Kim Jong-il photo is fake declares media

[mr_self_destruct]

Don't you just love the way the media are happy to analyse photos and declare them fake when it suits their agenda...but if we "conspiracy theorists" do the same with government-released video and photos, we're dismissed or ridiculed?!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7715458.stm

[abaddon]

Not the first time, heh. (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=30497&highlight=Iran+Photo+Fake)

[jesta_g]

lmao all i can think ofwhen i see that photo is ....

http://media.outnow.ch/Movies/Images/2004/TeamAmerica/movie.fs/87.jpg

"its a vewy pwecise and a compwicated pwan!!!" :p

[sweheretic]

bet they fudged the pixels up so they'd have a story to run /end speculation

if they don't know a nose when they see it (the Osama pictures are just a laugh), why would they find mismatching pixels in *any* image? :eek:

[apekteina lordosis]

aye i can remember the london evening standard doing a photoshop on the piccies they published concerning that saddam statue being pulled down in iraq a few years back. anyways they got found out and in the print edition of the newspaper a few days lately they published an apology, but "strangely" they didn't publish a apology about photoshopping the pics on their website.

as for the actual photoshopping basically they bulked out the crowd aka made it look like the crowd in the square round the statue was much bigger than the reality.

[jonas parker]

Actually the photo is real. Kim Jong Il is fake...

[citroen999]

get the 2 mythbuster idiots on the case, they know all about shadow as they successfully debunked the moon landing hoax :rolleyes: (yeah right)

[christuffer]

Maybe the BBC should have gone through the same process with this.

http://www.lifeisajoke.com/news/london%20bombers%20at%20luton%20station.jpg



Just how did he get 'through' that fence?