children into the New World Order.

The NWO wants our kids. First it's their minds. Later, they'll then come for them bodily for Soylent green and the human meat grinder of war which is the NWO.

The propaganda course will teach 'World Citizenship.' No doubt they will be taught their own death is good as it will serve the 'greater good' by extinguishing their carbon footprint. The Australian Broadcasting Commission TV website already has an online interactive children's game along this line.

The shame is the sheeple parents do not know about the NWO...or don't want to know. Instead, they are engrossed in sports, TV, celebrity, recreational shopping and misdirection.

These irresponsible parents will hand over their children. They will way as their precious babies put their little hands into the sweaty palm of these NWO killers who will turn and smile with a dark grin as they walk of with innocent children.

The NWO is clearly breaking the surface now. No more in the shadows. They're coming in for the kill...and specialist dissident local killings, which will accompany the mass world depopulation extermination, won't even rate a mention.


Religion In Schools To Go God-Free

http://www.theage.com.au/national/religion-in-
schools-to-go-godfree-20081213-6xxs.html?page=-1

"Humanist Society education director Harry Gardner said he had designed a course to be taught from prep to year 6 called Applied Ethical Education - Humanism for Schools. It covers subjects such as the art of living, the environment, philosophy, science and world citizenship. The curriculum is likely to be submitted for approval next year."

http://www.rense.com/general84/godfree.htm

[ownoiz]

For those who refuse to acknowledge reality. The New World Order is real and Australia is a the leading edge.

Yep they're here, thats why AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT HOUSE IS SHAPED LIKE A MASONIC LODGE, and HAS A PYRAMID ON THE TOP .

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/6042/australianparliamenthousb4.jpg

And when the suns just in the right spot you get a perty all-seeing eye pyramid effect holding that Union Jack and stars thingy up.

[wisdomgirl]

Here is an interesting point of view from what the austrailians feel about their part in the world. And also a few links on other matters.


Security and Australia's involvement in the world

Gary Dean, May 1999
Reference: http://okusi.net/garydean/works/ozsecurity.html

Australians have always felt uncertain about their place in the world. As a transplanted, predominantly European, society situated within Asia, Australians have always felt a sense of threat from the north. Profound differences with the nations of East Asia exist in nearly every respect: race, history, culture, social structure and population density. Within this region, Australia is truly an oddity. It should be no surprise, therefore, that security issues have always dominated Australian foreign policy. Separated by vast distances from other rich, English-speaking, and predominantly white, nations such as Britain, the US, and Canada, Australians feel an acute sense of isolation in this region, like a 'continent adrift'[1], or a mere 'province of the English-speaking world'.[2]

An Australia highly threatened and highly desired, militarily defenceless and driven into alliances with 'great and powerful' friends, has been the underpinning of Australian foreign policy from the 19th century to the 1970's.[3] However it has been suggested that this attitude is more one of perception that reality, as apart from the Japanese challenge which grazed several small towns on the north coast of the country more than 50 years ago, Australia has never experienced military attack.[4] Leaver (1997) postulates that Australian security is not so much threatened from any specific enemy, but rather from the possibility that known and understood arrangements with existing allies would break down.[5]

It is indeed security issues that have determined Australia's active role in the UN, within East Asia, and with the United States; however, for more than a decade it has been security defined broadly, and not military security issues alone.

What is security?

Within the Australian context 'security' has meant the territorial integrity of the Australian landmass from military threat from the north, and the maintenance of stability in neighbour states.

In realist discussions of international relations 'security' and 'military security' are regarded as almost synonymous.[6] However concepts of security, especially since the end of the Cold War, have now broadened to encompass a much broader agenda, to include among other things, issues such as the environment, economic and cultural globalisation, and human rights.[7] These non-military issues demand a multilateral approach utilising international organisations, such as the UN, WTO, the World Bank and IMF, Amnesty International, just to name a few, and international agreements, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Framework Convention for Climate Change. The realist approach, with its emphasis on alliances and military power, does not provide a complete perspective for the needs of the 21st century[8] and new perspectives must take into account a much broader range of issues that affect international security, and not simply geopolitical strategic issues by themselves.

Narrow focus on 'national security' can tend to obscure other dimensions of foreign policy. Horner (1997) contends that focus on non-military issues such as disarmament, trade, environment, immigration, and reform of the UN have done more to enhance Australia's security than specific defence policies.[9] If, as former Foreign Minister Gareth Evans contended in December 1989, the first duty of the Australian government is the 'protection of our physical integrity ... from armed attack', then the way to achieve this is not merely though military strategy alone, but by addressing the issues which lead to conflict.[10] Evan's went on to cite the main priorities for Australian foreign policy which consisted of: pursing trade, investment and economic co-operation; contributing to global security and to the cause of 'good international citizenship'; and, maintaining a positive security and strategic environment.[11]

Australia and the American Alliance

For all the changes that have occurred within Australia and the world for the past half-century since the signing of the ANZUS treaty in 1951, the American military alliance and the Western strategic community remain the 'essential pillars' of Australian foreign policy.[12] Any changes that have occurred within the expression of Australian foreign policy over the years since 1951 have essentially been at the margins; the central tenant has remained unchallenged to this day.

When New Zealand effectively took itself out of ANZUS in 1984 the alliance was deprived of some crucial consonants, thus nowadays the term 'alliance' or 'American alliance'' is used rather than 'ANZUS alliance'. In fact the American alliance relationship consists of more than just the ANZUS treaty; it is a long-standing wider pattern of military co-operation of which only some elements have been formalised in treaties and agreements.[13]

The overall Australia-US relationship has never been completely smooth. Trade disputes in particular have frequently intervened to threaten the relationship. Despite this no Australian government has (openly at least) used the security relationship as a 'bargaining chip' to gain leverage in these disputes. This perhaps demonstrates the high level of importance Australian governments give to this relationship despite these occasionally bitter disagreements about US trade policy and its impact on the Australian economy.

What has changed in the relationship since the formal alliance was entered into more than 50 years ago has been Australia's posture in relation to its own defence. Up until the mid-70's the concept of 'forward defence' dominated the defence outlook of Australian policy makers. Taking the view that Australia, with its low population density and long coasts, was basically 'indefensible', forward defence meant the deployment of forces across the approaches to Australia in order prevent an enemy ever reaching Australia.[14] In 1955 PM Menzies declared that Australia should be defended 'as far from our own shores as possible'.[15] This concept was compatible with the pre-existing Australian concept of achieving security through alliances. All forward deployment of Australian forces have been done within the context of an alliance with either the US or Britain.

Forward defence within the American alliance has meant that Australia has frequently had to involve itself in disputes far from our shores in order to support US political objectives, Korea and Vietnam being examples. This involvement and support has been given with the open purpose of paying an 'insurance premium' to the US to guarantee military support should Australia ever face threat. This has meant that the structure of Australian defence forces, their hardware and protocols, need to be compatible with that of the senior ally, in order to maximise interoperability. Defence and foreign policy too, needed to be subordinated to a great degree. On the positive side the policy of forward defence was relatively cheap in that Australia did not have to maintain large armed forces.[16]

The enunciation of the Guam Doctrine by President Nixon in 1969, and the outcome of the Vietnam War in 1975, forced a rethink concerning the policy of forward defence.[17] In November 1976 a new approach to Australia's defence was articulated in a government White Paper, which argued that Australia should be more self-reliant and focus more attention on the regions adjacent to Australia.[18] 'Self-reliance' did not, however, mean any significant diminution of Australia's commitment to the American alliance, but rather that Australia's independent capacity would be enhanced by US support.[19] It was, however, another 10 years before this policy of self-reliance clarified. The Dibb report of 1986 more clearly expressed this self-reliance in the form of a policy of 'denial', and of 'layered defence', concluding that it was indeed possible for Australia to defend itself using its own resources.[20] According to Dibb, the most important task was to ensure that an enemy would have difficulty crossing the air-sea gap to the north of Australia, and this would involve four layers of defence; intelligence and surveillance, longer range maritime forces, defensive capabilities close to Australian shores, and most significantly, ground forces capable of denying the enemy Australia's population centres and military installations.[21]

The need to secure the air-sea gap led to increased emphasis on defence co-operation programs with the countries of Southeast Asia.[22] Australia's defence policy is not inward looking but rather seeks to be part of a regional security framework. However, despite all this concentration on self-reliance and regional co-operation, the American alliance remains central to Australian defence policy.

Australia and East Asia

Australia's burgeoning relationship with East Asia over the past few decades in particular has had a strong national security subtext. Australia now tends to seek security as part of the region; security within Asia, rather than from Asia.

From its very beginning ASEAN was seen by Australian governments as a possible vehicle for security co-operation.[23] ASEAN governments were initially resistant to this idea, and it was not until 1993 that a formal security dialogue became part of the ASEAN Post-ministerial Conference, becoming known as the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF).[24]

Besides being tied into multilateral arrangements such as the ARF and the Five-Power Defence Arrangement, bilateral security relationships with the countries of Southeast Asia have also strengthened considerably over the past few years. Australia's relationship with the Singaporean defence forces is 'unusually close'[25] with Australia providing access to air training facilities at the RAAF base at Pearce, WA and at Oakley in Queensland. In August 1995 the Philippines and Australia established a Joint Defence Co-operation Committee, making provision, among other things, for joint training and exercises, and personnel exchange.[26]

Probably the most significant security arrangement entered into by Australia for the past few decades was signed with Indonesia in December 1995. The Agreement on Maintaining Security requires regular consultation at ministerial level, with each party undertaking to consult with each other in the event of security problems affecting the parties. Indonesia has a closer defence relationship with Australia than any other country, including the US and ASEAN members.[27]

Australia and the UN

Whilst it is the American alliance, defence self-reliance, and regional security agreements that form the backbone of Australian defence strategy, it is within the UN and other international organisations that Australia attempts to address much broader issues aimed at improving global security, both military and non-military.

As a middle power Australia has always been an enthusiastic supporter of the UN system and of the multilateralist approach to solving international problems. The Cold War, however, placed limitations on Australian multilateralism, and it was not really until the mid-80's that Australia started to emphasise multilateralism in its foreign policy approach, in particular in relation to world security and trade issues.

Through the UN and other multilateral organisations Australia seeks to address security issues outside the scope of its territorial defence policy. Disarmament in particular has been a focus of Australian attention, such as the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the extension of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the Chemical Weapons Convention.[28]

Australia has continued to make significant contributions both diplomatically and militarily to UN peacekeeping efforts. Of note, Australia played a leading role in the UN Transitional Authority in Cambodia by providing communications personnel and the Authority's military commander. Of current interest, and very much in Australia's backyard, the Australian government seems set to provide a large proportion of the police to be sent to East Timor to monitor the autonomy plebiscite in August 1999.

Conclusion

Australia was and remains a country wracked by insecurity about its place in the world, and about its ability to protect itself from the increasingly powerful and unstable giants to the north. As I concluded in my previous essay[29] the areas to the north of Australia will remain areas of instability for many decades to come. Civil strife, environmental catastrophe, and all-out war all have the potential to trigger huge population movement, and like gravity, the easiest direction is 'downwards' towards the 'empty' expanses and relative riches of Australia. Working to maintain regional stability therefore remains a critical objective of Australian foreign policy. For the past few decades Australia has been attempting to 'socialise' itself into the regional community, at the same time trying to obliterate memory of more than a century of standoffishness and outright racism towards Asia.

Security issues - both military and non-military - drive Australian foreign policy and determine its activist role within the UN and international trade organisations. To a greater extent it also accounts for Australia's 'engagement' with East Asia. Lastly, it could be concluded that Australia's relationship with the US would be a good deal more cool and remote were it not for shared security interests.

Notes

[1] S. Dalby (1996), Continent Adrift?: Dissident Security Discourse and the Australian Geopolitical Imagination, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol 50 No 1, 1996
[2] Richard Leaver (1997) 'Patterns of dependence in post-war Australian foreign policy' in R Leaver and D Cox (eds), Middling, Meddling, Muddling: Issues in Australian foreign policy, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards: 74
[3] Gary Smith et al (1996), Australia in the World: An introduction to Australian Foreign Policy, Oxford University Press, Melbourne: 25
[4] Smith et al (1996): 25
[5] Leaver (1997): 74
[6] Smith et al (1996): 21
[7] Smith et al (1996): 117, 118
[8] Smith et al (1996): 22
[9] David Horner (1997) 'Security Objectives' in FA Mediansky (ed), Australian Foreign Policy: The New Millennium, McMillan, South Melbourne: 73
[10] Gareth Evans (1989) Australia's Regional Security, Ministerial Statement by the Hon. Gareth Evans QC, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, December 1989
[11] Evans (1989)
[12] Smith et al (1996): 52
[13] Smith et al (1996): 54
[14] Horner (1997): 77
[15] M. Gurry (1995), Identifying Australia's 'Region': From Evatt to Evans, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol 49, No 1, May 1995: 22
[16] Horner (1997): 81
[17] Horner (1997): 81
[18] Horner (1997): 81-82
[19] Horner (1997): 82
[20] Horner (1997): 83
[21] Horner (1997): 83
[22] Horner (1997): 85
[23] Carlyle A. Thayer (1997): 'Australia and Southeast Asia' in FA Mediansky (ed), Australian Foreign Policy: The New Millennium, McMillan, South Melbourne: 258
[24] Horner (1997): 86
[25] Thayer(1997): 261
[26] Thayer (1997): 262
[27] Thayer (1997): 262
[28] Smith et al (1996): 125
[29] Gary Dean (1999), 'The Development of Australian Foreign Policy', http://okusi.net/garydean/works/afp.html.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ Gary Dean: Essays Index ]
[ Send Commentary ] © 1999, Gary Dean. All rights reserved.

[ownoiz]

Ok heres another article which i thought summarises the complex COMMONWEALTH Federal Takeover and inevitable privatisation of the Murray Darling Basin quite well.

*remember the Commonwealth being a COMPANY listed with the U.S. Securities and Exchage Commission (SEC) . Check these vids if you need a reminder of who owns the commonwealth:

Who owns the RBA? (www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukZhV0UMq0w)

Mark mcmurtrie lessons in law pt1 (www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fW6ny7_vGc)

This is important information for all Australians as it affects everything from the food we eat to the price we pay for water in our cities.

It was originally posted here so all credit to them

http://cecaust.com.au/main.asp?sub=ausnews&id=2007_08_13.htm

(It was written before the Rudd government took power, Rudd is continuing Howards work for TPTB)

The Rudd labour governments meagre 5% carbon reduction target by 2020 announced today also adds weight to the argument that Climate Change is not the great threat it is made out to be in the media matrix. WHY?

It appears they are not worried about climate change, remember they have kids too and if they were REALLY worried about it they would take more drastic action.

Greens leader and alternative viewpoint providing PUPPET Bob Brown is playing the GOOD COP BAD COP routine to a tea today arguing for greater reductions, but it will come to nothing as what they really want to do wins out, the rest is just about appearing to provide an alternative viewpoint AND ALSO make people keep thinking climate change is a problem therefore water and energy is a problem so then we are happy to pay more for it.

HERE IS THE ARTICLE IN FULL (long) :

The Real Story Behind Howard's Murray-Darling Water Legislation

Written by Citizens Electoral Council Research Team

Prime Minister John Howard has presented legislation to the Parliament, authorising the Federal Government to seize control of all of the water of the Murray-Darling Basin from the states, and to put it under a new Federal agency with dictatorial powers. Just before Victorian Premier Steve Bracks and his Water Minister John Thwaites suddenly resigned on Friday, July 27, Bracks charged that Howard's actual intent was to privatise all of the Basin's water. Caught, Howard bellowed that Bracks was "desperate, stupid, inaccurate and just totally wrong."

It is Howard who is desperate. The global financial system is now crashing down, and the financial oligarchy which owns Howard is attempting to grab control over such vital assets as raw materials, food, and water, so as to maintain their political power when their paper, and even their banks vaporise. Howard's legislation will give his owners control over the Basin's water for which they will charge whatever they want, and, by bankrupting most of the farmers there, in Australia's food bowl—as this legislation assuredly will—will make us dependent on multinational agribusiness for our food.

Howard lied that he had no secret plan to privatise the Basin's water, but the plot is hardly a secret: it has been underway since another rabid privatiser, Prime Minister Paul Keating, initiated it in 1994 through an agreement of the Council of Australian Governments (COAG), and as part of the same National Competition Policy which led to the other privatisations in gas, electricity, transport and telecommunications. It picked up steam when the Murray-Darling Basin Commission started interstate water trading in 1998, and accelerated rapidly when Howard created his National Water Initiative (NWI) in 2003, and then the National Water Commission (NWC) in December 2004, to implement the NWI. Its final phase is the legislation now before Parliament, which Howard intends to ram through before the Federal election, and it has the full backing of Kevin Rudd's ALP.

Howard's enraged reply to Bracks notwithstanding, Howard, his Water Minister Malcolm Turnbull, and all of the key personnel of the institutions named above have constantly trumpeted their intent to privatise water, often under such typical NWC euphemisms as the "principles of consumption-based pricing and full cost recovery". Or, when NWC Chairman Ken Matthews lectures all over the country, he emphasises such "Reform Challenges" as, in his words:


* The water stewardship concept engages the private sector in improved water management. To [sic] often, water is seen as just the business of governments and in my view this is both myopic, and wrong;
* pricing reform not keeping pace with the task (e.g. recovery of water management costs; recovery of urban investments);
* strengthen competition and innovation and private sector opportunities;
* significant government subsidy of infrastructure still says the sector is not 'normalised'.

The Prime Minister and Cabinet's own website even features the study, "A Discussion Paper on the Role of the Private Sector in the Supply of Water and Wastewater Services". Echoing Bracks, NSW's Minister for Lands and Regional Development, Tony Kelly, declared on August 2, 2007, "I am just a little bit worried this is all about making water another commodity so that Macquarie Bank can be able to buy and sell it and make an absolute fortune".

An absolute fortune, indeed: under the 1994 COAG agreements, governments corporatised their water utilities, which are worth over $70 billion, but would be sold for far less. The real money would be made in charging consumers and the few remaining farmers tens of billions more for water.

The Murray-Darling Basin is the breadbasket of Australia, which accounts for 71% of all of our irrigated crops, and feeds 61% of all Australians. At stake, therefore, is the security of our national food supply, as well as the social and economic viability of regional Australia throughout the Basin. Deregulation of the dairy industry and the initial phases of water privatisation have already contributed to the collapse of Australia's farms by 20,000 from an official figure of 150,391 in 1994 to 130,526 today, though in reality there are far fewer, because the Australian Bureau of Statistics has changed their definition of what is a farm, from one with $22,000 of agricultural output to only $5,000, inflating the farm numbers.

The Privatisation Scam

Privatisation has a simple premise: the less water there is, the more can be charged for it. Thus, there was and has been no serious Federal Government attempts to expand water supplies throughout the entire, horrific drought-ridden period which began coincident with Keating's initial moves toward water privatisation in 1994-95, right through until today. Water supplies to farmers have been shrinking throughout that period, not solely—or perhaps even mainly—due to drought, but to governmental action or inaction, including, most recently, the cut-off of water allocations, and the diversion of ever-larger quantities into "environmental flows".

The whole process of privatising government assets, including water, was begun internationally under the Thatcher government in Britain, and was designed by a London-based think tank, the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS), the granddaddy of all right-wing, deregulationist, pro-globalist think tanks internationally. The MPS was set up after World War II by the British Crown and its chief financier, Harley Drayton, to organise against the type of strong national government represented by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the U.S., which would not kneel to the financial oligarchy. Given the Crown's role in privatisation, it is lawful that the President of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission is the Rt. Hon. Ian Sinclair, a member of Her Majesty's Privy Council. On behalf of, and answerable only to the Crown, the Privy Council is the ruling body of Britain and its still-existing empire ("Commonwealth"). Upon induction, all members swear sole allegiance to the Crown, and an oath of complete secrecy regarding any Privy Council business—which includes any financial business of substance throughout the empire.

All of the chief personnel involved in Howard's "water reforms", from the Murray-Darling Basin Commission through his National Water Commission, are either hard-core privatisers or radical environmentalists. Notably, Howard stacked the MDBC and NWC with former officials of the radical right-wing, Big Business-financed National Farmers Federation (NFF), and with environmentalist fanatics, notably from the notorious Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists [sic]. (As in the global warming scam, Big Business is in bed with the environmental lobby, which it has heavily financed.)

