View Full Version : New 9/11 Footage.
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:01 PM
Yes my friends, this is indeed a very sad day for the No Planers.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HoyWAjVpZzY
0:07 seconds in u can see the plane clear is day,
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:02 PM
Yes my friends, this is indeed a very sad day for the No Planers.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HoyWAjVpZzY
0:07 seconds in u can see the plane clear is day,
What footage? oh that black object filmed from a mile away,very good evidence looks like one of them cgi holly wood films.Yep i am convinced now that planes were used:rolleyes: yeah crystal clear shot of a plane close up cracking,did you shoot that one.
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:05 PM
What footage? oh that black object filmed from a mile away,very good evidence looks like one of them cgi holly wood films.
ha ha, look you know it's a REAL Plane... Admit it, the evidence is real...... It's all new footage coming right up in your face. accept it.
Yes my friends, this is indeed a very sad day for the No Planers.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HoyWAjVpZzY
0:07 seconds in u can see the plane clear is day,
Oh, i like the way it zooms in AFTER the plane hits. :cool:
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:07 PM
Oh, i like the way it zooms in AFTER the plane hits. :cool:
That's not good enough for you??
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HtavS6Dquc4
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:08 PM
ha ha, look you know it's a REAL Plane... Admit it, the evidence is real...... It's all new footage coming right up in your face. accept it.
No NO NO i do not accept it,until i see some real evidence,and where is all the plane wreckage being kept for forensic analysis? no one can answer such a simple question,i thought you were all experts maybe mynamis or keystone may provide the answers:confused:
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:11 PM
That's not good enough for you??
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HtavS6Dquc4
yes i heard her mention a plane???????? no, she just said it exploded. Pause the vid around 9 to 10 seconds in,funny looking plane?
we can go on all day with this vid nonsense,it is not going to convince me until i see some concrete evidence,and even that managed to get pulverised,some how:confused:
I will ask again where is the plane wreckage evidence being kept 911 armchair computer experts:confused:
mynameis
11-11-2008, 10:12 PM
No NO NO i do not accept it,until i see some real evidence,and where is all the plane wreckage being kept for forensic analysis? no one can answer such a simple question,i thought you were all experts maybe mynamis or keystone may provide the answers:confused:
First, what does keystone have to do with me answering anything or vice versa?
Second, I asked you which plane do you mean?
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:13 PM
No NO NO i do not accept it,until i see some real evidence,and where is all the plane wreckage being kept for forensic analysis? no one can answer such a simple question,i thought you were all experts maybe mynamis or keystone may provide the answers:confused:
So let me guess this straight your not going to accept the fact that evidence is their right in your face, because their is no evidence of plane wreckage??.
And what is real evidence to you???
That's not good enough for you??
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HtavS6Dquc4
Ok, the plane doesnt even appear to be going at the right angle the way the explosion is being shown. plus the girl seems to have the fakest acting ever and she only mentions she saw an "explosion" nothing about a plane, she just says that she saw an explosion. still not good enough.
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:16 PM
yes i heard her mention a plane???????? no, she just said it exploded.
we can go on all day with this vid nonsense,it is not going to convince me until i see some concrete evidence,and even that managed to get pulverised,some how:confused:
I will ask again where is the plane wreckage evidence being kept 911 armchair computer experts:confused:
the video is not nonsense it is actual evidence new footage.
Look at the explosion, do you think plane parts would survive that???? with that amount of jet fuel inside it???? no I don't think so. Watch the test plane into a concrete wall video. For an example. you will never ever see truth.
Even if all of a sudden plane parts where found would you believe it? NO..
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:18 PM
Ok, the plane doesnt even appear to be going at the right angle the way the explosion is being shown. plus the girl seems to have the fakest acting ever and she only mentions she saw an "explosion" nothing about a plane, she just says that she saw an explosion. still not good enough.
This is the best evidence ever, and you all know it.
You lot just can not accept the fact, that your all wrong...
Watch the test plane into a concrete wall video. For an example. you will never ever see truth.
Ok... The towers where made largely from glass. it wasnt one giant block of concrete.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:19 PM
ffs, the video is not nonsense it is actual evidence new footage.
