View Full Version : The Masonic Truth Behind Aliens/UFOs (Animation)
phonicboom
30-10-2008, 10:54 AM
part-1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbh7iNrrmNs
part-2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l8fMdGmAIk
more than just blue-beam and fake moon landings....
king triad
30-10-2008, 11:16 AM
videos no longer available?..
phonicboom
30-10-2008, 12:06 PM
videos no longer available?..
hmmmm, ok I will ipdate when i find the problem...
for now, here are some of the words... The Masonic Truth Behind Aliens/UFOs (http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2008/07/masonic-truth-behind-aliensufos.html) - hopefully the animation will return..
phonicboom
31-10-2008, 02:11 PM
try again...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbh7iNrrmNs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4l8fMdGmAIk
...
krakhead
31-10-2008, 02:12 PM
You have to double-click on the video to get the video to open in it's original youtube page because the poster has disabled embedding.
romas
31-10-2008, 05:00 PM
Whats up with image re-animation technique nowdays? I saw those federation videos use that shit as well to make their "aliens" look like they move their mouth -_-
phonicboom
01-11-2008, 12:39 AM
Whats up with image re-animation technique nowdays? I saw those federation videos use that shit as well to make their "aliens" look like they move their mouth -_-
did you watch it? This is about there NOT being any aliens....
eternal_spirit
01-11-2008, 12:56 AM
did you watch it? This is about there NOT being any aliens....
That's like trying to convince the religionists their Messiah isn't going to return. Me I'm a none believer on both topics.
phonicboom
01-11-2008, 08:13 AM
That's like trying to convince the religionists their Messiah isn't going to return. Me I'm a none believer on both topics.
sorry we have crossed swords on a couple of occasions where i mistook what you were saying. Here we seem to be on the same page :)
romas
01-11-2008, 11:05 AM
did you watch it? This is about there NOT being any aliens....
What?
Read the post again.
phonicboom
01-11-2008, 11:46 AM
What?
Read the post again.
i tried but can't see you mention a word of the content. You could have watched the first few seconds and drawn your conclusions... do you have any comment on the contents besides the animation technique?
romas
01-11-2008, 12:48 PM
i tried but can't see you mention a word of the content. You could have watched the first few seconds and drawn your conclusions... do you have any comment on the contents besides the animation technique?
Yes, but can't take shit like that seriously. If you want to provide legit info you should stop trying to wrap it into some kinda hypnotising animation, I mean it even uses text to voice software to narrate it, wtf?
Major disinformation.
phonicboom
02-11-2008, 01:02 AM
Yes, but can't take shit like that seriously. If you want to provide legit info you should stop trying to wrap it into some kinda hypnotising animation, I mean it even uses text to voice software to narrate it, wtf?
Major disinformation.
Yes, but can't take shit like that seriously. If you want to provide legit info you should stop trying to wrap it into some kinda hypnotising animation, I mean it even uses text to voice software to narrate it, wtf?
Major disinformation.
wow, what's with the attitude and claims? Animations are animated, that's their medium.
The research is backed up, the research was compiled by an author, an animator animated it, i posted it. All that I can summarise from what you have said is that you dislike it because of the animation style.
ericdubay
02-11-2008, 11:24 AM
What's disinformative about it? I'm curious because I wrote it, and did so unpaid under my own volition. I intended for it to be informative - and you're dissing it. That's what makes it dis-information in my puntastic world.
~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com
romas
02-11-2008, 12:50 PM
What's disinformative about it? I'm curious because I wrote it, and did so unpaid under my own volition. I intended for it to be informative - and you're dissing it. That's what makes it dis-information in my puntastic world.
~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com
Ok no offence, but If you incist, you did not present it yourself, I wonder why, why all that hassle animating it and using robot to narrate it.
To many lose ties to hollywood, if Kubrick was mason, why would he make Eyes Wide Shut?
You used alot of Jordan Maxwells proposition and I like it, however I try to discern mish mash of second hand information whenever I see it, because that's the first sign of infiltration so to speak.
You've used numerology as proof, it's rather dubious, because numerology is not proven and is being pushed in by media now to, which is interesting coincidence.
ericdubay
04-11-2008, 08:38 AM
Ok no offence, but If you incist, you did not present it yourself, I wonder why, why all that hassle animating it and using robot to narrate it.
I wrote the book and a website fan took the Alien chapter and made this animation out of it. He's a fairly accomplished videographer/animator and asked me if he could do it... I said yes and thought he did a very decent job. As for your criticism about Kubrick and Numerology, sure, those things taken individually do not "prove" much of anything, but I'm touching on a variety of subjects pointing towards a bigger picture understanding of the Alien/UFO propaganda. My views are not the end all be all... this is just what I've found, I hope to make people think/research more for themselves. Peace
~Eric
www.atlanteanconspiracy.com