The Role of the NFF

The single most important figure in determining water allocations in the Murray-Darling Basin, has been Dr. Wendy Craik, Chief Executive of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission since 2004, and the Executive Director of the NFF from 1995-2000.

However, since the MDBC could not force changes in water flows and allocations, Howard founded the NWC to establish the infrastructure and policies for such mandatory changes, and two of its seven ruling Commissioners were top figures in the NFF: Peter Corish, the national president of the NFF from 2002-2006 when he left to join the NWC, and longtime Howard hit-man, David Trebeck, the founding Deputy Director of the NFF and the mastermind of the 1997-98 plot to bust the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA). NFF personnel also co-wrote the Workplace Relations Act 1996 as the precursor to the present, anti-human Work Choices Act. Many think that the NFF'er and MDBC boss Craik is the obvious choice to head up the new Murray-Darling Basin Authority, which will dictate what her Murray-Darling Basin Commission could only suggest.

The NFF itself has endorsed Howard's new legislation, though it is obvious that it will decimate regional Australia. Their endorsement is not surprising, since the NFF is known by most farmers as "No Family Farms", and was founded to help push free trade and deregulation throughout the economy, as it is now doing with water.

The full story of the NFF is told in the Citizens Electoral Council's 1998 96-page pamphlet, Stop the British Crown Plot to Crush Australia's Unions we will summarise the essentials here.

When Howard first came to power in March 1996, six members of his government were closely affiliated with the H.R. Nicholls Society, a radical deregulationist spin-off from the Crown's Mont Pelerin Society. These included Howard himself, Defense Minister Ian McLachlan (a former president of the NFF), Treasurer Peter Costello, Minister for Workplace Relations Peter Reith, Assistant Treasurer Rod Kemp, and Minister for Employment David Kemp. The H.R. Nicholls Society was named after the turn-of-the-century editor of the Hobart Mercury, who crusaded against Mr. Justice Higgins, the President of the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration, for his finding in the famous 1907 Sunshine Harvester case, that labour must be paid a "living wage" sufficient to support a worker, his wife, and three children.

The H.R. Nicholls Society, in turn, was indistinguishable from the leadership of the NFF, who had helped found H.R. Nicholls. The NFF itself had been founded in 1979 by members of the blueblood, Anglophile Australian Woolgrowers and Graziers Council, to lobby for free trade and to bust up the farmer-labour alliance policy of longtime Minister of Trade, the legendary John "Black Jack" McEwen, based upon a policy of rapid economic growth generated by a policy of "Protection All Around", for both agriculture and for manufacturing. The AWGC's Executive Director was David Trebeck, soon to be the founding Deputy Director of the NFF. Money poured in from Big Business to finance NFF actions against the unions, including the "wide combs" dispute in the shearing industry, and the Mudginberri abattoir conflict.

When then-Transport Minister John Sharp in early 1997 commissioned a report into "waterfront reform", he awarded an $80,000 contract to the Canberra-based industrial consultants, ACIL Economics (later known as ACIL Tasman), whose principals were NFF officials David Trebeck and Paul Houlihan, who was to be one of three authors of the union-busting Workplace Relations Act. Without tender, ACIL was then given a further $600,000 to develop the master plan to smash the MUA, complete with Dubai-trained strikebreakers from among Australian military veterans, overseen by Defense Minister and former NFF president Ian McLachlan.

To help crush the MUA, Big Business poured in funds to the NFF's Australian Farmers Fighting Fund (AFFF), which newspapers reported totaled $100 million. It was overseen by two well-known farmers: former Coles Myer chairman Nobby Clark, who was a partner with Rio Tinto in the world's largest diamond mine, Argyle in WA; and HR Nicholls cofounder Charles Copeman, who as a CRA executive had sacked his entire unionised workforce at Robe River in WA. Its trustees included NFF Executive Director Dr. Wendy Craik, who later headed up the National Competition Council until Howard tapped her to head the MDBC in 2004.

Besides the NFF'ers, another Howard appointee is Professor Peter Cullen, a member of the Wentworth Group, which advocates cutting off water supplies to agriculture and similar genocidal actions. In fact, contrary to Howard's phony pledge of "no forced reduction in allocations", Cullen openly calls for precisely that, as in The Australian on January 10, 2007. Among his other posts, Cullen is a member of the Natural Heritage Trust Advisory Committee, which specialises in locking up land in perpetuity. The Wentworth philosophy is most famously expressed by the quack "scientist" Tim Flannery, who demands that Australia's population be cut back to six million, and by fellow Wentworth member Prof. Mike Young of the University of Adelaide, who also calls for compulsory acquisition of water allotments because "the market is too small", as in his recent discussion paper. In fact, "buying water on the market should come before spending on water infrastructure, to allow the market to show which irrigation systems warrant future investment and which should be scrapped," Young told Stock & Land on June 12, 2007. "Some systems will inevitably be abandoned as water flows from them, with associated impact on rural communities", but, he chortled, "this would be a sign that the market is working."

Still another Howard appointee to the NWC is Chloe Munro, who oversaw the electricity sector "reforms" (i.e. wholesale privatisation) under former Victorian Premier and Mont Pelerin stooge Jeff Kennett.

How the Scam Actually Works

In January 2007, Howard gave merchant banker Malcolm Turnbull the newly tailor-made Cabinet post of Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, precisely for the purpose of overseeing the privatisation of the Murray-Darling under the MDBA. Turnbull is unabashed about his enthusiasm for water privatisation.
In a speech quoted in The Australian on July 26, 2007, Turnbull summarised the sweeping powers of the new MDBA:

"It will represent the biggest reform of water management in Australia's history, and it will see the Murray-Darling Basin on the path of a sustainable and secure water future. For the first time there will be one body setting and enforcing a sustainable diversion limit across the basin that recognises the interaction between surface water and ground water. There will be a basin-wide approach to establishing a water market and water pricing. The Murray-Darling Basin Authority will set salinity and water quality objectives and develop and implement a Basin Environmental Watering Plan…"

Turnbull said nothing about creating new water supplies, because the new Act is not intended to, but is entirely aimed at privatisation. Indeed, the NWC's chief scientist Dr. Colin Chartres has repeatedly come out against creating new water supplies, as by desalination, in favour of solely relying on "rainfall as the primary source of water", while the NWC's chairman Ken Matthews has denounced the idea of bringing some of the huge water supplies in northern Australia south, as "fanciful". "

The intent to privatise is obvious in the Act's objectives. As summarised by the NWC, its key points are:

1) water access entitlements and planning;
2) water markets and trading;
3) best practice water pricing;
4) integrated management of water for environmental and other public benefit outcomes;
5) water resource accounting;
6) urban water reform;
7) knowledge and capacity building; and
8) community partnerships and adjustment.

The initial premise from which everything in the new legislation will flow, is an "audit" of exactly how much water "exists" in the Murray-Darling Basin. That, of course, can be a highly subjective matter depending on the criteria of those doing the audit, not only as to quantity, but also depending on their calculations for salinity, "climate change", the need for "environmental flows", etc. not to mention whether or not they intend to create additional supplies. In plain English, they can say that the water supply is whatever they "find" it to be; determine whatever supplies should be allocated for whatever uses they want (70% currently goes for irrigation); and can thus cut off the tap to farmers at will, causing the price of water to zoom and bankrupting farmers by the hundreds and thousands. The CSIRO is currently doing an audit for the NWC, and—lo and behold!—is apparently going to find out that there is much less water than thought. "If the CSIRO's water calculations emerge as forecast by Dr. Chartres they may spell disaster for many farmers in Victoria, South Australia and NSW … Mr. Howard said the audit would determine the sustainability of irrigation." (The Age, July 26, 2007)

Howard already announced in April this year, that the general allocation of water for the water year from August to May 2008 will probably be zero. That could result in staggering losses of as much as $36 billion ($6 billion in direct production and the rest in associated industries) according to Prof. Wayne Meyer, Professor of Natural Resource Science at the University of Adelaide (April 20, 2007 The Age), even before considering the much higher prices for food. There is additionally a question as to how much Howard himself is responsible for the predicted zero allocation. Howard held a "Drought Summit" with the state premiers in November 2006. Ken Pattison of the Pyramid Hill-Boort Water Services Committee has reported that he told Howard at the time that a disaster was coming and that he should shut off water to recreational lakes in South Australia, and hold more back in the Snowy, Dartmouth and Hume reservoirs or "face a crisis within 24 weeks". Howard did nothing, the result of which was summarised by Wakool Shire Mayor Ken Trewin: "hundreds of thousands of megalitres of stored water has been squandered to SA where it largely evaporated in Lakes Alexandrina and Albert at the expense of the rest of the communities upstream." (Herald Sun, April 20, 2007)

Bankrupting Agriculture

Two preconditions for privatising water are to separate the ownership of water from the land, so that it is "tradeable", and then jack up its price so that it is profitable for the new water barons. The first took place several years ago, and helped lead directly to the second, in large part through huge government purchases of water, which forced up the price dramatically. Chris Lahy, a dairy farmer from the Murray Valley, recently described the process, "As soon as they separated land title from water title it allowed trading. This happened just after 2000, about 2002. When the water title was separated from land, we saw water prices go up by virtually 300%, from your modest $30 per megalitre up to on average 100 per megalitre and in the drought times we were paying $200 or $270 for water and at that price it was unsustainable and you could not grow or produce anything that was going to make money. That was going to send you broke. For us on our farm, $175 a megalitre once you got to that point, there was no point irrigating anymore because the cost of buying water and delivery exceeded your income."

Craik's MDBC gives each state an allocation, which it then divides up among its users, a process easily open to abuse, particularly as states are under pressure to increase environmental flows. Lahy described how it worked in NSW: "100% water allocations were reduced by the NSW state government in real terms by 13% down to 87%. That 13% was to allow for evaporation, infiltration and environment. That water was taken away from farmers' allocations without a single cent of compensation nor discussion. Then what started happening, at the end of the season, was that parcels of water that were tagged 'environment', they were selling it back to us. What the hell is going on—these guys are taking our allocation and selling it back to us!"

A June 30, 2007 Sydney Morning Herald article by Daniel Lewis and Marian Wilkinson summarized why prices are soaring, and the tap is being increasingly shut for farmers, through the actions of the MDBC/NWC and the host of government-funded radical environmentalist authorities.

"With farmers, management authorities and governments laying claim, the battle for water in the Murray-Darling Basin has reached fever pitch.

"Competition for water in the Murray-Darling Basin has gone from a non-event monopolised by farmers to an aggressive multi-billion-dollar game in a few short, remarkable years. In Australia's food bowl, irrigators have been crowded by the likes of RiverBank, the Murray-Darling Basin Commission, the National Water Commission, Water for Rivers, catchment management authorities, the Living Murray, the Achieving Sustainable Groundwater Entitlements Program, the National Water Initiative, the Australian Government Water Fund and the NSW Wetland Recovery Plan.
"So many vehicles for restoring water health and security in response to so many suffering farmers, thirsty towns, stressed rivers, aquifers and wetlands. Now the Prime Minister, John Howard, has trumped the lot with his $10 billion national plan for water security. …

"All this competition for water means it looks more like liquid gold than ever before."

Lewis and Wilkinson cite the case of Water for Rivers to show why water prices are soaring.

"Water for Rivers was set up in 2003 after an inquiry into the ailing Snowy River. Construction of the Snowy Mountains Scheme saw the iconic river reduced to two per cent of its natural flow in the upper reaches. With $375 million from the NSW, Victorian and Federal Governments, the Albury-based enterprise has the job of finding 212 gigalitres so 21 per cent of the Snowy's natural flow is restored. It also has to find 70 gigalitres for the Murray System.

"A recent paper written by the chairman, Richard Bull, said Water for Rivers reclaimed its first 80 gigalitres for $80 million. … But other water-procuring schemes have proliferated and 'as an outcome of these forces, project prices have dramatically increased from about $1 million a gigalitre to $3 million a gigalitre,' Bull says. Some project proponents suggest $5 million per gigalitre as a going rate.' Once the National Plan for Water Security starts operating 'it is not outlandish to suggest that further project costs may increase a further 100 per cent—$6 million per gigalitre' … he predicts that once the Federal Government starts spending its $3 billion dedicated to buyback, the cost of water licenses will 'go through the roof'. …"

To show how far that process has already advanced, Lewis and Wilkinson cite their interview with Cliff Twigg.

"Cliff Twigg is a dairy farmer who sits on the management board of the West Corurgan irrigation scheme near Corowa, on the Murray. The district has been unsuccessfully targeted by the Living Murray. 'The Government offered $1000 [a megalitre] and we just laughed at them,' Twigg says. 'They came back and said we will give you $2000. They wanted 10,000 megs. You will hear some of the deals they are doing are up to $5000 a meg now.'

"Twigg said he was determined to see no water leave Corurgan and undermine the investment he had made in irrigation. 'We have only got to lose 10 per cent of our allocation and it's non-viable. If we don't get that allocation we are running at a loss. I want to keep water because I want to stay as an irrigator. It's our lifeblood. You can't dairy without water'."

In terms of water allocations, Craik's MDBC is running another scam, in which desperate farmers trade in their "General Security" allocations for a much smaller level of allegedly guaranteed "High Security" allocations, and at a substantially higher price. But then, the MDBC (through the state governments which it directs), delivers only a fraction of the "High Security" water. Chris Lahy described how it has worked:
"High security water is divvied out to wine grapes, table grapes, nuts of all sorts—almonds in particular and vegetable growers. It's not a great amount of water, but their use per hectare is a lot lower. For example for a dairy farmer, your water usage per hectare was quite high. Then they started putting in a new equation—dollars per hectare per megalitre, so what that meant was it didn't matter what you do with irrigation water, it was all unproductive, because they say flood irrigation is an evil, because the dollars per megalitre per hectare did not stack up well against high security users. But the thing is the dairy industry says, 'That's crazy man, we're producing milk. Every person in this country has milk in their house—in their fridge and we need wine to live?' So we said dairy farmers should be a priority for water delivery, even if we don't get high security water. Fortunately they saw the sense in that, and said maybe we should supply something called 'modified stock and domestic' or 'modified water' for dairy farmers during the drought time, but it still was not enough. It was too little action too late. A lot of farmers just went broke."

And Howard's claim that there will be no forced acquisition of water is of course a fraud, because desperate farmers will have to sell their water.

Further, when private companies take over the water, they will obviously spend the bare minimum on repairs or upgrading of vital water infrastructure, all the NWI/NWC propaganda about "full cost recovery for infrastructure" to the contrary. University of Adelaide's Prof. Wayne Meyer pointed out the obvious: "We have public water systems that are 50 to 80 to 100 years old all in increasing need of upgrading and replacement." If such repairs/replacement is not done, "there is no way out short of going into catastrophic closure". Does anyone seriously think that the (bankrupt) Macquarie Banks of this world are going to pour tens of billions of dollars into water infrastructure? They clearly do not intend to, but to grab the 70% of the Basin's water now used for irrigation, bankrupt the farmers, and divert that water at skyrocketing prices to the cities.

Howard's new water legislation will devastate the rural sector in the MD Basin, a fact that is so obvious, that the Federal Government has absolutely refused to conduct the normal "social impact" study for such far-reaching legislation. However, an independent study at the Australian National University warns of "social dislocation from small and medium-sized farms being forced out of the market by the price of water. Local communities would be devastated."
.

[boots]

Another interesting fact I heard is that the Australian army was sold to an American firm called Tenax :rolleyes: They are after all corporations.


.

[accuracy]

So one knows now about why the government's PUSH for digital tv in Australia (free set top box to pensioners..etc) is so explained beautifully here in the USA and Iraq- accuracy

Digital TV - Mind Control By The Sound Of Silence



From Ken Adachi
Educate Yourself.com
12-22-8

Editor's Note -

This is an extremely timely and important essay. It overviews a secret Pentagon psychotronics technology known as Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) that has been fully operational since the early 1990s. I first found out about the use of this technology from Al Bielek in a 1992 video he made with Vladimir Terziski. This technology was used against battle-hardened Iraqi troops fortified in deep underground bunkers in Kuwait and Iraq in the first Gulf War in January of 1991.

The physical, emotional, and psychological effects of this technology were so severe that hundreds of thousands of Iraqi troops surrended en masse without firing even a single shot against US-led coalition forces. The numbers reported in the news were staggering: 75,000 and then annother 125,000 (or more) Iraqi troops would come out of their deep desert bunkers waving white flags and falling to their knees before approaching US troops and literally kiss their captor's boots or hands if given the opportunity.

Why would eight-year veterans of Middle Eastern warfare (with Iran 1980-1988) behave this way? Simple. They were subjected to a technology that was so extreme and incomprehensible that they were suddenly reduced to the level of compliant children and felt grateful to still be alive in the wake of their mind-wrenching experience.

This technology is about to be used, albeit in a more subtle fashion, against American citizens in a highly classified and covert operation to mind control and manipulate the entire population into 'compliance' with our New World order overlords. The technology will utilize a combination of HAARP transmitters, GWEN towers, microwave cell phone towers, and the soon-to-be-mandatory High Definition Digital TV that will enter your home via: a) cable, b) satellite, c) HD TVs, or d) those oh-so-easy-to-obtain "digital converter boxes" that the government is so anxious to help you obtain and underwrite most of the cost on your behalf.

But why is the government so anxious to help American citizens experience a clearer and more highly defined television picture? Does that make sense to you? Since when is the government so concerned about the visual quality of our televised entertainment that Congress would pass an undebated statutory proclamation which mandated that the HD conversion take place on Feb. 17, 2009 and then subsidze about 90% of the associated cost?

I'm only guessing, but if there are 200 million "regular" televisions in America to be converted into HD, then that $40 in government subsidy per TV ¥ 200,000,000 = $8 billion. Why is the government so anxious to spend 8 billion dollars on her citizens to improve the clarity of a TV picture? Or is the recently touted "additional bandwidth" cover story that supposedly is to be gained with the HD technology the only and genuine reason for spending so much taxpayer dollars on HD conversion?

The second service that this author performs is to "out" two of our more deceptive CIA/Pentagon 'assets' masquerading under the rubric of natural health advocates. Their names are Rima Laibow and her husband, "former" Major General Albert Stubblebine. If your e-mail Inbox has been filling with warnings and articles in recent months about the coming Codex regulations and the "wonderful" job that Rima and her retired Army husband have been doing to try and stem the tide, then you know who I'm talking about.

Folks, is it time to wake up yet? Or should we just resume our slumber and wait for them to take us away in those spiffy Gunderson cattle cars that Phil Schneider warned us about in 1995 (you know, the ones with the built in shackles and manacles)?
Ken Adachi, Educate Yourself.org



The Sound Of Silence -
The Antithesis Of Freedom
By A. True Ott, PhD, ND
12-15-8

The year was 1961, and John Kennedy was soon to become the 35th President. Shortly before Kennedy's inauguration, President Dwight D. Eisenhower shocked the nation and the world with his televised farewell speech. The speech's content was shocking because General Eisenhower was a very popular war hero, and American military might was second to none.
Eisenhower, a highly decorated five-star general, was the Supreme Commander of all allied forces during World War II. It was Eisenhower's leadership during the Normandy invasion that ultimately freed Europe from the Nazi scourge.

Incredibly, in his farewell address, this great American hero did not warn the nation of the budding communist threat or the horrors of nuclear proliferation. No, not at all! Instead, this career military genius poignantly and soberly declared to this great nation:

" We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence - economic, political, even spiritual - is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to recognize its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or our democratic processes."

Here we have a career military officer, and sitting US President warning the nation in his final farewell speech, that something called "unwarranted influence by the military-industrial complex" poses an extremely dangerous threat to our Free Republic society. According to Eisenhower, this threat "exists and will persist."

To President Eisenhower, in January of 1961, this evil was a much greater threat to America than Castro's Cuba or Kruschev's Soviet Union. What exactly could have happened in the "military-industrialist" establishment that would have caused Eisenhower to issue such a strongly worded warning? Improved machine gun production? Nope. Battleship production? Nope. Nuclear submarines? Nope. Proliferation of nuclear warheads? A concern of course, but a concern that most Americans were fully aware of.