Look at the explosion, do you think plane parts would survive that???? with that amount of jet fuel inside it???? no I don't think so. Watch the test plane into a concrete wall video. For an example. you will never ever see truth.
Even if all of a sudden plane parts where found would you believe it? NO..
You would not make a detective dear watson.
Maybe thats why the cops are crap.
mynameis
11-11-2008, 10:19 PM
Bullshit, this is the best evidence ever, and you all know it.
You lot just can not accept the fact, that your all wrong...
No Planer: Eye Witness report.
Oh 9/11 their were no Planes. because I had my face in my ass
and I didn't see anything but when I looked up I heard an explosion
and, that was when I knew it was an inside job.
To top it off with the fact that if she had said planes the NPT crowd would dismiss her as some kind of plant or fruitcake nonsense, then gangstalk her into silence.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:22 PM
To top it off with the fact that if she had said planes the NPT crowd would dismiss her as some kind of plant or fruitcake nonsense, then gangstalk her into silence.
Stupid boy,as captain mannering likes to say:D
maybe you know where all the 911 plane wreckage evidence is being stored:confused:
No body else seems to know where it is.
Maybe i will start a thread to see if any one else as some info on its whereabouts.
mynameis
11-11-2008, 10:25 PM
Stupid boy,as captain mannering likes to say:D
maybe you know where all the 911 plane wreckage evidence is being stored:confused:
No body else seems to know where it is.
Maybe i will start a thread to see if any one else as some info on its whereabouts.
So then you'd admit there were planes because there's wreckage if I find the location right?
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:25 PM
You would not make a detective dear watson.
Maybe thats why the cops are crap.
Look your out of words now, you know this footage is A CLASS. and you can't fight back over it, accept loss and defeat. Thanks to this new footage.
WE WIN, YOU LOOSE
PLANERS 1 NO PLANERS 0
So then you'd admit there were planes because there's wreckage if I find the location right?
But wouldnt they fake having the wreckages to "prove" there were planes?
Look your out of words now, you know this footage is A CLASS. and you can't fight back over it, accept loss and defeat. Thanks to this new footage.
WE WIN, YOU LOOSE
PLANERS 1 NO PLANERS 0
Wow. you really are childish.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:27 PM
So then you'd admit there were planes because there's wreckage if I find the location right?
Hmm,depends on where the wreckage is being stored,for forensic analysis and quality of pics and the authenticity of link?
All 4 planes? Engines,black boxes etc etc.
but i will definitely have a look,but flight 93 and the pentagon still very dubious,but i always keep an open mind.
qasrose
11-11-2008, 10:31 PM
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
mynameis
11-11-2008, 10:37 PM
Hmm,depends on where the wreckage is being stored,for forensic analysis and quality of pics and the authenticity of link?
All 4 planes? Engines,black boxes etc etc.
but i will definitely have a look,but flight 93 and the pentagon still very dubious,but i always keep an open mind.
What? First, you just said there was no planes and ask for evidence. We showed you. Then you said there is no plane evidence. Then we showed you. Now you asked for the location and are saying that the location isn't good enough unless checked and verified by etc...and even if I showed you the location you aren't willing to admit anything, so I give up, why do I bother even talking to you anymore. As the habitual pattern shows, case closed on lightgiver. Cause now you've backpedaled even more.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:37 PM
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
Just checked links for source info,nothing comes up?and seen all them pics before proves nothing in my eyes,by the way i am not a planer or no planer just trying to get the truth of the matter.Detective work.
There is no way on earth the nose of the plane could have penetrated all the rings of the pentagon and leave a hole the other side like that last pic,the 1 below,only a missile could make such an impact.
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
http://www.rense.com/general32/fuselagefragment_MVC-027S.jpg
Ok, i just dont understand how a plane can create a hole like that. Alright, maybe the wings do break off on impact or whatever but im surprised that the "No parking sign" managed to stay perfectly on the wall. :rolleyes:
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 10:42 PM
What? First, you just said there was no planes and ask for evidence. We showed you. Then you said there is no plane evidence. Then we showed you. Now you asked for the location and are saying that the location isn't good enough unless checked and verified by etc...and even if I showed you the location you aren't willing to admit anything, so I give up, why do I bother even talking to you anymore. As the habitual pattern shows, case closed on lightgiver. Cause now you've backpedaled even more.