No, obviously what caused Eisenhower such deep concern had to be something much more pervasively shadowy, dark and secret. Some new, covert, technology had clearly emerged that had the very real potential to provide certain individuals with the "acquisition of unwarranted influence" that in turn would "endanger our liberties or our democratic processes" (i.e., our free and fair election process). In other words, it had the clear potential to circumvent the voice of the people and completely empower un-elected power mongers.

Eisenhower, I would submit, was warning America about something called the "Sound of Silence".

Eisenhower was an honest and patriotic American. Like Marine Corp General Smedley Butler, who decades earlier declared to Congress that "War is a Racket," Ike knew that such absolute power and total covert control over the minds and hearts of individual citizens would corrupt society absolutely. He also knew and understood, as did the German philosopher Goethe: "No man is more hopelessly enslaved, than he who falsely believes that he is free." Therefore, he issued his strong, concluding warning to America. Today, this author must do no less.

The Sound of Silence is a military-intelligence code word for certain psychotronic weapons of mass mind-control tested in the mid-1950s, perfected during the 70s, and used extensively by the "modern" US military in the early 90s, despite the opposition and warnings issued by men such as Dwight David Eisenhower.

This mind-altering covert weapon is based on something called subliminal carrier technology, or the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) (also nicknamed S-Quad or "Squad" in military jargon). It was developed for military use by Dr. Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia, and is described in US Patent #5,159,703 - "Silent Subliminal Presentation System" for commercial use in 1992. The patent abstract reads:

"A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the very low (ELF) or very high audio-frequency (VHF) range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum, are amplitude- or frequency-modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener."

In layman's terms, this device, this "Sound of Silence"simply allows for the unwarranted implantation of specific thoughts, emotions, and even prescribed physical actions into unsuspecting human beings. In short, it has the very real ability to turn human beings into mere puppets in the hands of certain "controllers," or puppet-masters.

Eisenhower knew full well what such a "weapon" could do in the hands of greedy, conspiring men and women scheming to control the planet. It could easily result in the takeover of American society without a single bullet being fired. This is what he was warning America about, this is the "combination" he feared above all others.

Have the leaders of America ignored Ike's warning? Have conspiring and evil men and women utilized this diabolical technology on unsuspecting Americans and others outside of our borders? If so, will they continue to utilize the technology through the medium of television and radio? This exposé will attempt to answer these questions, and give the reader a clear picture of exactly who made the decisions to use the "Sound of Silence" in both war and peace.
On March 23, 1991, a news brief was released in the form of an ITV News Bureau Ltd (London) wire service bulletin entitled "High-Tech Psychological Warfare Arrives in the Middle East." This was during the administration of George Bush Sr., during "Operation Desert Storm," and describes in remarkable detail a US Psychological Operations (psy-ops) covert operation successfully deployed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait.

Saddam Hussein's vaunted "Republican Guard" crack troops were promising Bush "the mother of all battles" with many thousands of dead coalition troops. On paper, it looked convincing. Hussein's Republican Guard troops were battle-hardened veterans of the 10 year war with Iran, while coalition troops were unblooded. The Iraqis had modern weaponry and were well trained in how to use it.

Something very strange happened, however. The "mother of all battles" ended before it began, as literally hundreds of thousands of Iraqi soldiers surrendered en masse without even firing a shot!

Here is what the British press reported on the incident (while the American press was censored):
" an unbelievable and highly classified psy-ops program utilizing 'Silent Sound' techniques was successfully deployed. The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein's military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency. The US psy-ops team set up its own portable FM transmitter, utilizing the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji. This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with patriotic and religious music, psy-ops transmitted 'vague, confusing and contradictory military orders and information.

"Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work, however. A sophisticated electronic system designed to 'speak' directly to the mind of the listener; to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate his brain's electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns and thus artificially implant negative emotional states -- feelings of intense fear, anxiety, despair and hopelessness were created in the Iraqi troops. This incredibly effective subliminal system doesn't just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it implants that emotion in their minds."

While utilizing such a "non-lethal" covert psy-ops weapon resulted in many lives being saved, both American, Coalition, as well as Iraqi, the question begs to be asked: how can Americans be assured that such a weapon is not being used on them by "Big Brother" on a daily basis?
Moreover, why was the real story behind the mass Iraqi surrenders censored so completely from the American people? Typically, secrecy of this nature is only employed when the subject is morally offensive, or when the powers that be wish to continue to deploy the subject without public scrutiny or oversight, or both. Clearly, if such a device employed covertly on Americans could result in "unwarranted influence" over a society, as Eisenhower warned, I submit the majority of Americans would be completely outraged and incensed, and rightfully so. Therefore, of course the technology would need to remain hidden away.

Officially, the Sound of Silence (S-quad) technology does not exist, just as the US Government officially denies the existence of UFOs and Area 51 (Groom Lake) in the Nevada desert. However, the physical realities cannot be ignored by the rational and logical mind.

For instance, during the first Gulf war, the man who most likely ordered the deployment of the Sound of Silence was Major General Albert (Bert) Stubblebine, who was the Commanding General of the US Army's Intelligence School and Center, as well as the Army's Electronic Research and Development Command (ERADCOM) as well as the Army's Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM). In short, Albert Stubblebine was the Army's liaison with the CIA and Naval Intelligence operatives (ONI), and as head of ERADCOM, he would of necessity have had complete working knowledge of the Sound of Silence weaponry, if indeed it truly exists.

He was the US Army's top spy-boss, and of course, was privy to all its secrets. Now retired from active duty following a 32 year career, General Stubblebine has combined with his wife, Rima Laibow to form something called the Natural Solutions Foundation, supposedly dedicated to fighting all health freedom threats to individuals including Codex Alimentarius, vaccinations, and of course the FDA Gestapo.

On their website, <http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/>www.healthfreedomusa.org one can read this about Albert N. Stubblebine: "Many of the innovations he developed helped the US to conduct the First Gulf W ar effectively and swiftly with a very low casualty rate."

But of course, such "innovations" are never fully disclosed to Americans and are officially non-existent. With all due respect to General Stubblebine and shadowy power-brokers such as Frank Carlucci and Donald Rumsfeld, this author concurs whole-heartedly with General Eisenhower, and I declare that such posturing and secrecy with weapons of mind-control constitutes indeed an "acquisition of unwarranted power and influence" and has absolutely no place in a free and open society - no matter how many soldier's lives it may save on the battlefield. The potential for massive misuse and abuse of such immense controlling power is simply too great.

Furthermore, with all due respect Mr. Stubblebine, is he and Rima Laibow using the cover of Natural Health activistism to hide their true agenda? Could this hidden agenda be the covert promotion and testing of Sound of Silence equipment and technology commercially throughout the world?

Immediately after "retiring" from the army, General Stubblebine took a position as the "VP for Intelligence Systems" with Braddock, Dunn, and McDonald (BDM), a major defense contractor owned by the shadowy Carlyle Group and ex-Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci of Iran-Contra infamy

Since the Sound of Silence machine technology was patented for "privatization" commercial applications by Dr. Lowery on October 27, 1992 , it clearly opened the door to private defense contractors such as BDM to develop their own "intelligence systems". It would then make sense to employ General Stubblebine as a consultant. Of course, what would then stop BDM from quietly marketing and selling the Sound of Silence to large corporations tied to Wall Street?
For example, imagine utilizing the Sound of Silence in a large Wal-Mart store, mixing the ELF waves with background music to subliminally brainwash dishonest shoppers not to engage in shoplifting? Such a device would save Sam Walton many millions of dollars in lost revenue every year.

Suppose also that a young, black man from Illinois was given access to, and was able to utilize the S-quad Sound of Silence technology in his public speeches, radio and 30-minute television"infomercials" - all programmed and designed by "handlers" to illicit strong emotional responses from audience members who then are merely "hearing without listening."

Moreover, what if televisions across the US and Canada all went 100% digital [to be mandatory in Feb. 2009] implementing their signals use of the Sound of Silence frequencies in (in order to successfully link to GWEN towers) which would allow the unrestricted, complete and massive control of the nation's mind and consciousness? I am telling you that is exactly what is happening. President Eisenhower was absolutely correct, and his worst fears were indeed well founded!

The military-industrialist complex has quietly completed the takeover of the nation's consciousness, and thus its very soul.

Keep in mind that taking complete fascist control of America is just one step of the Zionist elites ultimate agenda, of which Stubblebine and Laibow have very likely pledged their true loyalty. The elitist Zionists overall objective is indeed absolute world control, something they refer to as a "New World Order" with them as dictators and overlords.

Again, the absolute secrecy surrounding the development and deployment of the electromagnetic mind-altering technology of the Sound of Silence in a very real way reflects the tremendous power that is inherent in it. This is why Eisenhower knew that he had to warn the nation about it back in 1961. To put it bluntly, whoever controls this technology literally has the power to control the minds of men - all men and women everywhere. [MM: When allowed to control [through the parasitic, Zionist private "Federal Reserve" System] the financial survival of "all men and women everywhere" the puzzle is easily completed!]

Of course, whoever controls the minds of all humans, controls the wealth and destiny of planet Earth. Furthermore, Stubblebine, as commander of Army Intelligence would likely follow the prescribed manual of all covert ops, such as is found in a declassified US manual for the planned subversion and coup of the government of Nicaragua. The manual instructs the CIA "guerilla forces" to engage in different "false front" organizations designed to win the respect, trust, and influence of the enemy. Once complete trust and confidence is achieved by means of the activities of the "false front," then the destruction of the enemy by means of misdirection and disinformation tactics can more easily be executed.

I would submit there is no better "false front" to infiltrate in America than Natural Health proponents, for they are typically healthier, better informed, and more dedicated to preserving individual freedoms and fighting tyranny than other Americans. Thus, there could be no better "false front" to establish, and there is clearly no more potentially vicious "wolf hiding in sheep's clothing" than the man who knows more about the Sound of Silence secret deployment than any other human

There is ample evidence that certain elitists in America and Israel plan to definitely extend the capacity of this technology to encompass all people on every continent. A key to this is the HAARP project where ELF and VHF frequencies can indeed be beamed off of the Earth's ionosphere to various GWEN towers worldwide.

Of course, the US Government officially denies all of this, telling the talking-heads of the [Zionist] controlled news media that the GWEN towers are merely private cell-phone towers with no ulterior agenda, and therefore anybody who thinks otherwise is a lunatic-fringe conspiracy nut.

The evidence to the contrary, however is clear and unequivocal. Dr Michael Persinger is a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Laurentian University, Ontario, Canada. Concerning this subject, Dr Persinger writes:

"Temporal lobe stimulation can evoke the feeling of a presence, disorientation, and perceptual irregularities. It can activate images stored in the subject's memory, including nightmares and monsters that are normally suppressed. Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental algorithms by which all sensory transduction is translated into an intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct stimulation of these codes within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied electromagnetic patterns may require energy levels which are within the range of both geomagnetic activity and contemporary communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow band of brain temperature could allow all normal human brains to be affected by a sub-harmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz would only vary by 0.1 Hz."

Dr Persinger concludes the article by writing:

"Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was improbable, but which is now feasible. This potential is the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately 6.5 billion brains of the human species, without mediation through classical sensory modalities, by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed.

"The historical emergence of such possibilities, which have ranged from gunpowder to atomic fission, have resulted in major changes in the social evolution that occurred inordinately quickly after the implementation. Reduction of the risk of the inappropriate application of these technologies requires the continued and open discussion of their realistic feasibility and implications within the scientific and public domain."

How can one have an "open discussion" on the subject when government circles continually deny the existence of such technology?

Lyrics to the pop song 'The Sound of Silence'
By Paul Kane (aka Paul Simon), 1963
Hello, darkness, my old friend
I've come to talk with you again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains within the Sound of Silence.

In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow streets of cobblestone
Beneath the halo of a street lamp
I turned my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a neon light
That split the night and touched the Sound of Silence.

And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never share
And no one dare disturb the Sound of Silence.

"Fools," said I, "you do not know
Silence like a cancer grows."
"Hear my words that I might teach you,
Take my arms that I might reach you."
But my words like silent raindrops fell,
And echoed in the wells of silence.

And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made.
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming.
And the signs said: "The words of the prophets
Are written on the subway walls
And tenement halls,
And whisper'd in the Sound of Silence."

Paul Simon/Paul Kane's musical work in the early 1960s was primarily as a contracted songwriter in the famed "Brill Building machine." He would write songs for other artists to record. He did try his hand at performing, however. He wrote many ballads and rockabilly tunes which were recorded, both by Paul and his mildly-successful Tico and the Triumphs. Paul also had a famous collaborator, Carole Kane (who changed her name to Carol King).

Paul Simon, whose family was part of the military-industrialist complex, was very likely a product of the early 1960s military experimentation in Silent Sound mind control, which is clearly what the lyrics of "The Sound of Silence" convey to those "in the know".


http://www.wariscrime.com/2008/12/15/news/digital-
tv-mind-control-by-the-sound-of-silence/
From the site:
http://www.rense.com/general84/edvv.htm

[ipopacific]

wow thats very insightfull i heard about this and harp in a tesla documentary ive since studdied remote influence and this process can also be done using your mind ...anyone can do it the question remains then if they already can induce emotional states and think toughts in our heads why do they need a microchip to be inserted ???

[accuracy]

Qantas boss Geoff Dixon tips 'new aviation world order'

July 22, 2008

Qantas chief executive Geoff Dixon believes the global aviation industry will consolidate into a few, very large players.

Mr Dixon today also disagreed with claims that Air New Zealand was too small to be a takeover target, but added that didn't imply Qantas was interested in buying the Kiwi carrier.

Just days after announcing 1500 job cuts at Qantas, Mr Dixon said globalisation, accelerated by permanently higher fuel prices, would result in a "new aviation world order".

"Right now the global aviation industry faces not just a shock or indeed a blip or indeed a crisis really but a permanent transformation," he said.

Cross-border merger and acquisition activity between airlines is currently prevented by strict foreign ownership rules in individual countries.

Mr Dixon said he was encouraged by current negotiations on an aviation agreement between the US and European Union.

"The EU's push for the abolition of foreign investment restrictions has so far - believe it or not - been resisted by the US, which limits foreign ownership of its airlines to 25 per cent of total voting stock," Mr Dixon said.

Mr Dixon said there were signs that the US may be prepared to accept airlines from Europe and potentially from other countries, based on their principal place of business rather than on strict ownership criteria.

"For us this would be a ground-breaking development," he said.

"It would open the way for airlines to engage in meaningful cross-border investments, and sooner or later it will happen.

"And we belive strongly at Qantas that over time, consolidation will transform aviation.

"It will produce a few very large and extremely efficient global airlines with a portfolio of interests and a portfolio of brands - the brands won't go.

When asked if Air New Zealand was a possible takeover target, Mr Dixon said that he disagreed with its chief executive's claims that the kiwi carrier was small enough to stay underneath the radar.

"I think it's changing so much that you won't be able to stay under the radar.

"And although I'm not going to say that Qantas and Air New Zealand are going to get together - we tried that once and we've moved on - I do believe very strongly and always have that consolidation will happen.

"Consolidation when it starts will be very erratic and I don't believe any airline, particularly in this part of the world, will be able to avoid consolidation."

"I'm not suggesting that's going to be Qantas and Air New Zealand but it's a small country, it's a difficult business (and) scale will be very, very important."

Mr Dixon said Qantas had positioned itself to avoid being swallowed up by investing in its business, cutting costs where appropriate, ordering more fuel efficient aircraft and developing a strong brand.

"The work that Qantas has done to date means that we will avoid any such dark destiny."

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24060612-664,00.html?from=public_rss

[accuracy]

Dixon Outlines New World Order


http://noworldsystem.com/2008/07/23/dixon-outlines-new-world-order/

[kale]

NWO God-Free Schools
Coming To Oz


Exclusive to Rense.com
12-13-8

For those who refuse to acknowledge reality. The New World Order is real and Australia is a the leading edge.

Australian schools are about to introduce 'humanist classes' to deny any God or supernatural deities. These classes are to indoctrinate Australian children into the New World Order.

The NWO wants our kids. First it's their minds. Later, they'll then come for them bodily for Soylent green and the human meat grinder of war which is the NWO.

The propaganda course will teach 'World Citizenship.' No doubt they will be taught their own death is good as it will serve the 'greater good' by extinguishing their carbon footprint. The Australian Broadcasting Commission TV website already has an online interactive children's game along this line.

The shame is the sheeple parents do not know about the NWO...or don't want to know. Instead, they are engrossed in sports, TV, celebrity, recreational shopping and misdirection.

These irresponsible parents will hand over their children. They will way as their precious babies put their little hands into the sweaty palm of these NWO killers who will turn and smile with a dark grin as they walk of with innocent children.

The NWO is clearly breaking the surface now. No more in the shadows. They're coming in for the kill...and specialist dissident local killings, which will accompany the mass world depopulation extermination, won't even rate a mention.


Religion In Schools To Go God-Free

http://www.theage.com.au/national/religion-in-
schools-to-go-godfree-20081213-6xxs.html?page=-1

"Humanist Society education director Harry Gardner said he had designed a course to be taught from prep to year 6 called Applied Ethical Education - Humanism for Schools. It covers subjects such as the art of living, the environment, philosophy, science and world citizenship. The curriculum is likely to be submitted for approval next year."

http://www.rense.com/general84/godfree.htm

Kids learning about no God is awesome, the rest is ghey, so what if they dont teach the bible in schools, fuk we used spit ball our RE teacher till she ran out of the classroom crying,

Ps be careful posting shit from The Age newspaper, it will be down as quickly as you put it up, free tip from a Victorian ;)

[sade]

The fact that the NWO wants you to think there is no God or no supernatural deities makes it even more clearer that there ARE supernatural deities.
And seriously, if reptilians are real and they are in the 4th dimension (or 3rd??) and control the elite members, then what should we call them? "Not supernatural?" Lol seriously.

The universe knows how to balance things with both GOOD and evil.

[friendsinthesky]

ANTI-BIKIE LAWS. Eliminate those who know you exist. ;)

ANYONE who makes contact with a bikie or a bikie gang at least six times a year will face five years in jail. This can include personal meetings, emails, text messages, faxes or phone calls.

Who defines what a bikie or outlaw organisation is ;) Will there be less drugs and crime, i doubt in. Just a monopoly or shift towards monopoly. Do bikies/gangs kill or maime anywhere near as many people as our governments illegally invading countries on false pretences?

Read more:

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23184257-5006301,00.html



Did the above proposal actually go through?

.

[ownoiz]

Did the above proposal actually go through?

.

Yes its through and the first lot of people will face court soon. The Finks motorcycle club members are the first on the hit list.

For somebody like me living in the state of South Australia, if i want to communicate with someone, even if it just private messaging or replying to posts on this forum, i could go to jail if i communicate with someone else from South Australia who is deemed to be "affiliated with or is an outlaw person or organisation"

Thats how bad its become.

The onus is on the individual to check who they communicate with. Ignorance is no excuse under these laws and wont hold up in court unless you or your lawyer really know what they are doing.

They decide who is "outlaw" . From what i and others can gather usually its mainly about those who compete with the government/illuminati in the drug trade or white collar crime, THAT IS THE REAL ISSUE.

The clubs and streets will still be full of drugs, that wont change. Only who gets all the money will change. TPTB have used scare tactics and fear to get the people to support these laws without knowing the real reasons.

Remember Australia is the test bed, what happens here will be propagated elsewhere if trials are sucessfull.
.

[friendsinthesky]

Maybe they'll use Ben Cousins as an example. That will get peoples attention.

[ownoiz]

Maybe they'll use Ben Cousins as an example. That will get peoples attention.

So far its only the state of South Australia that has these laws, they havent spread to the eastern states (yet) , so high profile AFL players should be ok for now but if the laws spread then many of the AFL players could be in trouble forghettaboutit ;) :eek: :D
.

[accuracy]

Kids learning about no God is awesome, the rest is ghey, so what if they dont teach the bible in schools, fuk we used spit ball our RE teacher till she ran out of the classroom crying,

Ps be careful posting shit from The Age newspaper, it will be down as quickly as you put it up, free tip from a Victorian ;)

That link was posted at Rense.com, which i passed on here.:)

[ownoiz]

bump

[kale]

That link was posted at Rense.com, which i passed on here.:)

Cool, my bad, I thought it was a link to the age which yeah will only leave up links for a short amount of time, love Rense though,

carry on!!!