You have shown me no concrete evidence whatsoever,whats up can you not find where the plane wreckage is being stored?
You give in to easy.
banoyes
11-11-2008, 10:43 PM
Does qasrose seem desperate??
Fact is qasrose
The no plane facts are too compelling
No wreckage
still alive hi-jackers
the impossible entry
the impossible speed
the impossible piloting skills
the videos with missing wings
plane changing color
the planes coming from different angles
the wrong engine in the street
conflicting eyewitness
there is nothing to make one believe real planes were involved at any of the crash sites
insist away
you are supporting the official story
and letting all these Anomalies go un answered
mynameis
11-11-2008, 10:48 PM
You have shown me no concrete evidence whatsoever,whats up can you not find where the plane wreckage is being stored?
You give in to easy.
I know where it was stored. Do I know if it's there? No. Am I going to move the goal posts for you? No. Is the burden on you to prove your case? Yes. I asked one question and you can't even bring yourself to say you are wrong in every sense, each time we are proven right. So go stick your tongue on a frozen iron pole, cause your BS don't work here any longer.
Does qasrose seem desperate??
Fact is qasrose
The no plane facts are too compelling
No wreckage
still alive hi-jackers
the impossible entry
the impossible speed
the impossible piloting skills
the videos with missing wings
plane changing color
the planes coming from different angles
the wrong engine in the street
conflicting eyewitness
there is nothing to make one believe real planes were involved at any of the crash sites
insist away
you are supporting the official story
and letting all these Anomalies go un answered
I like.
mynameis
11-11-2008, 10:50 PM
Does qasrose seem desperate??
Fact is qasrose
The no plane facts are too compelling
No wreckage
still alive hi-jackers
the impossible entry
the impossible speed
the impossible piloting skills
the videos with missing wings
plane changing color
the planes coming from different angles
the wrong engine in the street
conflicting eyewitness
there is nothing to make one believe real planes were involved at any of the crash sites
insist away
you are supporting the official story
and letting all these Anomalies go un answered
Each and every one of these has been proven wrong. We've shown the evidence and all NPT does play willful cognitive dissonance. My only regret is that others will be duped by the nonsense display here.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 11:02 PM
I know where it was stored. Do I know if it's there? No. Am I going to move the goal posts for you? No. Is the burden on you to prove your case? Yes. I asked one question and you can't even bring yourself to say you are wrong in every sense, each time we are proven right. So go stick your tongue on a frozen iron pole, cause your BS don't work here any longer.
Why do you people always get so angry when things do not go your way,i bet you are not doing a lot for the truth movement away from your computers,just coming on here with BS your selves,buying a t shirt with 911 was an inside job is not gonna get a investigation is it now?
So where are your credible links then padawan:D:D
I have had a research and cannot find anything,you must have superior intelligence than i, a mere mortal;)
mynameis
11-11-2008, 11:06 PM
Why do you people always get so angry when things do not go your way,i bet you are not doing a lot for the truth movement away from your computers,just coming on here with BS your selves,buying a t shirt with 911 was an inside job is not gonna get a investigation is it now?
So where are your credible links then padawan:D:D
I have had a research and cannot find anything,you must have superior intelligence than i, a mere mortal;)
More personal attacks....exactly what I'd thought you'd do.
*switches to banoes mode*
I see you clear
now patterns forming
See how they do it
Attack needless to say
no substance of anything we tell them
It's truth they seek not
kill the truth they do it here always again
watch another leap this post
and attack me again
like they always do
my precious...golem
my ring....my own....my love
my precious...give us the ring....
/sarcasm
*banoes mode off*
And btw I'm not angry.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 11:12 PM
More personal attacks....exactly what I'd thought you'd do.
*switches to banoes mode*
I see you clear
now patterns forming
See how they do it
Attack needless to say
no substance of anything we tell them
It's truth they seek not
kill the truth they do it here always again
watch another leap this post
and attack me again
like they always do
my precious...golem
my ring....my own....my love
my precious...give us the ring....
/sarcasm
And btw I'm not angry.
,are you sure you are alright:confused:you seem to be using my words,turning it all around like a mind game,tis child play:)
Rockefeller and co funded the twin towers project also.HHmm but you already know that,you soon watched the russo interview,but you have seen that also.BYE BYE.
EEE i bet your mind is on fire,ha ha. by the way i do not resort to personnel attacks.
The Rockefeller's and chums funded 911,elementary my dear Watson.
mynameis
11-11-2008, 11:13 PM
,are you sure you are alright:confused:you seem to be using my words,turning it all around like a mind game,tis child play:)
Rockefeller and co funded the twin towers project also.HHmm but you already know that,you soon watched the russo interview,but you have seen that also.BYE BYE.
EEE i bet your mind is on fire,ha ha.
And your evidence that Russo is correct is? I'm still waiting for you to prove it. Where's your evidence of your charge against Rockerfeller? Which Rockerfeller? Eh? Where's the beef of the argument you are making?
keystone
11-11-2008, 11:14 PM
First, what does keystone have to do with me answering anything or vice versa?Quite.
keystone
11-11-2008, 11:14 PM
More personal attacks....exactly what I'd thought you'd do.
*switches to banoes mode*
I see you clear
now patterns forming
See how they do it
Attack needless to say
no substance of anything we tell them
It's truth they seek not
kill the truth they do it here always again
watch another leap this post
and attack me again
like they always do
my precious...golem
my ring....my own....my love
my precious...give us the ring....
/sarcasm
*banoes mode off*
And btw I'm not angry.:D
banoyes
11-11-2008, 11:18 PM
The video I think came from
http://www.infowars.net/articles/november2008/111108Footage.htm
The Alex Jones site ..there 4 I think all "NEW"
Check this one
The wing disappears and the nose comes right out the other side of the building
geezzee of course composit nose cones can do that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K94NUtpGJw&e
Now watch this "new" one
It is the best yet of the spire turning to dust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCUbcmo9-kE&e
I downloaded this one
a telling video
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 11:20 PM
:D
:D:D
hell o
i knew you would arrive,familiar faces. familiar places
do you know where the plane wreckage is being stored,you know the 911 plane wreckage,the place it got forensically examined:confused:
The Rockefeller and co funded 911,and i do not care which one ,they are all crooks.
Powerful men walk on crooked legs.
mynameis
11-11-2008, 11:30 PM
i do not care which one ,they are all crooks.
Hold the presses.
Let's get the pitch forks and shovels boys. Grab your white hoods and march on the castle hick hick hick...we dun need na trails. Dems fer mental fo'k. Dey is.
/sarcasm
Still waiting for your proof they are crooks. Still waiting for names and evidence that ties them specifically.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 11:37 PM
Hold the presses.
Let's get the pitch forks and shovels boys. Grab your white hoods and march on the castle hick hick hick...we dun need na trails. Dems fer mental fo'k. Dey is.
/sarcasm
Still waiting for your proof they are crooks. Still waiting for names and evidence that ties them specifically.
Its like having a conversation with a child.you have shown your true colours,to me any how.
mynameis
11-11-2008, 11:41 PM
Its like having a conversation with a child.you have shown your true colours,to me any how.
Likewise. You treat others how you want to be treated. You ignore us and jump posts playing ignorant of evidence, even when time is given to you; so then a person like that is a baby, baby! :D
keystone
11-11-2008, 11:42 PM
:D:D
hell o
i knew you would arrive,familiar faces. familiar placesHey back to you. Well my antennae told me someone was taking my name in vain so I had to come see what it was about.
do you know where the plane wreckage is being stored,you know the 911 plane wreckage,the place it got forensically examined:confused:No sorry I don't.
lightgiver
11-11-2008, 11:48 PM
Hey back to you. Well my antennae told me someone was taking my name in vain so I had to come see what it was about.