[accuracy]

Australians warned their budget is 'buggered'

Australia's budget is "buggered", the nation's economic boom will "unwind scarily fast" and the outlook for the next year is "ugly", a leading economic forecaster has warned.

By Bonnie Malkin in Sydney
Last Updated: 11:01AM GMT 19 Jan 2009

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01241/Wayne-Swan_1241712c.jpg

Wayne Swan: Wayne Swan disagreed, but admitted the government was facing 'very difficult' global economic conditions. Photo: GETTY

Access Economics dispensed with financial jargon and opted for painfully frank language in order to paint a clear picture of the state of the country's economy, which it predicts will slide into a deep recession in the next 12 months.

"Batten the hatches. This is not just a recession. This is the sharpest deceleration Australia's economy has ever seen," the company's quarterly report said.

Thanks to its strong export ties to China, Australia – once dubbed the "miracle economy" – managed to escape the downturn that hit the US and British economies last year.

However, with China's growth now slowing and the mining boom effectively over, it is widely accepted that the country will join the long list of countries suffering from the global financial crisis.

Access Economics said the federal budget was "buggered" because of its heavy reliance on the price of commodities, which was now falling. It said the four year boom enjoyed by the country had disappeared in four months of "chaos".

"The glory days of big budget surpluses are over, and the feds are now staring down the barrel of deficits as far as the eye can see," the report said.

Treasurer Wayne Swan disagreed with the language used by Access Economics, but admitted the government was facing "very difficult" global economic conditions.

"The year ahead will be tough and there's no quick fix," Mr Swan said.

The report predicted unemployment will rise to 7 per cent next year and house prices could fall by 5 to 8 per cent.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/4288866/Australians-warned-their-budget-is-buggered.html

[boots]

Oh yeah. These money grabbing bastards are now coming down hard on unpaid fines. Watch as they start to go after you. There will be more ways of getting at you with the pretext that the economy is in bad shape and is for the good of the country, type of bullshit:mad:

[primordialman]

The Whole country is one big Facist Hubla, the Attitude Astounds me for what i have seen so far,

People here need to get with the programme and loose this she'll be right Mate Attitude FFS

Otherwise People, Your Dog Tucker

Disregard the critcism from the former poster you are spot on my sentiments to tee!. And we should keep critcising mainstream Australia as well,might make the beer swelling ocker meatpie heads take notice they might just realise having Trade (yeh mate)wont save them in recession hmm pehaps time to stop knocking education and for them to learn the meaning of of study and READ!.
I would even go so far to suggest Self employed Tradies have more FM based networks than professionals afterall FMs were first builders before the speculative aspect come along.
They certainly know the meaning of nepotism and how to screw junior apprentices than arent family always giving that paternal based lecture on ATTITUDE which ironically they seldom show themselves there every second word is swearing or road rage style spasms of frustration.:cool:

[nwoexposer]

Any other Aussies wanna leave?

[grateful]

i'm thinkin that russia's looking good. no chemtrails there lol.




love not fear

[boots]

I wouldn't want to live in another country. This a great place. Although it is heavily controlled, in the seats of power with masons and Illuminati influences, they are pushing a people who don't like authority. It's inbred,we don't like or trust government. IMO this will be the downfall of the mind control.

Less pollutions here. ;)

.

[primordialman]

I wouldn't want to live in another country. This a great place. Although it is heavily controlled, in the seats of power with masons and Illuminati influences, they are pushing a people who don't like authority. It's inbred,we don't like or trust government. IMO this will be the downfall of the mind control.
In world of Corporatism & until now(credit crisis) almost 95% Privatisation in Aus its not just governments, australians should be concerned about the private sector is just as much an indirect controller incoming laws afterall all their demands require it.
Also people are only enslaved because they like their mortgages their partners & their toys, its their choice they could walk away from control tommorrow, however its a state of mind and lifestlye choice, its not all the fault goverments or even the Rothscums of the world if the majority are willingly compliant.

[soxism]

If you havent Heard... Some Idiot called "Stephen Conroy" the Australian Minister for Censorship wants to implement a Firwall that is Apparently going to block all P2P and Bit Torrent traffic and the Threat and Spread of Child Porn..

Its Currently under live pilot tests (Edit: Apparently Has Yet to be Started) With IInet and Optus Expressing Interests in Helping Test

Taken From http://www.neowin.net/news/main/08/12/23/australia-to-test-blocking-all-p2p-and-bit-torrent-traffic

"Senator Conroy went on the record saying "technology that filters peer-to-peer and Bit Torrent traffic does exist and it is anticipated that the effectiveness of this will be tested in the live pilot trial".

It is a drastic step to filter out all P2P and Bit Torrent traffic as it assumes that those channels are only used for piracy. One example of legitimate use is the popular online game World of Warcraft. This game uses a Bit Torrent system of distrubution for its updates. Like any technology it can be used for both good and evil and choosing to block all on the account that it is only used for piracy is taking censorship to new levels.

Unsurprisingly the idea has fueled a serious debate in Australia; "I'm aware that this proposal has attracted significant debate and criticism ? on this blog and at other places in the blogosphere," Senator Conroy said. Many of the complaints stem around the idea that Senator Conroy is acting as a big brother.

If the Senator has his way and the filter is kept in place how far will the government be allowed to intervene? Simply blocking a technology for the potential illegal use is a preposterous idea as nearly all software can be used for malicious activities; it's the user who makes the decision."

This is Minister Conroy's "Blog" http://www.dbcde.gov.au/communications_for_business/industry_development/digital_economy/future_directions_blog/topics/civil_and_confident_society_online

Taken From: http://www.inquisitr.com/12909/great-firewall-of-australia-whats-not-mentioned-makes-it-even-more-scary/

I won’t rehash what’s already been reported, but having read it several times since publication, it’s what’s left out that makes the proposal even more scary.

Free Speech

The Minister has stated that political speech will not be filtered under the proposal, but fails to define acceptable free speech and does nothing more to articulate his previous comments that “unwanted” material will be filtered under the scheme.

The problem here is the extraordinary mish-mash of Australian laws relating to open speech. In Victoria for example inciting religious hatred is an offense, so theoretically arguing against a particular religion would constitute hate speech instead of fair political speech.

Australia has a long track record of banning books, but for all the hatred are we now not better today having access to something like Mein Kampf so we can understand how wrong it is. There is a blurred line between political and hate speech, and blocking such speech on the internet will not stop people accessing it.

Conroy is disingenuous in suggesting that the Government is pro-free speech, yet pro-censorship: the price of free speech is that we must put up with the stuff we don’t like. The alternative system is not free speech, it’s totalitarianism.

Adult Games

Australia still has the bizarre situation of refusing to categorize video games for adults. The Minister says nothing of such games online, so we can still only presume that adult games online that would be refused categorization in Australia will be blocked under the filter.

Such games include online virtual world Second Life among many.

It should be remembered that Australia is a country that refused classification to Duke Nukem 3D, let alone far more seriously violent games.

Pornography

Whether you like pornography or not, the hypocrisy of the Governments proposal remains the same. Senator Conroy continues to point to existing guidelines being extended to International content, but ignores the absurdity in the current guidelines.

R rated pornography is legal in Australia and can be purchased at newsagents or service stations. Under the guidelines proposed, R rated pornography online would be illegal unless those pages included a thorough adult verification scheme. That doesn’t mean enter your date here to proceed: as has previously been the case for age requirements for mobile content and R rated content hosted in Australia (of which there is little to none) that would include handing over credit card details, or in some cases being forced to register with the provider first, including the provision of adequate identifying measures to prove ones age.

The net affect is that 99.99% of R rated pornography, or any R rated material under this proposal will be blocked by the filter, as overseas providers will not bend over backwards to cater for a small market like Australia. Secondly: Australian’s will be none to keen to hand over details to these sites should they meet the criteria.

X Rated pornography is treated more strictly in Australia currently, but is quite legal, and available for purchase from the ACT and Northern Territory. X rated material under this proposal will be completely banned: so while it is legal to possess, look at or own in print or video, it will now be completely blocked online. Again: whether you agree with porn or not, the hypocrisy is rich. In terms of freedom of speech it also raises other issues: who is the Government to play moral guardian online over a picture of two consenting adults having sex? Presuming they are doing nothing illegal, why in the 21st century does the Government seek to prevent others seeing it? Government finally got out of the bedroom in the 80s when homosexuality became legal, some would argue that X Rated porn is no different again.

Secret Blacklist/ Due Process

The Minister points out that the blacklist to be maintained by ACMA will remain a secret, and cites legislation supporting this. His reasoning, as it seems to be for everything, is that it’s all about kiddie porn

Publishing the title or internet address of child abuse material would constitute distribution of illegal material and is therefore protected from release. To do otherwise would allow a person to view and download the material in jurisdictions where ISP-level filtering was not implemented.

That may well be the case, but the Minister fails to address concerns about due process should a site be added to the list. If there is no access to the list, there is no way to appeal a site being blocked incorrectly. Imagine a commenter leaving a lurid comment or pic on this blog, or a forum, and the site being added to the list based on this one instance. No transparency can only equal unfair and arbitrary justice that remains the hallmark of totalitarian Government.

Selection Criteria

The Minister refers to the National Classification Scheme, a system where by content providers must seek classification of content prior to publication. He then refers to content complaints being made to ACMA, and ACMA making the call on classification. One again the Minister fails to address properly the selection criteria under the scheme: will website owners need to seek classification on content prior to publication? If so, this would be an onerous burden on new media owners and businesses in Australia, costing time, money and putting those businesses at a strict competitive disadvantage compared to overseas operators.

If ACMA will decide on content classification, will they only act on complaints as is currently the process (again the Minister swaps and changes between the current and proposed system). If so, how exactly will the filter know what is acceptable and not acceptable content given the millions of porn sites alone that may fall under the censorship regime.

Likewise, will the filter then decide to block content based on keywords? Could we not see the case, as has happened before that a site about breast cancer is blocked because the filter considers breasts to be pornographic?

Overblocking

The Minister notes that in the last round of tests, overblocking, that is filters blocking legal content came in at 3-6%. He only notes that this is an advance on previous tests, but fails to address the very serious implications.

Under the scheme, three to six percent of perfectly legal content gets blocked. Anything other than a 0% rate is unacceptable.

Imagine the Australian Government waking up one morning and deciding that 6% of Australian businesses could no longer open their doors to their customers, and the outcry this would cause. This is EXACTLY what this proposal will do to online businesses, and companies with a primarily Australian focus online could find themselves out of business for no other reason that the Government’s filter has decided to block them, even though they were doing no wrong.

BitTorrent

The Minister now states that P2P filtering technology is in the mix, despite its relative infancy. The question then becomes one of “unwanted.” Will the Government now extend the censorship regime to content presumed to be in breach of copyright as well? We can bet with absolute certainty that the Record and Movie Industries already have a letter on the Ministers desk.

Like general filtering, the question then becomes one of identification and process. How does the Government identify “unwanted material” and given that the blacklist or decision process is secret, what happens when content is incorrectly tagged. As we know the music and record industries don’t have a great track record of respecting existing copyright laws when it comes to accusations (for example, the defense of Fair Use, or Fair Trading in Australia).

Further will P2P network speeds be adversely affected for legal traffic?

Internet Speeds

The Minister notes falsely once again that in other countries running ISP filtering using blacklists that there was no discernable decrease in speed, despite noting the tests here proving otherwise.

What the Minister continues to fail to mention is that the countries running blacklists he mentions were running child porn blacklists in some cases on non-compulsory feeds. What the Minister is proposing is far more reaching than anything any of these countries are running, and every time he quotes those figures it’s a lie of context.

Conclusion

While it’s a positive that the Minister has finally spoken on some of the points raised by the Great Firewall of Australia proposal, it’s what he doesn’t answer that makes the proposal even more scary.

The implementation of this scheme can and will take Australia into an elite club of totalitarian societies that value state control over free speech. The Rudd Government seems hell bent on implementing a scheme with no recourse, that may kill legitimate businesses, and slow internet speeds so that Australia can truly take its place as an online backwater in the digital age.

Today I am ashamed to be Australian, ashamed that my Government should seek to implement draconian 19th century style censorship laws over the marvel of the modern age: The Internet. Free Speech may not be totally dead in Australia yet, but it’s about to be placed on life support. Conroy can say all he wants that this isn’t about free speech, but speech censored by Government isn’t free, no matter which way you want to spin it.


Yay For An Illuminate Country... And I thought Some Other Countries where Bad...

[soxism]

Did you Know Here in Perth... The TRAIN SECURITY.. Are now Dressed like Police, and have the Same Powers As Police for Arrest and Detain, Amongst Many Many More Powers that They SHOULD NOT HAVE.. They ALL Carry Tazer Guns, and Pepper Spray.. (While i was Sitting on the Train the Other Day i Noted the Model, Its Now an Upgraded Version of what the POLICE Had)..

EDIT: I Just Tried looking for the Article about them Receiving More police Powers and My Website is no Longer Available. i shall Keep Searching..


A "Community" Program created a while Back called "EYES ON THE STREETS"

http://www.crimeprevention.wa.gov.au/images/eyesbanner.bmp
Strangely Simular's to the Illuminate Eye.. ?

They Fear Mong by Saying that "The 'Eyes on the Street' program aims to makes homes and streets safer for everyone." With The Mail man, Bus Drivers, All Goverment Employee apart of the Program Watching You "Commit Crime" Tho In the Report From the AIC the Term "Crime" is EXTREMELY Elusive..

Taken From: http://www.crimeprevention.wa.gov.au/content.php?page=Eyes%20on%20the%20Street

Eyes on the Street is a coordinated intelligence gathering program.

The program encourages and enables state government agencies, local governments and businesses to identify and record possible criminal activities and suspicious behaviour to report to police.

Oks So this May sound Extreme, But Isnt this Similar to what the SS of Nazi Germany Encouraged? Brother Against Brother?

Program objectives


Establish partnerships between state and local government, businesses and WA Police to reduce crime and criminal activity
Provide local workers with an opportunity to participate in intelligence gathering and reporting to assist police
Increase police intelligence
Deter crime and criminal activity
Increase public confidence through high visibility campaigning


Current partners

State government agencies, local governments, businesses and organisations are encouraged to become involved in Eyes on the Street.

As a participant you will: Eyes on the Street vehicle branding


Join in the fight against crime and criminal activity
Gather information about suspicious occurrences and report this to police
Encourage active participation of your employees
Support the Eyes on the Street campaign through branding of vehicles



Current Eyes on the Street partners include:


Major Shopping Centres
Local Governments
Educational Institutions
Government Agencies/Departments
Industry Bodies


Taken From: Eyes on The Street (https://www.becrimefree.com/EyesOnTheStreet.php)

Eyes On the Street

City of Belmont staff, security guards, and other government agencies are watching your streets while you may not be.

City of Belmont staff carry out their normal duties, but they have also been specifically trained in watching for suspicious vehicles, people and behaviour. When they see something suspicious, they use reporting forms to detail the exact time date description and other details of the suspicious activity.

All of these forms are collated by the Office of Crime Prevention any the details forwarded onto the relevant agency for action or attention.

[nwoexposer]

Australia really isn't a bad country. In my opinion Australia would be one of the safest countries to live in, as it's isolated from all other countries and as it's an continent country and therefore free from international local wars. Australia is also one of the wealthiest and most free counties in the Asia/Pacific region.

But man... this country sure has its faults.

- Australia has one of the most censored internet in the Western World and also one of the slowest. On top of that, the current Federal Government intends or at least planned to further censor it dramatically.

- Australia lacks inituitive and enterprise, especially when it comes to technology, public transportation and the so-called "water crisis".

Laptops are like 1 year behind to what's on market in North America and are also doubled the price. This country likes to put a yuppie/trendy dressing on items that other Western Countries take for granted.

Public transportation in Melbourne, well need I explain! Crowded, slow, behind the times, abusive transit officers and ridiculously overpriced.

And the big one, the manufactured water crisis. The Victorian Government will constantly say that there's not enough rain yet they haven't built any new dams in 30 years! They've also done a very good job in brainwashing the population to believe that anyone who has a shower for 4min 1sec is a water-wasting Nazi!

Australia is also the fattest country (it took the crown away from the United States relatively recently) and is hellbent on boozing up and following boring and pointless sports (i.e. GayFL).

[primordialman]

Australia really isn't a bad country. In my opinion Australia would be one of the safest countries to live in, as it's isolated from all other countries and as it's an continent country and therefore free from international local wars. Australia is also one of the wealthiest and most free counties in the Asia/Pacific region.
How do you to define good or bad? I agree it is a good country for those reasons above , however that was not my intention when posting this thread. In relevance to this thread and forum, Australia is either one of two scenarios, a very asleep populace that have absolutely no idea about NWO,(which is unlikely) or mainstream middle class that is very delibrately & very much involved in the whole Humanist NWO coup, since the majority never like to discuss these issues otherwise far more aussies would be posting in this forum, well i dont see them.

By the way this is not the first conspiracy forum i have visited ive been on several including AJs Prisonplanet and its the same story in all these forums very few Aussies overall however stacks of alientated & disenfranchised europeans and americans. So what am I to make of this fact, Australia has no alientated citizens that want to post conspiracy forums, could be, or could be the fact that in Aus your either in secret network(FMS &OTHERS) or your not, if your not that makes you a nobody which limits your potential oppetunities very severly in Australian society.

Is Australia an equal oppertunity society i doubt it in sydney or melbourne especially unless you go to the right GPS grammar school if your a local tertiary candidate for Uni, chances are you wont have the right connections or background into the top Universties e.g Sydney University UNSW,UTS, or in Melbourne , Melbourne Uni or Monash, latrobe. Even Public school students that do make it, due to their natural talent&merit are snubbed by the snobby GPS student networks tell me the Masons or other seceret societies and their families dont have a hand in this elitist GPS judeo/anglophile network.:cool:

[ownoiz]

Australia really isn't a bad country. In my opinion Australia would be one of the safest countries to live in, as it's isolated from all other countries and as it's an continent country and therefore free from international local wars. Australia is also one of the wealthiest and most free counties in the Asia/Pacific region.

But man... this country sure has its faults.

- Australia has one of the most censored internet in the Western World and also one of the slowest. On top of that, the current Federal Government intends or at least planned to further censor it dramatically.

- Australia lacks inituitive and enterprise, especially when it comes to technology, public transportation and the so-called "water crisis".

Laptops are like 1 year behind to what's on market in North America and are also doubled the price. This country likes to put a yuppie/trendy dressing on items that other Western Countries take for granted.

Public transportation in Melbourne, well need I explain! Crowded, slow, behind the times, abusive transit officers and ridiculously overpriced.

And the big one, the manufactured water crisis. The Victorian Government will constantly say that there's not enough rain yet they haven't built any new dams in 30 years! They've also done a very good job in brainwashing the population to believe that anyone who has a shower for 4min 1sec is a water-wasting Nazi!

Australia is also the fattest country (it took the crown away from the United States relatively recently) and is hellbent on boozing up and following boring and pointless sports (i.e. GayFL).

You make some good points i agree with all of this...

And the point about laptops, i find it extends to many goods where we get inferior models or get ripped off with unjustified markups...

Ebay and paypal have their faults but...i find i can buy many NEW things from the USA and UK much cheaper than in the stores here, including postage and most times higher spec...everything from computer bits to friggin chainsaws, machinery and holden mechanical parts, many of which are AC delco same as USA. Some holden parts cost over 10x more here than there, yet they have same part # and are the exact same part...10 x :rolleyes:

Damn even entire holdens (monaros) were for a long time cheaper in USA (even accounting for exchange rate) than the holden dealer at Elizabeth S.A. ...5 mins from the assembly line... i say were because now they dropping prices quick smart on the VE (pontiac G8 in the US) as they arent selling as much here :p

And before anyone starts with the 'support local shops whatever' well markups can be unjustified in many cases so in these cases bypass em i say and send them a message...

Some of these markups are ridiculous...i had a whole 20 foot shipping container full arrive from USA recently full of machinery stuff for me and quite a few other people...and freight is not that expensive when you fill a container...so when you consider the shops here that freight in bulk charge you more for something that someone in the USA sellling it from their garage and sending it USPS (post office, which ends up much more expensive) and it still ends up way cheaper...and im including exchange rates and import duties...its bullshit...