No sorry I don't.
nice one keystone:)
Hey no one else knows where it is either,i think they melted it down and made a few commemorative 911 coins out of it,all of about 10.:confused::rolleyes:;)
banoyes
12-11-2008, 12:31 AM
The video I think came from
http://www.infowars.net/articles/november2008/111108Footage.htm
The Alex Jones site ..there 4 I think all "NEW"
Check this one
The wing disappears and the nose comes right out the other side of the building
geezzee of course composit nose cones can do that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K94NUtpGJw&e
Now watch this "new" one
It is the best yet of the spire turning to dust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCUbcmo9-kE&e
I downloaded this one
a telling video
A slowed down view
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ&feature=related
keystone
12-11-2008, 12:46 AM
Now watch this "new" one
It is the best yet of the spire turning to dust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCUbcmo9-kE&e
I downloaded this one
a telling videoNow that IS interesting. Never seen that one before. Have you an explanation?
banoyes
12-11-2008, 01:07 AM
Now that IS interesting. Never seen that one before. Have you an explanation?
molecular dis - association about the only thing I have seen that explains this phenomenon aka DEW -explains a few other anomolys also
keystone
12-11-2008, 01:09 AM
molecular dis - association about the only thing I have seen that explains this phenomenon aka DEW -explains a few other anomolys alsoThanks. I'll have to do some more research.
cheeb
12-11-2008, 01:24 AM
It's Not A Metal Structure,
Being Vapourised,
But The Concrete And Asbestos Turning To Dust,
As A Violent Crumbling Building Is Wont To Do....!!!
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/2712/asbestosadvertet0.jpg
lightgiver
12-11-2008, 01:33 AM
molecular dis - association about the only thing I have seen that explains this phenomenon aka DEW -explains a few other anomolys also
Hell o bayones,:)
What is aka DEW?any links for this phenomena?cheers,your posts by the way are very interesting;)
keystone
12-11-2008, 01:38 AM
Directed Energy Weapon.
lightgiver
12-11-2008, 01:45 AM
Directed Energy Weapon.
cheers keystone,i have heard of this,but not give it much attention,but i will;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
LETHAL DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS
The World's Elite Banking Cabal Funds Direct Energy Weapons in its Attempts at One World Government.
The elite cabal of bankers and industrialists who are set on bringing in the New World Order have a new toy to use on anyone or anything that gets in the way:
Direct Energy Weapons (DEW)
".energy weapons include a host of technologies, including lasers and microwave radiation emitters.
These weapons can inflict casualties and damage equipment by depositing energy on their intended target.
Compared with conventional weapons, which rely on the kinetic or chemical energy of a projectile, DEW's hit a target with subatomic particles or electromagnetic waves that travel at speeds at or near the speed of light.
DEWs generate very high power beams and typically use a single optical system to both track a target and to focus the beam on the target in order to destroy it.
Lasers - the most mature form of DEWs... form intense beams of light that can be precisely aimed across many kilometers to disable a wide range of targets..."
- Sourced from Heritage.org
http://www.fdrs.org/direct_energy_weapons.html
banoyes
12-11-2008, 01:50 AM
Hell o bayones,:)
What is aka DEW?any links for this phenomena?cheers,your posts by the way are very interesting;)
search Dr Judy Wood or Morgan Reynolds
lightgiver
12-11-2008, 01:52 AM
search Dr Judy Wood or Morgan Reynolds
I will,cheers banoyes;):)
onourwayto2012
12-11-2008, 03:51 AM
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
two words....... BULL SHIT
mynameis
12-11-2008, 04:15 AM
two words....... BULL SHIT
What contents in that link from the Rense and the information contained is BULLSHIT? Otherwise, I have to consider the BS is coming from an instigator. I know the Rense isn't exactly truthful either and neither are a lot of no planes misinformation specialists.
qasrose
12-11-2008, 08:28 AM
Does qasrose seem desperate??
Fact is qasrose
The no plane facts are too compelling
No wreckage
still alive hi-jackers
the impossible entry
the impossible speed
the impossible piloting skills
the videos with missing wings
plane changing color
the planes coming from different angles
the wrong engine in the street
conflicting eyewitness
there is nothing to make one believe real planes were involved at any of the crash sites
insist away
you are supporting the official story
and letting all these Anomalies go un answered
I'd like to see some NEW EVIDENCE which backs up the No Plane Theory??
qasrose
12-11-2008, 08:41 AM
,are you sure you are alright:confused:you seem to be using my words,turning it all around like a mind game,tis child play:)
Rockefeller and co funded the twin towers project also.HHmm but you already know that,you soon watched the russo interview,but you have seen that also.BYE BYE.