Making a profit is one thing...raping our wallets and selling us the junk is another...

And dont get me started with the water LOL...yeah they make it scarce so that they have an excuse to take it all over and ultimately charge more...not to mention its all part of Rothschild climate change carbon tax...water is not a finite resource on this planet...especially in high rainfall melbourne...but hey when TPTB need to get us more water its cheaper to take from the food producer and pump 75 billion litres a year of crystal clear 200 EC water that needs little treatment other that the poisons they add out of the Goulburn River (murray tributary) than to collect and clean more Melbourne stormwater (less profit as its slightly more effort).
.

[hordeari]

Also people are only enslaved because they like their mortgages their partners & their toys, its their choice they could walk away from control tommorrow, however its a state of mind and lifestlye choice, its not all the fault goverments or even the Rothscums of the world if the majority are willingly compliant.

very nicely put... we are in the 'cage' ..BUT the door is wide open we just must wanting to go out... no key needed, door's open :eek: but we get lost between all the.. SUVs', plasmas lcds, fancy plastic big-tits, expensive graphic cards, insanely expensive fashion brand clothes, tears on our eyes cause 'our' team lost the game and bull like that, weird.

I like bill hicks' quote:
"It's just a ride and we can change it any time we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings and money, a choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your door, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love instead see all of us as one."

[ownoiz]

For over a year now I've been fairly certain that Adelaide has been the centre of much more international activity than we're being told about. Halliburton's ghostly co-ordination of it's Asia-Pacific activities, not to mention its global infrastructure activities, from this location seems to be at the head of this octopus, if not initiating the thought then at least co-ordinating the tentacles.

Read the full article...

Halliburton and South Australia (http://www.yourdemocracy.net.au/drupal/node/1004)
.

[kale]

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53114

[noesis]

Posted this on another thread but may be of interest ...

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574...007133,00.html

A work colleague of mine tipped this about three months ago. I think the gov can call an early election if they feel they cant govern due to lack of majority - a double-disolution election.

Stimulus packages, fires, floods etc, wouldnt prob be a wise time to change government now would it. I would guarantee another four years government to ensure Rudd's in for 2012 and ensure the carbon reduction scheme wont lose him votes in 2011. Not that i think the ptb wants Turnbull in ... but why rig it if you dont have to.

[accuracy]

Global warming is a hoax; the western world is WASTING money for the sake of carbon reduction.

This is a propaganda at it's worst!:eek:

[accuracy]

Hmmm, the Australian get up site seems to have it wrong in this case.

I fully supported the site for the removal of David Hicks, from Guantanamo Bay!

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2963

[accuracy]

Hmmm, the Australian get up site seems to have it wrong in this case.




Global warming is a hoax. :cool:

[ownoiz]

For those of you who havent seen my previous posts in this thread about laws being introduced by South Australian premier Mike Rann see here...

Mike Rann Anti Bike Laws (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=627808#post627808)

In response to these draconian laws, a new political party has been formed, named F.R.E.E. AUSTRALIA

http://www.freeaustralia.net.au/ (http://www.freeaustralia.net.au/)

The FREE Australia party, standing for freedom, rights, education and environment, has gained the necessary 150 members and has had its formal application for registration accepted, placing it a step closer to contesting next year's South Australian election.

The party was formed by opponents of the government's anti-bikie legislation, which they say will have broad impacts for other law abiding groups.

These draconian laws apply to all people and nowhere in the ACTUAL ACT does it make reference to bikies.

Bikies are being used as a problem-reaction-solution to create fear and hence acceptance of these laws by the average joe.

The new laws have a serious impact on our civil liberties, as ANY "organisation" , gathering or group of people can be declared an outlaw organisation if the powers that be choose to.

These laws allow the police to apply for Control Orders against individuals which will result in people being restricted from socialising with friends, attending events, entering premises - including premises which they may actually own or lease.

The law will make it a crime to associate with members of a declared organisation, and associating has been defined to include communication by telephone, letter, facsimile, email and other electronic means.

The government has thrown out hundreds of years of social development in laws, society and human rights – since the signing of the Magana Carta in 1215 AD – at the stroke of a pen with the commissioning of many new tough laws and amendments to existing Acts.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was signed by the Commonwealth Government on behalf of all Australians and as signatory to this document Australia should respect and obey this.

We now stand as a rogue state within Australia with these draconian new laws although the other states are keen to see what happens next.

We are a “SOCIAL EXPERIMENT” according to The South Australian Attorney Gerneral. Is this what the people want? Dispensing with our basic rights? We believe that we should not give up any freedoms or rights, and governments should not erode the rights of its citizens.

WE WANT OUR RIGHTS BACK!
These new laws dispense with or undermine:

PRESUMPTION of innocence
ABILITY to know the detail of the allegations against you
RIGHT to silence
ABILITY to cross-examination of evidence against you in a court of law
FREEDOM of assembly
RIGHT to a trial by jury
NEED for proof BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT

For more detailed information about concerns and implications of these laws:

http://www.freeaustralia.net.au/our-concerns.html (http://www.freeaustralia.net.au/our-concerns.html)

I can feel a challenge in the federal court coming on, as there is substantial evidence that these laws are in contradiction to our constitution and the feds may have no choice but to reverse the laws.

Australia, and notably South Australia, is once again being used as a test bed, trial run, of laws which the powers that be will then attempt to introduce nationwide and then internationally.

Good luck to F.R.E.E. in the next election, and anyone else who can take votes from the Halliburton puppets that are the Mike Rann Labour government.
.
__________________
"98% of us will die at some point in our lives" - Will Ferrell - Talladega Nights

[soxism]

Someone Noted about South Australia being Heaverly Active...

A Bill just Passed, it is now Illegal to Protest anywhere around or near (including affilicate companies) Pine Gap...

They REALLY want us to stay away from Pine Gap... WHY?

I also love the Fact that there is a Complete Media blackout on the Internet Cenership Yet the Minister wants people to "Disscuss" it.. Yeah Right!

[friendsinthesky]

When they go hard after the bikie gangs, then you know shit is gunna hit the fan.

[ownoiz]

Looks like Mike Rann and his posse of Halliburton puppets have been busy spreading the word to other states in regards to bikie laws...all but VIC and WA seem to be ready to introduce them...

These laws will apply to any organisation which is deemed to be "outlaw" by the state governments...

Think about the unconventional ways in which the state labour leaders have gotten into power...

S.A. - Motorola scandal which made the former Liberal premier John Olsen unpopular and paved the way for little napoleon Rann to be the Mann come election time...Also resulted in the unprecedented move of a National party member (WATER Minister and Riverland area seat holder Karlene "Masonic" Maywald) to side with Labour (WTF?) in order to gain a majority and hold power...

VIC - Unusual out of the blue resignation of Steve Bracks (and his water minister Thwaites at the same time??) , Bracks talking about importance of family/spending more time with his family etc...reminiscant of utterings by Latham...in comes Brumby, new premier without being voted in.

QLD - Ditto but with Peter Beatty...Anna Bligh was then premier without being elected for a time.

N.S.W. - Iemma and Costa quitting in unusual circumstances...they were pushed out but not by voters... Now im sure those two probably werent doing what the masters wanted and were looking after themselves...in comes the new guy without winning the election...then we have bikie wars and hence bikie laws...problem-reaction-solution...

Who else thinks these circumstances in state politics are "a little" unusual, or am i just insane in the membrane here...

.
__________________
"98% of us will die at some point in our lives" - Will Ferrell - Talladega Nights

[soxism]

Na your Spot on ownoiz (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/member.php?u=22034) ....Australia is already a quiet controlled NWO Land.. Latham is the best example of someone trying to do good then get threatened out...

I've Well Documented how problem-reaction-solution has been used lately.. Especially in regards to the Internet Censorship of late...

Give it Time in WA... things are Really Stirring up in the Bikie Gangs.. Channel 7 seems to love "bitching" and fear mongering about them..

[friendsinthesky]

Keep an open eye on the melb transport (train) industry and the smart card system. There may be a take over from Hong Kong.

[ownoiz]

South East SA - Groundwater plan awaits Govt approval

The new system for groundwater allocation in south-east South Australia could be approved within weeks.

The South East Natural Resources Management Board is waiting for State Government approval to implement its water plan for the region.

Irrigators face up to 30 per cent cuts to their water usage.

Board general manager Hugo Hopton says there are a lot of people anxiously awaiting the plan.

"Irrigators - whether irrigated agriculture, or processing industry, or the plantation forest industry - do need to know where we're going with water policy," he said.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/18/2519628.htm?site=southeastsa (http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/18/2519628.htm?site=southeastsa)


$30 million for new national groundwater centre

The Rudd Government today announced a national consortium led by Flinders University will administer $30 million in Australian Government funding for a new National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training.

Minister for Climate Change and Water, Senator Penny Wong, and Minister for Innovation and Research, Senator Kim Carr, said the new centre was an important investment in helping secure Australia's future water supplies.

"In Australia's water management, groundwater has often been overlooked," Senator Wong said while making the announcement at Flinders University.

"The new National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training will undertake important work to help us manage our groundwater in a more sustainable way.

The centre will train a new generation of scientists in advanced hydrogeological and related technologies, and improve our knowledge of groundwater connectivity, policy and management


Source: http://www.environment.gov.au/minister/wong/2009/mr20090122.html (http://www.environment.gov.au/minister/wong/2009/mr20090122.html)



OK so what does all of this mean?...I will attempt to explain it in laymans terms...

OK the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) up until recently produced somewhere in the vicinity of 40% of Australias fresh food, but now irrigation allocations on this surface water system have been reduced to miniscule amounts in recent times, 0% in winter and as little as 16-18% in summer in the major food producing regions of South Australias Riverland, and Sunraysia in Victoria and across the river border in NSW. (See my previous posts in this thread about the implications of this)

So now, with the MDB food production under control of TPTB, because of "climate change" of course...it is in a state of chaos for food producers who dont know where they stand...

We still have Goundwater right? WRONG!! We know better by now that these people will leave no stone unturned in the quest for complete food and water domination...

Heres some backgound on groundwater in South-Eastern Australia...

Groundwater also plays a major role in food production in the states of Victoria, SA and NSW, and aquifers containing decent quality water in these regions also support large amounts of food productions...

this water for the most part isnt as good for irrigation as the surface water in most of the MDB, due to higher NaCl (salt, for those who didnt pay attention in Chemistry class) and other TDS levels (total dissolved solids)...but good enough.

In South Australia alone, although there is approximately over 1.2 Million megalitres of water allocated for irrigation from the Murray River...there is 650 000 thousand megalitres of GROUNDWATER allocated east and south-east of Adelaide, so you can see that this resource also plays a vital role in our food production and security.

This and other aquifers also extend into or are present in Victoria and NSW.
All of these aquifers support large scale vegetable, Fruit and Nut production as well as growing feed for animals.

Just but one of many specific examples...operations from the LARGEST potato grower in the SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE are present in these regions, and have become ever reliant on this water supply especially since their allocations have been cut in the MDB...so you get an idea of the scale of some of the business investment dollars poured into these regions by private food producers.

Now even though some of these aquifers are NOT LINKED IN ANYWAY to the surface water that is the Murray River, they all have recently come to the attention of "the powers that be", who of course in their infinite kindness, want to "study" and "re-evaluate" water allocations and rules.

OF COURSE, this is all under the guise of helping us, the people, so we have "sustainable water supplies" , and heck most people fall for this "we the government are trying to help you by spending lots of money on this...see how much money we are spending, it says so on the 6 o'clock news...now lets all hold hands under the rainbow", as they fall for all the bogus CSIRO and other reports about the MDB and how our great government is "helping to save it".

What they are really doing is using taxpayers money to help fund research and operations such as water diversions and storage, water buybacks , restrictions and exit packages that are either eliminating, shaking out and/or ruining family farms, private food producers, from the smallest, to the largest which turn over hundreds of millions of dollars, no one is immune to this.

All the while there IS NEVER ANY TALK OF CREATING NEW WATER SUPPLIES for food production in recent times.

Now i have been suspicious for a number of years as to why they didnt start with this groundwater earlier, as they did with the MDB, and i came to the conclusion that they simply cant, because the subterranean geology is too complex and difficult to map, understand and control (unlike surface water) and the water levels cannot be manipulated or diverted without GREAT difficulty and much research...

Well along comes the $30 Million dollar groundwater research facility i linked to above, with objectives such as this listed on their website..

"The centre will train a new generation of scientists in advanced hydrogeological and related technologies"

Translated (for me anyway) it reads...WE WANT TO FIGURE OUT HOW THIS SUCKER WORKS AND CONTROL IT, and if we throw enough coin at it, we will figure it out and own it.

Research facility partners include some of our well known mates such as United Water (KBR Halliburton owned) and others. No suprise there, they dont even try and hide it, its all right there on all of their websites, i mean why would they, since most of us are stupid sheeple eaters that dont know any better and the rest are just conspiracy loons right? Halliburton is well and truly entrenched in South Australia, supplying everything from urban water to all of Adelaide to infrastructure for events such as the Clipsal 500 V8 supercar race and Tour Down Under. Yes even our so called Aussie v8 race puts money into Halliburtons purse. Thanks, DICK.

Malcolm Turnbull first mentioned this research facility when he was the Water Minister in the previous Howard government as part of their so called Murray-Darling Basin $10 billion dollar rescue package.

Of course the "Nude erection" (New direction) Rudd government with Penny Wong at the water helm has just picked up where the "other" *ahem* *cough* government left off.

What will this ultimately lead to?

First up, more groundwater allocation restrictions, the first of which have already begun in South Australias south-east (see the article and link i posted above)...it will then spread nationwide as this "new" research centre "tells" us that the previous models of aquifers recharging or aquifer drawdown levels were "wrong" and the water is now much "scarcer and finite" than previously thought...

After this, well best case scenario...Aussies, get used to eating unregulated Chinese and other sweat shop slave peasant grown food, or possibly food grown here by TPTB owned companies in these very regions after this big shakeout...

thats if there even will be enough food...maybe they want shortages...maybe they just want to produce it themselves and still keep us "eaters" around, i dont know which is the case...but what i do know is that there is a big shakeout going on...

Add to this all the businesses that will vanish and go under, as they already are in the MDB, and the associated increase in unemployment and poverty.

I know some will view my post as alarmist, those insulated from the goings on in the food producing regions because they are in the city and Woolworths is still full of food and they watch propaganda like the 6 o'clock news and other food features or shows like Getaway or the ones starring the likes of Paul Mecurio or other chefs, which is telling them otherwise...that everything is cranking nicely and all crimson and clover...some serious programming from TPTB to make city people believe that the government is doing all it can do to help with these water and food issues...but things are going from bad to worse as i actually travel these areas, and the towels are being thrown in left right and centre by food producers, large and small, who are now becoming aware that they are being enslaved.

I feel "a change is gonna come" when it comes to what we are now eating and anyone who tries to resist will likely end up like Sam Cooke who previously coined this phrase just before meeting his demise.

.
__________________
"98% of us will die at some point in our lives" - Will Ferrell - Talladega Nights

[ownoiz]

Bump
.
__________________
"Mall people they come and go, small people they just dont know" - Anna Faris

[oiram]

Fuck this I have been away for some time now but when I hear all this shit now I will not return to Oz being run-over by the parasites!

Fuck got to look for another country to live.

I will sell everything & get the fuck out of the place.

I came to Australia because it was free & now it looks like another prison.

Fuck Fuck Fuck.

Don't know if Australians will fix it most being totally passive to politics & a lot are piss pots not giving a shit.

That's bad news guys.

One more Country is fucked up by government & cooperations.

Is it correct that Jews own most of the MSM now; I heard a story about Perth?

How stupid a government has to be to fuck up a big country like Australia with only 22 million people.
This proves that a external Elite controls Australia.
I started to get worry when this fuck-head Keating in public said that Australians had it to good & they should slow down.
What a fucking thing to say but know we know why because they part of the Cabal which infested the entire Earth.

If America will not start there own cleanup very soon I don't see a chance for Oz.

They are ruled by British subjects fucking "Maison's"; Bye Bye Oz did not last long that's for sure.

[tomahawk]

Fuck this I have been away for some time now but when I hear all this shit now I will not return to Oz being run-over by the parasites!

Fuck got to look for another country to live.

I will sale everything & get the fuck out of the place.

I came to Australia because it was free & now it looks like another prison.

Fuck Fuck Fuck.

Don't know if Australians will fix it most being piss pots.

That's bad news guys.

One more Country is fucked up by government & cooperations.

I remember thinking a few years ago that Australia would be a good place to go to ride out the storm (or at least most of it). Given the vast expanse of the place and the relatively small population I thought that rural life in Australia would be an smart option. Doesn't seem like a smart option anymore, it is getting locked down just as fast if not faster than everywhere else in the westernised world.

Just look at the gun ban in Australia, twenty years ago if you told the average Australian that most guns would be banned and the rest would be so heavily regulated that they might as well be banned you would have been laughed out of the room. Now most of them can't remember or even imagine a time when guns were free to own. It went down the memory hole, they think the current status que was always the norm. The propaganda worked a treat.

[oiram]

I remember thinking a few years ago that Australia would be a good place to go to ride out the storm (or at least most of it). Given the vast expanse of the place and the relatively small population I thought that rural life in Australia would be an smart option. Doesn't seem like a smart option anymore, it is getting locked down just as fast if not faster than everywhere else in the westernised world.

Just look at the gun ban in Australia, twenty years ago if you told the average Australian that most guns would be banned and the rest would be so heavily regulated that they might as well be banned you would have been laughed out of the room. Now most of them can't remember or even imagine a time when guns were free to own. It went down the memory hole, they think the current status que was always the norm. The propaganda worked a treat.No Australia is a great place also the normal people are great!

But there is something very sick with the Government puppets & the Cops but this was always like this only lately they are going totally tropp'o & it started with this fuck-head Howard teaming up with fuck-head Bush & his illegal crap war .

I can only say if there is not a world wide Revolution to get rid of all Elite serving Governments & Cops it's not worth living anywhere on this fucking Earth ruled by nut cases.

I just can not get it what the fuck do they get out of it.
They are sick sociopath's that's the only explanation I got. It's not money because it's man made & they can supply & print as much as they want.

So what is there gain I can not get it & it does not make sense at all.

Did anyone figured out what they are getting out of this; they already own 75% of the entire earth what the fuck is it?

Seriously can someone help me with this.
I am a very logical person but this does not make any sense to me. What big thing is it we are missing.

Or do they have a death wish because they know how sick they are?

Must be something because it is totally & absolutely illogical? IMO
.

[ownoiz]

Do we blame the politicians...some of which who sell out...others at high levels, both their wallets and their lives may be in danger if they dont follow orders from above...

Or do we blame the people for being asleep and caring more about beer and watching other men chase a strange shaped ball wearing tight clothes...

As for reasons...there are many...but the biggest reason...they do it because they can...
.
__________________
"Mall people they come and go, small people they just dont know" - Anna Faris

[ownoiz]

Another forum thread:

The Murray Darling Basin (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread444252/pg1)


------------------------------


Water diversions:

there is strong evidence to suggest water is being held upstream, in the Menindee Lakes and others being built constantly, diverted into Lake Eyre (desert/salt pans), and of course sucked out by the like of Halliburton for easy urban water sales..all for financial and power gains...control of food and water...

At the least one could argue its government incompetence...if the problems really are caused by food producers, as TPTB kindly remind us all the time...it should not take a decade to increase water flows...they need to reclaim the water quickly.

But they dont, and its not incompetence...they like it being a mess and leaving people unsure of where they stand...its the best way to shake them out and break them spiritually and financially, thereby acheiving their ultimate goal of food domination.


-------------------------------------------


IF WILLY WONKA WAS RUNNING THE MURRAY DARLING BASIN - A story based on fact or fiction? - you decide...

Why are the Murray Darling Basin lower lakes empty?

Well, here in Australia, Willy Wonka uses umpa loompas who get funding from Macquarie Bank to buy up all the permanent water rights which are on offer on the open trading market in the Murray Darling Basin...but dont take my word for it, ask one of our federal senators like Nick X who can be found saying the same thing in parliament.

Then the umpa loompas convince the government to allow legislation which permits the building of large dams in the upper reaches of the Murray Darling basin river system to store ridiculous amounts of water that previously flowed freely downstream...while disallowing legislation to build the same dams lower down...

Then the umpa loompas travel downstream and take lots of photos of the lower lakes and the rivers mouth where it meets the sea, which is now much drier because of the dams the umpa loompas built upstream...and they give these photos and camera footage to the media so they can show the people how dry the river is everyday...

Meanwhile, other oompa loompas convince people that harvesting stormwater in our high rainfall coastal cities where 95% of Austtralians live is a bad idea that costs too much, and that desalination plants are bad for fish and cost even more...

And even more oompa loompas tell us that because of the melbourne bushfires, the melbourne dams are contaminated with chemicals and ash and that we must build a new pipeline to remove 75 billion (yes billion) litres of water a year from the murray river system, because of course the dams are polluted with ash, and stormwater costs too much to harvest and desalination costs even more.

Then the oompa loompas tell all the food producers along most of the murray darling basin that their water allocations will be severely restricted and they wont be able to produce the 40% of Australias food they currently produce unless they spent large sums of money to buy more water and are basically producing food without turning a profit....

a form of slavery where the big chain supermarkets here with 80% market domination still get much of the cheap produce they need, and then add large markups to the prices to keep up the multi million dollar profits, for the shareholders of course, the largest of which are british and american corporations...some of which happen to be major shareholders in Macquarie Bank also (awww its a small world isnt it, how cute) but the grower works day and night and makes nothing.

but the oompa loompas arent all bad news, they politely remind the growers that they can "lease" annual water rights from Macquarie Bank, who as you may recall previously, have purchased most of the permanent water rights on offer since the early two thous, and are now leasing it out, at much higher prices of course because now it is "scarce"...

And if ya dont beleive its scarce, just look at the images on the 6 o clock news that shows how dry the lower parts of the system are...thanks for the footage you little orange faced angels...

And lucky for the farmers that Macquarie Bank is so nice to lease the water that they purchased with funding received from such projects as government assisted roadworks and infastructure in both Australia and worldwide, particularly the Texas corridor where they got approvals to do pretty much what they like from George and Jeb Bush, including buying out a Texas media conglomerate comprsing of no less than 40 media outlets.

All of this while Kevin Rudd gives the Australian people 40 billion dollars for economic stimulus.

Yes the oompa loompas have been busy down under, more than just an orange face that stirs chocolate.

And dont forget carbon emmissions, global warming and climate change. I think the muslims have something to do with it too.



---------------------------------------------


Climate change doubt gets an airing:

I just wanted to highlight this story from Australian columist Andrew Bolt who has long been very public about his climate change/global warming scepticism. He can be a bit of a tosser on some issues but he is one of the few media voices in our country that writes on this topic.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25367707-5000117,00.html

He highlights an Australian climatologist who has come out with a book that challenges the government line on climate change.

And unfortunately next to the article, ol' Rupert is advertising how news limited will be 'carbon neutral'

http://m1.au.2mdn.net/viewad/1790500/OneDegree_March08_300x250.gif

Anyway, back OT...the National Famers Federation has also backed the professor..so something is definately cooking (or cooling) here...lets hope its not controlled opposition...you know...tell the people what they wanna hear kind of deal...



Full Story:

NFF backs climate change dissenter (http://sj.farmonline.com.au/news/nationalrural/agribusiness-and-general/finance/nff-backs-climate-change-dissenter/1491908.aspx)
.



.
__________________
"Mall people they come and go, small people they just dont know" - Anna Faris

[lizzy]

Do we blame the politicians...some of which who sell out...others at high levels, both their wallets and their lives may be in danger if they dont follow orders from above...

Or do we blame the people for being asleep and caring more about beer and watching other men chase a strange shaped ball wearing tight clothes...

As for reasons...there are many...but the biggest reason...they do it because they can....
__________________
"Mall people they come and go, small people they just dont know" - Anna Faris

and believe we are the inferior man , they are the gods and brought their masonic "religion' to Aussie , as else where. The agenda is as you know to control, cull, conquer , de-populate , only those with a pre-ordainded purpose will have " life" and that will never be worth living......;)

War has always gone for the necessities, food /water.....a slow death for most and quick one (Iraq ect) for others....but we are all rats in their cage.

my regards to you ownoiz.;)

[noesis]

i need to sit down and read all your water info Ownoiz ... it's not something i've delved much into but it always amazes me that we can get all this rain, yet our water storages keep shrinking. i was also talking to a scientist a couple of weeks back who told me that as the water storage levels drop, more and more chemicals are added to the supply to ensure its taste etc is not effected -- something i hadnt thought about before.

[ownoiz]

it always amazes me that we can get all this rain, yet our water storages keep shrinking.

The problem for us is that the catchments are now too well controlled, and many are linked..on the Eastern seaboard and into SW and central QLD. It is not difficult fo them to hold water back from specific areas...such as the lower lakes...then thats what they film for us to see on the 6 o'clock news.

For example, the recent floods in QLD and NSW...you wont see much or any of that water in the lower Murray, when it could have been, instead the floodplains of menindee lakes and lake eyre are full of water, and so is the ocean ;)

And besides all of this...Northern Australia is so wet, if TPTB wanted...there would be water diverted south...instead of allowing it to run out to sea...mankind has undertaken infastructure projects such as this for thousands of years sucessfully, even before modern technology...countries such as China...if you see their water infastructure projects...well they make Australians look like a bunch of primitive rock apes...and i know the Chinese think it too...

And as for the political puppets who may want to tear information like this apart...the likes of Karlene "Masonic" Maywald etc...even if you can convince people that these activities are untrue (which they aint)...

well you people still have no excuse, you have had many years to create additional water storages, harvest more stormwater and other alternative supplies...and lets just assume what you say is true about food producers as well, that they are also to blame...well you have had time to buyback water allocations as well...high security permanent ones, not the junk low security allocs which actually dont really exist at this point in time...

instead you all act like you dont know what you are doing...you hide behide a facade of incompetence...and many members of the public fall for it, they think it IS incompetence...but some know better...you love creating feelings of fear and uncertainty...like for example leaking stories/government documents about the city of Adelaide running out of drinking water...because thats what you are told to do...just following orders for your shitty 200K a year wage, which is sweet FA for your puppetmasters, im sure their printers print that in seconds out of thin air.

i was also talking to a scientist a couple of weeks back who told me that as the water storage levels drop, more and more chemicals are added to the supply to ensure its taste etc is not effected -- something i hadnt thought about before.

One of those substances they add to poor quality water is H2O2, or hydrogen peroxide. Just like flouride and chlorine...we should not be drinking that, but we are.

my regards to you ownoiz.;)

Thanks for reading my posts lizzy. Best regards to you also. :)
.
__________________
"Mall people they come and go, small people they just dont know" - Anna Faris

[noesis]

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25377156-5000117,00.html

[lightgiver]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3880524994354148258

The Coming One World Government,One World Religion,One World Currency. Want accurate verifiable information from a cutting edge source? Go to Dr Stanley Monteith (supported by his wife Barbara) at www.radioliberty.com . Free videos downloads and monthly newsletters. Free weekly audio mp3 downloads at www.soundwaves2000.com/radio_liberty/ . Check out his book titled,"Brotherhood of Darkness". Stan began studying the covert organizations that are working to establish World Government since 1962. Tags: Conspiracy, International Bankers, Lord Action,Dr Coombs, Reserve Bank,Magna Carta,William Paterson,Bank of England, Builderberg,Adam Weishaupt, New World Order,Humanism, World Government,New Age, The Aquarian Conspiracy, Karl Marx, League of the Just, Communist League,Communist Manifesto,Frederick Engels, World Council of Churches,CFR,Rothschild,David Rockefeller, United States Federal Reserve,Israel,Fabian Society,Club of Rome,Aurelio Peccei,One World Government, New World Order,Pine Gap,Nikola Tesla,Stan Deyo Co

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7543218238820051838&hl=en

[noesis]

Sorry if this has been posted - a bit under the pump at the slave factory - does anyone know what Australia's involvement is in the NLE 09 exercise?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/nle-09-fema-takes-preparations-for-martial-law-to-the-next-level.html

[father ted]

Any other Aussies wanna leave?

I do.

[noesis]

http://www.theage.com.au/national/dont-panic-yet--just-stock-up-20090430-aoyc.html

[ownoiz]

And lower rainfall in Australia's "drought" ravaged Murray Darling Basin is also a lie...

The Murray Darling Basin - the worst rainfall ever? (http://gustofhotair.blogspot.com/2008/10/murray-darling-basin-worst-rainfall.html)
.
__________________
"Mall people they come and go, small people they just dont know" - Anna Faris

[ownoiz]

The courts in South Australia have in recent times become clogged and backlogged with hearings involving "drivers" ;) travelling in unregistered vehicles, as people increasingly resist paying ever increasing fees to "The Crown"

So heres what they have done about it...

Road traffic cameras around the State will begin detecting unregistered and uninsured vehicles from Monday, June 1.
Road Safety Minister Michael O’Brien says all cameras on the network, including speed and red light cameras, can now be used to detect illegal vehicles on SA roads following legislative amendments passed by State Parliament last year.

“The increased detection capability will be complemented by tougher penalties for owners who failure to register and insure their vehicles," he said.

“The maximum fine for failing to register a vehicle will jump from $750 to $2500, while failure to insure will attract a maximum fine of $5000, up from $2500.

“We’re acting to reduce the number of unregistered and uninsured vehicles on our roads which research suggests has risen by around 30 per cent in recent years

Full article: uneregistered-and-uninsured-drivers-beware (http://sj.farmonline.com.au/news/state/agribusiness-and-general/general/uneregistered-and-uninsured-drivers-beware/1503653.aspx)


So $7500 K Fine for driving an unregistered vehicle :eek:

Jeez the owners of "The Crown" are really pissed at all the revenue they have been missing out on so they are doing their best to turn things around and prevent it from happening.

However considering we are talking about the Rann government, i suppose one should be thankful they didnt make the offence a prison term :rolleyes:
.
__________________
"All good things must come to an end" - Kevin "working families" Rudd

[boots]

Ah, yes the fuckers got me for that here in Victoria (although I wasn't "driving" Missus was) It was over the speed limit of a massive 3km/h So the fine came and then the next week the fine for not registering the car. It was the same as the rego $500.00 fine $500.00 rego fee. :mad:

So yes they have started to use this wonderful technology here. In conjunction with upping the amount of speed camera's on the road from 3500 to over 7000. Everyone know that it's a revenue grabber and they even sarcastically say it on ABC radio.


This is how too really screw the people of OZ who have to have a car because of such long distances.

Another thing is with the Hume freeway they have camera's permanently installed to check the times trucks travel and what rest times they have. That maybe OK but not practical. What get's my goat is the fact that we are being monitored all the time, everywhere you go.

.

[ownoiz]

Another thing is with the Hume freeway they have camera's permanently installed to check the times trucks travel and what rest times they have. That maybe OK but not practical. What get's my goat is the fact that we are being monitored all the time, everywhere you go.

Yep those overhead cameras for trucks are now linked countrywide, so if you drive for example from NSW to VIC or SA and get from point A to point B faster than what they want you to, you will get fined.

I believe those truck cameras are now activated to detect cars also, i read about the ones on SA/VIC border can now get you for unreg and speeding.

On the SA/Vic borders, in 3 seperate main entry places (sturt hwy, mallee hwy and princes hwy) they even have an extra one pointing to the "fruit fly" check points :rolleyes: (they aint just looking for fruit)...so if the workers there wave anyone through without checking their car/truck/caravan they are in the shit also.

They are not only watching us, they are also watching those who are watching us.

Not that it does much other than monitor traffic offences, the runners just use the always present dirt backroads to avoid the hotspots.

So the fine came and then the next week the fine for not registering the car. It was the same as the rego $500.00 fine $500.00 rego fee.

At least you got the fine in VIC...in SA its a maximum $7500...which usually means $7500. Max fines and sentences imposed by the courts are quite the norm in Rannistan.
.
__________________
"All good things must come to an end" - Kevin "working families" Rudd

[boots]

Yep those overhead cameras for trucks are now linked countrywide, so if you drive for example from NSW to VIC or SA and get from point A to point B faster than what they want you to, you will get fined.

I believe those truck cameras are now activated to detect cars also, i read about the ones on SA/VIC border can now get you for unreg and speeding.

It's a big money grab :rolleyes: 90 % of cars on the road today are in good condition, road worthy. In NSW you have to get a road worthy every year when you renew your rego. That sucks.


On the SA/Vic borders, in 3 seperate main entry places (sturt hwy, mallee hwy and princes hwy) they even have an extra one pointing to the "fruit fly" check points :rolleyes: (they aint just looking for fruit)...so if the workers there wave anyone through without checking their car/truck/caravan they are in the shit also.

They are not only watching us, they are also watching those who are watching us.

Not that it does much other than monitor traffic offences, the runners just use the always present dirt backroads to avoid the hotspots.



At least you got the fine in VIC...in SA its a maximum $7500...which usually means $7500. Max fines and sentences imposed by the courts are quite the norm in Rannistan.
.
__________________
"All good things must come to an end" - Kevin "working families" Rudd

This smacks of total control ownoiz. When you think what the people of Europe went through in the 1930's to 50's with checkpoints every where. They are now doing it here on the sly just getting people conditioned to accept it.

Like you said if you want to get through one for any reason then it's just a matter of going on the back roads. Reminds me of the gun control issue. You can get one without having to go through the BS. So whats the point.

I've got admit $7500.00 is fucking outrageous. who the fuck has that sort of money. If you are late 1 or 2 days because you CANT pay till the next wage come's in, then your fucked..How fair is that.

Fuck the Governments.

[friendsinthesky]

Point to point blood sucking repress me camera's do operate in Victoria detecting "cars".

The vehicle that detects unregistered "cars" is usually a dark blue merc van.

[noesis]

Queensland Premier Anna Bligh yesterday revealed 300,000 litres of contaminated water was pumped to up to 4000 northern Brisbane homes for three hours on May 1 after a malfunction delivered 20 times the allowable limit of fluoride into the water supply.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25486867-5005961,00.html

[noesis]

http://www.theage.com.au/national/car-rego-stickers-to-go-the-way-of-the-dogs-20090517-b7di.html

Something i did not know was ...

"In today's computerised and electronic age there are other alternatives to registration stickers on the horizon," Mr Negus said.

"All new cars now have a microchip in them and it is therefore possible to embed or code information about the car and its registration on the microchip," he said.

Does anyone know how 'new' they're talking about -- i'm guessing it's those with built in GPS?

[ownoiz]

Source: South Australian Water (http://www.sawater.com.au/SAWater/AboutUs/AboutSAWater/United+Water.htm)


United Water

Established in 1996, United Water is the largest private water company operating in Australia and New Zealand, providing water and wastewater services to more than one million people.

United Water is a consortia of three companies:

Veolia Water - the world's largest water services company and is the water division of Veolia Environment.

Thames Water - the UK's largest water company, providing water and wastewater services to 13 million people in Southern England and 43 million people worldwide.

Halliburton KBR - a leader in engineering, planning and project management in the Asia Pacific region.

In 1996 the SA Government awarded United Water a 15-year contract to manage and operate the metropolitan Adelaide water and wastewater systems on behalf of SA Water.


And from United Waters website: United Water (http://www.uwi.com.au/)

Veolia Water, the world’s largest water company, holds total ownership of United Water.
.
__________________
"All good things must come to an end" - Kevin "i speak fluent Mandarin" Rudd

[ownoiz]

"All new cars now have a microchip in them and it is therefore possible to embed or code information about the car and its registration on the microchip," he said.

Does anyone know how 'new' they're talking about -- i'm guessing it's those with built in GPS?

Before GPS...
Early 90's to mid 90's cars have chips with vehicle data (make, model, VIN etc) and vehicle management programs in the chip. The chip must be removed and modified to change code, then refitted...

Mid-late 90's till present have writable computers, containing downloadable programs, which can be acessed with the correct software via plug and play, and either downloaded and modified on a windows based PC or similar, then uploaded again, OR altered on the fly, while the vehicle is operating. Every facet of the vehicles operation is in this code, it is very comprehensive. It can also record data, speeds, airbag deployment etc, for example like a black box after an accident.

Usually it is only the vehicle manufacturer, or TPTB, that has the software to 'access all areas' ... unless someone makes a hack program...

For example Ferrari service centers were using stand alone touch screen tuning stations to change vehicle programming since the mid 90's...355 era...for their road cars...plug and play...the technology was perfected in Formula 1 and has now filtered to all production cars.

The next step to plug and play of course is telemetry and remote access to the computer.

And that is the worst part of modern writable vehicle computers...

They have the ability to be accessed remotely (no cable - wireless) when fitted with bluetooth or similar transmitters, this is already a reality on some models, and is used for example if you report your vehicle stolen, the manufacturer can shut it down while it is in motion. It can also be used to modify the engine management mapping while the vehicle is in motion...or read vehicle information, VIN number etc...and read current operationg conditions, speeds rpms etc...

so its plausible that registration details that have been uploaded...could be read when driving through suitably equipped check points that can 'read' the information...

Models with writable computers, but not fitted with transmitters, can be retrofitted, but its not very likely that governments would be doing this IMO, even though it is possible to do this to mid to late 90's and newer cars.

But yes, late model cars have the potential, well the quote from 2fast 2furious isnt hollywood make believe i assure you...

Or where the hell you got these rides from? They're hot.

Yeah, they hot. They wired so hot that whoever's trackin' these things will know...every time you don't wear your seat belt.


As for the future...new production models, its quite likely that remote access could be phased in across the board, as the technology has been there for years...
.
__________________
"All good things must come to an end" - Kevin "i speak fluent Mandarin" Rudd

[friendsinthesky]

http://www.theage.com.au/national/car-rego-stickers-to-go-the-way-of-the-dogs-20090517-b7di.html

Something i did not know was ...

"In today's computerised and electronic age there are other alternatives to registration stickers on the horizon," Mr Negus said.

"All new cars now have a microchip in them and it is therefore possible to embed or code information about the car and its registration on the microchip," he said.

Does anyone know how 'new' they're talking about -- i'm guessing it's those with built in GPS?

I'm sure there's something in the rego sticker. I did hear someone saying that when they go on the road "toll's" they put the rego sticker in the glove box so they wouldn't be detected.

[ownoiz]

A link to an article about the Port Arthur Massacre in Tasmania, by Joe Vialls...

Gun Control (http://www.whale.to/b/viallspam.html)
.
__________________
"All good things must come to an end" - Kevin "i speak fluent Mandarin" Rudd

[ownoiz]

http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/images/uploadedfiles/editorial/pictures/2009/05/19/zonetoon1.jpg


THOUSANDS of landholders on Melbourne's urban fringe will be hit with a $95,000 a hectare tax if they sell, subdivide or develop their properties.

The Victorian Government has decided to collect the tax on the sale of land, greater than 0.4ha, rezoned for urban growth.

So far, about 2675 landholders have received letters from Melbourne's Growth Area Authority outlining the new charge, which will apply if their land is rezoned as part of major review covering 50,820ha of rural land


Source: http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2009/05/20/80361_latest-news.html (http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2009/05/20/80361_latest-news.html)
.

[lizzy]

Ah, yes the fuckers got me for that here in Victoria (although I wasn't "driving" Missus was) It was over the speed limit of a massive 3km/h So the fine came and then the next week the fine for not registering the car. It was the same as the rego $500.00 fine $500.00 rego fee. :mad:



.

V sorry to hear that Boots.....


Yep those overhead cameras for trucks are now linked countrywide, so if you drive for example from NSW to VIC or SA and get from point A to point B faster than what they want you to, you will get fined.


They are not only watching us, they are also watching those who are watching us.
At least you got the fine in VIC...in SA its a maximum $7500...which usually means $7500. Max fines and sentences imposed by the courts are quite the norm in Rannistan..

__________________
"All good things must come to an end" - Kevin "working families" Rudd

Good Grief.....through a minor traffic offense you could lose 'the farm'?

Id's better stay put my friends.still no MOT or rego (even an emmisions testing that I had to do in the city).....but I has to come .........and on ownioz's last one the hit with a $95,000 a hectare tax if they sell, subdivide or develop their properties. .......