EEE i bet your mind is on fire,ha ha. by the way i do not resort to personnel attacks.
The Rockefeller's and chums funded 911,elementary my dear Watson.
LIGHTGIVER, why don't you just move away from this forum, it seems your not hear to look for evidence or even proof. The No Planers are all trouble makers, and when evidence is provided you have the likes of you and others insulting us and starting arguments. it's a big joke. How is his mind on fire, PERSONAL ATTACKS?? you lot are the only one's that cause these attacks, yet in return our side get spam points issued. for defending our selfs.
How does that work out. I'm telling you this side of the forum 9/11 has turned into one big pile of you know what thanks to the No Planers. We have to listen to their crap, yet when we provide the truth we get told too keep our mouth shut, because their is only one believe No Plane Theory.
mynameis
12-11-2008, 11:42 AM
- Sourced from Heritage.org
http://www.fdrs.org/direct_energy_weapons.html
Oh? Provide a link from heritage.org then please...according to the some quick n dirty searches fdrs.org lead here.
FDRS.org - Mark Cella - Federal Debt Relief System Scam, debt termination fraud, mark cella criminal, forgery Hollywood California
Thank You
Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.
Rebuttal Box
Respond to this report!
Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?
Victim of this person/company?
Are you also a victim of the same company or individual? Want Justice? File a Rip-off Report, help other consumers to be educated and donīt let them get away with it!
Print Email
FDRS.org
Phone: 877-943-8600
Fax:
www.fdrs.org
Hollywood, California,
U.S.A.
Submitted: 10/9/2008 7:58:53 AM
Modified: 10/9/2008 7:59:00 AM
Reported By
Seth
new york, New York
How to get Rip-off Revenge
FDRS.org run by Mark Cella are scamming people out of 30% of their cc debt. FDRS.org are not lawyers or paralegals, FDRS.org is a telemarketing boiler room that is really a criminal enterprise involved in forgery, misrepresentation, and fraud!
Seth
new york, New York
U.S.A.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/383/RipOff0383199.htm
oddblock
12-11-2008, 12:50 PM
I think the "No Plane" theory was infiltrated into the conspiracy by the powers that be. It makes the investigating look ridiculous and tars us all with the loony brush, which is far from the case...
We now have a mix of solid evidence and totally outlandish claims.
banoyes
12-11-2008, 01:01 PM
I'd like to see some NEW EVIDENCE which backs up the No Plane Theory??
See post #37
mynameis
12-11-2008, 01:04 PM
See post #37
And post #37 is scientific proof how, when the documents don't support the specious conjectures made by NPT.
banoyes
12-11-2008, 01:32 PM
And post #37 is scientific proof how, when the documents don't support the specious conjectures made by NPT.
There is no such thing as scientic proof in this matter- there would be if the was any wreckage-but there is none
The video shows the nose of the plane exiting - the composite nose cone went through 2 steel walls\
It is not specious conjecture- it is a freeking video-
what documents???
what are you talking about???
just empty words, meant to fool .. I don't know,yourself I guess
qasrose
12-11-2008, 03:24 PM
It is not specious conjecture- it is a freeking video-
what documents???
what are you talking about???
just empty words, meant to fool .. I don't know,yourself I guess
Calm down dude, no need to go in overdrive,
I would also like to know how post #37 is scientific proof.
A plane going that fast and exposing that amount of Jet Fuel
would not leave any trail of wreckage what so ever.
It's like this Banoyes
The Titanic was going fast too, that hit
a iceberg and it opened a hole, which made it sink, and split into two half's.