Just mind boggling........compliant rage they laff...in a riot they'll love it.

[lizzy]

"Deadly Deception at Port Arthur"
Patsies are normally used as decoys, deliberately inserted into the psyop to deflect attention away from the specialist group, allowing the latter time to extract safely from the operational area while the patsy takes the blame, But the planners leave tell-tale signs and occasionally make critical mistakes. It is a little-known fact that Lee Harvey Oswald was proved a patsy when a New Zealand newspaper printed a story about his guilt several hours before he was accused of the crime in Dallas. The planners put the decoy story on the news wires too early, forgetting the crucial time difference would allow the New Zealand paper to print the story long before Oswald was even accused. It was a single planning error, but one that proved in absolute scientific terms that Lee Harvey Oswald was deliberately set up as a patsy..........

hi ownioz.......
reminds me of the woman in Perth who phoned the the tv station and said she could see a coke-cola bottle on the Moon......( the film set)......apparently they transmitted through WA to give it a far away feel to control operatives and filter .......and many of those technicians / scientists died in 'accidents'.
Not quite the same as the Oswald or BBC third tower coming down (not yet)...

[ownoiz]

hi lizzy,

Fines and taxes, on the up and up...were heading for socialism/communism...us and them...if thats the case, then the governments should at least call a spade a spade, not the illusion of a capitalist society.

Soon they wont have to say it i suppose, it will be there in front of our eyes, as more and more people get smacked down, even affluent people, some of which will be the last to realise what is happening, but realise they will, when their businesses collapse and their capitalist illusion dissappears in a cloud of smoke.

Politicians are so weak, they sell out for a wage to help the billionaires and trillionaires elevate and monopolize...not as clever and enlightened as they think they are, at the end of the day they are Rothschilds bitches, being used because they are good at speeches and bullshitting on the TV...

they will never see or get anywhere near the kind of power, money or knowledge the elites have.
.
__________________
"Extended warranty! How can I lose?" - Homer "crayola oblongata" Simpson

[lizzy]

^^^ yup, all bang on ownoiz..........it did'nt have to be this way but they are on a roll now and with all the technology to control / modify / kill us externally and internally , I would like to do a Rapunsel and go to sleep for a thouasnd years, I wonder what I would see then? I hope it's not 500yr old elites.:eek:

[noesis]

CASH is accelerating down the path to extinction as new technologies threaten to mark the end of loose change within a decade.

Bank and credit union bosses say cash won't be alone, with wallets and credit cards also likely to disappear too.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,28348,25637102-5014239,00.html

[boots]

I suppose you might have heard the the scumbag banks have decided in their infinite wisdom to increase the interest rates....again. Fucking C*#t's.


If enough people can do this then they have to take notice.


Well you can send of this template to the ombudsman in your state.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
BEND OVER AUSSIES “BEND OVER”
5th of May 2009
IS YOUR BANK CHARGING YOU MORE THAN 3% INTEREST ON YOUR HOME LOAN?
READ ON TO FIND OUT WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT
THEN SEND THIS ON TO ALL YOUR CONTACTS TO MAKE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACCOUNTABLE.


If your bank is charging you more than 3% interest on your current home loan rate in Australia then they are committing fraud!

All Australian banks signed an agreement to fall in line with interest rates set by The Reserve Bank of Australia; all financial institutes in Australia were happy enough to increase their interest rates when the interest rates were set and on the rise (in line with The Reserve Bank of Australia) but these same financial institutes who have recently made billions of dollars out of people who have loans have failed to decrease the interest rates and pass on the savings to their customers as The Reserve Bank decreased the interest rates to help families with meeting repayments during this world economic recession.

Why hasn’t The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission held the Australian financial institutes accountable for not passing on the decreases in interest rates as agreed and signed off on by all Australian financial institutions and “as set by The Reserve Bank of Australia”?


Why haven’t these interest rate drops been passed onto customers (consumers) in Australia?
This is blatant outright fraud by the majority of financial institutions in Australia; see the chart below.



World Interest Rates Table -- Major Central Banks Overview
Central Bank Next Meeting Last Change Current Interest Rate
Bank of Canada Jun 04 2009 Apr 21 2009 0.25%
Bank of England May 07 2009 Mar 05 2009 0.5%
Bank of Japan Apr 30 2009 Dec 19 2008 0.1%
European Central Bank May 07 2009 Apr 02 2009 1.25%
Swiss National Bank Jun 18 2009 Mar 12 2009 0.25%
The Reserve Bank of Australia May 05 2009 Apr 07 2009 3%
Federal Reserve n/a Dec 16 2008 0.25%



Here’s our chance to make them accountable with very little effort!
But everyone has to do it!
I have attached a draft letter to send to The ACCC and the Banking Industry Ombudsman;
So it’s as simple as filling in your details and mailing or faxing them to the relevant departments.

I have also attached a Financial Ombudsman Service Limited (Australia) Dispute Form - Banking & Finance Division
Which you can fill in and print off or go online and complete
But remember that by posting it or faxing it; it will have a much better impact as they will be inundated with this same request over and over and over; the ACCC and the Banking Ombudsman will therefore have to address the issue to make it go away.
Plus each complaint is sent to your financial institution, they then have 30 days to answer your complaint in accordance with the Banking Industry Ombudsman’s guidelines.
Because of the financial institutes almost instant abundant workload this will encourage them to pass on the interest rate reductions that should have been passed on when The Reserve Bank of Australia reduced the interest rates.
(This is People Power)

The letter of complaint which I have provided under

“REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE FROM
THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION AND
THE BANKING INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN”
Simply requires your details and then

Send in your request to both
THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION AND
THE BANKING INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN and send a copy to your bank.
The Address for The ACCC in your state is below and the Banking Industry Ombudsman’s phone number is 1300 78 08 08

So you can get the address of where to send your request.

Let us Australian’s as a concerted effort on behalf of all Australian’s stand up for our rights and send a letter of request via fax or mail to:

(The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission)

Addresses for the ACCC are provided below

And for

(The Banking Industry Ombudsman in your state) Phone: 1300 78 08 08



Please do it NOW so you don’t forget and then send it on to everyone else

Adelaide office

Postal address:

GPO Box 922
Adelaide SA 5001
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (08) 8213 3444
Fax: (08) 8410 4155
Brisbane office
Postal address:

PO Box 10048
Adelaide Street Post Office
Brisbane Qld 4000
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (07) 3835 4666
Fax: (07) 3832 0372
Canberra office

Postal address:

GPO Box 3131
Canberra ACT 2601
Phone and fax numbers:

Phone — general: (02) 6243 1111
Fax: (02) 6243 1199
Darwin office

Postal address:

GPO Box 3056
DARWIN NT 0801
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph - general: (08) 8946 9666
Fax: (08) 8946 9600
Hobart office

Postal address:

GPO Box 1210
Hobart Tas 7001
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (03) 6215 9333
Fax: (03) 6234 7796
Melbourne office

Postal address:

GPO Box 520
Melbourne Vic 3001
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (03) 9290 1800
Fax: (03) 9663 3699
Melbourne office of the Australian Energy Regulator

E-mail: AERInquiry@aer.gov.au (wlmailhtml:{238F9278-C26F-4FE0-983D-B63E97D46BAD}mid://00000022/!x-usc:mailto:AERInquiry@aer.gov.au)

Postal address:

GPO Box 520
Melbourne Vic 3001
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (03) 9290 1444
Fax: (03) 9290 1457
Perth office

Postal address:

PO Box 6381
East Perth WA 6892
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (08) 9325 0600
Fax: (08) 9325 5976
Sydney office

Postal address:

GPO Box 3648
Sydney NSW 2001
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (02) 9230 9133
Fax: (02) 9223 1092
Townsville office

Postal address:

PO Box 2016
Townsville Qld 4810
Phone and fax numbers:

Ph: (07) 4729 2666
Fax: (07) 4721 1538


The ACCC & The Banking Industry Ombudsman Your Name
Address Your Full Contact
In your state Details
Please see attached email for address Address
or type ACCC into your web browser and Phone
this will bring up every address in your state Mobile
Fax or Mail this Notice to them Fax
The Banking Industry Ombudsman’s
phone number 1300 78 08 08
Date: 5th of May 2009
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE FROM
THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION AND
THE BANKING INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN

　
I am officially requesting that The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission as well as The Banking Industry Ombudsman intervene in the current and reoccurring fraudulent acts of financial institutions within Australia.
I am aware that an agreement was made between The Reserve Bank of Australia and ALL Financial Institutions of Australia; in that they would adjust their interest rates up or down in accordance with the interest rates set by The Reserve Bank of Australia.
I as a customer and consumer of the products offered to me by my financial institute namely
The Bank of Account Number
I am hereby notifying The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and The Banking Industry Ombudsman to place Australian Financial Institutions on notice to reduce their interest rates immediately to fall in line with the agreement made with The Reserve Bank of Australia whose interest rate currently sits at 3%.
In the event that my financial institution does not reduce their interest rate as requested by you within 2 weeks or 10 business working days; I further request that you take action on my behalf and on the behalf of other consumers of products offered by these financial institutions for which they have not reduced the interest rate in accordance to agreement with The Reserve Bank of Australia.
In addition to this I request a refund of all interest that has been charged to my account since the reduction of interest rates in the last 12 months.
I am further requesting a reply to my letter within 2 weeks or 10 days from the date of this letter from my financial institution namely:
Thank you in advance and I look forward to your assistance as the governing bodies of the Financial Institutions of Australia.
Yours truly,
Sign Here
Print Name
　
　
Financial Ombudsman Service Limited (Australia) Dispute Form - Banking & Finance Division
Date:　 05/05/2009
Fields marked with a red asterisk * must be filled in.
　　　　　　Contact Details
Title:

*First Name:

*Surname:

Email:

Address
*Postal:

*Suburb:

*State:

*Postcode:

Contact Numbers
Business:
Home:
Mobile:
Fax:




　
Gender:
Male Female
*Are you lodging this dispute as an individual or on behalf of a business?
Individual Business
Business Name:
Dispute Details
*Name of financial institution you are lodging this dispute about

Name(s) Account is held in (e.g. Mr John Smith)

Account Number(if applicable)

*Have you contacted the financial institution about this problem?
Yes No
If Yes, which department/person did you speak to or have contact with?

*If Yes, when did you contact this department?

　　*Has the financial institution finalised its review of the dispute?
Yes No
If Yes, please provide details of the outcome and send a copy of any response received.

*Summary Of Dispute:
Please include specific detail about what has happened and explain what you consider
to be the financial services provider's error. You should forward separately copies of any
documentation you have to support your claim including a copy of any response received
from the financial services provider.

*When did the events causing the dispute first occur?

*When did you first become aware of the dispute?　

*What do you consider to be a fair and reasonable resolution to the dispute?

*Do you have any documentation to support your claim?　 Yes No

　

[ownoiz]

I suppose you might have heard the the scumbag banks have decided in their infinite wisdom to increase the interest rates....again. Fucking C*#t's.

World Interest Rates Table -- Major Central Banks Overview
Central Bank Next Meeting Last Change Current Interest Rate
Bank of Canada Jun 04 2009 Apr 21 2009 0.25%
Bank of England May 07 2009 Mar 05 2009 0.5%
Bank of Japan Apr 30 2009 Dec 19 2008 0.1%
European Central Bank May 07 2009 Apr 02 2009 1.25%
Swiss National Bank Jun 18 2009 Mar 12 2009 0.25%
The Reserve Bank of Australia May 05 2009 Apr 07 2009 3%
Federal Reserve n/a Dec 16 2008 0.25%





Hi boots,

Hope all is well with you.

Yes, c#nts...no other way to say it...another example of us getting ripped off more than the rest of the world, i am well aware of what peeps in other countries can get credit at compared to us.

I have been wondering, that there must be a way to completely bypass these a-holes and borrow money from overseas, the USA for example. I am hoping to research this in a few months when i have time as i am very busy now. Maybe along the lines of setting up a business name or account overseas, and if you say have a home mortgage or whatever, set up some kind of operation on that property here in Oz (even if it is a shill, or think of a small scale idea and actually make it exist, even if it just for appearances) and transfer the property into the business...something like that...i mean how many US and UK corps are already in Oz investing and expanding...im sure they dont go down to the likes of the f#cking Commonrip bank to get finance...i know we arent corporations but there must be a way.

The reason i say this, is because i am bypassing many many local offerings of late, and buying shit from overseas, im talking about things that are actually made overseas, not made locally, things we cant or dont get locally made, and the a-hole big companies just make a phone call, bring it over in a container and add ridiculous margins to rape us all...IM THINKING LOANS COULD ALSO FALL INTO THIS CATEGORY...since the big banks here (or should i say barclays and JP morgan chase shills)..get their funding at the low rates from overseas...there must be a way...

I dont have any loans out ATM from any financial institutions...(i would like to be able to borrow again in the future withouit being raped)...but i still have steam coming out of my ears at these a-holes, especially when i see the politicians like Gillard appearing on TV, 'acting' like they are angry and 'telling the banks off' etc...its all a load of bullshit, they are all puppets telling the people what they want to hear, it makes me sick...if one looks at the major shareholders of some of these banks...it just leads back to London...sometimes via NY...but ultimately London...just like the 'crown' that employs our politicians...

I have stirred shit before...by importing my own goods and putting the cheaper price (money) where my mouth is..and letting those that get ripped off here know...big customers of corporations...SO I KNOW THAT WHEN THE RIP OFF MERCHANTS BEGIN TO GET BYPASSED EN MASS, THATS WHEN THEY TAKE NOTICE and pull their f#!king heads in a little.
.

[ownoiz]

THE Rann Government's controversial control orders on outlaw bikie gangs have been declared invalid by the Full Court of the Supreme Court.

In a landmark 2-1 majority judgment this morning, the Full Court ruled Section 14 of the Rann Government's Serious and Organised Crime Act was not a valid law.

The court ordererd that a control order placed on Finks Motorcycle Club member Donald Hudson in May was therefore "void and of no effect".

Justices David Bleby and Trish Kelly ruled the section of the law which prevented named bikies from associating with each other was invalid, while Justice Richard White found the law was valid.


http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,26123052-5006301,00.html (http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,26123052-5006301,00.html)
.

[ownoiz]

SA Full Court declares Rann's bikie control orders illegal

ANDREW DOWDELL, ADELAIDENOW REPORTER

September 25, 2009 11:35am

THE Rann Government's controversial control orders on outlaw bikie gangs have been declared invalid by the Full Court of the Supreme Court.

In a landmark 2-1 majority judgment this morning, the Full Court ruled Section 14 of the Rann Government's Serious and Organised Crime Act was not a valid law.

The court ordererd that a control order placed on Finks Motorcycle Club member Donald Hudson in May was therefore "void and of no effect".

Justices David Bleby and Trish Kelly ruled the section of the law which prevented named bikies from associating with each other was invalid, while Justice Richard White found the law was valid.

The judgment is a major setback for the Rann Government's efforts to clamp down on outlaw motorcycle gangs.

Full ruling: Read the judgment here (http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/files/bikie%20laws%20ruling.rtf)

Attorney-General Michael Atkinson said the Government had been right to introduce the legislation and would seek urgent advice from the Solicitor-General as to its next move.

He said the court's decision only affected Section 14.1 of the Act - and police could still use Section 14.2 to obtain control orders against bikies.

"The main difference between sections 14.1 and 14.2 is that police in the latter must prove that the defendant's organisation exists for the purpose of organising, planning, facilitating, supporting or engaging in serious criminal activity and represent a risk to public safety and order," Mr Atkinson said.

Reaction to the ruling

But Mr Hudson's lawyer, Craig Caldicott, said the Full Court judgment was a victory for the "little guy".

"I think it's a great judgment for my clients, we have been vindicated. We have said from day one that section 14 of the Serious and Organised Crime Act is invalid, it's draconian and it's basically un-Australian," Mr Caldicott said.

"(The decision) helps the little guy. This is all about freedom of association, this is all about people choosing to mix or associate with anyone they like."

Justice Bleby said he handed down today's ruling "in the firm expectation that this case is not stopping here".

Mr Caldicott said he also expected the State Government would not accept the ruling.

"They will probably try to rush through legislation to fix it or appeal to the High Court because they certainly won't like this decision, and this government is very quick to act on things it doesn't like," he said.

Opposition leader Isobel Redmond said the ruling was an "illustration of the failure of the Rann Government to effectively tackle crime".

"This legislation was rushed through Parliament by an arrogant, impatient and sloppy government," Ms Redmond said.

"Mike Rann and his Ministers should hang their heads in shame - their sloppy work has allowed bikie gang members to thumb their noses at the law and return to their criminal activities with inflated confidence."

Family First MLC and former Liberal government police minister Robert Brokenshire said the judgment was "embarrassing" for the Rann Government.

"It is high time that the Premier started to resource the South Australian police properly and keep himself out of the media when it comes to bikies," Mr Brokenshire said.

"What we really need, rather than costly court battles and spin, is greater resourcing into Operation Avatar so that police, at an operational level, can infiltrate and get into the face of bikies on the ground."

Mr Brokenshire said the Rann Government's "media spin" about bikies was "counterproductive and in fact undermines the important work of police in breaking up organised crime".

A small group of outlaw motorcycle club members were in the court for the ruling, including at least one member of the Rebels Motorcycle Club, which was to be the next group to be declared an illegal organisation.

The member of the Rebels said the the Government had failed in its efforts to divide and conquer outlaw motorcycle clubs.

"For sure, it's had really the opposite effect, we meet every Monday to discuss things, we are raising money for the fighting fund for all this, even the Christian clubs, we are all in this together," he said.

United Motorcycle Council of South Australia spokesman Mac Hayes also welcomed the "momentous" ruling.

"These laws were never about motorcycle clubs and their members. They were a disgraceful attempt by the Government and police to trample long-standing legal and civil rights of all citizens," Mr Hayes said.

"No doubt the Rann Government will claim today's decision is a victory for crime. Nothing could be further from the truth.

"The police already have extraordinary powers to fight crime, including the ability to conduct unannounced property searches and phone taps. These laws were about stripping away long-standing rights from all South Australian citizens."
.

[ownoiz]

The Rann government is set to go ahead with compulsory acquisition of thousands of acres of beachfront land on the coasts of South Australia, under the guise of environmental protection.

Most of this land is owned by farmers, and some had potential as future beachfront real estate, that is, until the Rann government came along and decided to take it forcefully.

Cant find a story link now, will post when i get it.

Land theft and a blatent land grab.

That being said, no land is never really ours now is it ;) we are merely tenants, in their laws and systems, true ownership is an illusion, once again demonstrated in this case.

And there will probably be plenty more to follow, in other states of Australia also, and probably not confined to prime waterfront land either, just any prime land.
.

[accuracy]

Uranium gag adds to Labor rift

ROBERT TAYLOR STATE POLITICAL EDITOR, The West Australian
September 22, 2009, 1:33 pm

http://l.yimg.com/fv/xp/wan/20090922/17/257069217.jpg

Opposition Leader Eric Ripper has banned two of his senior frontbenchers from discussing Labor's uranium mining policy publicly as deep divisions over the issue threaten to split the party.

Mr Ripper carpeted shadow treasurer Ben Wyatt on Thursday night over comments to the Kalgoorlie Miner newspaper late last month.

Mr Wyatt told the newspaper Labor would have to accept that uranium mines would open under the Barnett Liberal-Nationals Government and a future ALP administration would not close them.

The State ALP still has a "no uranium mining" policy but Mr Wyatt said it would be "nonsensical" for a future Labor government to close the mines.

"The sovereign risk alone - I mean the level of compensation that would require - would simply not make it a sensible use of taxpayers' money," Mr Wyatt said.

Mr Ripper said yesterday the question of whether Labor would close uranium mines once it regained office was "hypothetical" because there was every chance a mine would not be in operation by that time.

But Mr Ripper's uranium spokesman, shadow mines minister Jon Ford, said uranium promoters should not think a Labor government would stick by approvals given by the Barnett Government.

"I don't want to give any confidence to the mining industry in relation to uranium mining," Mr Ford said.

On Thursday, Mr Wyatt went to the meeting in the Opposition Leader's Parliament House office in the company of shadow minister for State development Mark McGowan but Mr Ripper refused to let Mr McGowan into the room.

Instead, Mr Wyatt, from the party's Right faction, was ushered into the presence of Mr Ford and shadow environment minister Sally Talbot, both leading members of the party's left-wing metalworkers' union faction. Ms Talbot is the State ALP president.

_The West Australian _understands that during a heated conversation, Mr Wyatt was told Mr Ford would have sole responsibility for commenting on uranium mining despite the Treasury portfolio having responsibility for the royalty revenue that would flow from the industry.

In the Kalgoorlie Miner article, Mr Wyatt floated the idea of uranium royalties being tied to a future fund that would be used for regional development but Mr Ford said yesterday it was not the shadow treasurer's role to "speculate on a royalties scheme".

Mr McGowan refused yesterday to discuss the party's uranium policy and why he was barred from attending Thursday's meeting.

Asked to deny that he had been gagged on uranium, Mr McGowan gave a firm "no comment" and referred all questions to Mr Ripper.

Mr Ripper said Thursday's meeting was a "demarcation issue".

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/wa/6088484/uranium-gag-adds-to-labor-rift/

[wahita]

Queensland is planned to be the launch state, and Australia is planned to be the launch country, for the One World Government.

The quotes from these sometimes weird articles show a lot of evidence pointing in that direction. We need to warn not just Australians and Queenslanders but everyone of these issues.

http://thomaspainereturns.net/posts/du.html


"Examples of eroding democracy in Australia include: the issue of amalgamation of shires into super shires, which has been despotically forced on people against public choice; fluoridation of drinking water has been ordered against the will of the vast majority of the people; recycling of sewage into drinking water is also being forced upon unwilling constituents. The government has completely disregarded heated protests, and has bullied the people into unwillingly accepting these three sensitive matters. The people's wishes on these issues have been trampled upon. In other words, democratic principles are often discarded in Australia.

Australia does not have an express bill of rights. Free speech is not guaranteed in the Australian Constitution. When Pope Benedict visited Australia in 2008, the government severely curtailed protests and demonstrations against his visit. This shows official disregard for free speech. There was very little the people could do, and the media helped the government in curtailing free speech.

As the creeping erosion of democracy began to snowball, one insult after another, more and more Australians began seeing through the government's heavy-handed tactics. They now suspect that the government is planning the unthinkable - taking away their liberties.

Australia will soon be one of the most stringent internet censors amongst democratic countries. The supposed primary purpose of the new filtering system is to protect the children from exploitation by paedophiles and other unsavoury sorts. Once people venture down the path of censorship, there is no limit to the abuse that can be imposed upon the people. Under the guise of protecting the populations from “terrorist activities”, mosques, churches, schools, businesses, hospitals etc. are targeted and the inhumane cruelty inflicted on people is justified in the name of fighting terrorism. Likewise, censorship can be abused to limit anything that threatens the One World Government."



http://thomaspainereturns.net/posts/australia.html


"Australia is under siege! The ruling elite have ordered the siege as they trial their plans for full implementation of the New World Order. The aboriginal communities have already tasted the bitterness of martial law. The excuse given was that there was widespread child abuse and sexual molestation occurring in the indigenous communities. Not everyone sees through the lies - yet!"

"Australia, like the other "good" NWO participants, is pursuing a huge, debt-laden financial rescue package that will do little or nothing to help the local economy, but much to boost the ruling elite's plan. The widely stated purpose of the rescue package is to preserve Australian jobs and ward off the recession. The hidden agenda behind the Australian and similar rescue packages is to put the nations into deep debt, followed by depression, which will ultimately discourage entire nations. Many will succumb to the NWO plans as they will be so confused, helpless and in a state of hopeless despair that they will accept nearly any type of conditions. Unfortunately, the minority voice that sees through the ruling elite's plan will not be heard.

Over the years, Australia has already eliminated most of the smaller shires and virtually dismantled local governments. People have less and less of a voice in what is occurring. The ruling elite have effectively programmed their lackeys to shout the praises of fluoridating drinking water despite the overwhelming evidence that fluoride is a dangerous and potentially lethal toxin. Forced fluoridation is only the beginning. Once the people have been brainwashed to accept fluoride, they will accept any kind of medications or toxins in their water.

Whilst there is still massive resistance to re-cycling sewage into drinking water in Australia, the government ignores the people's protests. In the NWO, people will have no voice. The ruling elite are setting the stage so they can release dangerous bacterial diseases via supposed "accidents" that allow raw sewage into the drinking water. There will be plenty of "lone gunman" and "mad scientist" scapegoats to point fingers at when these planned disasters occur, and each event will be followed by drawn out investigations to develop "safeguards" to assure such "accidents" do not recur.

The ruling elite are shutting down the Australian economy to drive out the hope of its people. Whilst doing this, they are busy in other areas, destroying democracy, decimating communities and regions, and working away at the Australian psyche. Their timing is critical."



flyingbuffaloes7.net/keluar7.html

"Nearly a century ago, Queensland’s Legislative Council, its then upper house of parliament, endured relentless attacks from the Labor Party until it was finally eliminated in 1922, leaving the Legislative Assembly as the sole surviving house of parliament in Queensland. The Labor Party began its attacks on the Legislative Council by political manoeuvring in 1915, and again in 1916. Both attempts failed to abolish the state’s upper house. Then, government presented a referendum on the issue to the people in 1917, which was resoundingly rejected by over 60% of the people. Labor again went after the Legislative Council in 1920, which ultimately resulted in the abolishment of the upper house by constitutional amendment in 1922.

Having a single house of parliament allows a democratic forum to be turned into a despotic one. Other states in Australia are now considering following the Queensland, single-house model. The main reason for justifying this is to efficiently consolidate power into a single house. Worldwide, other governments have followed Queensland’s lead. The British Commonwealth country of New Zealand followed suit in 1950, followed by Denmark in 1953, and Sweden in 1970.

Now that Queensland has a long established rule by a single house of parliament, the groundwork is all laid for a legislative tyranny. The Queensland government presents the appearance of being a democratic state, but it is literally a foundation for a despotic parliament. The party that holds the majority of seats in the Legislative Assembly selects its leader, who must also be a member of that house. This leader is given the title and position of Premier of the State of Queensland. The Premier, as long as he or she does not run afoul of the majority party, can literally dictate whatever policy or programme he or she wants. This is a very dangerous system. The people think they have democratic protections, when in reality those rights are absolutely illusory.

In Queensland, the parliament can force any issue on the opposition party and the people, if the majority party in power is bold and shameless enough to do so. Queensland parliament has become bold enough to act the part of a legislative despot. It has wielded its despotic powers with regard to fluoridation, recycling and desalination of drinking water, amalgamation of shires, the selling off of a large amount of state assets to private sectors, and has run up atrocious deficits, among other things. In short, a parliamentary tyranny is operating in absolute defiance of the majority of the people. In regard to fluoridation of water and the amalgamation of shires, more than 80% of the people were against these issues, yet the Queensland parliament still defied the people’s wishes. In other words, Queensland has abandoned democratic rule on many important issues and the parliament has become a tyrant.

The capital of Queensland is Brisbane, where massive infrastructure projects are underway in and about the city. These include multi-billion dollar tunnels, desalination plants, bridges, and other congestion-causing road works. The projects go forward regardless of people’s objections, which is yet another indicator of the parliamentary tyranny in operation in Queensland.

To a lesser degree, parliamentary tyranny is operating in every Australian state and territory. Despite protests and overwhelming objections of the people of Australia on certain issues, they are powerless to halt the elimination of democratic principles.

Australia is a very large island that has been classified as a continent. Despite its large geographic area, Australia is sparsely populated, with fewer than 30 million inhabitants. Such a small, isolated country would not normally be able to play a significant role in launching the New World Order. However, it has been selected to do so by the ruling elite. Thus, the little country down under is now on the world stage!

The Prime Minister of Australia, who is co-incidentally a Queenslander, became an active international political figure soon after taking office. Queensland has become the fastest growing state in Australia. According to news reports, people from interstate and overseas are migrating to Queensland in great numbers every month. There is a force driving this behind the scenes. Indeed, Queensland is the launch state, and Australia is the launch country, for the One World Government.

The plans of where to launch the One World Government did not originate in Queensland, nor were they hatched in Australia. They have been in the works for many decades."

[primordialman]

The Whole country is one big Facist Hubla, the Attitude Astounds me for what i have seen so far,:rolleyes:

People here need to get with the programme and loose this she'll be right Mate Attitude FFS :mad:

Otherwise People, Your Dog Tucker

Couldnt agree more except instead of fascist based on racism they fascist based on worshipping the jewnited states and Big business i mean how about crazy redneck pple form WA that like to defend fat cat multi national miners at the expense of the broader Aus community whom need the mining revenues for the good of their communities.
Its as if they think the rest of the country doesnt exist beyond their borders. If you dont like it sand gropers suceed otherwise putup or shutup! Face it sandy gropers the benefits of mining revenues dont just belong to WA they belong to the whole of Australia get over yourselves!.

[primordialman]

I came to Australia because it was free & now it looks like another prison.

Fuck Fuck Fuck.

Just out of curiousity exactly what were you expecting to find in Aus you should know by now this NWO is just that! Why would going to another nation in the NWO change anything!


Don't know if Australians will fix it most being totally passive to politics & a lot are piss pots not giving a shit.

That's bad news guys.

One more Country is fucked up by government & cooperations.


Once again are you not stating the obvious as a senior poster with thousands posts to your rep,you should know by now what the score is. I assume you know full well politics is controlled opposition, yet you act as if your dumb founded and surprised!

If the masses are asleep to politics that matters neither here nor there, however what should matter is the fact they are asleep to Illuminist conspiracy in Aus perhaps this is no accident when one considers there is a masonic lodge in just about every Australian city and town makes a profane outsider to the craft, wonder just how many anglo/celtic families are tied up in this nefarious child molesting cult.
Btw the biggest Masonic lodge is the parliament house in canberra itself it also could be no coincidence the official residence of the PM is called the LODGE!.

[ozpixie]

Going downhill as each day passes.

[neoconsumer]

Going downhill as each day passes.


Can't be worse than the UK though?

[wahita]

http://www.flyingbuffaloes7.net/do5.html

Real Independence and Real Self Government
by
Amitakh Stanford
23rd June 2010

Australia potentially faces a very similar situation to Britain because the next election could very well end in a hung Parliament. The Australian Senate is already hung, giving independents and small parties such as the Greens, exaggerated voices. When voters are disillusioned with both major parties, they tend to express their frustrations and disenchantment by supporting minor, independent parties, such as the Greens.

It is obvious that the powerful interests influencing things from behind the scenes are trying to split the unity within the Labor party, which currently holds government. The Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, is presently facing an onslaught in the media, and from the rich and powerful mining and business sectors, all of which are controlled by the Qualas behind the scenes. The apparent reason for the onslaught against Mr. Rudd is his introduction of a planned super profits tax on the mining industry – but the real reason, as will be explained, is that Mr. Rudd has upset the ruling elite.

At the behest of the ruling elite, the Prime Minister ran up huge debts for implementing a stimulus package during the recession. Mr. Rudd angered the ruling elite and their lackeys by giving stimulus cheques directly to the people to spend as they saw fit. This benefited many people at a time of need, and the injection of money into the retail sector gave a temporary boost to Australia's economy. The stimulus measure was too effective. The bottom line is that the ruling elite are trying to destroy Australia's economy. They had hoped Mr. Rudd's stimulus package would be less effective, and that the newly-created debt would severely hamper Australia's ability to recover from the recession. This is because when poverty strikes a nation, the people are much easier to control. The ruling elite have an agenda to eliminate Australia's democratic, self governance.

Assuming the rich and powerful are angry with the PM, the following analysis makes more sense. Australia is still in a fragile state of economic recovery. Any form of problem could send it right back to the start of it. It is obvious that someone who is advising the PM regarding finance and the economy is under pressure from the ruling elite. That person, or persons, has convinced the PM to introduce the super profits tax on mining activities. While there are many good reasons for increasing taxes on the mining industry, the timing of its announcement amounts to political suicide. As could be expected, Mr. Rudd's approval rating dropped dramatically upon announcing the plans for the new tax. There is simultaneously so much internal stirring within the PM's own party that there is even discussion concerning a possible spill motion to remove the sitting Prime Minister! The internal strife is being orchestrated by the ruling elite to destabilise the party from within.

Another thing that the ruling elite is doing to destabilise the government at this time is to direct an unending fleet of refugee-laden boats to invade Australian waters. It is not an accident, nor a co-incidence, that more and more asylum seekers are arriving in boatloads in Australia. This is part and parcel of the ruling elite's plan to destabilise Australian governance.

The plans of the ruling elite are extremely complex, and are often made to appear to be natural occurrences that are unrelated to one another, making it very difficult to get a handle on what the ruling elite are doing. For instance, excessive refugee influx is caused by ruling elite sponsored wars. Few would suspect that one of the desired consequences of the wars is to flood the world with refugees. The influx of asylum seekers stirs many different issues in the country being deluged by them. These include religious, cultural, language, economic, democratic, moral, legal and racial issues, among other things. There is a primary objective, which is that the ruling elite are trying to take Australia's self governance from the people. The above-listed issues are side-tracking Australians and causing infighting whilst the house is on fire! There are enemies from without and within who want to take individual freedom away from Australian citizens.

The ruling elite do not want anyone in power who can think independently and will sincerely try to improve things for the people. They want people who can be manipulated into doing what they want done. Mr. Rudd is very obviously facing internal sabotage within his own party. Otherwise, he would never have presented the ill-timed super profits tax, and would already have abandoned it upon seeing the resultant backlash.

To compound this situation that government faces, the opposition party, which is composed of a coalition of the Nationals and the Liberals, cannot make much headway in the polls. The opposition leader, Tony Abbott, is in a similar position to Mr. Rudd – the ruling elite do not like him either!

With the stage so set, and an election looming, suddenly the Greens and other minor parties are making headway. The polls show the Greens gaining rapidly, with some saying that they could take 20 percent of the vote in the next election. This would be a huge increase, as the Greens have never drawn anywhere near that number of votes.

With the ruling elite backing the Greens in order to try to achieve a hung Parliament, Australian politics could be in a precarious state. Whenever the Parliament is hung, the British Sovereign gains significant power over the government. The Australian Parliament faces the ever-present threat of dissolution of government if it is deadlocked. This is why so many Australians want Australia to become a republic and cut ties with the monarchy. They want REAL independence and REAL self government. A deadlock can easily be manoeuvred if the Greens adhere to the ruling elite's demands.

Whilst people still have the voice, they need to speak out. A hung Parliament in Australia is dangerous to Australian democracy. It could jeopardise the amount of self government that Australia has so patiently and gradually acquired over the centuries. Ironically, the very parties responsible for eliminating many rights of Australians are, for the time being, the people's best protection for preserving democracy. The two major political parties are the Liberal/National Coalition and the Labor Party.

At this crucial time, for the sake of democratic government, it really does not matter so much which of these parties take government in the next election. What is
more important is to halt the ruling elite's plan to hang Parliament. Australia cannot afford a hung Parliament!

[jacki_e]

http://www.flyingbuffaloes7.net/do5.html

Real Independence and Real Self Government
by
Amitakh Stanford
23rd June 2010

Australia potentially faces a very similar situation to Britain because the next election could very well end in a hung Parliament. The Australian Senate is already hung, giving independents and small parties such as the Greens, exaggerated voices. When voters are disillusioned with both major parties, they tend to express their frustrations and disenchantment by supporting minor, independent parties, such as the Greens.

It is obvious that the powerful interests influencing things from behind the scenes are trying to split the unity within the Labor party, which currently holds government. The Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, is presently facing an onslaught in the media, and from the rich and powerful mining and business sectors, all of which are controlled by the Qualas behind the scenes. The apparent reason for the onslaught against Mr. Rudd is his introduction of a planned super profits tax on the mining industry – but the real reason, as will be explained, is that Mr. Rudd has upset the ruling elite.

At the behest of the ruling elite, the Prime Minister ran up huge debts for implementing a stimulus package during the recession. Mr. Rudd angered the ruling elite and their lackeys by giving stimulus cheques directly to the people to spend as they saw fit. This benefited many people at a time of need, and the injection of money into the retail sector gave a temporary boost to Australia's economy. The stimulus measure was too effective. The bottom line is that the ruling elite are trying to destroy Australia's economy. They had hoped Mr. Rudd's stimulus package would be less effective, and that the newly-created debt would severely hamper Australia's ability to recover from the recession. This is because when poverty strikes a nation, the people are much easier to control. The ruling elite have an agenda to eliminate Australia's democratic, self governance.

Assuming the rich and powerful are angry with the PM, the following analysis makes more sense. Australia is still in a fragile state of economic recovery. Any form of problem could send it right back to the start of it. It is obvious that someone who is advising the PM regarding finance and the economy is under pressure from the ruling elite. That person, or persons, has convinced the PM to introduce the super profits tax on mining activities. While there are many good reasons for increasing taxes on the mining industry, the timing of its announcement amounts to political suicide. As could be expected, Mr. Rudd's approval rating dropped dramatically upon announcing the plans for the new tax. There is simultaneously so much internal stirring within the PM's own party that there is even discussion concerning a possible spill motion to remove the sitting Prime Minister! The internal strife is being orchestrated by the ruling elite to destabilise the party from within.

Another thing that the ruling elite is doing to destabilise the government at this time is to direct an unending fleet of refugee-laden boats to invade Australian waters. It is not an accident, nor a co-incidence, that more and more asylum seekers are arriving in boatloads in Australia. This is part and parcel of the ruling elite's plan to destabilise Australian governance.

The plans of the ruling elite are extremely complex, and are often made to appear to be natural occurrences that are unrelated to one another, making it very difficult to get a handle on what the ruling elite are doing. For instance, excessive refugee influx is caused by ruling elite sponsored wars. Few would suspect that one of the desired consequences of the wars is to flood the world with refugees. The influx of asylum seekers stirs many different issues in the country being deluged by them. These include religious, cultural, language, economic, democratic, moral, legal and racial issues, among other things. There is a primary objective, which is that the ruling elite are trying to take Australia's self governance from the people. The above-listed issues are side-tracking Australians and causing infighting whilst the house is on fire! There are enemies from without and within who want to take individual freedom away from Australian citizens.

The ruling elite do not want anyone in power who can think independently and will sincerely try to improve things for the people. They want people who can be manipulated into doing what they want done. Mr. Rudd is very obviously facing internal sabotage within his own party. Otherwise, he would never have presented the ill-timed super profits tax, and would already have abandoned it upon seeing the resultant backlash.

To compound this situation that government faces, the opposition party, which is composed of a coalition of the Nationals and the Liberals, cannot make much headway in the polls. The opposition leader, Tony Abbott, is in a similar position to Mr. Rudd – the ruling elite do not like him either!

With the stage so set, and an election looming, suddenly the Greens and other minor parties are making headway. The polls show the Greens gaining rapidly, with some saying that they could take 20 percent of the vote in the next election. This would be a huge increase, as the Greens have never drawn anywhere near that number of votes.

With the ruling elite backing the Greens in order to try to achieve a hung Parliament, Australian politics could be in a precarious state. Whenever the Parliament is hung, the British Sovereign gains significant power over the government. The Australian Parliament faces the ever-present threat of dissolution of government if it is deadlocked. This is why so many Australians want Australia to become a republic and cut ties with the monarchy. They want REAL independence and REAL self government. A deadlock can easily be manoeuvred if the Greens adhere to the ruling elite's demands.

Whilst people still have the voice, they need to speak out. A hung Parliament in Australia is dangerous to Australian democracy. It could jeopardise the amount of self government that Australia has so patiently and gradually acquired over the centuries. Ironically, the very parties responsible for eliminating many rights of Australians are, for the time being, the people's best protection for preserving democracy. The two major political parties are the Liberal/National Coalition and the Labor Party.

At this crucial time, for the sake of democratic government, it really does not matter so much which of these parties take government in the next election. What is
more important is to halt the ruling elite's plan to hang Parliament. Australia cannot afford a hung Parliament!

This makes complete sense to me,and I fret the thought that it is falling into the elite's hands as they wanted.I am in Australia and we must get the message out to EVERYONE,without sounding completely bonkers!Thinking caps on!

[ozpixie]

Did the above proposal actually go through?

.

Yes it did :(