The Plane was going to fast, it sliced through the tower,
exploding in the middle of the tower. Their would be no wreckage.
mynameis
12-11-2008, 03:47 PM
There is no such thing as scientic proof in this matter- there would be if the was any wreckage-but there is none
The video shows the nose of the plane exiting - the composite nose cone went through 2 steel walls\
It is not specious conjecture- it is a freeking video-
what documents???
what are you talking about???
just empty words, meant to fool .. I don't know,yourself I guess
I think my questions show just how much you don't know and then those differences highlight what you think you know, but can't prove. :rolleyes:
And the words
of fools
make no sense
they type
ridiculous stuff
that has no pattern
of regularity
that nobody but you
seems to understand or read
as information
that simpletons try
to understand.
Who cares what use
what of commas
grammar or
how formulation of
coherent ideas
sentences make?
Those are for
shills...Shills guess
therefore
NPT knows
fiction from
fact or
fact from
fiction
misinformation
and that is
enough for
shills
there are plenty.
banoyes
12-11-2008, 05:44 PM
Calm down dude, no need to go in overdrive,
I would also like to know how post #37 is scientific proof.
A plane going that fast and exposing that amount of Jet Fuel
would not leave any trail of wreckage what so ever.
It's like this Banoyes
The Titanic was going fast too, that hit
a iceberg and it opened a hole, which made it sink, and split into two half's.
The Plane was going to fast, it sliced through the tower,
exploding in the middle of the tower. Their would be no wreckage.
exploded in the middle of the tower
but the nose comes out the otherside ok
and why does the wing disappear
there is no such thing as scientic proof
except your air plane breaking the law of physics and the whole plane idea breaking the law of probality
i.e.
can't go that fast
inexperienced pilots making ace moves and extraordinary navigating
violation of action-reaction
no collission
planes do not and cannot slice through steel columns
no wreckage
no black box
hi-jackers alive
wrong engine
if taken altogether
it works out to impossible
you will never believe the fact no planes were used
fine
believe what you want
just know it is a belief
This is calm ...you just think you know stuff
a believe type person
qasrose
12-11-2008, 07:27 PM
believe what you want
just know it is a belief
This is calm ...you just think you know stuff
a believe type person
lol, :D, another classic example of Banoyes, now starting to get personal.
Why oh Why, do you always come out with these personal attacks??
saying that I know stuff, of course I know stuff.
It's like this, they said the titanic could never SINK!!!.
It happened.
So people are saying Planes could never ever fly straight into a building.
It happened.
citroen999
12-11-2008, 08:39 PM
does anyone remember what the original title of this thread was as we have seem to have decended into a my dads bigger than your dad argument..
forget NPT for a sec, what about the footage...
looks real but why now? where has it been? and who owns it..
qasrose
12-11-2008, 08:46 PM
does anyone remember what the original title of this thread was as we have seem to have decended into a my dads bigger than your dad argument..
forget NPT for a sec, what about the footage...
looks real but why now? where has it been? and who owns it..
I agree Cirtroen....
I think it's because there are that many people awake now, the NWO are in panic mode. and are trying anything.
So they bring out new videos, of the attacks to show us that it wasn't an inside job...
The thing is it's not about planes or no planes.
It's all about opening a new investigation.
le chuck
12-11-2008, 11:14 PM
Ok, the plane doesnt even appear to be going at the right angle the way the explosion is being shown. plus the girl seems to have the fakest acting ever and she only mentions she saw an "explosion" nothing about a plane, she just says that she saw an explosion. still not good enough.
It was some sort of missle ?
gribz
16-11-2008, 02:57 AM
Yes my friends, this is indeed a very sad day for the No Planers.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HoyWAjVpZzY
0:07 seconds in u can see the plane clear is day,
Mate i wouldnt rule out NPT....There is a thread on here a while back with 2 clips showing the plane from 2 angles. Angle 1 from behind the towers shows the plane coming in at height, lowering down and smashing into the tower, whilst angle 2 (as per ur clip) shows the plane coming in at a straight line....both clips last 8 seconds. So how do you explain 2 different lines of flights??? - by tv trickery!
mynameis
16-11-2008, 04:32 AM
Mate i wouldnt rule out NPT....2 clips showing the plane from 2 angles... smashing into the tower...So how do you explain 2 different lines of flights?
You answered it in your own statement, what is this some kind of trick question?